How can I reduce a video's size with ffmpeg?












158















How can I use ffmpeg to reduce the size of a video by lowering the quality (as minimally as possible, naturally, but I need it to run on a mobile device that doesn't have much available space)?



I forgot to write one thing yet. When the video can use subtitles (*.srt or *.sub) I'd like to convert them too to fit the parameters of converted video file.










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

    – Kevin
    Jan 10 '12 at 23:41






  • 1





    I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

    – user13742
    Jan 11 '12 at 0:11








  • 3





    The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

    – Peter.O
    Jan 11 '12 at 1:16













  • @Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:34











  • @hesse What does it mean?

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:36
















158















How can I use ffmpeg to reduce the size of a video by lowering the quality (as minimally as possible, naturally, but I need it to run on a mobile device that doesn't have much available space)?



I forgot to write one thing yet. When the video can use subtitles (*.srt or *.sub) I'd like to convert them too to fit the parameters of converted video file.










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

    – Kevin
    Jan 10 '12 at 23:41






  • 1





    I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

    – user13742
    Jan 11 '12 at 0:11








  • 3





    The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

    – Peter.O
    Jan 11 '12 at 1:16













  • @Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:34











  • @hesse What does it mean?

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:36














158












158








158


65






How can I use ffmpeg to reduce the size of a video by lowering the quality (as minimally as possible, naturally, but I need it to run on a mobile device that doesn't have much available space)?



I forgot to write one thing yet. When the video can use subtitles (*.srt or *.sub) I'd like to convert them too to fit the parameters of converted video file.










share|improve this question
















How can I use ffmpeg to reduce the size of a video by lowering the quality (as minimally as possible, naturally, but I need it to run on a mobile device that doesn't have much available space)?



I forgot to write one thing yet. When the video can use subtitles (*.srt or *.sub) I'd like to convert them too to fit the parameters of converted video file.







video ffmpeg compression






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 11 '12 at 8:38







xralf

















asked Jan 10 '12 at 21:45









xralfxralf

2,2431971119




2,2431971119








  • 4





    I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

    – Kevin
    Jan 10 '12 at 23:41






  • 1





    I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

    – user13742
    Jan 11 '12 at 0:11








  • 3





    The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

    – Peter.O
    Jan 11 '12 at 1:16













  • @Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:34











  • @hesse What does it mean?

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:36














  • 4





    I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

    – Kevin
    Jan 10 '12 at 23:41






  • 1





    I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

    – user13742
    Jan 11 '12 at 0:11








  • 3





    The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

    – Peter.O
    Jan 11 '12 at 1:16













  • @Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:34











  • @hesse What does it mean?

    – xralf
    Jan 11 '12 at 8:36








4




4





I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

– Kevin
Jan 10 '12 at 23:41





I haven't used it but the ffmpeg man page shows a -fs option to limit the output size, does something like ffmpeg -i in.avi -fs 100M out.avi work?

– Kevin
Jan 10 '12 at 23:41




1




1





I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

– user13742
Jan 11 '12 at 0:11







I will not redirect you to the man page: man ffmpeg | wc -l --> 5254

– user13742
Jan 11 '12 at 0:11






3




3





The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

– Peter.O
Jan 11 '12 at 1:16







The .avi is not the main issue.. avi is just a container. The main issue is which codecs you use.. Many (most?) .avi vids use older style codecs (eg XviD) which are fine, but are larger for the same quality when compared to the later generation of codecs .. You can typically get a tight encoding by using the H.264 video compression standard (eg. codecx264) and aac compression for audio.. The container and codecs you use is up to you and your phone... The .mp4 container is well accepted.. (but can your phone handle it: see this link

– Peter.O
Jan 11 '12 at 1:16















@Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

– xralf
Jan 11 '12 at 8:34





@Kevin This wants more parameters for conversion.

– xralf
Jan 11 '12 at 8:34













@hesse What does it mean?

