Reporting number of files in Subdirectories, Bash












5















I'm working on a Win10 computer, but I usually work on Gitbash or in the linux subsystem.



I'm trying to get the number of files in all subdirectories of a specified directory.



This is a similar question to How to report number of files in all subdirectories? But the difference is that I do not have a constant number of levels on all subdirectories, I have something like:



Dir1/sub1
Dir1/sub1/subsub1
Dir1/sub2
Dir1/sub3/subsub3/subsubsub3


I tried



 shopt -s dotglob; for dir in */; do all=("$dir"/*); echo "$dir: ${#all[@]}"; done


playing around with the number of levels to search in (* /,* /* /* and so on)



But I cannot really get what Im looking for, something like:



Dir1/sub1: Number of files
Dir1/sub2: Number of files
Dir1/sub3: Number of files









share|improve this question

























  • You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

    – roaima
    Feb 13 at 22:48


















5















I'm working on a Win10 computer, but I usually work on Gitbash or in the linux subsystem.



I'm trying to get the number of files in all subdirectories of a specified directory.



This is a similar question to How to report number of files in all subdirectories? But the difference is that I do not have a constant number of levels on all subdirectories, I have something like:



Dir1/sub1
Dir1/sub1/subsub1
Dir1/sub2
Dir1/sub3/subsub3/subsubsub3


I tried



 shopt -s dotglob; for dir in */; do all=("$dir"/*); echo "$dir: ${#all[@]}"; done


playing around with the number of levels to search in (* /,* /* /* and so on)



But I cannot really get what Im looking for, something like:



Dir1/sub1: Number of files
Dir1/sub2: Number of files
Dir1/sub3: Number of files









share|improve this question

























  • You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

    – roaima
    Feb 13 at 22:48
















5












5








5








I'm working on a Win10 computer, but I usually work on Gitbash or in the linux subsystem.



I'm trying to get the number of files in all subdirectories of a specified directory.



This is a similar question to How to report number of files in all subdirectories? But the difference is that I do not have a constant number of levels on all subdirectories, I have something like:



Dir1/sub1
Dir1/sub1/subsub1
Dir1/sub2
Dir1/sub3/subsub3/subsubsub3


I tried



 shopt -s dotglob; for dir in */; do all=("$dir"/*); echo "$dir: ${#all[@]}"; done


playing around with the number of levels to search in (* /,* /* /* and so on)



But I cannot really get what Im looking for, something like:



Dir1/sub1: Number of files
Dir1/sub2: Number of files
Dir1/sub3: Number of files









share|improve this question
















I'm working on a Win10 computer, but I usually work on Gitbash or in the linux subsystem.



I'm trying to get the number of files in all subdirectories of a specified directory.



This is a similar question to How to report number of files in all subdirectories? But the difference is that I do not have a constant number of levels on all subdirectories, I have something like:



Dir1/sub1
Dir1/sub1/subsub1
Dir1/sub2
Dir1/sub3/subsub3/subsubsub3


I tried



 shopt -s dotglob; for dir in */; do all=("$dir"/*); echo "$dir: ${#all[@]}"; done


playing around with the number of levels to search in (* /,* /* /* and so on)



But I cannot really get what Im looking for, something like:



Dir1/sub1: Number of files
Dir1/sub2: Number of files
Dir1/sub3: Number of files






bash






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 13 at 16:45









Rui F Ribeiro

40.7k1479137




40.7k1479137










asked Feb 13 at 15:46









Faustino DelgadoFaustino Delgado

263




263













  • You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

    – roaima
    Feb 13 at 22:48





















  • You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

    – roaima
    Feb 13 at 22:48



















You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

– roaima
Feb 13 at 22:48







You'd want a report of files in each of the directories sub1, sub1/subsub1, sub2, sub3, sub3/subsub3, and subsubsub3? Or just for sub1, sub2, and sub3? If this second option, should sub1 and sub3 count files in their subdirectories too?

– roaima
Feb 13 at 22:48












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















2














#!/bin/bash

shopt -s dotglob nullglob

topdir='./Dir1'

for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ; |
printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"
done


This small bash script would output a list of pathnames of subdirectories of $topdir followed by the number of regular files found (anywhere) under each of those subdirectories.



The script loops over all subdirectories of $topdir and for each, it runs the find command



find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ;


This outputs a dot on an otherwise empty line for each found regular file under $subdir. We output a dot because these are easy to count (filenames can contain newline characters).



The dots are piped to



printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"


Here, printf is used to format the output. It takes the subdirectory path (with the final slash removed) and the count of files.



The count of files is had from wc -l which will count the dots coming over the pipe from find (strictly speaking, it does not count the dots but the newlines). Since printf itself is not reading its standard input stream, this is instead consumed by wc -l.



Setting the nullglob and dotglob shell options at the start allows us to skip the whole loop if there are no subdirectories under $topdir (that's with nullglob) and also to include hidden directory names under $topdir (that's with dotglob).



By changing



topdir='./Dir1'


into



topdir=$1


you can get the script to take a directory path as its only command line argument.



