Openswan's ipsec verify fails on “Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding”












5














I'm trying to set an L2TP/IPsec VPN. I have installed openswan from the repository on Ubuntu 13.04



Section: universe/net
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1:2.6.38-1


and configured it following the community docs.



# cat /etc/ipsec.conf 
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:!192.168.23.0/24
oe=off
protostack=netkey

conn L2TP-PSK-NAT
rightsubnet=vhost:%priv
also=L2TP-PSK-noNAT

conn L2TP-PSK-noNAT
authby=secret
pfs=no
auto=add
keyingtries=3
rekey=no
# Apple iOS doesn't send delete notify so we need dead peer detection
# to detect vanishing clients
dpddelay=30
dpdtimeout=120
dpdaction=clear
# Set ikelifetime and keylife to same defaults windows has
ikelifetime=8h
keylife=1h
type=transport
# Replace IP address with your local IP (private, behind NAT IP is okay as well)
left=my.ip
# For updated Windows 2000/XP clients,
# to support old clients as well, use leftprotoport=17/%any
leftprotoport=17/1701
right=%any
rightprotoport=17/%any
#force all to be nat'ed. because of iOS
forceencaps=yes


It starts fine but fails the verification



# ipsec verify
Checking your system to see if IPsec got installed and started correctly:
Version check and ipsec on-path [OK]
Linux Openswan U2.6.38/K3.8.0-29-generic (netkey)
Checking for IPsec support in kernel [OK]
SAref kernel support [N/A]
NETKEY: Testing XFRM related proc values [OK]
[OK]
[OK]
Checking that pluto is running [OK]
Pluto listening for IKE on udp 500 [OK]
Pluto listening for NAT-T on udp 4500 [OK]
Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]
Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing [OK]
Checking for 'ip' command [OK]
Checking /bin/sh is not /bin/dash [OK]
Checking for 'iptables' command [OK]
Opportunistic Encryption Support [DISABLED]


even though forwarding seems to be enabled



# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1


What's wrong and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Did you ever fix this?
    – Will Gunn
    Oct 4 '14 at 17:42










  • @WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
    – Damn Terminal
    Nov 6 '14 at 13:48


















5














I'm trying to set an L2TP/IPsec VPN. I have installed openswan from the repository on Ubuntu 13.04



Section: universe/net
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1:2.6.38-1


and configured it following the community docs.



# cat /etc/ipsec.conf 
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:!192.168.23.0/24
oe=off
protostack=netkey

conn L2TP-PSK-NAT
rightsubnet=vhost:%priv
also=L2TP-PSK-noNAT

conn L2TP-PSK-noNAT
authby=secret
pfs=no
auto=add
keyingtries=3
rekey=no
# Apple iOS doesn't send delete notify so we need dead peer detection
# to detect vanishing clients
dpddelay=30
dpdtimeout=120
dpdaction=clear
# Set ikelifetime and keylife to same defaults windows has
ikelifetime=8h
keylife=1h
type=transport
# Replace IP address with your local IP (private, behind NAT IP is okay as well)
left=my.ip
# For updated Windows 2000/XP clients,
# to support old clients as well, use leftprotoport=17/%any
leftprotoport=17/1701
right=%any
rightprotoport=17/%any
#force all to be nat'ed. because of iOS
forceencaps=yes


It starts fine but fails the verification



# ipsec verify
Checking your system to see if IPsec got installed and started correctly:
Version check and ipsec on-path [OK]
Linux Openswan U2.6.38/K3.8.0-29-generic (netkey)
Checking for IPsec support in kernel [OK]
SAref kernel support [N/A]
NETKEY: Testing XFRM related proc values [OK]
[OK]
[OK]
Checking that pluto is running [OK]
Pluto listening for IKE on udp 500 [OK]
Pluto listening for NAT-T on udp 4500 [OK]
Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]
Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing [OK]
Checking for 'ip' command [OK]
Checking /bin/sh is not /bin/dash [OK]
Checking for 'iptables' command [OK]
Opportunistic Encryption Support [DISABLED]


even though forwarding seems to be enabled



# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1


What's wrong and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Did you ever fix this?
    – Will Gunn
    Oct 4 '14 at 17:42










  • @WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
    – Damn Terminal
    Nov 6 '14 at 13:48
















5












5








5







I'm trying to set an L2TP/IPsec VPN. I have installed openswan from the repository on Ubuntu 13.04



Section: universe/net
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1:2.6.38-1


and configured it following the community docs.