– xralf
Jan 11 '12 at 8:36





@hesse What does it mean?

– xralf
Jan 11 '12 at 8:36










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















198














See this answer. Quoted below for convenience:




Calculate the bitrate you need by dividing 1 GB by the video length in seconds. So, for a video of length 16:40 (1000 seconds), use a bitrate of 1000000 bytes/sec:



ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -b 1000000 output.mp4


Additional options that might be worth considering is setting the Constant Rate Factor, which lowers the average bit rate, but retains better quality. Vary the CRF between around 18 and 24 — the lower, the higher the bitrate.



ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx264 -crf 20 output.mp4






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    This is a four year some time. 😂

    – wener
    Mar 28 '16 at 14:59






  • 6





    Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

    – Patrick Roberts
    Mar 25 '17 at 18:14






  • 1





    Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

    – sinisterstuf
    Mar 30 '18 at 12:20






  • 3





    Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

    – ZN13
    Apr 13 '18 at 19:55






  • 5





    Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

    – alpha_989
    May 23 '18 at 22:02



















21














Unless you're looking for a specific bitrate, I'd recommend the -crf option. This is the most commonly used for x264 encoding: http://slhck.info/articles/crf



In short: a CRF of 23 would make "DVD" quality movie (~700MB-1GB) and lower CRF values would be higher quality (larger files).






share|improve this answer
























  • Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

    – Jake Berger
    Aug 25 '18 at 17:17






  • 1





    @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

    – Tom Kelly
    Aug 27 '18 at 12:05



















10














You mentioned wanting to reduce filesize to fit more videos on a mobile device, which is my usecase as well. All the answers here are for reducing the compression quality but nobody has mentioned reducing video frame size. It's a lot quicker, from about 3 to 5 times quicker than recompressing in my experience. See the ffmpeg docs on scaling for more info.



ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" half_the_frame_size.mkv
ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/3:ih/3" a_third_the_frame_size.mkv
ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/4:ih/4" a_fourth_the_frame_size.mkv





share|improve this answer































    4














    I tested most of the other proposed answers to this question. The test data conclusions are below. These are the proposed answers that I tested:



    (BR) Modify the bitrate, using:



    ffmpeg -i $infile -b $bitrate $newoutfile 


    (CR) Vary the Constant Rate Factor, using:



    ffmpeg -i $infile -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 $outfile


    (SZ) Change the video size (for example to half size), using:



    ffmpeg -i $infile -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" $outfile


    (BL) Change the H.264 profile to "baseline", using:



    ffmpeg -i $infile -profile:v baseline $outfile


    (DF) Use the default ffmpeg processing, using:



    ffmpeg -i $infile $outfile


    DATA




    • "size" - percent size of the converted video in relation to the original.

    • "bitrate" - bitrates of original and converted videos.

    • "definition" - pixel size of videos.

    • "convert" - time to convert the video in seconds.


    I calculated the target bitrate for (BL)using the proposed method.



    === File A - How Node Is Helping To Propel Angular-Fnbixa7Ts6M.mkv ===



                original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
    -------- --- -- -- -- --
    size 64152 kb 214% 76% 40% 83% 76%
    bitrate 411 kb/s 883 313 165 342 313
    definition 1920x1080 1920x1080 1920x1080 960x540 1920x1080 1920x1080
    convert -- 648 509 225 427 510


    === File B - Using GraphQL with Angular _ By - Lee Costello-OGyFxqt5INw.mkv ===



                original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
    -------- --- -- -- -- --
    size 410301 kb 33% 109% 28% 143% 109%
    bitrate 2687 kb/s 880 2920 764 3843 2920
    definition 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 1920x1080 3840x2160 3840x2160
    convert -- 2307 3188 1116 2646 3278


    CONCLUSIONS




    • The (SZ) method is definitely the quickest method. It was 2X to 4X faster. This can be very much an issue on high-def videos, since all of the other methods took longer to convert than the actual length of the video! For example, The (CR) method took 53 minutes to convert the 21 minute video.


