For a non-controlling process, is `ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY)` the same as `close(fd)`?












-1














Assume a session has a controlling terminal.
If a process in the session that is not the session leader, calls ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY), is it correct that it only closes the fd for itself? Is it the same as close(fd)?



Thanks.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
    – Mark Plotnick
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
    – mosvy
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1




    @Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
    – mosvy
    yesterday
















-1














Assume a session has a controlling terminal.
If a process in the session that is not the session leader, calls ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY), is it correct that it only closes the fd for itself? Is it the same as close(fd)?



Thanks.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
    – Mark Plotnick
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
    – mosvy
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1




    @Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
    – mosvy
    yesterday














-1












-1








-1







Assume a session has a controlling terminal.
If a process in the session that is not the session leader, calls ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY), is it correct that it only closes the fd for itself? Is it the same as close(fd)?



Thanks.










share|improve this question















Assume a session has a controlling terminal.
If a process in the session that is not the session leader, calls ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY), is it correct that it only closes the fd for itself? Is it the same as close(fd)?



Thanks.







linux controlling-terminal






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









炸鱼薯条德里克

423114




423114










asked yesterday









Tim

26.2k74246455




26.2k74246455








  • 1




    This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
    – Mark Plotnick
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
    – mosvy
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1




    @Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
    – mosvy
    yesterday














  • 1




    This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
    – Mark Plotnick
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
    – mosvy
    yesterday












  • @JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1




    @Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
    – mosvy
    yesterday








1




1




This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
– JdeBP
yesterday




This question takes as a premise the false notion that terminals have controlling processes, and is thus unanswerable. Terminals have foreground process groups, and sessions have controlling terminals. The general notion of a controlling process for a terminal does not exist.
– JdeBP
yesterday












man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
– Mark Plotnick
yesterday






man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/tty.4.html might help - look at "If the process is the session leader ..."
– Mark Plotnick
yesterday














@JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
– mosvy
yesterday






@JdeBP from the susv4 _exit: "If the process is a controlling process, the SIGHUP signal shall be sent to each process in the foreground process group of the controlling terminal belonging to the calling process.".
– mosvy
yesterday














@JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
– mosvy
yesterday




@JdeBP and here is the definition. Notice that a controlling process is always a session leader, but not vice-versa.
– mosvy
yesterday




1




1




@Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
– mosvy
yesterday




@Tim why do you think that ioctl(fd, TIOCNOTTY) is closing that fd? It isn't. echo 'int main(void){ ioctl(1, TIOCNOTTY); write(1, "foon", 4); }' | cc -include sys/ioctl.h -include unistd.h -Wall -x c - && ./a.out
– mosvy
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492531%2ffor-a-non-controlling-process-is-ioctlfd-tiocnotty-the-same-as-closefd%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492531%2ffor-a-non-controlling-process-is-ioctlfd-tiocnotty-the-same-as-closefd%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

is 'sed' thread safe

How to make a Squid Proxy server?