You may speed the find up radically by changing it into the slightly more complex



find "$subdir" -type f -exec sh -c 'for pathname do echo .; done' sh {} +


(the rest of the loop should be left as it is). This runs a really small in-line shell script for batches of found files, instead of echo for each file. This would be much quicker assuming echo is a built-in command in the sh shell. (You may want to change sh -c to bash -c to be sure of that.) When -exec echo . ; is used, find would execute /bin/echo, which would be slow to do for each file.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    I'm not familiar with Gitbash on Windows, but I'll assume that whatever platform you're running this script on, you have these installed:





    • bash v4.x or higher (macOS users will need to install a more recent version via Homebrew or something)

    • GNU find--really, any standard Unix find will do, just not the MS-DOS/Windows version (which is more like grep)


    Assuming the above, this script should do the trick:



    #!/bin/bash
    # USAGE: count_files <dir> ...

    declare -A filecount

    # Tell bash to execute the last pipeline element in this shell, not a subshell
    shopt -s lastpipe

    # Run through all the user-supplied directories at one go
    for d in "$@"; do
    find "$d" -type f | while read f; do
    [[ $f =~ ^(${d%%/}/[^/]+)/ ]] && (( filecount["${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"]++ ))
    done
    done

    # REPORT!
    for k in "${!filecount[@]}"; do
    echo "$k: ${filecount[$k]}"
    done





    share|improve this answer


























    • I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

      – Faustino Delgado
      Feb 13 at 17:03











    • @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

      – Adrian
      Feb 13 at 17:06






    • 1





      Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

      – Kusalananda
      Feb 13 at 17:23













    • @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

      – Faustino Delgado
      Feb 13 at 17:39






    • 1





      @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

      – Adrian
      Feb 13 at 18:06



















    1














    With GNU utilities:



    find Dir1 -mindepth 2 -type f -printf '%P' |
    awk -F/ -vRS='' '{n[$1]++}; END{for (i in n) print i ": " n[i]}'


    Counting only regular files for each of the subdirectories of Dir1.



    Outputs something like:



    sub1: 3
    sub2: 30
    sub3: 13
    sub4: 3
    sub5: 3





    share|improve this answer































      0














      find $DIR -mindepth 2 -type f -exec bash -c 'echo ${0%${0#$1/*/}}' {} $DIR  ; | uniq -c



      1. The -mindepth 2 means we look only at files which are descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR.


      2. -type f looks only at files.


      3. -exec bash -c "..." {} $DIR executes the string with the arguments {} and $DIR, where {} is substituted with each file name found by find.

      4. The echo part extracts the corresponding direct subdirectory of $DIR from a descendent filename. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16623835/remove-a-fixed-prefix-suffix-from-a-string-in-bash for an explanation of what % and # do. The 0 and 1 correspond to the first and second arguments after the string respectively.


      5. find will list all descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR in succession, so uniq -c will return the total number of descendant files along with the name for each direct subdirectory.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

        – Stephen Harris
        Feb 13 at 21:29











      • Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

        – justinpc
        Feb 13 at 21:31











      • I've fixed the answer.

        – justinpc
        Feb 13 at 22:41



















      0














      Assuming that your bash version is at least 4.0, actually you were almost there.



      You can allow your code to count files recursively with the globstar shell option. From man bash(1):




      If set, the pattern ** used in a pathname expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a /, only directories and subdirectories match.




      If you want to recursively count all files, including subdirectories, that are in your top-level directories:



      shopt -s dotglob globstar
      for dir in */; do
      all=( "$dir"/** )
      printf '%sn' "$dir: ${#all[@]}"
      done


      As in the code you tried, for each of your top-level directory we are populating an array with the results of pathname expansion and then displaying the number of its elements.
      dotglob is used to include files whose names start with . (hidden files).



      If you want to recursively count all files except for subdirectory objects, you can just subtract the count of subdirectories from the count of all files:



      shopt -s dotglob globstar
      for dir in */; do
      all=( "$dir"/** )
      alldir=( "$dir"/**/ )
      printf '%sn' "$dir: $(( ${#all[@]} - ${#alldir[@]} ))"
      done


      However, here I'm assuming a broad definition of "file", which, in POSIX, may refer to a regular file, character, block or FIFO special file, symbolic link, socket, directory, or whatever specific implementations may add beyond the standard.

      To count a specific type of files only (e.g. regular files), it may be easier to resort to a find-based solution.

      Alternatively you can extend the above code, testing for the file type in a loop:



      shopt -s dotglob globstar
      for dir in */; do
      all=( "$dir"/** )
      count=0
      for file in "${all[@]}"; do
      test -f "$file" && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
      done
      printf '%sn' "$dir: $count"
      done


      But this less convenient solution will also be significantly slower than the find-based alternative (e.g. more than two times slower than the faster one in Kusalananda's answer, tested on Linux with bash 5.0 and find 4.6).



      Also note that, unlike find in its default behavior, pathname expansion with the globstar option will follow symbolic links that resolve to files, making all the above snippets include them in the counts as well.

      (Initially it used to follow symbolic links that resolve to directories too, but this behavior has been changed in bash 4.3).