    • The (SZ) method is definitely the best method if the definition of the video is larger than the definition of the screen that will be displaying it. For example, if your phone can only display a 1080p picture, sending it a 3840x2160 video is just wasteful. It would be best to half its size to 1080p.


    • Some of the proposed answers actually INCREASED the size of some videos. For example, the (BR) method more than doubled the size of the 1080p sample. It did however make the 2160p size one-third. For the high-def sample, the (CR), (BL) and (DF) methods all INCREASED the size of the video.



    Correct (or best) Answer



    It is always best to first lower the resolution to the maximum supported by your target display.



    If you want to reduce file size further, it will depend on personal choices. You can either reduce information content or increase compression.




    • You can lower the resolution more if that is not something that concerns you.


    • If the video doesn't include fast action scenes, you may want to lower the frame rate.


    • If you have a powerful processor and space is the only issue, you can increase the compression rate.


    • Bit rate is a combination of multiple factors. So just telling ffmpeg to lower the bit rate may not give you the results you want.


    • Another way of lower information content is to lower the color depth. How to do this was not yet discussed.







    share|improve this answer

































      2














      Note that it seems that ffmpeg already performs some optimization when ran without options, so before trying to use settings you don't understand or deciding to explicitly lose information, give a try to a default conversion :



      ffmpeg -i input.mp4 output.mp4


      In my case it reduced the bitrate of both the video and audio (you can check and compare the input and output file by running ffprobe on them), transforming a 700 Mb video into a 60 Mb one of seemingly similar quality.






      share|improve this answer































        1














        You'll need to use 2-pass encoding to "fit" a video within a designated file size (bitrate), without reducing the quality too drastically. This is quite a detailed topic: http://www.mpabo.com/2014/12/14/ffmpeg-and-x264-encoding-guide/






        share|improve this answer































          1














          I have a recipe I originally forged for myself in order to convert the Motion JPEG videos my old camera generates (they are very large videos, since each frame is an entire JPEG image) to h264. Here's an adaptation for other kinds of videos (courses, etc).



          I'm not using ffmpeg, but mplayer and mencoder. First, We have to demux the audio with mplayer:



          mplayer -vo null -ao pcm:fast:file=<audio_pcm.wav> <video>



          • The -vo null and -ao null parameters tells mplayer to not extract video.


          In the next steps, we'll do a 3-pass compression with mencoder. At the first pass we'll choose a suitable Constant Quality Mode compression (crf parameter) as a start point:



          mencoder <video> -ovc x264  
          -x264encopts ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:crf=<value>:pass=1
          -nosound -o video1.h264



          • You can add slow_firstpass parameter to the -x264encopts if you are paranoid with the final quality of the video. Mencoder manual says that this option disable some parameters that “significantly improve encoding speed while having little or no impact on the quality of the final pass”. So, use it only at the last step.


          • You should try several values for crf
            try starting from 25 and goes on increasing it until you note artifacts at the resulting video (higher values compresses more). Remember subsequent encoding passes will improve the quality you have choosed for crf.


          • Alternatives for the veryslow preset are slower, slow, medium etc. See mencoder manual for the complete list.


          • ratetol controls the bitrate variation — I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing here, but I set it to the maximum value in order to let total freedom to mencoder to choose the right bitrate for each scene.



          After the first pass, you'll note that the last line gives you the average bitrate you will use at the next steps:



          (...)
          x264 [info]: kb/s:526.43


          Change the crf parameter, recommended at the first pass, to bitrate, required at the subsequent passes:



          mencoder <video> -ovc x264 
          -x264encopts slow_firstpass:ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:bitrate=526:pass=3
          -nosound -o video2.h264


          This second pass encoding will read the statistics generated at the first pass (divx2pass.log and divx2pass.log.mbtree) in order to optimize the compression.




