How do I compare binary files in Linux?
I need to compare two binary files and get the output in the form:
<fileoffset-hex> <file1-byte-hex> <file2-byte-hex>
for every different byte. So if file1.bin
is
00 90 00 11
in binary form and file2.bin
is
00 91 00 10
I want to get something like
00000001 90 91
00000003 11 10
Is there a way to do this in Linux? I know about cmp -l
but it uses a decimal system for offsets and octal for bytes which I would like to avoid.
linux diff binary-files
|
show 3 more comments
I need to compare two binary files and get the output in the form:
<fileoffset-hex> <file1-byte-hex> <file2-byte-hex>
for every different byte. So if file1.bin
is
00 90 00 11
in binary form and file2.bin
is
00 91 00 10
I want to get something like
00000001 90 91
00000003 11 10
Is there a way to do this in Linux? I know about cmp -l
but it uses a decimal system for offsets and octal for bytes which I would like to avoid.
linux diff binary-files
9
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner withod
...
– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
2
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
2
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07
|
show 3 more comments
I need to compare two binary files and get the output in the form:
<fileoffset-hex> <file1-byte-hex> <file2-byte-hex>
for every different byte. So if file1.bin
is
00 90 00 11
in binary form and file2.bin
is
00 91 00 10
I want to get something like
00000001 90 91
00000003 11 10
Is there a way to do this in Linux? I know about cmp -l
but it uses a decimal system for offsets and octal for bytes which I would like to avoid.
linux diff binary-files
I need to compare two binary files and get the output in the form:
<fileoffset-hex> <file1-byte-hex> <file2-byte-hex>
for every different byte. So if file1.bin
is
00 90 00 11
in binary form and file2.bin
is
00 91 00 10
I want to get something like
00000001 90 91
00000003 11 10
Is there a way to do this in Linux? I know about cmp -l
but it uses a decimal system for offsets and octal for bytes which I would like to avoid.
linux diff binary-files
linux diff binary-files
edited Nov 26 '18 at 21:13
bertieb
5,652112542
5,652112542
asked Mar 29 '10 at 15:28
frustratedCmpNoLongerUser
9
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner withod
...
– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
2
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
2
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07
|
show 3 more comments
9
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner withod
...
– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
2
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
2
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07
9
9
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner with
od
...– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner with
od
...– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
2
2
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
2
2
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07
|
show 3 more comments
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
This will print the offset and bytes in hex:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Or do $1-1
to have the first printed offset start at 0.
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1-1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Unfortunately, strtonum()
is specific to GAWK, so for other versions of awk—e.g., mawk—you will need to use an octal-to-decimal conversion function. For example,
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {dec *= 8; dec += substr(oct, i, 1)}; return dec} {printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)}'
Broken out for readability:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin |
mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {
for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {
dec *= 8;
dec += substr(oct, i, 1)
};
return dec
}
{
printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)
}'
3
@gertvdijk:strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point tomawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see alsoman update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't requirestrtonum
.
– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
add a comment |
As ~quack pointed out:
% xxd b1 > b1.hex
% xxd b2 > b2.hex
And then
% diff b1.hex b2.hex
or
% vimdiff b1.hex b2.hex
63
In Bash:diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.
– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
This worked great for me (withopendiff
on OS X instead ofvimdiff
) — the default viewxxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit withfold
,diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.
– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified bydiff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
Try diff
in the following combination of zsh/bash process substitution and colordiff
in CLI:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin) | colordiff
Where:
-y
shows you differences side-by-side (optional)
xxd
is CLI tool to create a hexdump output of the binary file
colordiff
will colorizediff
output (install via:sudo apt-get install colordiff
)- add
-W200
todiff
for wider output (of 200 characters per line)
Hints:
- if files are too big, add limit (e.g.
-l1000
) for eachxxd
Sample output:
10
Command can be simplified ascolordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.
– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the-q
or--brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.
– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
create a functionxxddiff
for this with:xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
great! still,diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug
– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
There's a tool called DHEX which may do the job, and there's another tool called VBinDiff.
For a strictly command-line approach, try JDIFF.
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
|
show 3 more comments
Method that works for byte addition / deletion
diff <(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file1)
<(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file2)
Generate a test case with a single removal of byte 64:
for i in `seq 128`; do printf "%02x" "$i"; done | xxd -r -p > file1
for i in `seq 128`; do if [ "$i" -ne 64 ]; then printf "%02x" $i; fi; done | xxd -r -p > file2
Output:
64d63
< 40
If you also want to see the ASCII version of the character:
bdiff() (
f() (
od -An -tx1c -w1 -v "$1" | paste -d '' - -
)
diff <(f "$1") <(f "$2")
)
bdiff file1 file2
Output:
64d63
< 40 @
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
I prefer od
over xxd
because:
- it is POSIX,
xxd
is not (comes with Vim) - has the
-An
to remove the address column withoutawk
.
Command explanation:
-An
removes the address column. This is important otherwise all lines would differ after a byte addition / removal.
-w1
puts one byte per line, so that diff can consume it. It is crucial to have one byte per line, or else every line after a deletion would become out of phase and differ. Unfortunately, this is not POSIX, but present in GNU.
-tx1
is the representation you want, change to any possible value, as long as you keep 1 byte per line.