      Finally — to also provide a solution that does not depend on the globstar shell option — you can use a recursive function to recursively count all regular files in the top-level subdirectories of the $1 directory:



      #!/bin/bash

      # nullglob is needed to avoid the function being
      # invoked on 'dir/*' when * matches nothing
      shopt -s nullglob dotglob

      function count_files () {
      for file in "$1"/*; do
      # Only count regular files
      [ -f "$file" ] && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
      # Only recurse on directories
      [ -d "$file" ] && count_files "$file"
      done
      }

      for dir in "$1"/*/; do
      count="0"
      count_files "$dir"
      printf '%s: %sn' "$dir" "$count"
      done





      share|improve this answer

























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "106"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500417%2freporting-number-of-files-in-subdirectories-bash%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2














        #!/bin/bash

        shopt -s dotglob nullglob

        topdir='./Dir1'

        for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
        find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ; |
        printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"
        done


        This small bash script would output a list of pathnames of subdirectories of $topdir followed by the number of regular files found (anywhere) under each of those subdirectories.



        The script loops over all subdirectories of $topdir and for each, it runs the find command



        find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ;


        This outputs a dot on an otherwise empty line for each found regular file under $subdir. We output a dot because these are easy to count (filenames can contain newline characters).



        The dots are piped to



        printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"


        Here, printf is used to format the output. It takes the subdirectory path (with the final slash removed) and the count of files.



        The count of files is had from wc -l which will count the dots coming over the pipe from find (strictly speaking, it does not count the dots but the newlines). Since printf itself is not reading its standard input stream, this is instead consumed by wc -l.



        Setting the nullglob and dotglob shell options at the start allows us to skip the whole loop if there are no subdirectories under $topdir (that's with nullglob) and also to include hidden directory names under $topdir (that's with dotglob).



        By changing



        topdir='./Dir1'


        into



        topdir=$1


        you can get the script to take a directory path as its only command line argument.



        You may speed the find up radically by changing it into the slightly more complex



        find "$subdir" -type f -exec sh -c 'for pathname do echo .; done' sh {} +


        (the rest of the loop should be left as it is). This runs a really small in-line shell script for batches of found files, instead of echo for each file. This would be much quicker assuming echo is a built-in command in the sh shell. (You may want to change sh -c to bash -c to be sure of that.) When -exec echo . ; is used, find would execute /bin/echo, which would be slow to do for each file.






        share|improve this answer






























          2














          #!/bin/bash

          shopt -s dotglob nullglob

          topdir='./Dir1'

          for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
          find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ; |
          printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"
          done


          This small bash script would output a list of pathnames of subdirectories of $topdir followed by the number of regular files found (anywhere) under each of those subdirectories.



          The script loops over all subdirectories of $topdir and for each, it runs the find command



          find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ;


          This outputs a dot on an otherwise empty line for each found regular file under $subdir. We output a dot because these are easy to count (filenames can contain newline characters).



          The dots are piped to



          printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"


          Here, printf is used to format the output. It takes the subdirectory path (with the final slash removed) and the count of files.



          The count of files is had from wc -l which will count the dots coming over the pipe from find (strictly speaking, it does not count the dots but the newlines). Since printf itself is not reading its standard input stream, this is instead consumed by wc -l.



          Setting the nullglob and dotglob shell options at the start allows us to skip the whole loop if there are no subdirectories under $topdir (that's with nullglob) and also to include hidden directory names under $topdir (that's with dotglob).



          By changing



          topdir='./Dir1'


          into



          topdir=$1


          you can get the script to take a directory path as its only command line argument.



          You may speed the find up radically by changing it into the slightly more complex



          find "$subdir" -type f -exec sh -c 'for pathname do echo .; done' sh {} +


          (the rest of the loop should be left as it is). This runs a really small in-line shell script for batches of found files, instead of echo for each file. This would be much quicker assuming echo is a built-in command in the sh shell. (You may want to change sh -c to bash -c to be sure of that.) When -exec echo . ; is used, find would execute /bin/echo, which would be slow to do for each file.






          share|improve this answer




























            2












            2








            2







            #!/bin/bash

            shopt -s dotglob nullglob

            topdir='./Dir1'

            for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
            find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ; |
            printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"
            done


            This small bash script would output a list of pathnames of subdirectories of $topdir followed by the number of regular files found (anywhere) under each of those subdirectories.



            The script loops over all subdirectories of $topdir and for each, it runs the find command



            find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ;


            This outputs a dot on an otherwise empty line for each found regular file under $subdir. We output a dot because these are easy to count (filenames can contain newline characters).



            The dots are piped to



            printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"


            Here, printf is used to format the output. It takes the subdirectory path (with the final slash removed) and the count of files.



            The count of files is had from wc -l which will count the dots coming over the pipe from find (strictly speaking, it does not count the dots but the newlines). Since printf itself is not reading its standard input stream, this is instead consumed by wc -l.



            Setting the nullglob and dotglob shell options at the start allows us to skip the whole loop if there are no subdirectories under $topdir (that's with nullglob) and also to include hidden directory names under $topdir (that's with dotglob).



            By changing



            topdir='./Dir1'


            into



            topdir=$1


            you can get the script to take a directory path as its only command line argument.