          • Note you'll use the same video input, not the generated by the first pass — first pass' output video is only useful to check the initial quality.


          • Note also that the pass=3 (not pass=2) will generate a new statistics file, so you can repeat the last step as many times you want. I usually do pass=3 twice, always paying attention to the result bitrate.



          Meanwhile, you can compress the audio too, using lame or oggenc:



          oggenc -q<n> <audio_pcm.wav>


          Finally, we'll remux audio and video



          mencoder -audiofile <audio>.ogg video2.h264 -oac copy -ovc copy 
          -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 -o <video>.mp4



          • The -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 generates mp4 file format using the lavopts muxers.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28803%2fhow-can-i-reduce-a-videos-size-with-ffmpeg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            7 Answers
            7






            active

            oldest

            votes








            7 Answers
            7






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            198














            See this answer. Quoted below for convenience:




            Calculate the bitrate you need by dividing 1 GB by the video length in seconds. So, for a video of length 16:40 (1000 seconds), use a bitrate of 1000000 bytes/sec:



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -b 1000000 output.mp4


            Additional options that might be worth considering is setting the Constant Rate Factor, which lowers the average bit rate, but retains better quality. Vary the CRF between around 18 and 24 — the lower, the higher the bitrate.



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx264 -crf 20 output.mp4






            share|improve this answer





















            • 5





              This is a four year some time. 😂

              – wener
              Mar 28 '16 at 14:59






            • 6





              Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

              – Patrick Roberts
              Mar 25 '17 at 18:14






            • 1





              Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

              – sinisterstuf
              Mar 30 '18 at 12:20






            • 3





              Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

              – ZN13
              Apr 13 '18 at 19:55






            • 5





              Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

              – alpha_989
              May 23 '18 at 22:02
















            198














            See this answer. Quoted below for convenience:




            Calculate the bitrate you need by dividing 1 GB by the video length in seconds. So, for a video of length 16:40 (1000 seconds), use a bitrate of 1000000 bytes/sec:



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -b 1000000 output.mp4


            Additional options that might be worth considering is setting the Constant Rate Factor, which lowers the average bit rate, but retains better quality. Vary the CRF between around 18 and 24 — the lower, the higher the bitrate.



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx264 -crf 20 output.mp4






            share|improve this answer





















            • 5





              This is a four year some time. 😂

              – wener
              Mar 28 '16 at 14:59






            • 6





              Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

              – Patrick Roberts
              Mar 25 '17 at 18:14






            • 1





              Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

              – sinisterstuf
              Mar 30 '18 at 12:20






            • 3





              Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

              – ZN13
              Apr 13 '18 at 19:55






            • 5





              Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

              – alpha_989
              May 23 '18 at 22:02














            198












            198








            198







            See this answer. Quoted below for convenience:




            Calculate the bitrate you need by dividing 1 GB by the video length in seconds. So, for a video of length 16:40 (1000 seconds), use a bitrate of 1000000 bytes/sec:



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -b 1000000 output.mp4


            Additional options that might be worth considering is setting the Constant Rate Factor, which lowers the average bit rate, but retains better quality. Vary the CRF between around 18 and 24 — the lower, the higher the bitrate.



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx264 -crf 20 output.mp4






            share|improve this answer















            See this answer. Quoted below for convenience:




            Calculate the bitrate you need by dividing 1 GB by the video length in seconds. So, for a video of length 16:40 (1000 seconds), use a bitrate of 1000000 bytes/sec:



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -b 1000000 output.mp4


            Additional options that might be worth considering is setting the Constant Rate Factor, which lowers the average bit rate, but retains better quality. Vary the CRF between around 18 and 24 — the lower, the higher the bitrate.