-v
prevents asterisk repetition abbreviation*
which might interfere with the diff
paste -d '' - -
joins every two lines. We need it because the hex and ASCII go into separate adjacent lines. Taken from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8987257/concatenating-every-other-line-with-the-next
- we use parenthesis
()
to definebdiff
instead of{}
to limit the scope of the inner functionf
, see also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8426077/how-to-define-a-function-inside-another-function-in-bash
See also:
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/59849/diff-binary-files-of-different-sizes
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8385618/using-cmp-to-compare-two-binaries
add a comment |
Short answer
vimdiff <(xxd -c1 -p first.bin) <(xxd -c1 -p second.bin)
When using hexdumps and text diff to compare binary files, especially xxd
, the additions and removals of bytes become shifts in addressing which might make it difficult to see. This method tells xxd to not output addresses, and to output only one byte per line, which in turn shows exactly which bytes were changed, added, or removed. You can find the addresses later by searching for the interesting sequences of bytes in a more "normal" hexdump (output of xxd first.bin
).
(Of course, one may usediff
instead ofvimdiff
.)
– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
add a comment |
I'd recommend hexdump for dumping binary files to textual format and kdiff3 for diff viewing.
hexdump myfile1.bin > myfile1.hex
hexdump myfile2.bin > myfile2.hex
kdiff3 myfile1.hex myfile2.hex
2
Even here in bashkdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create filesmyfile1.hex
andmyfile2.hex
.
– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
add a comment |
The hexdiff
is a program designed to do exactly what you're looking for.
Usage:
hexdiff file1 file2
It displays the hex (and 7-bit ASCII) of the two files one above the other, with any differences highlighted. Look at man hexdiff
for the commands to move around in the file, and a simple q
will quit.
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
add a comment |
It may not strictly answer the question, but I use this for diffing binaries:
gvim -d <(xxd -c 1 ~/file1.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}') <(xxd -c 1 ~/file2.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}')
It prints both files out as hex and ASCII values, one byte per line, and then uses Vim's diff facility to render them visually.
add a comment |
dhex http://www.dettus.net/dhex/
DHEX is a more than just another hex editor: It includes a diff mode, which can be used to easily and conveniently compare two binary files. Since it is based on ncurses and is themeable, it can run on any number of systems and scenarios. With its utilization of search logs, it is possible to track changes in different iterations of files easily.
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
add a comment |
You can use gvimdiff tool that is included in vim-gui-common package
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim-gui-common
Then you can compare 2 hex files using following commands :
ubuntu> gvimdiff <hex-file1> <hex-file2>
Tha's all. Hope tha help !
add a comment |
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/03/bindiff-now-available-for-free.html
BinDiff is a great UI tool for comparing binary files that has been open sourced recently.
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
add a comment |
The go to open source product on Linux (and everything else) is Radare which provides radiff2
explicitly for this purpose. I voted to close this because myself and others have the same question, in the question you ask
for every different byte
That's insane though. Because as asked, if you insert one byte at the first byte in the file, you'd find every subsequent byte was different and so the diff would repeat the whole file, for an actual difference of one byte.
Slightly more practical is radiff -O
. The -O
is for ""Do code diffing with all bytes instead of just the fixed opcode bytes""
0x000000a4 0c01 => 3802 0x000000a4
0x000000a8 1401 => 3802 0x000000a8
0x000000ac 06 => 05 0x000000ac
0x000000b4 02 => 01 0x000000b4
0x000000b8 4c05 => 0020 0x000000b8
0x000000bc 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000bc
0x000000c0 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000c0
Like IDA Pro, Radare is a tool primary for binary analysis, you can also show delta diffing with -d
, or display the disassembled bytes instead of hex with -D
.
If you're asking these kind of questions though, check out
- Stack Overflow for the software questions,
- Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange
- Radare's
radiff2
for binary diffing
add a comment |
I recommend IDA Pro to analyse the binary files. Comparison can then be done using a plug-in for IDA such as BinDiff.
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f125376%2fhow-do-i-compare-binary-files-in-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This will print the offset and bytes in hex:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Or do $1-1
to have the first printed offset start at 0.
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1-1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Unfortunately, strtonum()
is specific to GAWK, so for other versions of awk—e.g., mawk—you will need to use an octal-to-decimal conversion function. For example,
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {dec *= 8; dec += substr(oct, i, 1)}; return dec} {printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)}'
Broken out for readability:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin |
mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {
for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {
dec *= 8;
dec += substr(oct, i, 1)
};
return dec
}
{
printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)
}'
3
@gertvdijk:strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point tomawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see alsoman update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't requirestrtonum
.
– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
add a comment |
This will print the offset and bytes in hex:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Or do $1-1
to have the first printed offset start at 0.
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1-1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Unfortunately, strtonum()
is specific to GAWK, so for other versions of awk—e.g., mawk—you will need to use an octal-to-decimal conversion function. For example,
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {dec *= 8; dec += substr(oct, i, 1)}; return dec} {printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)}'
Broken out for readability:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin |
mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {
for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {
dec *= 8;
dec += substr(oct, i, 1)
};
return dec
}
{
printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)
}'
3
@gertvdijk:strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point tomawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see alsoman update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't requirestrtonum
.
– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
add a comment |
This will print the offset and bytes in hex:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Or do $1-1
to have the first printed offset start at 0.
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1-1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Unfortunately, strtonum()
is specific to GAWK, so for other versions of awk—e.g., mawk—you will need to use an octal-to-decimal conversion function. For example,
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {dec *= 8; dec += substr(oct, i, 1)}; return dec} {printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)}'
Broken out for readability:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin |
mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {
for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {
dec *= 8;
dec += substr(oct, i, 1)
};
return dec
}
{
printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)
}'
This will print the offset and bytes in hex:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Or do $1-1
to have the first printed offset start at 0.
