dmesg + why somethings link is up and link is down from dmesg












0















from the dmesg we get something interesting



some time we see



 [   41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready


and sometimes we see



[   41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
[ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready

c
[ 9.718977] XFS (dm-2): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
[ 9.817914] systemd-journald[768]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
[ 10.040875] type=1305 audit(1548315015.555:3): audit_pid=1129 old=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 res=1
[ 41.072770] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
[ 41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
[ 41.236669] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
[ 41.873618] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
[ 42.022891] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
[ 42.124346] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
[ 42.187499] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
[ 42.769593] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
[ 42.809801] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
[ 43.453234] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: removed PHC on eth2f0
[ 43.702828] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
[ 43.803821] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
[ 43.804588] team0: Port device eth2f0 added
[ 43.868346] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
[ 44.486522] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: removed PHC on eth2f1
[ 44.488389] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 44.566338] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
[ 44.722799] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
[ 44.823782] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
[ 44.824903] team0: Port device eth2f1 added
[ 44.863922] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
[ 44.896265] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
[ 45.187139] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
[ 45.249344] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
[ 45.530790] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team0: link is not ready
[ 45.568059] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
[ 45.869748] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 45.870340] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team0: link becomes ready
[ 46.188516] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 46.188744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
[ 47.128972] IPv6: team0: IPv6 duplicate address fe80::4adf:37ff:fe30:d754 detected!


why we see this behavior ?



is it normal?










share|improve this question



























    0















    from the dmesg we get something interesting



    some time we see



     [   41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready


    and sometimes we see



    [   41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
    [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready

    c
    [ 9.718977] XFS (dm-2): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
    [ 9.817914] systemd-journald[768]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
    [ 10.040875] type=1305 audit(1548315015.555:3): audit_pid=1129 old=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 res=1
    [ 41.072770] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
    [ 41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
    [ 41.236669] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
    [ 41.873618] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [ 41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
    [ 42.022891] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
    [ 42.124346] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
    [ 42.187499] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
    [ 42.769593] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
    [ 42.809801] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
    [ 43.453234] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: removed PHC on eth2f0
    [ 43.702828] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
    [ 43.803821] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
    [ 43.804588] team0: Port device eth2f0 added
    [ 43.868346] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
    [ 44.486522] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: removed PHC on eth2f1
    [ 44.488389] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [ 44.566338] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
    [ 44.722799] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
    [ 44.823782] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
    [ 44.824903] team0: Port device eth2f1 added
    [ 44.863922] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
    [ 44.896265] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
    [ 45.187139] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
    [ 45.249344] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
    [ 45.530790] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team0: link is not ready
    [ 45.568059] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
    [ 45.869748] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [ 45.870340] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team0: link becomes ready
    [ 46.188516] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [ 46.188744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
    [ 47.128972] IPv6: team0: IPv6 duplicate address fe80::4adf:37ff:fe30:d754 detected!


    why we see this behavior ?



    is it normal?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      from the dmesg we get something interesting



      some time we see



       [   41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready


      and sometimes we see



      [   41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready

      c
      [ 9.718977] XFS (dm-2): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
      [ 9.817914] systemd-journald[768]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
      [ 10.040875] type=1305 audit(1548315015.555:3): audit_pid=1129 old=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 res=1
      [ 41.072770] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
      [ 41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
      [ 41.236669] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 41.873618] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 42.022891] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
      [ 42.124346] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
      [ 42.187499] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 42.769593] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
      [ 42.809801] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
      [ 43.453234] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: removed PHC on eth2f0
      [ 43.702828] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
      [ 43.803821] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
      [ 43.804588] team0: Port device eth2f0 added
      [ 43.868346] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 44.486522] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: removed PHC on eth2f1
      [ 44.488389] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 44.566338] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 44.722799] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
      [ 44.823782] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
      [ 44.824903] team0: Port device eth2f1 added
      [ 44.863922] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
      [ 44.896265] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 45.187139] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
      [ 45.249344] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 45.530790] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team0: link is not ready
      [ 45.568059] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 45.869748] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 45.870340] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team0: link becomes ready
      [ 46.188516] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 46.188744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
      [ 47.128972] IPv6: team0: IPv6 duplicate address fe80::4adf:37ff:fe30:d754 detected!


      why we see this behavior ?



      is it normal?










      share|improve this question














      from the dmesg we get something interesting



      some time we see



       [   41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready


      and sometimes we see



      [   41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready

      c
      [ 9.718977] XFS (dm-2): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
      [ 9.817914] systemd-journald[768]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
      [ 10.040875] type=1305 audit(1548315015.555:3): audit_pid=1129 old=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 res=1
      [ 41.072770] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
      [ 41.174357] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
      [ 41.236669] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 41.873618] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 41.874332] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 42.022891] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
      [ 42.124346] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
      [ 42.187499] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 42.769593] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
      [ 42.809801] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 42.810042] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
      [ 43.453234] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: removed PHC on eth2f0
      [ 43.702828] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0: registered PHC device on eth2f0
      [ 43.803821] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f0: link is not ready
      [ 43.804588] team0: Port device eth2f0 added
      [ 43.868346] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 44.486522] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: removed PHC on eth2f1
      [ 44.488389] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 44.566338] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f0: link becomes ready
      [ 44.722799] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1: registered PHC device on eth2f1
      [ 44.823782] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2f1: link is not ready
      [ 44.824903] team0: Port device eth2f1 added
      [ 44.863922] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
      [ 44.896265] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 45.187139] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: changing MTU from 1500 to 9000
      [ 45.249344] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: detected SFP+: 6
      [ 45.530790] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team0: link is not ready
      [ 45.568059] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: detected SFP+: 5
      [ 45.869748] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.0 eth2f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 45.870340] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team0: link becomes ready
      [ 46.188516] ixgbe 0000:0b:00.1 eth2f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [ 46.188744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2f1: link becomes ready
      [ 47.128972] IPv6: team0: IPv6 duplicate address fe80::4adf:37ff:fe30:d754 detected!


      why we see this behavior ?



      is it normal?







      linux networking rhel dmesg






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 5 at 10:30









      yaelyael

      2,78632878




      2,78632878






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504454%2fdmesg-why-somethings-link-is-up-and-link-is-down-from-dmesg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504454%2fdmesg-why-somethings-link-is-up-and-link-is-down-from-dmesg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

          is 'sed' thread safe

          How to make a Squid Proxy server?