            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx264 -crf 20 output.mp4







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 26 '17 at 13:44

























            answered May 11 '12 at 5:36









            Vicky ChijwaniVicky Chijwani

            2,21211313




            2,21211313








            • 5





              This is a four year some time. 😂

              – wener
              Mar 28 '16 at 14:59






            • 6





              Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

              – Patrick Roberts
              Mar 25 '17 at 18:14






            • 1





              Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

              – sinisterstuf
              Mar 30 '18 at 12:20






            • 3





              Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

              – ZN13
              Apr 13 '18 at 19:55






            • 5





              Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

              – alpha_989
              May 23 '18 at 22:02














            • 5





              This is a four year some time. 😂

              – wener
              Mar 28 '16 at 14:59






            • 6





              Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

              – Patrick Roberts
              Mar 25 '17 at 18:14






            • 1





              Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

              – sinisterstuf
              Mar 30 '18 at 12:20






            • 3





              Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

              – ZN13
              Apr 13 '18 at 19:55






            • 5





              Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

              – alpha_989
              May 23 '18 at 22:02








            5




            5





            This is a four year some time. 😂

            – wener
            Mar 28 '16 at 14:59





            This is a four year some time. 😂

            – wener
            Mar 28 '16 at 14:59




            6




            6





            Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

            – Patrick Roberts
            Mar 25 '17 at 18:14





            Second command, using -crf 24 took a 255.3MB video I had and reduced it to 72.7MB without lowering the quality noticeably. Have an upvote!

            – Patrick Roberts
            Mar 25 '17 at 18:14




            1




            1





            Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

            – sinisterstuf
            Mar 30 '18 at 12:20





            Impressively reduced a ~2G video to 14MB, still looks good, this was the first search result and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

            – sinisterstuf
            Mar 30 '18 at 12:20




            3




            3





            Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

            – ZN13
            Apr 13 '18 at 19:55





            Might be good to note that you can now use libx265 for even more size reduction.

            – ZN13
            Apr 13 '18 at 19:55




            5




            5





            Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

            – alpha_989
            May 23 '18 at 22:02





            Used ffmpeg -i input.avi -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi. It reduced a 100mb video to 9mb.. Very little change in video quality. Thank you!

            – alpha_989
            May 23 '18 at 22:02













            21














            Unless you're looking for a specific bitrate, I'd recommend the -crf option. This is the most commonly used for x264 encoding: http://slhck.info/articles/crf



            In short: a CRF of 23 would make "DVD" quality movie (~700MB-1GB) and lower CRF values would be higher quality (larger files).






            share|improve this answer
























            • Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

              – Jake Berger
              Aug 25 '18 at 17:17






            • 1





              @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

              – Tom Kelly
              Aug 27 '18 at 12:05
















            21














            Unless you're looking for a specific bitrate, I'd recommend the -crf option. This is the most commonly used for x264 encoding: http://slhck.info/articles/crf



            In short: a CRF of 23 would make "DVD" quality movie (~700MB-1GB) and lower CRF values would be higher quality (larger files).






            share|improve this answer
























            • Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

              – Jake Berger
              Aug 25 '18 at 17:17






            • 1





              @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

              – Tom Kelly
              Aug 27 '18 at 12:05














            21












            21








            21







            Unless you're looking for a specific bitrate, I'd recommend the -crf option. This is the most commonly used for x264 encoding: http://slhck.info/articles/crf



            In short: a CRF of 23 would make "DVD" quality movie (~700MB-1GB) and lower CRF values would be higher quality (larger files).






            share|improve this answer













            Unless you're looking for a specific bitrate, I'd recommend the -crf option. This is the most commonly used for x264 encoding: http://slhck.info/articles/crf



            In short: a CRF of 23 would make "DVD" quality movie (~700MB-1GB) and lower CRF values would be higher quality (larger files).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 14 '17 at 13:50









            Tom KellyTom Kelly

            34726




            34726













            • Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

              – Jake Berger
              Aug 25 '18 at 17:17






            • 1





              @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

              – Tom Kelly
              Aug 27 '18 at 12:05



















            • Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

              – Jake Berger
              Aug 25 '18 at 17:17






            • 1





              @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

              – Tom Kelly
              Aug 27 '18 at 12:05

















            Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

            – Jake Berger
            Aug 25 '18 at 17:17





            Please give examples of the full command instead of linking to an external website (which could break someday:)

            – Jake Berger
            Aug 25 '18 at 17:17




            1




            1





            @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

            – Tom Kelly
            Aug 27 '18 at 12:05





            @Vicky Chijwani provides the code in the example above. This is better suited to a comment but it was my first activity on this site. The link has more explanation on the crf option but isn’t necessary to get the code to work.