            You may speed the find up radically by changing it into the slightly more complex



            find "$subdir" -type f -exec sh -c 'for pathname do echo .; done' sh {} +


            (the rest of the loop should be left as it is). This runs a really small in-line shell script for batches of found files, instead of echo for each file. This would be much quicker assuming echo is a built-in command in the sh shell. (You may want to change sh -c to bash -c to be sure of that.) When -exec echo . ; is used, find would execute /bin/echo, which would be slow to do for each file.






            share|improve this answer















            #!/bin/bash

            shopt -s dotglob nullglob

            topdir='./Dir1'

            for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
            find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ; |
            printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"
            done


            This small bash script would output a list of pathnames of subdirectories of $topdir followed by the number of regular files found (anywhere) under each of those subdirectories.



            The script loops over all subdirectories of $topdir and for each, it runs the find command



            find "$subdir" -type f -exec echo . ;


            This outputs a dot on an otherwise empty line for each found regular file under $subdir. We output a dot because these are easy to count (filenames can contain newline characters).



            The dots are piped to



            printf '%s: %dn' "${subdir%/}" "$( wc -l )"


            Here, printf is used to format the output. It takes the subdirectory path (with the final slash removed) and the count of files.



            The count of files is had from wc -l which will count the dots coming over the pipe from find (strictly speaking, it does not count the dots but the newlines). Since printf itself is not reading its standard input stream, this is instead consumed by wc -l.



            Setting the nullglob and dotglob shell options at the start allows us to skip the whole loop if there are no subdirectories under $topdir (that's with nullglob) and also to include hidden directory names under $topdir (that's with dotglob).



            By changing



            topdir='./Dir1'


            into



            topdir=$1


            you can get the script to take a directory path as its only command line argument.



            You may speed the find up radically by changing it into the slightly more complex



            find "$subdir" -type f -exec sh -c 'for pathname do echo .; done' sh {} +


            (the rest of the loop should be left as it is). This runs a really small in-line shell script for batches of found files, instead of echo for each file. This would be much quicker assuming echo is a built-in command in the sh shell. (You may want to change sh -c to bash -c to be sure of that.) When -exec echo . ; is used, find would execute /bin/echo, which would be slow to do for each file.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Feb 25 at 13:29

























            answered Feb 13 at 17:02









            KusalanandaKusalananda

            133k17253416




            133k17253416

























                1














                I'm not familiar with Gitbash on Windows, but I'll assume that whatever platform you're running this script on, you have these installed:





                • bash v4.x or higher (macOS users will need to install a more recent version via Homebrew or something)

                • GNU find--really, any standard Unix find will do, just not the MS-DOS/Windows version (which is more like grep)


                Assuming the above, this script should do the trick:



                #!/bin/bash
                # USAGE: count_files <dir> ...

                declare -A filecount

                # Tell bash to execute the last pipeline element in this shell, not a subshell
                shopt -s lastpipe

                # Run through all the user-supplied directories at one go
                for d in "$@"; do
                find "$d" -type f | while read f; do
                [[ $f =~ ^(${d%%/}/[^/]+)/ ]] && (( filecount["${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"]++ ))
                done
                done

                # REPORT!
                for k in "${!filecount[@]}"; do
                echo "$k: ${filecount[$k]}"
                done





                share|improve this answer


























                • I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:03











                • @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 17:06






                • 1





                  Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                  – Kusalananda
                  Feb 13 at 17:23













                • @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:39






                • 1





                  @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 18:06
















                1














                I'm not familiar with Gitbash on Windows, but I'll assume that whatever platform you're running this script on, you have these installed:





                • bash v4.x or higher (macOS users will need to install a more recent version via Homebrew or something)

                • GNU find--really, any standard Unix find will do, just not the MS-DOS/Windows version (which is more like grep)


                Assuming the above, this script should do the trick:



                #!/bin/bash
                # USAGE: count_files <dir> ...

                declare -A filecount

                # Tell bash to execute the last pipeline element in this shell, not a subshell
                shopt -s lastpipe

                # Run through all the user-supplied directories at one go
                for d in "$@"; do
                find "$d" -type f | while read f; do
                [[ $f =~ ^(${d%%/}/[^/]+)/ ]] && (( filecount["${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"]++ ))
                done
                done

                # REPORT!
                for k in "${!filecount[@]}"; do
                echo "$k: ${filecount[$k]}"
                done





                share|improve this answer


























                • I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:03











                • @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 17:06






                • 1





                  Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                  – Kusalananda
                  Feb 13 at 17:23













                • @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:39






                • 1





                  @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 18:06














                1












                1








                1







                I'm not familiar with Gitbash on Windows, but I'll assume that whatever platform you're running this script on, you have these installed:





                • bash v4.x or higher (macOS users will need to install a more recent version via Homebrew or something)

                • GNU find--really, any standard Unix find will do, just not the MS-DOS/Windows version (which is more like grep)


                Assuming the above, this script should do the trick:



                #!/bin/bash
                # USAGE: count_files <dir> ...

