How does `mbuffer -T` work?












2















I'm currently trying to make a tar backup to a tape with mbuffer acting as a buffer between e.g:



tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 8G -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k


But the buffer is still empty about 10-20 times. So I wanted to use a file based buffer with the following command:



tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k 


My understanding was, that the option -T would create a file at the given location and use it as a read/write buffer.



But no file is created, and on one system mbuffer just hangs.




  • Am I missing something?

  • Does mbuffer create the file in a special way?

  • Does mbuffer create the file in another directory?

  • Does mbuffer extend/use the swap in some way?


As far as I read in the source of mbuffer (settings.c) mbuffer allocs space of the size of the tmpfile via malloc().



Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?










share|improve this question









New contributor




bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    I'm currently trying to make a tar backup to a tape with mbuffer acting as a buffer between e.g:



    tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 8G -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k


    But the buffer is still empty about 10-20 times. So I wanted to use a file based buffer with the following command:



    tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k 


    My understanding was, that the option -T would create a file at the given location and use it as a read/write buffer.



    But no file is created, and on one system mbuffer just hangs.




    • Am I missing something?

    • Does mbuffer create the file in a special way?

    • Does mbuffer create the file in another directory?

    • Does mbuffer extend/use the swap in some way?


    As far as I read in the source of mbuffer (settings.c) mbuffer allocs space of the size of the tmpfile via malloc().



    Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      2












      2








      2








      I'm currently trying to make a tar backup to a tape with mbuffer acting as a buffer between e.g:



      tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 8G -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k


      But the buffer is still empty about 10-20 times. So I wanted to use a file based buffer with the following command:



      tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k 


      My understanding was, that the option -T would create a file at the given location and use it as a read/write buffer.



      But no file is created, and on one system mbuffer just hangs.




      • Am I missing something?

      • Does mbuffer create the file in a special way?

      • Does mbuffer create the file in another directory?

      • Does mbuffer extend/use the swap in some way?


      As far as I read in the source of mbuffer (settings.c) mbuffer allocs space of the size of the tmpfile via malloc().



      Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I'm currently trying to make a tar backup to a tape with mbuffer acting as a buffer between e.g:



      tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 8G -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k


      But the buffer is still empty about 10-20 times. So I wanted to use a file based buffer with the following command:



      tar --acls -c /var/test | mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer -P 100% -R 100M | dd of=/dev/nst0 bs=256k 


      My understanding was, that the option -T would create a file at the given location and use it as a read/write buffer.



      But no file is created, and on one system mbuffer just hangs.




      • Am I missing something?

      • Does mbuffer create the file in a special way?

      • Does mbuffer create the file in another directory?

      • Does mbuffer extend/use the swap in some way?


      As far as I read in the source of mbuffer (settings.c) mbuffer allocs space of the size of the tmpfile via malloc().



      Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?







      ubuntu command-line






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Kamil Maciorowski

      1,5391827




      1,5391827






      New contributor




      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Jan 14 at 23:09









      bpfrhbpfrh

      133




      133




      New contributor




      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      bpfrh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0















          no file is created




          mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer creates a file, opens it and unlinks it right after. If you check the file descriptors in /proc/<PID of mbuffer>/fd you will find one that points to



          /srv/testbuffer (deleted)


          This is quite a standard trick when it comes to temporary files. If mbuffer terminates for whatever reason (even if brutally killed), the filesystem will eventually free the space (in the worst case of power failure or kernel panic: after fsck in the future). There's no risk a totally unused, abandoned file will occupy your diskspace forever.




          on one system mbuffer just hangs




          The tool actually reserves diskspace like fallocate (not just creates a sparse file like truncate) before it starts its main job of buffering data. Allocating a large file may take time. This delay depends on the filesystem type, possible fragmentation etc.




          Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?




          No. The file exists in the filesystem appropriate for the chosen path (/srv/testbuffer in your case), but the path no longer exists. (Note: a new file with the same path will be a separate file with different inode number).






