Find two numbers with target sum












1












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this problem:




Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.




and this is my implementation:



public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}


How can I improve its execution time?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 7 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Soni
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
















1












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this problem:




Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.




and this is my implementation:



public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}


How can I improve its execution time?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 7 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Soni
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:24














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this problem:




Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.




and this is my implementation:



public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}


How can I improve its execution time?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to solve this problem:




Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.




and this is my implementation:



public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}


How can I improve its execution time?







java performance programming-challenge






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 18:30









Ankit Soni

483111




483111










asked Dec 23 '18 at 15:12









Karan KhannaKaran Khanna

1656




1656





bumped to the homepage by Community 7 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 7 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Soni
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:24














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Soni
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:24








1




1




$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24




$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap:



Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);


As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.



The load_factor defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3 is required. numbers.length * 2 is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210225%2ffind-two-numbers-with-target-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap:



    Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);


    As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.



    The load_factor defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3 is required. numbers.length * 2 is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap:



      Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);


      As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.



      The load_factor defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3 is required. numbers.length * 2 is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap:



        Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);


        As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.



        The load_factor defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3 is required. numbers.length * 2 is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap:



        Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);


        As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.



        The load_factor defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3 is required. numbers.length * 2 is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 23 '18 at 19:55









        AJNeufeldAJNeufeld

        4,497318




        4,497318






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210225%2ffind-two-numbers-with-target-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

            is 'sed' thread safe

            How to make a Squid Proxy server?