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | gawk '{printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1-1, strtonum(0$2), strtonum(0$3)}'
Unfortunately, strtonum()
is specific to GAWK, so for other versions of awk—e.g., mawk—you will need to use an octal-to-decimal conversion function. For example,
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin | mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {dec *= 8; dec += substr(oct, i, 1)}; return dec} {printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)}'
Broken out for readability:
cmp -l file1.bin file2.bin |
mawk 'function oct2dec(oct, dec) {
for (i = 1; i <= length(oct); i++) {
dec *= 8;
dec += substr(oct, i, 1)
};
return dec
}
{
printf "%08X %02X %02Xn", $1, oct2dec($2), oct2dec($3)
}'
edited Dec 22 '16 at 15:55
answered Mar 29 '10 at 16:30
Dennis WilliamsonDennis Williamson
77.4k14130167
77.4k14130167
3
@gertvdijk:strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point tomawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see alsoman update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't requirestrtonum
.
– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
add a comment |
3
@gertvdijk:strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point tomawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see alsoman update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't requirestrtonum
.
– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
3
3
@gertvdijk:
strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point to mawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see also man update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't require strtonum
.– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
@gertvdijk:
strtonum
is specific to GAWK. I believe Ubuntu previously used GAWK as the default, but switched at some point to mawk
. In any case, GAWK can be installed and set to the default (see also man update-alternatives
). See my updated answer for a solution that doesn't require strtonum
.– Dennis Williamson
Jul 4 '13 at 18:08
add a comment |
As ~quack pointed out:
% xxd b1 > b1.hex
% xxd b2 > b2.hex
And then
% diff b1.hex b2.hex
or
% vimdiff b1.hex b2.hex
63
In Bash:diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.
– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
This worked great for me (withopendiff
on OS X instead ofvimdiff
) — the default viewxxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit withfold
,diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.
– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified bydiff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
As ~quack pointed out:
% xxd b1 > b1.hex
% xxd b2 > b2.hex
And then
% diff b1.hex b2.hex
or
% vimdiff b1.hex b2.hex
63
In Bash:diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.
– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
This worked great for me (withopendiff
on OS X instead ofvimdiff
) — the default viewxxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit withfold
,diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.
– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified bydiff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
As ~quack pointed out:
% xxd b1 > b1.hex
% xxd b2 > b2.hex
And then
% diff b1.hex b2.hex
or
% vimdiff b1.hex b2.hex
As ~quack pointed out:
% xxd b1 > b1.hex
% xxd b2 > b2.hex
And then
% diff b1.hex b2.hex
or
% vimdiff b1.hex b2.hex
edited Feb 15 '18 at 13:37
answered Mar 29 '10 at 16:07
akiraakira
49k15112152
49k15112152
63
In Bash:diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.
– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
This worked great for me (withopendiff
on OS X instead ofvimdiff
) — the default viewxxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit withfold
,diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.
– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified bydiff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
63
In Bash:diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.
– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
This worked great for me (withopendiff
on OS X instead ofvimdiff
) — the default viewxxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit withfold
,diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.
– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified bydiff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
63
63
In Bash:
diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
In Bash:
diff <(xxd b1) <(xxd b2)
but the output format of this (or yours) is nowhere near what the OP asked for.– Dennis Williamson
Mar 29 '10 at 16:33
6
6
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
with vimdiff it is, it will color the bytes in the lines where the two 'files' differ
– akira
Mar 30 '10 at 4:45
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
Aww, why didn't I think of that? And I'm sure I've used this technique in the past too.
– njd
Mar 30 '10 at 17:37
1
1
This worked great for me (with
opendiff
on OS X instead of vimdiff
) — the default view xxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit with fold
, diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
This worked great for me (with
opendiff
on OS X instead of vimdiff
) — the default view xxd
provides keeps the diff engine on track comparing byte-by-byte. With plain (raw) hex simply column-fit with fold
, diff
would try to fold/group random stuff in the files I was comparing.– natevw
Nov 15 '14 at 23:26
1
1
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified by
diff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
This command does not work well for byte addition removal, as every line that follows will be misaligned and seen as modified by
diff
. The solution is to put 1 byte per line and remove the address column as proposed by John Lawrence Aspden and me.– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Apr 4 '15 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
Try diff
in the following combination of zsh/bash process substitution and colordiff
in CLI:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin) | colordiff
Where:
-y
shows you differences side-by-side (optional)
xxd
is CLI tool to create a hexdump output of the binary file
colordiff
will colorizediff
output (install via:sudo apt-get install colordiff
)- add
-W200
todiff
for wider output (of 200 characters per line)
Hints:
- if files are too big, add limit (e.g.
-l1000
) for eachxxd
Sample output:
10
Command can be simplified ascolordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.
– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the-q
or--brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.
– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
create a functionxxddiff
for this with:xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
great! still,diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug
– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
Try diff
in the following combination of zsh/bash process substitution and colordiff
in CLI:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin) | colordiff
Where:
-y
shows you differences side-by-side (optional)
xxd
is CLI tool to create a hexdump output of the binary file
colordiff
will colorizediff
output (install via:sudo apt-get install colordiff
)- add
-W200
todiff
for wider output (of 200 characters per line)
Hints:
- if files are too big, add limit (e.g.
-l1000
) for eachxxd
Sample output:
10
Command can be simplified ascolordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.
– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the-q
or--brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.
– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
create a functionxxddiff
for this with:xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
great! still,diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug
– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
Try diff
in the following combination of zsh/bash process substitution and colordiff
in CLI:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin) | colordiff
Where:
-y
shows you differences side-by-side (optional)
xxd
is CLI tool to create a hexdump output of the binary file
colordiff
will colorizediff
output (install via:sudo apt-get install colordiff
)- add
-W200
todiff
for wider output (of 200 characters per line)
Hints:
- if files are too big, add limit (e.g.
-l1000
) for eachxxd
Sample output:
Try diff
in the following combination of zsh/bash process substitution and colordiff
in CLI:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin) | colordiff
Where:
-y
shows you differences side-by-side (optional)
xxd
is CLI tool to create a hexdump output of the binary file
colordiff
will colorizediff
output (install via:sudo apt-get install colordiff
)- add
-W200
todiff
for wider output (of 200 characters per line)
Hints:
- if files are too big, add limit (e.g.