                declare -A filecount

                # Tell bash to execute the last pipeline element in this shell, not a subshell
                shopt -s lastpipe

                # Run through all the user-supplied directories at one go
                for d in "$@"; do
                find "$d" -type f | while read f; do
                [[ $f =~ ^(${d%%/}/[^/]+)/ ]] && (( filecount["${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"]++ ))
                done
                done

                # REPORT!
                for k in "${!filecount[@]}"; do
                echo "$k: ${filecount[$k]}"
                done





                share|improve this answer















                I'm not familiar with Gitbash on Windows, but I'll assume that whatever platform you're running this script on, you have these installed:





                • bash v4.x or higher (macOS users will need to install a more recent version via Homebrew or something)

                • GNU find--really, any standard Unix find will do, just not the MS-DOS/Windows version (which is more like grep)


                Assuming the above, this script should do the trick:



                #!/bin/bash
                # USAGE: count_files <dir> ...

                declare -A filecount

                # Tell bash to execute the last pipeline element in this shell, not a subshell
                shopt -s lastpipe

                # Run through all the user-supplied directories at one go
                for d in "$@"; do
                find "$d" -type f | while read f; do
                [[ $f =~ ^(${d%%/}/[^/]+)/ ]] && (( filecount["${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"]++ ))
                done
                done

                # REPORT!
                for k in "${!filecount[@]}"; do
                echo "$k: ${filecount[$k]}"
                done






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Feb 13 at 18:01

























                answered Feb 13 at 16:32









                AdrianAdrian

                96268




                96268













                • I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:03











                • @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 17:06






                • 1





                  Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                  – Kusalananda
                  Feb 13 at 17:23













                • @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:39






                • 1





                  @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 18:06



















                • I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:03











                • @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 17:06






                • 1





                  Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                  – Kusalananda
                  Feb 13 at 17:23













                • @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                  – Faustino Delgado
                  Feb 13 at 17:39






                • 1





                  @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                  – Adrian
                  Feb 13 at 18:06

















                I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                – Faustino Delgado
                Feb 13 at 17:03





                I should really learn how to use Bash properly, this did the job very nicely, how do I cite you for showing me the script?

                – Faustino Delgado
                Feb 13 at 17:03













                @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                – Adrian
                Feb 13 at 17:06





                @FaustinoDelgado Just point back to this answer. The permalink can be found by clicking on the "share" link at the bottom of the answer.

                – Adrian
                Feb 13 at 17:06




                1




                1





                Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                – Kusalananda
                Feb 13 at 17:23







                Does this work on directories given with absolute pathnames? What about pathnames containing newlines? It also seems to count the number of files in the given directories, not in their subdirectories, as asked for in the question, but that may just be me not understanding your code. Care to describe what you're doing?

                – Kusalananda
                Feb 13 at 17:23















                @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                – Faustino Delgado
                Feb 13 at 17:39





                @Kusalananda How can you introduce new lines in path names?, I do not have that problem fortunately, yet.

                – Faustino Delgado
                Feb 13 at 17:39




                1




                1





                @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                – Adrian
                Feb 13 at 18:06





                @Kusalananda And for full disclosure, I just noticed that I’d accidentally edited out a trailing slash from my regex. Time for bed. :)

                – Adrian
                Feb 13 at 18:06











                1














                With GNU utilities:



                find Dir1 -mindepth 2 -type f -printf '%P' |
                awk -F/ -vRS='' '{n[$1]++}; END{for (i in n) print i ": " n[i]}'


                Counting only regular files for each of the subdirectories of Dir1.



                Outputs something like:



                sub1: 3
                sub2: 30
                sub3: 13
                sub4: 3
                sub5: 3





                share|improve this answer




























                  1














                  With GNU utilities:



                  find Dir1 -mindepth 2 -type f -printf '%P' |
                  awk -F/ -vRS='' '{n[$1]++}; END{for (i in n) print i ": " n[i]}'


                  Counting only regular files for each of the subdirectories of Dir1.



                  Outputs something like:



                  sub1: 3
                  sub2: 30
                  sub3: 13
                  sub4: 3
                  sub5: 3





                  share|improve this answer


























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    With GNU utilities:



                    find Dir1 -mindepth 2 -type f -printf '%P' |
                    awk -F/ -vRS='' '{n[$1]++}; END{for (i in n) print i ": " n[i]}'


                    Counting only regular files for each of the subdirectories of Dir1.



                    Outputs something like:



                    sub1: 3
                    sub2: 30
                    sub3: 13
                    sub4: 3
                    sub5: 3





                    share|improve this answer













                    With GNU utilities:



                    find Dir1 -mindepth 2 -type f -printf '%P' |
                    awk -F/ -vRS='' '{n[$1]++}; END{for (i in n) print i ": " n[i]}'


                    Counting only regular files for each of the subdirectories of Dir1.



                    Outputs something like:



                    sub1: 3
                    sub2: 30
                    sub3: 13
                    sub4: 3
                    sub5: 3






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Feb 25 at 14:22









                    Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

                    308k57581939




                    308k57581939























                        0














                        find $DIR -mindepth 2 -type f -exec bash -c 'echo ${0%${0#$1/*/}}' {} $DIR  ; | uniq -c



                        1. The -mindepth 2 means we look only at files which are descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR.


                        2. -type f looks only at files.