# cat /etc/ipsec.conf 
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:!192.168.23.0/24
oe=off
protostack=netkey

conn L2TP-PSK-NAT
rightsubnet=vhost:%priv
also=L2TP-PSK-noNAT

conn L2TP-PSK-noNAT
authby=secret
pfs=no
auto=add
keyingtries=3
rekey=no
# Apple iOS doesn't send delete notify so we need dead peer detection
# to detect vanishing clients
dpddelay=30
dpdtimeout=120
dpdaction=clear
# Set ikelifetime and keylife to same defaults windows has
ikelifetime=8h
keylife=1h
type=transport
# Replace IP address with your local IP (private, behind NAT IP is okay as well)
left=my.ip
# For updated Windows 2000/XP clients,
# to support old clients as well, use leftprotoport=17/%any
leftprotoport=17/1701
right=%any
rightprotoport=17/%any
#force all to be nat'ed. because of iOS
forceencaps=yes


It starts fine but fails the verification



# ipsec verify
Checking your system to see if IPsec got installed and started correctly:
Version check and ipsec on-path [OK]
Linux Openswan U2.6.38/K3.8.0-29-generic (netkey)
Checking for IPsec support in kernel [OK]
SAref kernel support [N/A]
NETKEY: Testing XFRM related proc values [OK]
[OK]
[OK]
Checking that pluto is running [OK]
Pluto listening for IKE on udp 500 [OK]
Pluto listening for NAT-T on udp 4500 [OK]
Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]
Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing [OK]
Checking for 'ip' command [OK]
Checking /bin/sh is not /bin/dash [OK]
Checking for 'iptables' command [OK]
Opportunistic Encryption Support [DISABLED]


even though forwarding seems to be enabled



# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1


What's wrong and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question













I'm trying to set an L2TP/IPsec VPN. I have installed openswan from the repository on Ubuntu 13.04



Section: universe/net
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1:2.6.38-1


and configured it following the community docs.



# cat /etc/ipsec.conf 
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:!192.168.23.0/24
oe=off
protostack=netkey

conn L2TP-PSK-NAT
rightsubnet=vhost:%priv
also=L2TP-PSK-noNAT

conn L2TP-PSK-noNAT
authby=secret
pfs=no
auto=add
keyingtries=3
rekey=no
# Apple iOS doesn't send delete notify so we need dead peer detection
# to detect vanishing clients
dpddelay=30
dpdtimeout=120
dpdaction=clear
# Set ikelifetime and keylife to same defaults windows has
ikelifetime=8h
keylife=1h
type=transport
# Replace IP address with your local IP (private, behind NAT IP is okay as well)
left=my.ip
# For updated Windows 2000/XP clients,
# to support old clients as well, use leftprotoport=17/%any
leftprotoport=17/1701
right=%any
rightprotoport=17/%any
#force all to be nat'ed. because of iOS
forceencaps=yes


It starts fine but fails the verification



# ipsec verify
Checking your system to see if IPsec got installed and started correctly:
Version check and ipsec on-path [OK]
Linux Openswan U2.6.38/K3.8.0-29-generic (netkey)
Checking for IPsec support in kernel [OK]
SAref kernel support [N/A]
NETKEY: Testing XFRM related proc values [OK]
[OK]
[OK]
Checking that pluto is running [OK]
Pluto listening for IKE on udp 500 [OK]
Pluto listening for NAT-T on udp 4500 [OK]
Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]
Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing [OK]
Checking for 'ip' command [OK]
Checking /bin/sh is not /bin/dash [OK]
Checking for 'iptables' command [OK]
Opportunistic Encryption Support [DISABLED]


even though forwarding seems to be enabled



# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1


What's wrong and how do I fix it?







networking vpn ipsec openswan






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 25 '13 at 11:36









Damn TerminalDamn Terminal

92141530




92141530





bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • Did you ever fix this?
    – Will Gunn
    Oct 4 '14 at 17:42










  • @WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
    – Damn Terminal
    Nov 6 '14 at 13:48




