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

            – bpfrh
            2 days ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          bpfrh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494511%2fhow-does-mbuffer-t-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0















          no file is created




          mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer creates a file, opens it and unlinks it right after. If you check the file descriptors in /proc/<PID of mbuffer>/fd you will find one that points to



          /srv/testbuffer (deleted)


          This is quite a standard trick when it comes to temporary files. If mbuffer terminates for whatever reason (even if brutally killed), the filesystem will eventually free the space (in the worst case of power failure or kernel panic: after fsck in the future). There's no risk a totally unused, abandoned file will occupy your diskspace forever.




          on one system mbuffer just hangs




          The tool actually reserves diskspace like fallocate (not just creates a sparse file like truncate) before it starts its main job of buffering data. Allocating a large file may take time. This delay depends on the filesystem type, possible fragmentation etc.




          Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?




          No. The file exists in the filesystem appropriate for the chosen path (/srv/testbuffer in your case), but the path no longer exists. (Note: a new file with the same path will be a separate file with different inode number).






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

            – bpfrh
            2 days ago
















          0















          no file is created




          mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer creates a file, opens it and unlinks it right after. If you check the file descriptors in /proc/<PID of mbuffer>/fd you will find one that points to



          /srv/testbuffer (deleted)


          This is quite a standard trick when it comes to temporary files. If mbuffer terminates for whatever reason (even if brutally killed), the filesystem will eventually free the space (in the worst case of power failure or kernel panic: after fsck in the future). There's no risk a totally unused, abandoned file will occupy your diskspace forever.




          on one system mbuffer just hangs




          The tool actually reserves diskspace like fallocate (not just creates a sparse file like truncate) before it starts its main job of buffering data. Allocating a large file may take time. This delay depends on the filesystem type, possible fragmentation etc.




          Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?




          No. The file exists in the filesystem appropriate for the chosen path (/srv/testbuffer in your case), but the path no longer exists. (Note: a new file with the same path will be a separate file with different inode number).






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

            – bpfrh
            2 days ago














          0












          0








          0








          no file is created




          mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer creates a file, opens it and unlinks it right after. If you check the file descriptors in /proc/<PID of mbuffer>/fd you will find one that points to



          /srv/testbuffer (deleted)


          This is quite a standard trick when it comes to temporary files. If mbuffer terminates for whatever reason (even if brutally killed), the filesystem will eventually free the space (in the worst case of power failure or kernel panic: after fsck in the future). There's no risk a totally unused, abandoned file will occupy your diskspace forever.




          on one system mbuffer just hangs




          The tool actually reserves diskspace like fallocate (not just creates a sparse file like truncate) before it starts its main job of buffering data. Allocating a large file may take time. This delay depends on the filesystem type, possible fragmentation etc.




          Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?




          No. The file exists in the filesystem appropriate for the chosen path (/srv/testbuffer in your case), but the path no longer exists. (Note: a new file with the same path will be a separate file with different inode number).






          share|improve this answer
















          no file is created




          mbuffer -m 60G -T /srv/testbuffer creates a file, opens it and unlinks it right after. If you check the file descriptors in /proc/<PID of mbuffer>/fd you will find one that points to



          /srv/testbuffer (deleted)


          This is quite a standard trick when it comes to temporary files. If mbuffer terminates for whatever reason (even if brutally killed), the filesystem will eventually free the space (in the worst case of power failure or kernel panic: after fsck in the future). There's no risk a totally unused, abandoned file will occupy your diskspace forever.




          on one system mbuffer just hangs




          The tool actually reserves diskspace like fallocate (not just creates a sparse file like truncate) before it starts its main job of buffering data. Allocating a large file may take time. This delay depends on the filesystem type, possible fragmentation etc.




          Does that mean that I still need the same amount of RAM, or at least swap, as if I would use it without the -T parameter?




          No. The file exists in the filesystem appropriate for the chosen path (/srv/testbuffer in your case), but the path no longer exists. (Note: a new file with the same path will be a separate file with different inode number).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          Kamil MaciorowskiKamil Maciorowski

          1,5391827




          1,5391827













          • Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

            – bpfrh
            2 days ago



















          • Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

            – bpfrh
            2 days ago

















          Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

          – bpfrh
          2 days ago





          Thanks, I also wrote to the maintainer of mbuffer and he gave me the same explanation. I was just about to Answer the question myself :)

          – bpfrh
          2 days ago










          bpfrh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          bpfrh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          bpfrh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          bpfrh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494511%2fhow-does-mbuffer-t-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

          is 'sed' thread safe

          How to make a Squid Proxy server?