Operator Search for Puzzle












0












$begingroup$


I was wondering if I could solve the problem here (mostly unrelated) using only simple binary operators since it is just mapping 100 different inputs to a boolean. For this I wrote this, but I have no real way to test, and I was also hoping it could be faster.



#include <iostream>
#define MIN(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
#define MAX_VAL 100

bool CODES = {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1};

int op(int a, int b, int index) {
switch (index) {
case 0: return a + b; break;
case 1: return a - b; break;
case 2: return a * b; break;
case 3: return a / b; break;
case 4: return a & b; break;
case 5: return a | b; break;
case 6: return a ^ b; break;
case 7: return a % b; break;
}
}

int main(int argc, char const *argv) {
for (int A=1; A < 2; A++) {
std::cout << A << std::endl;
for (int B=1; B < 2; B++) {
std::cout << A << " " << B << std::endl;
for (int C=1; C < 2; C++) {
for (int D=1; D < MAX_VAL; D++) {
std::cout << A << " " << B << " " << C << " " << D << std::endl;
for (int E=1; E < MAX_VAL; E++) {
for (int opA = 0; opA < 8; opA++) {
for (int opB = 0; opB < 8; opB++) {
for (int opC = 0; opC < 8; opC++) {
for (int opD = 0; opD < 8; opD++) {
for (int opE = 0; opE < 8; opE++) {
bool good = true;
int index = 1;
for (bool item : CODES) {
int val = op(index, A, opA);
val = op(val, B, opB);
val = op(val, C, opC);
val = op(val, D, opD);
val = op(val, E, opE);
val &= 1;
if (val != item) {
good = false;
break;
}
index++;
}
if (good) {
std::cout<<"GOOD "<<A<<" "<<opA<<" "<<B<<" "<<opB<<" "<<C<<" "<<opC<<" "<<D<<" "<<opD<<" "<<E<<" "<<opE<<std::endl;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
return 0;
}


I am specifically looking for help for optimization, but of course style, correctness, or anything else is much appreciated.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I was wondering if I could solve the problem here (mostly unrelated) using only simple binary operators since it is just mapping 100 different inputs to a boolean. For this I wrote this, but I have no real way to test, and I was also hoping it could be faster.



    #include <iostream>
    #define MIN(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
    #define MAX_VAL 100

    bool CODES = {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1};

    int op(int a, int b, int index) {
    switch (index) {
    case 0: return a + b; break;
    case 1: return a - b; break;
    case 2: return a * b; break;
    case 3: return a / b; break;
    case 4: return a & b; break;
    case 5: return a | b; break;
    case 6: return a ^ b; break;
    case 7: return a % b; break;
    }
    }

    int main(int argc, char const *argv) {
    for (int A=1; A < 2; A++) {
    std::cout << A << std::endl;
    for (int B=1; B < 2; B++) {
    std::cout << A << " " << B << std::endl;
    for (int C=1; C < 2; C++) {
    for (int D=1; D < MAX_VAL; D++) {
    std::cout << A << " " << B << " " << C << " " << D << std::endl;
    for (int E=1; E < MAX_VAL; E++) {
    for (int opA = 0; opA < 8; opA++) {
    for (int opB = 0; opB < 8; opB++) {
    for (int opC = 0; opC < 8; opC++) {
    for (int opD = 0; opD < 8; opD++) {
    for (int opE = 0; opE < 8; opE++) {
    bool good = true;
    int index = 1;
    for (bool item : CODES) {
    int val = op(index, A, opA);
    val = op(val, B, opB);
    val = op(val, C, opC);
    val = op(val, D, opD);
    val = op(val, E, opE);
    val &= 1;
    if (val != item) {
    good = false;
    break;
    }
    index++;
    }
    if (good) {
    std::cout<<"GOOD "<<A<<" "<<opA<<" "<<B<<" "<<opB<<" "<<C<<" "<<opC<<" "<<D<<" "<<opD<<" "<<E<<" "<<opE<<std::endl;
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    }
    return 0;
    }


    I am specifically looking for help for optimization, but of course style, correctness, or anything else is much appreciated.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I was wondering if I could solve the problem here (mostly unrelated) using only simple binary operators since it is just mapping 100 different inputs to a boolean. For this I wrote this, but I have no real way to test, and I was also hoping it could be faster.