                        3. -exec bash -c "..." {} $DIR executes the string with the arguments {} and $DIR, where {} is substituted with each file name found by find.

                        4. The echo part extracts the corresponding direct subdirectory of $DIR from a descendent filename. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16623835/remove-a-fixed-prefix-suffix-from-a-string-in-bash for an explanation of what % and # do. The 0 and 1 correspond to the first and second arguments after the string respectively.


                        5. find will list all descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR in succession, so uniq -c will return the total number of descendant files along with the name for each direct subdirectory.






                        share|improve this answer





















                        • 1





                          Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                          – Stephen Harris
                          Feb 13 at 21:29











                        • Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 21:31











                        • I've fixed the answer.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 22:41
















                        0














                        find $DIR -mindepth 2 -type f -exec bash -c 'echo ${0%${0#$1/*/}}' {} $DIR  ; | uniq -c



                        1. The -mindepth 2 means we look only at files which are descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR.


                        2. -type f looks only at files.


                        3. -exec bash -c "..." {} $DIR executes the string with the arguments {} and $DIR, where {} is substituted with each file name found by find.

                        4. The echo part extracts the corresponding direct subdirectory of $DIR from a descendent filename. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16623835/remove-a-fixed-prefix-suffix-from-a-string-in-bash for an explanation of what % and # do. The 0 and 1 correspond to the first and second arguments after the string respectively.


                        5. find will list all descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR in succession, so uniq -c will return the total number of descendant files along with the name for each direct subdirectory.






                        share|improve this answer





















                        • 1





                          Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                          – Stephen Harris
                          Feb 13 at 21:29











                        • Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 21:31











                        • I've fixed the answer.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 22:41














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        find $DIR -mindepth 2 -type f -exec bash -c 'echo ${0%${0#$1/*/}}' {} $DIR  ; | uniq -c



                        1. The -mindepth 2 means we look only at files which are descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR.


                        2. -type f looks only at files.


                        3. -exec bash -c "..." {} $DIR executes the string with the arguments {} and $DIR, where {} is substituted with each file name found by find.

                        4. The echo part extracts the corresponding direct subdirectory of $DIR from a descendent filename. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16623835/remove-a-fixed-prefix-suffix-from-a-string-in-bash for an explanation of what % and # do. The 0 and 1 correspond to the first and second arguments after the string respectively.


                        5. find will list all descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR in succession, so uniq -c will return the total number of descendant files along with the name for each direct subdirectory.






                        share|improve this answer















                        find $DIR -mindepth 2 -type f -exec bash -c 'echo ${0%${0#$1/*/}}' {} $DIR  ; | uniq -c



                        1. The -mindepth 2 means we look only at files which are descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR.


                        2. -type f looks only at files.


                        3. -exec bash -c "..." {} $DIR executes the string with the arguments {} and $DIR, where {} is substituted with each file name found by find.

                        4. The echo part extracts the corresponding direct subdirectory of $DIR from a descendent filename. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16623835/remove-a-fixed-prefix-suffix-from-a-string-in-bash for an explanation of what % and # do. The 0 and 1 correspond to the first and second arguments after the string respectively.


                        5. find will list all descendants of direct subdirectories of $DIR in succession, so uniq -c will return the total number of descendant files along with the name for each direct subdirectory.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Feb 13 at 22:46

























                        answered Feb 13 at 21:15









                        justinpcjustinpc

                        1114




                        1114








                        • 1





                          Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                          – Stephen Harris
                          Feb 13 at 21:29











                        • Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 21:31











                        • I've fixed the answer.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 22:41














                        • 1





                          Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                          – Stephen Harris
                          Feb 13 at 21:29











                        • Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 21:31











                        • I've fixed the answer.

                          – justinpc
                          Feb 13 at 22:41








                        1




                        1





                        Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                        – Stephen Harris
                        Feb 13 at 21:29





                        Won't this show sub3 and sub3/subsub3 as two different entries?

                        – Stephen Harris
                        Feb 13 at 21:29













                        Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                        – justinpc
                        Feb 13 at 21:31





                        Oh I see now. We need a command to extract direct subdirectories of ${DIR}.

                        – justinpc
                        Feb 13 at 21:31













                        I've fixed the answer.

                        – justinpc
                        Feb 13 at 22:41





                        I've fixed the answer.

                        – justinpc
                        Feb 13 at 22:41











                        0














                        Assuming that your bash version is at least 4.0, actually you were almost there.



                        You can allow your code to count files recursively with the globstar shell option. From man bash(1):




                        If set, the pattern ** used in a pathname expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a /, only directories and subdirectories match.




                        If you want to recursively count all files, including subdirectories, that are in your top-level directories:



                        shopt -s dotglob globstar
                        for dir in */; do
                        all=( "$dir"/** )
                        printf '%sn' "$dir: ${#all[@]}"
                        done


                        As in the code you tried, for each of your top-level directory we are populating an array with the results of pathname expansion and then displaying the number of its elements.
                        dotglob is used to include files whose names start with . (hidden files).



