Having problems with a local yum repo

Multi tool use
I've tried to set up a local repo on a server (alecto) using reposync
. This part seems to go OK and the the target directory (/repo) gets populated.
I did this so I could update multiple VMs running CentOS without hammering my Internet connection.
The problem is that when using 'yum update' on the VMs, it fails on most (not all) packages, apparently looking for older versions of that package than is installed in the /repo directory. For example, it looks to install zlib-1.2.7-17
when the version in /repo
is zlib-1.2.7-18
. I have no idea where it gets the idea that the -17 version should be used.
There is only one repo defined in the VM's /etc/yum.repos.d directory - alecto.repo
and that contains:
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
It's not the FTP setup - some installations work (eg yum install pigz
) and it's possible that they work because their version number doesn't change very often.
I've run createrepo
on all the reposync'ed directories and I have cleared out all yum
caches on the VM.
My question is: What the heck is going on? Failing that: where does yum
get the version numbers of what it thinks it needs to install?
I have been beating my head against a wall for two days now and could really use some help.
centos-7 yum
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I've tried to set up a local repo on a server (alecto) using reposync
. This part seems to go OK and the the target directory (/repo) gets populated.
I did this so I could update multiple VMs running CentOS without hammering my Internet connection.
The problem is that when using 'yum update' on the VMs, it fails on most (not all) packages, apparently looking for older versions of that package than is installed in the /repo directory. For example, it looks to install zlib-1.2.7-17
when the version in /repo
is zlib-1.2.7-18
. I have no idea where it gets the idea that the -17 version should be used.
There is only one repo defined in the VM's /etc/yum.repos.d directory - alecto.repo
and that contains:
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
It's not the FTP setup - some installations work (eg yum install pigz
) and it's possible that they work because their version number doesn't change very often.
I've run createrepo
on all the reposync'ed directories and I have cleared out all yum
caches on the VM.
My question is: What the heck is going on? Failing that: where does yum
get the version numbers of what it thinks it needs to install?
I have been beating my head against a wall for two days now and could really use some help.
centos-7 yum
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
On the VMs you ranyum clean all
?
– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03
add a comment |
I've tried to set up a local repo on a server (alecto) using reposync
. This part seems to go OK and the the target directory (/repo) gets populated.
I did this so I could update multiple VMs running CentOS without hammering my Internet connection.
The problem is that when using 'yum update' on the VMs, it fails on most (not all) packages, apparently looking for older versions of that package than is installed in the /repo directory. For example, it looks to install zlib-1.2.7-17
when the version in /repo
is zlib-1.2.7-18
. I have no idea where it gets the idea that the -17 version should be used.
There is only one repo defined in the VM's /etc/yum.repos.d directory - alecto.repo
and that contains:
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
It's not the FTP setup - some installations work (eg yum install pigz
) and it's possible that they work because their version number doesn't change very often.
I've run createrepo
on all the reposync'ed directories and I have cleared out all yum
caches on the VM.
My question is: What the heck is going on? Failing that: where does yum
get the version numbers of what it thinks it needs to install?
I have been beating my head against a wall for two days now and could really use some help.
centos-7 yum
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've tried to set up a local repo on a server (alecto) using reposync
. This part seems to go OK and the the target directory (/repo) gets populated.
I did this so I could update multiple VMs running CentOS without hammering my Internet connection.
The problem is that when using 'yum update' on the VMs, it fails on most (not all) packages, apparently looking for older versions of that package than is installed in the /repo directory. For example, it looks to install zlib-1.2.7-17
when the version in /repo
is zlib-1.2.7-18
. I have no idea where it gets the idea that the -17 version should be used.
There is only one repo defined in the VM's /etc/yum.repos.d directory - alecto.repo
and that contains:
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
It's not the FTP setup - some installations work (eg yum install pigz
) and it's possible that they work because their version number doesn't change very often.
I've run createrepo
on all the reposync'ed directories and I have cleared out all yum
caches on the VM.
My question is: What the heck is going on? Failing that: where does yum
get the version numbers of what it thinks it needs to install?