      #include <iostream>
      #define MIN(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
      #define MAX_VAL 100

      bool CODES = {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1};

      int op(int a, int b, int index) {
      switch (index) {
      case 0: return a + b; break;
      case 1: return a - b; break;
      case 2: return a * b; break;
      case 3: return a / b; break;
      case 4: return a & b; break;
      case 5: return a | b; break;
      case 6: return a ^ b; break;
      case 7: return a % b; break;
      }
      }

      int main(int argc, char const *argv) {
      for (int A=1; A < 2; A++) {
      std::cout << A << std::endl;
      for (int B=1; B < 2; B++) {
      std::cout << A << " " << B << std::endl;
      for (int C=1; C < 2; C++) {
      for (int D=1; D < MAX_VAL; D++) {
      std::cout << A << " " << B << " " << C << " " << D << std::endl;
      for (int E=1; E < MAX_VAL; E++) {
      for (int opA = 0; opA < 8; opA++) {
      for (int opB = 0; opB < 8; opB++) {
      for (int opC = 0; opC < 8; opC++) {
      for (int opD = 0; opD < 8; opD++) {
      for (int opE = 0; opE < 8; opE++) {
      bool good = true;
      int index = 1;
      for (bool item : CODES) {
      int val = op(index, A, opA);
      val = op(val, B, opB);
      val = op(val, C, opC);
      val = op(val, D, opD);
      val = op(val, E, opE);
      val &= 1;
      if (val != item) {
      good = false;
      break;
      }
      index++;
      }
      if (good) {
      std::cout<<"GOOD "<<A<<" "<<opA<<" "<<B<<" "<<opB<<" "<<C<<" "<<opC<<" "<<D<<" "<<opD<<" "<<E<<" "<<opE<<std::endl;
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      return 0;
      }


      I am specifically looking for help for optimization, but of course style, correctness, or anything else is much appreciated.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I was wondering if I could solve the problem here (mostly unrelated) using only simple binary operators since it is just mapping 100 different inputs to a boolean. For this I wrote this, but I have no real way to test, and I was also hoping it could be faster.



      #include <iostream>
      #define MIN(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
      #define MAX_VAL 100

      bool CODES = {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1};

      int op(int a, int b, int index) {
      switch (index) {
      case 0: return a + b; break;
      case 1: return a - b; break;
      case 2: return a * b; break;
      case 3: return a / b; break;
      case 4: return a & b; break;
      case 5: return a | b; break;
      case 6: return a ^ b; break;
      case 7: return a % b; break;
      }
      }

      int main(int argc, char const *argv) {
      for (int A=1; A < 2; A++) {
      std::cout << A << std::endl;
      for (int B=1; B < 2; B++) {
      std::cout << A << " " << B << std::endl;
      for (int C=1; C < 2; C++) {
      for (int D=1; D < MAX_VAL; D++) {
      std::cout << A << " " << B << " " << C << " " << D << std::endl;
      for (int E=1; E < MAX_VAL; E++) {
      for (int opA = 0; opA < 8; opA++) {
      for (int opB = 0; opB < 8; opB++) {
      for (int opC = 0; opC < 8; opC++) {
      for (int opD = 0; opD < 8; opD++) {
      for (int opE = 0; opE < 8; opE++) {
      bool good = true;
      int index = 1;
      for (bool item : CODES) {
      int val = op(index, A, opA);
      val = op(val, B, opB);
      val = op(val, C, opC);
      val = op(val, D, opD);
      val = op(val, E, opE);
      val &= 1;
      if (val != item) {
      good = false;
      break;
      }
      index++;
      }
      if (good) {
      std::cout<<"GOOD "<<A<<" "<<opA<<" "<<B<<" "<<opB<<" "<<C<<" "<<opC<<" "<<D<<" "<<opD<<" "<<E<<" "<<opE<<std::endl;
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      }
      return 0;
      }


      I am specifically looking for help for optimization, but of course style, correctness, or anything else is much appreciated.







      c++ performance






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      nedla2004nedla2004

      1244




      1244






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211503%2foperator-search-for-puzzle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211503%2foperator-search-for-puzzle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to make a Squid Proxy server?

          第一次世界大戦

          Touch on Surface Book