-l1000
) for eachxxd
Sample output:
edited Jan 30 at 4:22
The Matt
1013
1013
answered Sep 5 '15 at 21:14
kenorbkenorb
11.2k1578116
11.2k1578116
10
Command can be simplified ascolordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.
– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the-q
or--brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.
– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
create a functionxxddiff
for this with:xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
great! still,diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug
– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
10
Command can be simplified ascolordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.
– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the-q
or--brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.
– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
create a functionxxddiff
for this with:xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
great! still,diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug
– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
10
10
Command can be simplified as
colordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
Command can be simplified as
colordiff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
.– golem
Nov 17 '15 at 22:46
3
3
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
If you don't have colordiff, this will do the same thing without colors:
diff -y <(xxd foo1.bin) <(xxd foo2.bin)
– Rock Lee
Aug 4 '16 at 15:25
5
5
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the
-q
or --brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
If you just want to know whether both files are actually the same, you can use the
-q
or --brief
switch, which will only show output when the files differ.– Stefan van den Akker
Oct 8 '16 at 11:14
1
1
create a function
xxddiff
for this with: xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
create a function
xxddiff
for this with: xxddiff() ( f() ( xxd "$1" ; ); diff -y <(f "$1") <(f "$2") | colordiff; )
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:35
2
2
great! still,
diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
great! still,
diff -u <(xxd tinga.tgz) <(xxd dec.out.tinga.tgz) | vim -
will do a job good enoug– ribamar
Jun 1 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
There's a tool called DHEX which may do the job, and there's another tool called VBinDiff.
For a strictly command-line approach, try JDIFF.
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
|
show 3 more comments
There's a tool called DHEX which may do the job, and there's another tool called VBinDiff.
For a strictly command-line approach, try JDIFF.
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
|
show 3 more comments
There's a tool called DHEX which may do the job, and there's another tool called VBinDiff.
For a strictly command-line approach, try JDIFF.
There's a tool called DHEX which may do the job, and there's another tool called VBinDiff.
For a strictly command-line approach, try JDIFF.
edited Jun 8 '14 at 9:03
Peter Mortensen
8,376166185
8,376166185
answered Mar 29 '10 at 15:41
njdnjd
9,18313034
9,18313034
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
|
show 3 more comments
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
8
8
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
DHEX is awesome is comparing binaries is what you want to do. Feed it two files and it takes you right to a comparative view, highlighting to differences, with easy ability to move to the next difference. Also it's able to work with large terminals, which is very useful on widescreen monitors.
– Marcin
Sep 8 '11 at 0:08
6
6
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
I prefer VBinDiff. DHEX is using CPU even when idling, I think it's redrawing all the time or something. VBinDiff doesn't work with wide terminals though. But the addresses become weird with wide terminals anyway, since you have more than 16 bytes per row.
– Janus Troelsen
Oct 17 '12 at 14:22
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
vbindiff lets us actually edit the file, thx!
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:28
2
2
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
@DanielBeauyat compressed files will be completely different after you encounter the first different byte. The output is not likely to be useful.
– Mark Ransom
Aug 5 '15 at 3:12
2
2
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
@1111161171159459134 jdiff is part of a "suite" of programs to sync and patch the differences found by jdiff. But, as Mark Ransom said, that would be generally not wise on compressed files; the exception is "synchronizable" compressed formats (like that produced by gzip --rsyncable), in which small differences in the uncompressed files should have a limited effect on the compressed file.
– hmijail
Feb 13 '16 at 11:12
|
show 3 more comments
Method that works for byte addition / deletion
diff <(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file1)
<(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file2)
Generate a test case with a single removal of byte 64:
for i in `seq 128`; do printf "%02x" "$i"; done | xxd -r -p > file1
for i in `seq 128`; do if [ "$i" -ne 64 ]; then printf "%02x" $i; fi; done | xxd -r -p > file2
Output:
64d63
< 40
If you also want to see the ASCII version of the character:
bdiff() (
f() (
od -An -tx1c -w1 -v "$1" | paste -d '' - -
)
diff <(f "$1") <(f "$2")
)
bdiff file1 file2
Output:
64d63
< 40 @
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
I prefer od
over xxd
because:
- it is POSIX,
xxd
is not (comes with Vim) - has the
-An
to remove the address column withoutawk
.
Command explanation:
-An
removes the address column. This is important otherwise all lines would differ after a byte addition / removal.
-w1
puts one byte per line, so that diff can consume it. It is crucial to have one byte per line, or else every line after a deletion would become out of phase and differ. Unfortunately, this is not POSIX, but present in GNU.
-tx1
is the representation you want, change to any possible value, as long as you keep 1 byte per line.
-v
prevents asterisk repetition abbreviation*
which might interfere with the diff
paste -d '' - -
joins every two lines. We need it because the hex and ASCII go into separate adjacent lines. Taken from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8987257/concatenating-every-other-line-with-the-next
- we use parenthesis
()
to definebdiff
instead of{}
to limit the scope of the inner functionf
, see also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8426077/how-to-define-a-function-inside-another-function-in-bash
See also:
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/59849/diff-binary-files-of-different-sizes
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8385618/using-cmp-to-compare-two-binaries
add a comment |
Method that works for byte addition / deletion
diff <(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file1)
<(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file2)
Generate a test case with a single removal of byte 64:
for i in `seq 128`; do printf "%02x" "$i"; done | xxd -r -p > file1
for i in `seq 128`; do if [ "$i" -ne 64 ]; then printf "%02x" $i; fi; done | xxd -r -p > file2
Output:
64d63
< 40
If you also want to see the ASCII version of the character:
bdiff() (
f() (
od -An -tx1c -w1 -v "$1" | paste -d '' - -
)
diff <(f "$1") <(f "$2")
)
bdiff file1 file2
Output:
64d63
< 40 @
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
I prefer od
over xxd
because:
- it is POSIX,
xxd
is not (comes with Vim) - has the
-An
to remove the address column withoutawk
.