                        If you want to recursively count all files except for subdirectory objects, you can just subtract the count of subdirectories from the count of all files:



                        shopt -s dotglob globstar
                        for dir in */; do
                        all=( "$dir"/** )
                        alldir=( "$dir"/**/ )
                        printf '%sn' "$dir: $(( ${#all[@]} - ${#alldir[@]} ))"
                        done


                        However, here I'm assuming a broad definition of "file", which, in POSIX, may refer to a regular file, character, block or FIFO special file, symbolic link, socket, directory, or whatever specific implementations may add beyond the standard.

                        To count a specific type of files only (e.g. regular files), it may be easier to resort to a find-based solution.

                        Alternatively you can extend the above code, testing for the file type in a loop:



                        shopt -s dotglob globstar
                        for dir in */; do
                        all=( "$dir"/** )
                        count=0
                        for file in "${all[@]}"; do
                        test -f "$file" && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                        done
                        printf '%sn' "$dir: $count"
                        done


                        But this less convenient solution will also be significantly slower than the find-based alternative (e.g. more than two times slower than the faster one in Kusalananda's answer, tested on Linux with bash 5.0 and find 4.6).



                        Also note that, unlike find in its default behavior, pathname expansion with the globstar option will follow symbolic links that resolve to files, making all the above snippets include them in the counts as well.

                        (Initially it used to follow symbolic links that resolve to directories too, but this behavior has been changed in bash 4.3).



                        Finally — to also provide a solution that does not depend on the globstar shell option — you can use a recursive function to recursively count all regular files in the top-level subdirectories of the $1 directory:



                        #!/bin/bash

                        # nullglob is needed to avoid the function being
                        # invoked on 'dir/*' when * matches nothing
                        shopt -s nullglob dotglob

                        function count_files () {
                        for file in "$1"/*; do
                        # Only count regular files
                        [ -f "$file" ] && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                        # Only recurse on directories
                        [ -d "$file" ] && count_files "$file"
                        done
                        }

                        for dir in "$1"/*/; do
                        count="0"
                        count_files "$dir"
                        printf '%s: %sn' "$dir" "$count"
                        done





                        share|improve this answer






























                          0














                          Assuming that your bash version is at least 4.0, actually you were almost there.



                          You can allow your code to count files recursively with the globstar shell option. From man bash(1):




                          If set, the pattern ** used in a pathname expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a /, only directories and subdirectories match.




                          If you want to recursively count all files, including subdirectories, that are in your top-level directories:



                          shopt -s dotglob globstar
                          for dir in */; do
                          all=( "$dir"/** )
                          printf '%sn' "$dir: ${#all[@]}"
                          done


                          As in the code you tried, for each of your top-level directory we are populating an array with the results of pathname expansion and then displaying the number of its elements.
                          dotglob is used to include files whose names start with . (hidden files).



                          If you want to recursively count all files except for subdirectory objects, you can just subtract the count of subdirectories from the count of all files:



                          shopt -s dotglob globstar
                          for dir in */; do
                          all=( "$dir"/** )
                          alldir=( "$dir"/**/ )
                          printf '%sn' "$dir: $(( ${#all[@]} - ${#alldir[@]} ))"
                          done


                          However, here I'm assuming a broad definition of "file", which, in POSIX, may refer to a regular file, character, block or FIFO special file, symbolic link, socket, directory, or whatever specific implementations may add beyond the standard.

                          To count a specific type of files only (e.g. regular files), it may be easier to resort to a find-based solution.

                          Alternatively you can extend the above code, testing for the file type in a loop:



                          shopt -s dotglob globstar
                          for dir in */; do
                          all=( "$dir"/** )
                          count=0
                          for file in "${all[@]}"; do
                          test -f "$file" && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                          done
                          printf '%sn' "$dir: $count"
                          done


                          But this less convenient solution will also be significantly slower than the find-based alternative (e.g. more than two times slower than the faster one in Kusalananda's answer, tested on Linux with bash 5.0 and find 4.6).



                          Also note that, unlike find in its default behavior, pathname expansion with the globstar option will follow symbolic links that resolve to files, making all the above snippets include them in the counts as well.

                          (Initially it used to follow symbolic links that resolve to directories too, but this behavior has been changed in bash 4.3).



                          Finally — to also provide a solution that does not depend on the globstar shell option — you can use a recursive function to recursively count all regular files in the top-level subdirectories of the $1 directory:



                          #!/bin/bash

                          # nullglob is needed to avoid the function being
                          # invoked on 'dir/*' when * matches nothing
                          shopt -s nullglob dotglob

                          function count_files () {
                          for file in "$1"/*; do
                          # Only count regular files
                          [ -f "$file" ] && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                          # Only recurse on directories
                          [ -d "$file" ] && count_files "$file"
                          done
                          }

                          for dir in "$1"/*/; do
                          count="0"
                          count_files "$dir"
                          printf '%s: %sn' "$dir" "$count"
                          done





                          share|improve this answer




























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Assuming that your bash version is at least 4.0, actually you were almost there.