            – Tom Kelly
            Aug 27 '18 at 12:05











            10














            You mentioned wanting to reduce filesize to fit more videos on a mobile device, which is my usecase as well. All the answers here are for reducing the compression quality but nobody has mentioned reducing video frame size. It's a lot quicker, from about 3 to 5 times quicker than recompressing in my experience. See the ffmpeg docs on scaling for more info.



            ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" half_the_frame_size.mkv
            ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/3:ih/3" a_third_the_frame_size.mkv
            ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/4:ih/4" a_fourth_the_frame_size.mkv





            share|improve this answer




























              10














              You mentioned wanting to reduce filesize to fit more videos on a mobile device, which is my usecase as well. All the answers here are for reducing the compression quality but nobody has mentioned reducing video frame size. It's a lot quicker, from about 3 to 5 times quicker than recompressing in my experience. See the ffmpeg docs on scaling for more info.



              ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" half_the_frame_size.mkv
              ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/3:ih/3" a_third_the_frame_size.mkv
              ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/4:ih/4" a_fourth_the_frame_size.mkv





              share|improve this answer


























                10












                10








                10







                You mentioned wanting to reduce filesize to fit more videos on a mobile device, which is my usecase as well. All the answers here are for reducing the compression quality but nobody has mentioned reducing video frame size. It's a lot quicker, from about 3 to 5 times quicker than recompressing in my experience. See the ffmpeg docs on scaling for more info.



                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" half_the_frame_size.mkv
                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/3:ih/3" a_third_the_frame_size.mkv
                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/4:ih/4" a_fourth_the_frame_size.mkv





                share|improve this answer













                You mentioned wanting to reduce filesize to fit more videos on a mobile device, which is my usecase as well. All the answers here are for reducing the compression quality but nobody has mentioned reducing video frame size. It's a lot quicker, from about 3 to 5 times quicker than recompressing in my experience. See the ffmpeg docs on scaling for more info.



                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" half_the_frame_size.mkv
                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/3:ih/3" a_third_the_frame_size.mkv
                ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vf "scale=iw/4:ih/4" a_fourth_the_frame_size.mkv






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jun 2 '18 at 19:07









                georgiecaseygeorgiecasey

                24123




                24123























                    4














                    I tested most of the other proposed answers to this question. The test data conclusions are below. These are the proposed answers that I tested:



                    (BR) Modify the bitrate, using:



                    ffmpeg -i $infile -b $bitrate $newoutfile 


                    (CR) Vary the Constant Rate Factor, using:



                    ffmpeg -i $infile -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 $outfile


                    (SZ) Change the video size (for example to half size), using:



                    ffmpeg -i $infile -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" $outfile


                    (BL) Change the H.264 profile to "baseline", using:



                    ffmpeg -i $infile -profile:v baseline $outfile


                    (DF) Use the default ffmpeg processing, using:



                    ffmpeg -i $infile $outfile


                    DATA




                    • "size" - percent size of the converted video in relation to the original.

                    • "bitrate" - bitrates of original and converted videos.

                    • "definition" - pixel size of videos.

                    • "convert" - time to convert the video in seconds.


                    I calculated the target bitrate for (BL)using the proposed method.