Command explanation:
-An
removes the address column. This is important otherwise all lines would differ after a byte addition / removal.
-w1
puts one byte per line, so that diff can consume it. It is crucial to have one byte per line, or else every line after a deletion would become out of phase and differ. Unfortunately, this is not POSIX, but present in GNU.
-tx1
is the representation you want, change to any possible value, as long as you keep 1 byte per line.
-v
prevents asterisk repetition abbreviation*
which might interfere with the diff
paste -d '' - -
joins every two lines. We need it because the hex and ASCII go into separate adjacent lines. Taken from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8987257/concatenating-every-other-line-with-the-next
- we use parenthesis
()
to definebdiff
instead of{}
to limit the scope of the inner functionf
, see also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8426077/how-to-define-a-function-inside-another-function-in-bash
See also:
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/59849/diff-binary-files-of-different-sizes
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8385618/using-cmp-to-compare-two-binaries
add a comment |
Method that works for byte addition / deletion
diff <(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file1)
<(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file2)
Generate a test case with a single removal of byte 64:
for i in `seq 128`; do printf "%02x" "$i"; done | xxd -r -p > file1
for i in `seq 128`; do if [ "$i" -ne 64 ]; then printf "%02x" $i; fi; done | xxd -r -p > file2
Output:
64d63
< 40
If you also want to see the ASCII version of the character:
bdiff() (
f() (
od -An -tx1c -w1 -v "$1" | paste -d '' - -
)
diff <(f "$1") <(f "$2")
)
bdiff file1 file2
Output:
64d63
< 40 @
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
I prefer od
over xxd
because:
- it is POSIX,
xxd
is not (comes with Vim) - has the
-An
to remove the address column withoutawk
.
Command explanation:
-An
removes the address column. This is important otherwise all lines would differ after a byte addition / removal.
-w1
puts one byte per line, so that diff can consume it. It is crucial to have one byte per line, or else every line after a deletion would become out of phase and differ. Unfortunately, this is not POSIX, but present in GNU.
-tx1
is the representation you want, change to any possible value, as long as you keep 1 byte per line.
-v
prevents asterisk repetition abbreviation*
which might interfere with the diff
paste -d '' - -
joins every two lines. We need it because the hex and ASCII go into separate adjacent lines. Taken from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8987257/concatenating-every-other-line-with-the-next
- we use parenthesis
()
to definebdiff
instead of{}
to limit the scope of the inner functionf
, see also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8426077/how-to-define-a-function-inside-another-function-in-bash
See also:
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/59849/diff-binary-files-of-different-sizes
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8385618/using-cmp-to-compare-two-binaries
Method that works for byte addition / deletion
diff <(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file1)
<(od -An -tx1 -w1 -v file2)
Generate a test case with a single removal of byte 64:
for i in `seq 128`; do printf "%02x" "$i"; done | xxd -r -p > file1
for i in `seq 128`; do if [ "$i" -ne 64 ]; then printf "%02x" $i; fi; done | xxd -r -p > file2
Output:
64d63
< 40
If you also want to see the ASCII version of the character:
bdiff() (
f() (
od -An -tx1c -w1 -v "$1" | paste -d '' - -
)
diff <(f "$1") <(f "$2")
)
bdiff file1 file2
Output:
64d63
< 40 @
Tested on Ubuntu 16.04.
I prefer od
over xxd
because:
- it is POSIX,
xxd
is not (comes with Vim) - has the
-An
to remove the address column withoutawk
.
Command explanation:
-An
removes the address column. This is important otherwise all lines would differ after a byte addition / removal.
-w1
puts one byte per line, so that diff can consume it. It is crucial to have one byte per line, or else every line after a deletion would become out of phase and differ. Unfortunately, this is not POSIX, but present in GNU.
-tx1
is the representation you want, change to any possible value, as long as you keep 1 byte per line.
-v
prevents asterisk repetition abbreviation*
which might interfere with the diff
paste -d '' - -
joins every two lines. We need it because the hex and ASCII go into separate adjacent lines. Taken from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8987257/concatenating-every-other-line-with-the-next
- we use parenthesis
()
to definebdiff
instead of{}
to limit the scope of the inner functionf
, see also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8426077/how-to-define-a-function-inside-another-function-in-bash
See also:
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/59849/diff-binary-files-of-different-sizes
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8385618/using-cmp-to-compare-two-binaries
edited Nov 9 '17 at 12:30
answered Apr 4 '15 at 20:31
Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
4,06622735
4,06622735
add a comment |
add a comment |
Short answer
vimdiff <(xxd -c1 -p first.bin) <(xxd -c1 -p second.bin)
When using hexdumps and text diff to compare binary files, especially xxd
, the additions and removals of bytes become shifts in addressing which might make it difficult to see. This method tells xxd to not output addresses, and to output only one byte per line, which in turn shows exactly which bytes were changed, added, or removed. You can find the addresses later by searching for the interesting sequences of bytes in a more "normal" hexdump (output of xxd first.bin
).
(Of course, one may usediff
instead ofvimdiff
.)
– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
add a comment |
Short answer
vimdiff <(xxd -c1 -p first.bin) <(xxd -c1 -p second.bin)
When using hexdumps and text diff to compare binary files, especially xxd
, the additions and removals of bytes become shifts in addressing which might make it difficult to see. This method tells xxd to not output addresses, and to output only one byte per line, which in turn shows exactly which bytes were changed, added, or removed. You can find the addresses later by searching for the interesting sequences of bytes in a more "normal" hexdump (output of xxd first.bin
).
