Can you get an external monitor running on 4k resolution at 60hz using a USB 3.0 to Displayport adapter?












2















I am trying to get my new 4k monitor running at 60hz refresh rate. At the moment I have a laptop with a micro HDMI port that is most likely HDMI 1.4, since the xrandr outputs:



HDMI-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 393mm
3840x2160 30.00* 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 29.98
1920x2160 59.99
1920x1080 60.00 60.00 50.00 59.94
...


Are there any hopes of running at 60hz short of buying a new laptop?



I was considering this dongle:



to connect from USB 3.0 to a DisplayPort. Event the seller says:




Expand your work space by up to two external DisplayPort monitors via
USB 3.0, USB C or Thunderbolt 3 Port. The adaptor supports 1x 5 K
resolution up to 5120X2880 @ 60Hz or 2x 4 K resolution up to 4096 x
2160 at 60 Hz addition audio signal




However, for me, the numbers don't add up. If you would like to have a 32bit color depth with 8 megapixels times 60 frames, you get a required bandwidth of 15 Gbit/s, yet USB 3.0 has only 5 Gbit/s.



Are my calculations correct, or am I missing something? Is the pc sending out the color of each single pixel at each single frame, or just the pixels that changed? Is there perhaps some in-monitor firmware decompression? Is this just false advertising?



enter image description here










share|improve this question























  • i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 16:35











  • @Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

    – AFH
    Jan 21 at 18:00






  • 1





    @AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 18:03
















2















I am trying to get my new 4k monitor running at 60hz refresh rate. At the moment I have a laptop with a micro HDMI port that is most likely HDMI 1.4, since the xrandr outputs:



HDMI-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 393mm
3840x2160 30.00* 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 29.98
1920x2160 59.99
1920x1080 60.00 60.00 50.00 59.94
...


Are there any hopes of running at 60hz short of buying a new laptop?



I was considering this dongle:



to connect from USB 3.0 to a DisplayPort. Event the seller says:




Expand your work space by up to two external DisplayPort monitors via
USB 3.0, USB C or Thunderbolt 3 Port. The adaptor supports 1x 5 K
resolution up to 5120X2880 @ 60Hz or 2x 4 K resolution up to 4096 x
2160 at 60 Hz addition audio signal




However, for me, the numbers don't add up. If you would like to have a 32bit color depth with 8 megapixels times 60 frames, you get a required bandwidth of 15 Gbit/s, yet USB 3.0 has only 5 Gbit/s.



Are my calculations correct, or am I missing something? Is the pc sending out the color of each single pixel at each single frame, or just the pixels that changed? Is there perhaps some in-monitor firmware decompression? Is this just false advertising?



enter image description here










share|improve this question























  • i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 16:35











  • @Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

    – AFH
    Jan 21 at 18:00






  • 1





    @AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 18:03














2












2








2








I am trying to get my new 4k monitor running at 60hz refresh rate. At the moment I have a laptop with a micro HDMI port that is most likely HDMI 1.4, since the xrandr outputs:



HDMI-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 393mm
3840x2160 30.00* 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 29.98
1920x2160 59.99
1920x1080 60.00 60.00 50.00 59.94
...


Are there any hopes of running at 60hz short of buying a new laptop?



I was considering this dongle:



to connect from USB 3.0 to a DisplayPort. Event the seller says:




Expand your work space by up to two external DisplayPort monitors via
USB 3.0, USB C or Thunderbolt 3 Port. The adaptor supports 1x 5 K
resolution up to 5120X2880 @ 60Hz or 2x 4 K resolution up to 4096 x
2160 at 60 Hz addition audio signal




However, for me, the numbers don't add up. If you would like to have a 32bit color depth with 8 megapixels times 60 frames, you get a required bandwidth of 15 Gbit/s, yet USB 3.0 has only 5 Gbit/s.



Are my calculations correct, or am I missing something? Is the pc sending out the color of each single pixel at each single frame, or just the pixels that changed? Is there perhaps some in-monitor firmware decompression? Is this just false advertising?



enter image description here










share|improve this question














I am trying to get my new 4k monitor running at 60hz refresh rate. At the moment I have a laptop with a micro HDMI port that is most likely HDMI 1.4, since the xrandr outputs:



HDMI-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 393mm
3840x2160 30.00* 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 29.98
1920x2160 59.99
1920x1080 60.00 60.00 50.00 59.94
...


Are there any hopes of running at 60hz short of buying a new laptop?



I was considering this dongle:



to connect from USB 3.0 to a DisplayPort. Event the seller says:




Expand your work space by up to two external DisplayPort monitors via
USB 3.0, USB C or Thunderbolt 3 Port. The adaptor supports 1x 5 K
resolution up to 5120X2880 @ 60Hz or 2x 4 K resolution up to 4096 x
2160 at 60 Hz addition audio signal




However, for me, the numbers don't add up. If you would like to have a 32bit color depth with 8 megapixels times 60 frames, you get a required bandwidth of 15 Gbit/s, yet USB 3.0 has only 5 Gbit/s.



Are my calculations correct, or am I missing something? Is the pc sending out the color of each single pixel at each single frame, or just the pixels that changed? Is there perhaps some in-monitor firmware decompression? Is this just false advertising?



enter image description here







usb bandwidth displayport 4k-resolution






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 21 at 14:34









Martin DrozdikMartin Drozdik

1255




1255













  • i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 16:35











  • @Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

    – AFH
    Jan 21 at 18:00






  • 1





    @AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 18:03



















  • i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 16:35











  • @Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

    – AFH
    Jan 21 at 18:00






  • 1





    @AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

    – Tetsujin
    Jan 21 at 18:03

















i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

– Tetsujin
Jan 21 at 16:35





i-tec.cz/en/produkt/u3dual4kdp-2

– Tetsujin
Jan 21 at 16:35













@Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

– AFH
Jan 21 at 18:00





@Tetsujin - These are the specs that the questioner quotes, but they don't explain his arithmetic, which underestimates the quandary, since the interface claims to support two independent 4K displays at 60Hz with their audio channels.

– AFH
Jan 21 at 18:00




1




1





@AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

– Tetsujin
Jan 21 at 18:03





@AFH - I was just linking to the manufacturer's main page on it - I wasn't trying to work out the numbers independently ;)

– Tetsujin
Jan 21 at 18:03










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396642%2fcan-you-get-an-external-monitor-running-on-4k-resolution-at-60hz-using-a-usb-3-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396642%2fcan-you-get-an-external-monitor-running-on-4k-resolution-at-60hz-using-a-usb-3-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

is 'sed' thread safe

How to make a Squid Proxy server?