                            You can allow your code to count files recursively with the globstar shell option. From man bash(1):




                            If set, the pattern ** used in a pathname expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a /, only directories and subdirectories match.




                            If you want to recursively count all files, including subdirectories, that are in your top-level directories:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: ${#all[@]}"
                            done


                            As in the code you tried, for each of your top-level directory we are populating an array with the results of pathname expansion and then displaying the number of its elements.
                            dotglob is used to include files whose names start with . (hidden files).



                            If you want to recursively count all files except for subdirectory objects, you can just subtract the count of subdirectories from the count of all files:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            alldir=( "$dir"/**/ )
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: $(( ${#all[@]} - ${#alldir[@]} ))"
                            done


                            However, here I'm assuming a broad definition of "file", which, in POSIX, may refer to a regular file, character, block or FIFO special file, symbolic link, socket, directory, or whatever specific implementations may add beyond the standard.

                            To count a specific type of files only (e.g. regular files), it may be easier to resort to a find-based solution.

                            Alternatively you can extend the above code, testing for the file type in a loop:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            count=0
                            for file in "${all[@]}"; do
                            test -f "$file" && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                            done
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: $count"
                            done


                            But this less convenient solution will also be significantly slower than the find-based alternative (e.g. more than two times slower than the faster one in Kusalananda's answer, tested on Linux with bash 5.0 and find 4.6).



                            Also note that, unlike find in its default behavior, pathname expansion with the globstar option will follow symbolic links that resolve to files, making all the above snippets include them in the counts as well.

                            (Initially it used to follow symbolic links that resolve to directories too, but this behavior has been changed in bash 4.3).



                            Finally — to also provide a solution that does not depend on the globstar shell option — you can use a recursive function to recursively count all regular files in the top-level subdirectories of the $1 directory:



                            #!/bin/bash

                            # nullglob is needed to avoid the function being
                            # invoked on 'dir/*' when * matches nothing
                            shopt -s nullglob dotglob

                            function count_files () {
                            for file in "$1"/*; do
                            # Only count regular files
                            [ -f "$file" ] && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                            # Only recurse on directories
                            [ -d "$file" ] && count_files "$file"
                            done
                            }

                            for dir in "$1"/*/; do
                            count="0"
                            count_files "$dir"
                            printf '%s: %sn' "$dir" "$count"
                            done





                            share|improve this answer















                            Assuming that your bash version is at least 4.0, actually you were almost there.



                            You can allow your code to count files recursively with the globstar shell option. From man bash(1):




                            If set, the pattern ** used in a pathname expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a /, only directories and subdirectories match.




                            If you want to recursively count all files, including subdirectories, that are in your top-level directories:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: ${#all[@]}"
                            done


                            As in the code you tried, for each of your top-level directory we are populating an array with the results of pathname expansion and then displaying the number of its elements.
                            dotglob is used to include files whose names start with . (hidden files).



                            If you want to recursively count all files except for subdirectory objects, you can just subtract the count of subdirectories from the count of all files:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            alldir=( "$dir"/**/ )
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: $(( ${#all[@]} - ${#alldir[@]} ))"
                            done


                            However, here I'm assuming a broad definition of "file", which, in POSIX, may refer to a regular file, character, block or FIFO special file, symbolic link, socket, directory, or whatever specific implementations may add beyond the standard.

                            To count a specific type of files only (e.g. regular files), it may be easier to resort to a find-based solution.

                            Alternatively you can extend the above code, testing for the file type in a loop:



                            shopt -s dotglob globstar
                            for dir in */; do
                            all=( "$dir"/** )
                            count=0
                            for file in "${all[@]}"; do
                            test -f "$file" && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                            done
                            printf '%sn' "$dir: $count"
                            done


                            But this less convenient solution will also be significantly slower than the find-based alternative (e.g. more than two times slower than the faster one in Kusalananda's answer, tested on Linux with bash 5.0 and find 4.6).



                            Also note that, unlike find in its default behavior, pathname expansion with the globstar option will follow symbolic links that resolve to files, making all the above snippets include them in the counts as well.

                            (Initially it used to follow symbolic links that resolve to directories too, but this behavior has been changed in bash 4.3).



                            Finally — to also provide a solution that does not depend on the globstar shell option — you can use a recursive function to recursively count all regular files in the top-level subdirectories of the $1 directory:



                            #!/bin/bash

                            # nullglob is needed to avoid the function being
                            # invoked on 'dir/*' when * matches nothing
                            shopt -s nullglob dotglob

                            function count_files () {
                            for file in "$1"/*; do
                            # Only count regular files
                            [ -f "$file" ] && count="$(( "$count" + 1 ))"
                            # Only recurse on directories
                            [ -d "$file" ] && count_files "$file"
                            done
                            }

                            for dir in "$1"/*/; do
                            count="0"
                            count_files "$dir"
                            printf '%s: %sn' "$dir" "$count"
                            done






                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Feb 25 at 15:12

























                            answered Feb 14 at 9:45









                            fra-sanfra-san

                            1,8131518




                            1,8131518






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500417%2freporting-number-of-files-in-subdirectories-bash%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to make a Squid Proxy server?

                                Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

                                19世紀