(Of course, one may usediff
instead ofvimdiff
.)
– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
add a comment |
Short answer
vimdiff <(xxd -c1 -p first.bin) <(xxd -c1 -p second.bin)
When using hexdumps and text diff to compare binary files, especially xxd
, the additions and removals of bytes become shifts in addressing which might make it difficult to see. This method tells xxd to not output addresses, and to output only one byte per line, which in turn shows exactly which bytes were changed, added, or removed. You can find the addresses later by searching for the interesting sequences of bytes in a more "normal" hexdump (output of xxd first.bin
).
Short answer
vimdiff <(xxd -c1 -p first.bin) <(xxd -c1 -p second.bin)
When using hexdumps and text diff to compare binary files, especially xxd
, the additions and removals of bytes become shifts in addressing which might make it difficult to see. This method tells xxd to not output addresses, and to output only one byte per line, which in turn shows exactly which bytes were changed, added, or removed. You can find the addresses later by searching for the interesting sequences of bytes in a more "normal" hexdump (output of xxd first.bin
).
answered Apr 22 '15 at 12:10
EvgenyEvgeny
6501711
6501711
(Of course, one may usediff
instead ofvimdiff
.)
– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
add a comment |
(Of course, one may usediff
instead ofvimdiff
.)
– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
(Of course, one may use
diff
instead of vimdiff
.)– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
(Of course, one may use
diff
instead of vimdiff
.)– VasyaNovikov
Dec 15 '15 at 17:35
add a comment |
I'd recommend hexdump for dumping binary files to textual format and kdiff3 for diff viewing.
hexdump myfile1.bin > myfile1.hex
hexdump myfile2.bin > myfile2.hex
kdiff3 myfile1.hex myfile2.hex
2
Even here in bashkdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create filesmyfile1.hex
andmyfile2.hex
.
– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
add a comment |
I'd recommend hexdump for dumping binary files to textual format and kdiff3 for diff viewing.
hexdump myfile1.bin > myfile1.hex
hexdump myfile2.bin > myfile2.hex
kdiff3 myfile1.hex myfile2.hex
2
Even here in bashkdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create filesmyfile1.hex
andmyfile2.hex
.
– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
add a comment |
I'd recommend hexdump for dumping binary files to textual format and kdiff3 for diff viewing.
hexdump myfile1.bin > myfile1.hex
hexdump myfile2.bin > myfile2.hex
kdiff3 myfile1.hex myfile2.hex
I'd recommend hexdump for dumping binary files to textual format and kdiff3 for diff viewing.
hexdump myfile1.bin > myfile1.hex
hexdump myfile2.bin > myfile2.hex
kdiff3 myfile1.hex myfile2.hex
answered Jun 12 '13 at 7:46
BugoKBugoK
11114
11114
2
Even here in bashkdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create filesmyfile1.hex
andmyfile2.hex
.
– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
add a comment |
2
Even here in bashkdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create filesmyfile1.hex
andmyfile2.hex
.
– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
2
2
Even here in bash
kdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create files myfile1.hex
and myfile2.hex
.– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
Even here in bash
kdiff3 <(hexdump myfile1.bin) <(hexdump myfile2.bin)
with no need to create files myfile1.hex
and myfile2.hex
.– Hastur
Jan 25 '16 at 14:34
add a comment |
The hexdiff
is a program designed to do exactly what you're looking for.
Usage:
hexdiff file1 file2
It displays the hex (and 7-bit ASCII) of the two files one above the other, with any differences highlighted. Look at man hexdiff
for the commands to move around in the file, and a simple q
will quit.
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
add a comment |
The hexdiff
is a program designed to do exactly what you're looking for.
Usage:
hexdiff file1 file2
It displays the hex (and 7-bit ASCII) of the two files one above the other, with any differences highlighted. Look at man hexdiff
for the commands to move around in the file, and a simple q
will quit.
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
add a comment |
The hexdiff
is a program designed to do exactly what you're looking for.
Usage:
hexdiff file1 file2
It displays the hex (and 7-bit ASCII) of the two files one above the other, with any differences highlighted. Look at man hexdiff
for the commands to move around in the file, and a simple q
will quit.
The hexdiff
is a program designed to do exactly what you're looking for.
Usage:
hexdiff file1 file2
It displays the hex (and 7-bit ASCII) of the two files one above the other, with any differences highlighted. Look at man hexdiff
for the commands to move around in the file, and a simple q
will quit.
edited Nov 3 '15 at 16:42
kenorb
11.2k1578116
11.2k1578116
answered Oct 7 '15 at 4:11
MickMick
10111
10111
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
add a comment |
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
4
4
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
But it does a pretty bad job when it comes to the comparing part. If you insert some bytes into a file, it will mark all byte afterwards as changes
– Murmel
Apr 27 '16 at 19:43
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
and hexdiff is not available via apt-get on Ubuntu 16.4
– rubo77
Nov 14 '16 at 6:38
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@Murmel while I agree, isn't that what's being asked here?
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:00
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
@EvanCarroll true, and hence I left a comment (only) and did not downvote
– Murmel
Nov 9 '18 at 17:52
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
I also didn't down vote Mick, but I agree with you and answered here superuser.com/a/1373977/11116 because it seems likely that this bad question will get reformed or closed.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 19:06
add a comment |
It may not strictly answer the question, but I use this for diffing binaries:
gvim -d <(xxd -c 1 ~/file1.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}') <(xxd -c 1 ~/file2.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}')
It prints both files out as hex and ASCII values, one byte per line, and then uses Vim's diff facility to render them visually.
add a comment |
It may not strictly answer the question, but I use this for diffing binaries:
gvim -d <(xxd -c 1 ~/file1.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}') <(xxd -c 1 ~/file2.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}')
It prints both files out as hex and ASCII values, one byte per line, and then uses Vim's diff facility to render them visually.
add a comment |
It may not strictly answer the question, but I use this for diffing binaries:
gvim -d <(xxd -c 1 ~/file1.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}') <(xxd -c 1 ~/file2.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}')
It prints both files out as hex and ASCII values, one byte per line, and then uses Vim's diff facility to render them visually.