I have been beating my head against a wall for two days now and could really use some help.
centos-7 yum
centos-7 yum
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 7 at 2:58
slm
6,23563846
6,23563846
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 6 at 23:07
cassini232cassini232
262
262
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
On the VMs you ranyum clean all
?
– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03
add a comment |
On the VMs you ranyum clean all
?
– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03
On the VMs you ran
yum clean all
?– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03
On the VMs you ran
yum clean all
?– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There's a couple of Q&A's on access.redhat.com that show the following setup:
For the VMs
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
[RHEL7]
name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=ftp://<ip_address>/<somedirectory>/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
You'd then run the following:
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo yum repolist
[...]
RHEL7 | 1.5 kB 00:00
RHEL7/primary | 920 kB 00:00
RHEL7 3285/3285
repo id repo name status
RHEL7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Server - x86_64 3,285
repolist: 3,285
You can then run on the VMs:
$ sudo yum update
NOTE1: This is the URL but it requires an account to see it - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3187892.
The Q&A also referenced this video on Youtube which anyone can view titled:Creating a Local Repository and Sharing With Offline Systems.
NOTE2: You do not show your reposync
method for pulling the repo down, but I suspect that the method you used is the root of your issue. Take a look at the video, it shows how to properly perform a reposync
.
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try runningyum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.
– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
add a comment |
Solved it!
I was thrown by the fact that issuing the reposync command used alecto's own yum.repos.d to populate /repo. Somehow I thought the same would apply to the client - it doesn't, so I can't just specify /repo as the start point on the client. This means that alecto.repo goes from looking like this
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
to this
[base]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - base
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/base/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
[epel]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - epel
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/epel/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
etc...
I still don't understand where the -17 version of zlib came from, but that's something I'll look into when I have more time.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
cassini232 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1391294%2fhaving-problems-with-a-local-yum-repo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's a couple of Q&A's on access.redhat.com that show the following setup:
For the VMs
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
[RHEL7]
name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=ftp://<ip_address>/<somedirectory>/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
You'd then run the following:
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo yum repolist
[...]
RHEL7 | 1.5 kB 00:00
RHEL7/primary | 920 kB 00:00
RHEL7 3285/3285
repo id repo name status
RHEL7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Server - x86_64 3,285
repolist: 3,285
You can then run on the VMs:
$ sudo yum update
NOTE1: This is the URL but it requires an account to see it - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3187892.
The Q&A also referenced this video on Youtube which anyone can view titled:Creating a Local Repository and Sharing With Offline Systems.
NOTE2: You do not show your reposync
method for pulling the repo down, but I suspect that the method you used is the root of your issue. Take a look at the video, it shows how to properly perform a reposync
.
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try runningyum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.
– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
add a comment |
There's a couple of Q&A's on access.redhat.com that show the following setup:
For the VMs
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
[RHEL7]
name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=ftp://<ip_address>/<somedirectory>/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
You'd then run the following:
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo yum repolist
[...]
RHEL7 | 1.5 kB 00:00
RHEL7/primary | 920 kB 00:00
RHEL7 3285/3285
repo id repo name status
RHEL7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Server - x86_64 3,285
repolist: 3,285
You can then run on the VMs:
$ sudo yum update
NOTE1: This is the URL but it requires an account to see it - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3187892.
The Q&A also referenced this video on Youtube which anyone can view titled:Creating a Local Repository and Sharing With Offline Systems.
NOTE2: You do not show your reposync
method for pulling the repo down, but I suspect that the method you used is the root of your issue. Take a look at the video, it shows how to properly perform a reposync
.
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try runningyum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.
– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
add a comment |
There's a couple of Q&A's on access.redhat.com that show the following setup:
For the VMs
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
[RHEL7]
name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=ftp://<ip_address>/<somedirectory>/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
You'd then run the following:
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo yum repolist
[...]
RHEL7 | 1.5 kB 00:00
RHEL7/primary | 920 kB 00:00
RHEL7 3285/3285
repo id repo name status
RHEL7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Server - x86_64 3,285
repolist: 3,285
You can then run on the VMs:
$ sudo yum update
NOTE1: This is the URL but it requires an account to see it - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3187892.
The Q&A also referenced this video on Youtube which anyone can view titled:Creating a Local Repository and Sharing With Offline Systems.
