How do I make my display a dual-screen stretch with Debian Jessie and a Radeon RX460?












3















I am running Debian 8.2 Jessie with an AMD Radeon RX 460. MATE is my desktop environment. I use two monitors.



Anything on Monitor 1 is displayed on Monitor 2. I want instead for Monitor 2 to be like an extension of Monitor 1, as you would see in many monitor setups.



Is this possible with Debian 8.2 and my RX 460?



Edit



Output of running xrandr -q in MATE Terminal:



xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 0.00*
1280x1024 0.00
1024x768 0.00
800x600 0.00
640x480 0.00


Output of uname -a:



Linux desktop 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux









share|improve this question

























  • Look into ARandR. might help

    – jc__
    Nov 28 '16 at 19:49











  • @jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

    – Username
    Nov 28 '16 at 20:01











  • Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 2:00











  • @icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

    – Username
    Nov 29 '16 at 5:34











  • OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 6:22
















3















I am running Debian 8.2 Jessie with an AMD Radeon RX 460. MATE is my desktop environment. I use two monitors.



Anything on Monitor 1 is displayed on Monitor 2. I want instead for Monitor 2 to be like an extension of Monitor 1, as you would see in many monitor setups.



Is this possible with Debian 8.2 and my RX 460?



Edit



Output of running xrandr -q in MATE Terminal:



xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 0.00*
1280x1024 0.00
1024x768 0.00
800x600 0.00
640x480 0.00


Output of uname -a:



Linux desktop 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux









share|improve this question

























  • Look into ARandR. might help

    – jc__
    Nov 28 '16 at 19:49











  • @jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

    – Username
    Nov 28 '16 at 20:01











  • Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 2:00











  • @icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

    – Username
    Nov 29 '16 at 5:34











  • OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 6:22














3












3








3








I am running Debian 8.2 Jessie with an AMD Radeon RX 460. MATE is my desktop environment. I use two monitors.



Anything on Monitor 1 is displayed on Monitor 2. I want instead for Monitor 2 to be like an extension of Monitor 1, as you would see in many monitor setups.



Is this possible with Debian 8.2 and my RX 460?



Edit



Output of running xrandr -q in MATE Terminal:



xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 0.00*
1280x1024 0.00
1024x768 0.00
800x600 0.00
640x480 0.00


Output of uname -a:



Linux desktop 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux









share|improve this question
















I am running Debian 8.2 Jessie with an AMD Radeon RX 460. MATE is my desktop environment. I use two monitors.



Anything on Monitor 1 is displayed on Monitor 2. I want instead for Monitor 2 to be like an extension of Monitor 1, as you would see in many monitor setups.



Is this possible with Debian 8.2 and my RX 460?



Edit



Output of running xrandr -q in MATE Terminal:



xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 1920 x 1080
default connected 1920x1080+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1920x1080 0.00*
1280x1024 0.00
1024x768 0.00
800x600 0.00
640x480 0.00


Output of uname -a:



Linux desktop 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux






debian display display-settings amd-graphics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '16 at 7:40







Username

















asked Nov 28 '16 at 19:43









UsernameUsername

3141416




3141416













  • Look into ARandR. might help

    – jc__
    Nov 28 '16 at 19:49











  • @jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

    – Username
    Nov 28 '16 at 20:01











  • Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 2:00











  • @icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

    – Username
    Nov 29 '16 at 5:34











  • OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 6:22



















  • Look into ARandR. might help

    – jc__
    Nov 28 '16 at 19:49











  • @jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

    – Username
    Nov 28 '16 at 20:01











  • Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 2:00











  • @icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

    – Username
    Nov 29 '16 at 5:34











  • OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

    – icarus
    Nov 29 '16 at 6:22

















Look into ARandR. might help

– jc__
Nov 28 '16 at 19:49





Look into ARandR. might help

– jc__
Nov 28 '16 at 19:49













@jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

– Username
Nov 28 '16 at 20:01





@jc__ Hm, the GUI does not seem to detect the second monitor...

– Username
Nov 28 '16 at 20:01













Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

– icarus
Nov 29 '16 at 2:00





Since you are running Debian, there is a good chance you are running Gnome. If so the simplest thing to try is running gnome-control-center display and see if that sees your two displays.

– icarus
Nov 29 '16 at 2:00













@icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

– Username
Nov 29 '16 at 5:34





@icarus That package does not show up in the list of packages I can install. I'm using MATE desktop environment rather than GNOME.