It may not strictly answer the question, but I use this for diffing binaries:
gvim -d <(xxd -c 1 ~/file1.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}') <(xxd -c 1 ~/file2.bin | awk '{print $2, $3}')
It prints both files out as hex and ASCII values, one byte per line, and then uses Vim's diff facility to render them visually.
edited Jun 8 '14 at 9:02
Peter Mortensen
8,376166185
8,376166185
answered Sep 7 '11 at 15:47
John Lawrence AspdenJohn Lawrence Aspden
4532719
4532719
add a comment |
add a comment |
dhex http://www.dettus.net/dhex/
DHEX is a more than just another hex editor: It includes a diff mode, which can be used to easily and conveniently compare two binary files. Since it is based on ncurses and is themeable, it can run on any number of systems and scenarios. With its utilization of search logs, it is possible to track changes in different iterations of files easily.
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
add a comment |
dhex http://www.dettus.net/dhex/
DHEX is a more than just another hex editor: It includes a diff mode, which can be used to easily and conveniently compare two binary files. Since it is based on ncurses and is themeable, it can run on any number of systems and scenarios. With its utilization of search logs, it is possible to track changes in different iterations of files easily.
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
add a comment |
dhex http://www.dettus.net/dhex/
DHEX is a more than just another hex editor: It includes a diff mode, which can be used to easily and conveniently compare two binary files. Since it is based on ncurses and is themeable, it can run on any number of systems and scenarios. With its utilization of search logs, it is possible to track changes in different iterations of files easily.
dhex http://www.dettus.net/dhex/
DHEX is a more than just another hex editor: It includes a diff mode, which can be used to easily and conveniently compare two binary files. Since it is based on ncurses and is themeable, it can run on any number of systems and scenarios. With its utilization of search logs, it is possible to track changes in different iterations of files easily.
answered Aug 18 '17 at 11:25
Vincent VegaVincent Vega
1
1
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
add a comment |
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
Welcome to SuperUser! Although this software looks like it could solve the OP's problem, pure advertisement is strongly frowned upon on the Stack Exchange network. If you are affiliated to this software's editor, please disclose this fact. And try to rewrite your post so that it looks less like a commercial. Thank you.
– Nathan.Eilisha Shiraini
Aug 18 '17 at 13:31
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
I am not affiliated with dhex in any way. I copied the author's description into the post because there is minimum post length limit
– Vincent Vega
Aug 19 '17 at 13:59
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
Already mentioned at: superuser.com/a/125390/128124
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功
Sep 7 '17 at 8:36
add a comment |
You can use gvimdiff tool that is included in vim-gui-common package
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim-gui-common
Then you can compare 2 hex files using following commands :
ubuntu> gvimdiff <hex-file1> <hex-file2>
Tha's all. Hope tha help !
add a comment |
You can use gvimdiff tool that is included in vim-gui-common package
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim-gui-common
Then you can compare 2 hex files using following commands :
ubuntu> gvimdiff <hex-file1> <hex-file2>
Tha's all. Hope tha help !
add a comment |
You can use gvimdiff tool that is included in vim-gui-common package
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim-gui-common
Then you can compare 2 hex files using following commands :
ubuntu> gvimdiff <hex-file1> <hex-file2>
Tha's all. Hope tha help !
You can use gvimdiff tool that is included in vim-gui-common package
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install vim-gui-common
Then you can compare 2 hex files using following commands :
ubuntu> gvimdiff <hex-file1> <hex-file2>
Tha's all. Hope tha help !
answered Oct 8 '18 at 13:52
crakencraken
101
101
add a comment |
add a comment |
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/03/bindiff-now-available-for-free.html
BinDiff is a great UI tool for comparing binary files that has been open sourced recently.
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
add a comment |
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/03/bindiff-now-available-for-free.html
BinDiff is a great UI tool for comparing binary files that has been open sourced recently.
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
add a comment |
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/03/bindiff-now-available-for-free.html
BinDiff is a great UI tool for comparing binary files that has been open sourced recently.
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/03/bindiff-now-available-for-free.html
BinDiff is a great UI tool for comparing binary files that has been open sourced recently.
answered Mar 23 '16 at 20:18
EvgenyEvgeny
6501711
6501711
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
add a comment |
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
3
3
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
Can it be used on arbitrary binary files, though? That page seems to indicate that it's only useful for comparing executables that have been disassembled by Hex-Rays IDA Pro.
– eswald
Apr 29 '16 at 22:57
add a comment |
The go to open source product on Linux (and everything else) is Radare which provides radiff2
explicitly for this purpose. I voted to close this because myself and others have the same question, in the question you ask
for every different byte
That's insane though. Because as asked, if you insert one byte at the first byte in the file, you'd find every subsequent byte was different and so the diff would repeat the whole file, for an actual difference of one byte.
Slightly more practical is radiff -O
. The -O
is for ""Do code diffing with all bytes instead of just the fixed opcode bytes""
0x000000a4 0c01 => 3802 0x000000a4
0x000000a8 1401 => 3802 0x000000a8
0x000000ac 06 => 05 0x000000ac
0x000000b4 02 => 01 0x000000b4
0x000000b8 4c05 => 0020 0x000000b8
0x000000bc 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000bc
0x000000c0 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000c0
Like IDA Pro, Radare is a tool primary for binary analysis, you can also show delta diffing with -d
, or display the disassembled bytes instead of hex with -D
.
