How to remove space in section title at KOMA-Script












2















Here is MWE:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}


renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


The output is this:
enter image description here



I want it will be: 1. ABC and not 1 . ABC (no space between the "1" and the ".").

It is possible? and if it's possible, how can I do it?



Thank you!










share|improve this question

























  • sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

    – AndiW
    6 hours ago


















2















Here is MWE:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}


renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


The output is this:
enter image description here



I want it will be: 1. ABC and not 1 . ABC (no space between the "1" and the ".").

It is possible? and if it's possible, how can I do it?



Thank you!










share|improve this question

























  • sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

    – AndiW
    6 hours ago
















2












2








2








Here is MWE:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}


renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


The output is this:
enter image description here



I want it will be: 1. ABC and not 1 . ABC (no space between the "1" and the ".").

It is possible? and if it's possible, how can I do it?



Thank you!










share|improve this question
















Here is MWE:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}


renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


The output is this:
enter image description here



I want it will be: 1. ABC and not 1 . ABC (no space between the "1" and the ".").

It is possible? and if it's possible, how can I do it?



Thank you!







sectioning numbering koma-script sections-paragraphs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Schweinebacke

22k4577




22k4577










asked 6 hours ago









heblyxheblyx

935919




935919













  • sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

    – AndiW
    6 hours ago





















  • sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

    – AndiW
    6 hours ago



















sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

– AndiW
6 hours ago







sorry, I am not able to compile your MWE (Font OrnementsADF not found). Just a guess: try to terminate every line that might be fragile with a %: ifstr{#1}{section}{% {adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}% }%

– AndiW
6 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The macro sectionformat contains an enskip at the end. You can redefine it without that:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

defsectionformat{thesectionautodot}% enskip
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}



enter image description here







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you!! What is the csname command?

    – heblyx
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago













  • @PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

    – Mico
    6 hours ago













  • @Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

    – Schweinebacke
    5 hours ago



















3














You should reduce group braces to a minimum and add the . either to the sectionformat:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand*{sectionformat}{thesection.enskip}% replaced autodot by .
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


or select numbers=withdot to add the dot to all section levels:



documentclass[numbers=enddot]{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


You should not combine a autodot in sectionformat with a hard coded . (neither in autodot nor on sectionlinesformat where it is misplaced by specification), because this could result in two dots.



Please have a look to the KOMA-Script manual for the default of sectionformat and the meaning of numbers=withdot, sectionformat and autodot.



BTW: The makeatother in your example is also not necessary and should be removed (so I did).



Off-Topic: You should also avoid possible spurious white spaces by newlines after } or { and by real spaces in the middle of the code.






share|improve this answer


























  • Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

    – heblyx
    5 hours ago













  • It is possible?

    – heblyx
    4 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480147%2fhow-to-remove-space-in-section-title-at-koma-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














The macro sectionformat contains an enskip at the end. You can redefine it without that:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

defsectionformat{thesectionautodot}% enskip
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}



enter image description here







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you!! What is the csname command?

    – heblyx
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago













  • @PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

    – Mico
    6 hours ago













  • @Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

    – Schweinebacke
    5 hours ago
















2














The macro sectionformat contains an enskip at the end. You can redefine it without that:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

defsectionformat{thesectionautodot}% enskip
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}



enter image description here







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you!! What is the csname command?

    – heblyx
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago













  • @PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

    – Mico
    6 hours ago













  • @Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

    – Schweinebacke
    5 hours ago














2












2








2







The macro sectionformat contains an enskip at the end. You can redefine it without that:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

defsectionformat{thesectionautodot}% enskip
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}



enter image description here







share|improve this answer















The macro sectionformat contains an enskip at the end. You can redefine it without that:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

defsectionformat{thesectionautodot}% enskip
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}{%
{adforn{30} {#3}. {#4} adforn{58}}
}
{{hskip#2#3}{#4}}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}



enter image description here








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik

24.3k54688




24.3k54688













  • Thank you!! What is the csname command?

    – heblyx
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago













  • @PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

    – Mico
    6 hours ago













  • @Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

    – Schweinebacke
    5 hours ago



















  • Thank you!! What is the csname command?

    – heblyx
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago













  • @PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

    – Mico
    6 hours ago













  • @Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

    – Phelype Oleinik
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

    – Schweinebacke
    5 hours ago

















Thank you!! What is the csname command?

– heblyx
6 hours ago





Thank you!! What is the csname command?

– heblyx
6 hours ago




1




1





@heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago







@heblyx It allows you to use a control sequence (a.k.a. macro) by its name. One expansion of csname thesectionendcsname gives thesection. If you simply use thesection it will work as well. The csname thingy is just for dynamically creating these formatting commands.

– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago















@PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

– Mico
6 hours ago







@PhelypeOleinik - Using the csname ... endcsname machinery would seem to be overkill here. Maybe replace csname thesectionendcsname autodot with thesection.autodot? :-)

– Mico
6 hours ago















@Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago





@Mico Indeed, unnecessary complication. Done :)

– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago




2




2





Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

– Schweinebacke
5 hours ago





Note: This could result in two ., if autodot results in adding a .. And IMHO the KOMA-Script guide recommends to add number format parts like the end dot to sectionformat instead of sectionlinesformat. See my answer about how to do this.

– Schweinebacke
5 hours ago











3














You should reduce group braces to a minimum and add the . either to the sectionformat:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand*{sectionformat}{thesection.enskip}% replaced autodot by .
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


or select numbers=withdot to add the dot to all section levels:



documentclass[numbers=enddot]{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


You should not combine a autodot in sectionformat with a hard coded . (neither in autodot nor on sectionlinesformat where it is misplaced by specification), because this could result in two dots.



Please have a look to the KOMA-Script manual for the default of sectionformat and the meaning of numbers=withdot, sectionformat and autodot.



BTW: The makeatother in your example is also not necessary and should be removed (so I did).



Off-Topic: You should also avoid possible spurious white spaces by newlines after } or { and by real spaces in the middle of the code.






share|improve this answer


























  • Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

    – heblyx
    5 hours ago













  • It is possible?

    – heblyx
    4 hours ago
















3














You should reduce group braces to a minimum and add the . either to the sectionformat:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand*{sectionformat}{thesection.enskip}% replaced autodot by .
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


or select numbers=withdot to add the dot to all section levels:



documentclass[numbers=enddot]{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


You should not combine a autodot in sectionformat with a hard coded . (neither in autodot nor on sectionlinesformat where it is misplaced by specification), because this could result in two dots.



Please have a look to the KOMA-Script manual for the default of sectionformat and the meaning of numbers=withdot, sectionformat and autodot.



BTW: The makeatother in your example is also not necessary and should be removed (so I did).



Off-Topic: You should also avoid possible spurious white spaces by newlines after } or { and by real spaces in the middle of the code.






share|improve this answer


























  • Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

    – heblyx
    5 hours ago













  • It is possible?

    – heblyx
    4 hours ago














3












3








3







You should reduce group braces to a minimum and add the . either to the sectionformat:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand*{sectionformat}{thesection.enskip}% replaced autodot by .
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


or select numbers=withdot to add the dot to all section levels:



documentclass[numbers=enddot]{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


You should not combine a autodot in sectionformat with a hard coded . (neither in autodot nor on sectionlinesformat where it is misplaced by specification), because this could result in two dots.



Please have a look to the KOMA-Script manual for the default of sectionformat and the meaning of numbers=withdot, sectionformat and autodot.



BTW: The makeatother in your example is also not necessary and should be removed (so I did).



Off-Topic: You should also avoid possible spurious white spaces by newlines after } or { and by real spaces in the middle of the code.






share|improve this answer















You should reduce group braces to a minimum and add the . either to the sectionformat:



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand*{sectionformat}{thesection.enskip}% replaced autodot by .
renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}makeatother

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


or select numbers=withdot to add the dot to all section levels:



documentclass[numbers=enddot]{scrartcl}
usepackage{adforn}

renewcommand{sectionlinesformat}[4]{%
ifstr{#1}{section}%
{adforn{30} #3#4 adforn{58}}%
{hskip#2#3#4}%
}

begin{document}

section{ABC}

end{document}


You should not combine a autodot in sectionformat with a hard coded . (neither in autodot nor on sectionlinesformat where it is misplaced by specification), because this could result in two dots.



Please have a look to the KOMA-Script manual for the default of sectionformat and the meaning of numbers=withdot, sectionformat and autodot.



BTW: The makeatother in your example is also not necessary and should be removed (so I did).



Off-Topic: You should also avoid possible spurious white spaces by newlines after } or { and by real spaces in the middle of the code.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 5 hours ago









SchweinebackeSchweinebacke

22k4577




22k4577













  • Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

    – heblyx
    5 hours ago













  • It is possible?

    – heblyx
    4 hours ago



















  • Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

    – heblyx
    5 hours ago













  • It is possible?

    – heblyx
    4 hours ago

















Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

– heblyx
5 hours ago







Your solution is good, but I'm not sure it's good for me. Because I'm Hebrew user - the dot is always at wrong side... at Hebrew it shuold be ".1" and not "1."

– heblyx
5 hours ago















It is possible?

– heblyx
4 hours ago





It is possible?

– heblyx
4 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480147%2fhow-to-remove-space-in-section-title-at-koma-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

is 'sed' thread safe

How to make a Squid Proxy server?