  • Did you ever fix this?
    – Will Gunn
    Oct 4 '14 at 17:42










  • @WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
    – Damn Terminal
    Nov 6 '14 at 13:48


















Did you ever fix this?
– Will Gunn
Oct 4 '14 at 17:42




Did you ever fix this?
– Will Gunn
Oct 4 '14 at 17:42












@WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
– Damn Terminal
Nov 6 '14 at 13:48






@WillGunn No. I ditched IPsec in favour of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is supported well through VPN API starting with Android 4.something. I remember that IPsec kinda worked on 12.04 though.
– Damn Terminal
Nov 6 '14 at 13:48












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Stumbled over this while looking up the error :



I think this is the answer :



https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2009-September/017423.html




I have just upgraded to 2.6.23 and run ipsec verify and I get an
unexpected error:
Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]



cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward gives 1 so I am confused.



If it helps eth0 is my WAN, eth1 is my normal LAN, eth1:0 is a virtual
IP on eth1 to get round a problem I have been having with running
Openswan on a combined gateway/file server, and eth2 is a second, unused
LAN adaptor.




Then you can ignore it. It's a warning when running a subnet-subnet or
subnet-host tunnel on the subnet side, where you need forwarding to go
from the public side (internet) to the lan.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f337036%2fopenswans-ipsec-verify-fails-on-two-or-more-interfaces-found-checking-ip-forw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Stumbled over this while looking up the error :



    I think this is the answer :



    https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2009-September/017423.html




    I have just upgraded to 2.6.23 and run ipsec verify and I get an
    unexpected error:
    Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]



    cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward gives 1 so I am confused.



    If it helps eth0 is my WAN, eth1 is my normal LAN, eth1:0 is a virtual
    IP on eth1 to get round a problem I have been having with running
    Openswan on a combined gateway/file server, and eth2 is a second, unused
    LAN adaptor.




    Then you can ignore it. It's a warning when running a subnet-subnet or
    subnet-host tunnel on the subnet side, where you need forwarding to go
    from the public side (internet) to the lan.






    share|improve this answer


























      0














      Stumbled over this while looking up the error :



      I think this is the answer :



      https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2009-September/017423.html




      I have just upgraded to 2.6.23 and run ipsec verify and I get an
      unexpected error:
      Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]



      cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward gives 1 so I am confused.



      If it helps eth0 is my WAN, eth1 is my normal LAN, eth1:0 is a virtual
      IP on eth1 to get round a problem I have been having with running
      Openswan on a combined gateway/file server, and eth2 is a second, unused
      LAN adaptor.




      Then you can ignore it. It's a warning when running a subnet-subnet or
      subnet-host tunnel on the subnet side, where you need forwarding to go
      from the public side (internet) to the lan.






      share|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        Stumbled over this while looking up the error :



        I think this is the answer :



        https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2009-September/017423.html




        I have just upgraded to 2.6.23 and run ipsec verify and I get an
        unexpected error:
        Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]



        cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward gives 1 so I am confused.



        If it helps eth0 is my WAN, eth1 is my normal LAN, eth1:0 is a virtual
        IP on eth1 to get round a problem I have been having with running
        Openswan on a combined gateway/file server, and eth2 is a second, unused
        LAN adaptor.




        Then you can ignore it. It's a warning when running a subnet-subnet or
        subnet-host tunnel on the subnet side, where you need forwarding to go
        from the public side (internet) to the lan.






        share|improve this answer












        Stumbled over this while looking up the error :



        I think this is the answer :



        https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2009-September/017423.html




        I have just upgraded to 2.6.23 and run ipsec verify and I get an
        unexpected error:
        Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [FAILED]



        cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward gives 1 so I am confused.



        If it helps eth0 is my WAN, eth1 is my normal LAN, eth1:0 is a virtual
        IP on eth1 to get round a problem I have been having with running
        Openswan on a combined gateway/file server, and eth2 is a second, unused
        LAN adaptor.




        Then you can ignore it. It's a warning when running a subnet-subnet or
        subnet-host tunnel on the subnet side, where you need forwarding to go
        from the public side (internet) to the lan.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 4 '14 at 13:31









        John CrispJohn Crisp

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f337036%2fopenswans-ipsec-verify-fails-on-two-or-more-interfaces-found-checking-ip-forw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

            is 'sed' thread safe

            How to make a Squid Proxy server?