If you're asking these kind of questions though, check out
- Stack Overflow for the software questions,
- Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange
- Radare's
radiff2
for binary diffing
add a comment |
The go to open source product on Linux (and everything else) is Radare which provides radiff2
explicitly for this purpose. I voted to close this because myself and others have the same question, in the question you ask
for every different byte
That's insane though. Because as asked, if you insert one byte at the first byte in the file, you'd find every subsequent byte was different and so the diff would repeat the whole file, for an actual difference of one byte.
Slightly more practical is radiff -O
. The -O
is for ""Do code diffing with all bytes instead of just the fixed opcode bytes""
0x000000a4 0c01 => 3802 0x000000a4
0x000000a8 1401 => 3802 0x000000a8
0x000000ac 06 => 05 0x000000ac
0x000000b4 02 => 01 0x000000b4
0x000000b8 4c05 => 0020 0x000000b8
0x000000bc 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000bc
0x000000c0 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000c0
Like IDA Pro, Radare is a tool primary for binary analysis, you can also show delta diffing with -d
, or display the disassembled bytes instead of hex with -D
.
If you're asking these kind of questions though, check out
- Stack Overflow for the software questions,
- Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange
- Radare's
radiff2
for binary diffing
add a comment |
The go to open source product on Linux (and everything else) is Radare which provides radiff2
explicitly for this purpose. I voted to close this because myself and others have the same question, in the question you ask
for every different byte
That's insane though. Because as asked, if you insert one byte at the first byte in the file, you'd find every subsequent byte was different and so the diff would repeat the whole file, for an actual difference of one byte.
Slightly more practical is radiff -O
. The -O
is for ""Do code diffing with all bytes instead of just the fixed opcode bytes""
0x000000a4 0c01 => 3802 0x000000a4
0x000000a8 1401 => 3802 0x000000a8
0x000000ac 06 => 05 0x000000ac
0x000000b4 02 => 01 0x000000b4
0x000000b8 4c05 => 0020 0x000000b8
0x000000bc 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000bc
0x000000c0 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000c0
Like IDA Pro, Radare is a tool primary for binary analysis, you can also show delta diffing with -d
, or display the disassembled bytes instead of hex with -D
.
If you're asking these kind of questions though, check out
- Stack Overflow for the software questions,
- Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange
- Radare's
radiff2
for binary diffing
The go to open source product on Linux (and everything else) is Radare which provides radiff2
explicitly for this purpose. I voted to close this because myself and others have the same question, in the question you ask
for every different byte
That's insane though. Because as asked, if you insert one byte at the first byte in the file, you'd find every subsequent byte was different and so the diff would repeat the whole file, for an actual difference of one byte.
Slightly more practical is radiff -O
. The -O
is for ""Do code diffing with all bytes instead of just the fixed opcode bytes""
0x000000a4 0c01 => 3802 0x000000a4
0x000000a8 1401 => 3802 0x000000a8
0x000000ac 06 => 05 0x000000ac
0x000000b4 02 => 01 0x000000b4
0x000000b8 4c05 => 0020 0x000000b8
0x000000bc 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000bc
0x000000c0 4c95 => 00a0 0x000000c0
Like IDA Pro, Radare is a tool primary for binary analysis, you can also show delta diffing with -d
, or display the disassembled bytes instead of hex with -D
.
If you're asking these kind of questions though, check out
- Stack Overflow for the software questions,
- Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange
- Radare's
radiff2
for binary diffing
answered Nov 9 '18 at 4:18
Evan CarrollEvan Carroll
4,294853105
4,294853105
add a comment |
add a comment |
I recommend IDA Pro to analyse the binary files. Comparison can then be done using a plug-in for IDA such as BinDiff.
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
add a comment |
I recommend IDA Pro to analyse the binary files. Comparison can then be done using a plug-in for IDA such as BinDiff.
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
add a comment |
I recommend IDA Pro to analyse the binary files. Comparison can then be done using a plug-in for IDA such as BinDiff.
I recommend IDA Pro to analyse the binary files. Comparison can then be done using a plug-in for IDA such as BinDiff.
answered Dec 30 '13 at 15:04
user3119546user3119546
11517
11517
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
add a comment |
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
1
1
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
I would have to buy to test it right?
– Aquarius Power
Sep 16 '14 at 18:17
1
1
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
@AquariusPower Not necessarily, IDA Pro does have a Free Version
– user3119546
Sep 19 '14 at 1:19
7
7
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
but it is not for linux! :(
– Aquarius Power
Sep 19 '14 at 20:08
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
I've used quite a few different free versions of IDA Pro under Wine without issues, if I recall correctly.
– doshea
May 17 '15 at 5:42
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
This has been open sourced recently security.googleblog.com/2016/03/…
– Evgeny
Mar 23 '16 at 20:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f125376%2fhow-do-i-compare-binary-files-in-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
9
you're basically looking for "binary diff". i can imagine some reeeally ugly commandline one-liner with
od
...– quack quixote
Mar 29 '10 at 15:36
2
@quack quixote: What's ugly about a one-liner? ;)
– Bobby
Mar 29 '10 at 16:50
xdelta.org works quite well. Perhaps it'd be worth having a look at it.
– thatjuan
Oct 10 '13 at 5:31
Because you can't answer this question (as you're not a user), I'm voting to close. A binary diff as explicitly requested here isn't at all useful, and I'm inclined to think you want something useful, if you insert one byte at the start of the file should all bytes be marked as being different? Without knowing that, this is simply too vague.
– Evan Carroll
Nov 9 '18 at 4:02
2
@EvanCarroll If you think the question is off topic why are you answering it?
– DavidPostill♦
Nov 26 '18 at 21:07