NOTE2: You do not show your reposync
method for pulling the repo down, but I suspect that the method you used is the root of your issue. Take a look at the video, it shows how to properly perform a reposync
.
There's a couple of Q&A's on access.redhat.com that show the following setup:
For the VMs
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/local.repo
[RHEL7]
name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=ftp://<ip_address>/<somedirectory>/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
You'd then run the following:
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo yum repolist
[...]
RHEL7 | 1.5 kB 00:00
RHEL7/primary | 920 kB 00:00
RHEL7 3285/3285
repo id repo name status
RHEL7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Server - x86_64 3,285
repolist: 3,285
You can then run on the VMs:
$ sudo yum update
NOTE1: This is the URL but it requires an account to see it - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3187892.
The Q&A also referenced this video on Youtube which anyone can view titled:Creating a Local Repository and Sharing With Offline Systems.
NOTE2: You do not show your reposync
method for pulling the repo down, but I suspect that the method you used is the root of your issue. Take a look at the video, it shows how to properly perform a reposync
.
answered Jan 7 at 3:08
slmslm
6,23563846
6,23563846
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try runningyum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.
– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
add a comment |
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try runningyum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.
– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
I have followed the tutorials and some of it seems to work. The command I use to set up /reo is 'reposync -g -l -d -n -p /repo createrepo /repo'
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:40
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
It seems the basic setup works, but I still have the problem of the differing package versions. Where is the client yum getting a version of the package that doesn't even exist in the /repo directory?
– cassini232
Jan 7 at 11:43
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try running
yum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
@cassini232 - it can only get it from 2 places, either a errant repo or a cache. You could try running
yum
with more verbose logging to see where it's getting this package.– slm
Jan 7 at 14:12
add a comment |
Solved it!
I was thrown by the fact that issuing the reposync command used alecto's own yum.repos.d to populate /repo. Somehow I thought the same would apply to the client - it doesn't, so I can't just specify /repo as the start point on the client. This means that alecto.repo goes from looking like this
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
to this
[base]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - base
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/base/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
[epel]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - epel
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/epel/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
etc...
I still don't understand where the -17 version of zlib came from, but that's something I'll look into when I have more time.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Solved it!
I was thrown by the fact that issuing the reposync command used alecto's own yum.repos.d to populate /repo. Somehow I thought the same would apply to the client - it doesn't, so I can't just specify /repo as the start point on the client. This means that alecto.repo goes from looking like this
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
to this
[base]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - base
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/base/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
[epel]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - epel
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/epel/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
etc...
I still don't understand where the -17 version of zlib came from, but that's something I'll look into when I have more time.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Solved it!
I was thrown by the fact that issuing the reposync command used alecto's own yum.repos.d to populate /repo. Somehow I thought the same would apply to the client - it doesn't, so I can't just specify /repo as the start point on the client. This means that alecto.repo goes from looking like this
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
to this
[base]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - base
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/base/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
[epel]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - epel
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/epel/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
etc...
I still don't understand where the -17 version of zlib came from, but that's something I'll look into when I have more time.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Solved it!
I was thrown by the fact that issuing the reposync command used alecto's own yum.repos.d to populate /repo. Somehow I thought the same would apply to the client - it doesn't, so I can't just specify /repo as the start point on the client. This means that alecto.repo goes from looking like this
[alecto]
name=Local network repo on Alecto
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
to this
[base]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - base
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/base/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
[epel]
name=Local network repo on Alecto - epel
baseurl=ftp://192.168.1.110/epel/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
etc...
I still don't understand where the -17 version of zlib came from, but that's something I'll look into when I have more time.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Jan 7 at 12:50
cassini232cassini232
262
262
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
cassini232 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
cassini232 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cassini232 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cassini232 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
cassini232 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1391294%2fhaving-problems-with-a-local-yum-repo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
k u6,lw5Pf1ISaEZRybHBaY9Vkg,qip UEf,6ko0iA8Wsl7,4sRve4H0Nx,Is,D c9SlAY6 Sl01 Bschg4bj
On the VMs you ran
yum clean all
?– slm
Jan 7 at 3:03