– Username
Nov 29 '16 at 5:34













OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

– icarus
Nov 29 '16 at 6:22





OK, I am out of my depth, so this is just generic advice until someone who can help comes along. Can you run xrandr -q? If so can you add the output to the question? What we are aiming for are the names of the outputs of the RX 460, and then we can try telling it to drive them separately. Probably Mate will have a pretty gui to drive this, but let me try and help via a cli.

– icarus
Nov 29 '16 at 6:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I had a similar issue and it appeared (bug report) it was due to the fact that the proprietary binary-only firmware was not installed on my system.



That firmware ships with firmware-linux-nonfree. I installed that package (RMS won't be proud anymore...) and now it works.



See Debian wiki about radeon proprietary firmware.






share|improve this answer
























  • Installing that package did nothing for me

    – Username
    Jan 11 '17 at 0:29











  • Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:31













  • I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:32













  • I get the same xrandr output

    – Username
    Jan 17 '17 at 20:22













  • Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 17 '17 at 23:28











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f326650%2fhow-do-i-make-my-display-a-dual-screen-stretch-with-debian-jessie-and-a-radeon-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














I had a similar issue and it appeared (bug report) it was due to the fact that the proprietary binary-only firmware was not installed on my system.



That firmware ships with firmware-linux-nonfree. I installed that package (RMS won't be proud anymore...) and now it works.



See Debian wiki about radeon proprietary firmware.






share|improve this answer
























  • Installing that package did nothing for me

    – Username
    Jan 11 '17 at 0:29











  • Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:31













  • I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:32













  • I get the same xrandr output

    – Username
    Jan 17 '17 at 20:22













  • Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 17 '17 at 23:28
















0














I had a similar issue and it appeared (bug report) it was due to the fact that the proprietary binary-only firmware was not installed on my system.



That firmware ships with firmware-linux-nonfree. I installed that package (RMS won't be proud anymore...) and now it works.



See Debian wiki about radeon proprietary firmware.






share|improve this answer
























  • Installing that package did nothing for me

    – Username
    Jan 11 '17 at 0:29











  • Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:31













  • I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:32













  • I get the same xrandr output

    – Username
    Jan 17 '17 at 20:22













  • Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 17 '17 at 23:28














0












0








0







I had a similar issue and it appeared (bug report) it was due to the fact that the proprietary binary-only firmware was not installed on my system.



That firmware ships with firmware-linux-nonfree. I installed that package (RMS won't be proud anymore...) and now it works.



See Debian wiki about radeon proprietary firmware.






share|improve this answer













I had a similar issue and it appeared (bug report) it was due to the fact that the proprietary binary-only firmware was not installed on my system.



That firmware ships with firmware-linux-nonfree. I installed that package (RMS won't be proud anymore...) and now it works.



See Debian wiki about radeon proprietary firmware.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 10 '17 at 22:49









JérômeJérôme

8412731




8412731













  • Installing that package did nothing for me

    – Username
    Jan 11 '17 at 0:29











  • Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:31













  • I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:32













  • I get the same xrandr output

    – Username
    Jan 17 '17 at 20:22













  • Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 17 '17 at 23:28



















  • Installing that package did nothing for me

    – Username
    Jan 11 '17 at 0:29











  • Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:31













  • I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 11 '17 at 8:32













  • I get the same xrandr output

    – Username
    Jan 17 '17 at 20:22













  • Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

    – Jérôme
    Jan 17 '17 at 23:28

















Installing that package did nothing for me

– Username
Jan 11 '17 at 0:29





Installing that package did nothing for me

– Username
Jan 11 '17 at 0:29













Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

– Jérôme
Jan 11 '17 at 8:31







Sorry to hear that. Still relevant to you in the bug report : 'Output name "default" means you're not using the radeon driver but some kind of generic fallback driver.' You may want to check your Xorg log and dmesg output to figure out what is wrong. Do you still get the same xrandr output?

– Jérôme
Jan 11 '17 at 8:31















I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

– Jérôme
Jan 11 '17 at 8:32







I'd like to keep this answer here anyway as it may help someone with the same symptoms: it would have saved myself some time and I wouldn't have wasted the developers time with a wrong bug report.

– Jérôme
Jan 11 '17 at 8:32















I get the same xrandr output

– Username
Jan 17 '17 at 20:22







I get the same xrandr output

– Username
Jan 17 '17 at 20:22















Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

– Jérôme
Jan 17 '17 at 23:28





Weird. It would mean you have the firmware installed but not loaded? From the answer I had on the bugtracker, I suggest you edit your question with Xorg log and dmesg output.

– Jérôme
Jan 17 '17 at 23:28


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f326650%2fhow-do-i-make-my-display-a-dual-screen-stretch-with-debian-jessie-and-a-radeon-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

is 'sed' thread safe

How to make a Squid Proxy server?