                    === File A - How Node Is Helping To Propel Angular-Fnbixa7Ts6M.mkv ===



                                original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                    -------- --- -- -- -- --
                    size 64152 kb 214% 76% 40% 83% 76%
                    bitrate 411 kb/s 883 313 165 342 313
                    definition 1920x1080 1920x1080 1920x1080 960x540 1920x1080 1920x1080
                    convert -- 648 509 225 427 510


                    === File B - Using GraphQL with Angular _ By - Lee Costello-OGyFxqt5INw.mkv ===



                                original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                    -------- --- -- -- -- --
                    size 410301 kb 33% 109% 28% 143% 109%
                    bitrate 2687 kb/s 880 2920 764 3843 2920
                    definition 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 1920x1080 3840x2160 3840x2160
                    convert -- 2307 3188 1116 2646 3278


                    CONCLUSIONS




                    • The (SZ) method is definitely the quickest method. It was 2X to 4X faster. This can be very much an issue on high-def videos, since all of the other methods took longer to convert than the actual length of the video! For example, The (CR) method took 53 minutes to convert the 21 minute video.


                    • The (SZ) method is definitely the best method if the definition of the video is larger than the definition of the screen that will be displaying it. For example, if your phone can only display a 1080p picture, sending it a 3840x2160 video is just wasteful. It would be best to half its size to 1080p.


                    • Some of the proposed answers actually INCREASED the size of some videos. For example, the (BR) method more than doubled the size of the 1080p sample. It did however make the 2160p size one-third. For the high-def sample, the (CR), (BL) and (DF) methods all INCREASED the size of the video.



                    Correct (or best) Answer



                    It is always best to first lower the resolution to the maximum supported by your target display.



                    If you want to reduce file size further, it will depend on personal choices. You can either reduce information content or increase compression.




                    • You can lower the resolution more if that is not something that concerns you.


                    • If the video doesn't include fast action scenes, you may want to lower the frame rate.


                    • If you have a powerful processor and space is the only issue, you can increase the compression rate.


                    • Bit rate is a combination of multiple factors. So just telling ffmpeg to lower the bit rate may not give you the results you want.


                    • Another way of lower information content is to lower the color depth. How to do this was not yet discussed.







                    share|improve this answer






























                      4














                      I tested most of the other proposed answers to this question. The test data conclusions are below. These are the proposed answers that I tested:



                      (BR) Modify the bitrate, using:



                      ffmpeg -i $infile -b $bitrate $newoutfile 


                      (CR) Vary the Constant Rate Factor, using:



                      ffmpeg -i $infile -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 $outfile


                      (SZ) Change the video size (for example to half size), using:



                      ffmpeg -i $infile -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" $outfile


                      (BL) Change the H.264 profile to "baseline", using:



                      ffmpeg -i $infile -profile:v baseline $outfile


                      (DF) Use the default ffmpeg processing, using:



                      ffmpeg -i $infile $outfile


                      DATA




                      • "size" - percent size of the converted video in relation to the original.

                      • "bitrate" - bitrates of original and converted videos.

                      • "definition" - pixel size of videos.

                      • "convert" - time to convert the video in seconds.


                      I calculated the target bitrate for (BL)using the proposed method.



                      === File A - How Node Is Helping To Propel Angular-Fnbixa7Ts6M.mkv ===



                                  original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                      -------- --- -- -- -- --
                      size 64152 kb 214% 76% 40% 83% 76%
                      bitrate 411 kb/s 883 313 165 342 313
                      definition 1920x1080 1920x1080 1920x1080 960x540 1920x1080 1920x1080
                      convert -- 648 509 225 427 510


                      === File B - Using GraphQL with Angular _ By - Lee Costello-OGyFxqt5INw.mkv ===



                                  original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                      -------- --- -- -- -- --
                      size 410301 kb 33% 109% 28% 143% 109%
                      bitrate 2687 kb/s 880 2920 764 3843 2920
                      definition 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 1920x1080 3840x2160 3840x2160
                      convert -- 2307 3188 1116 2646 3278


                      CONCLUSIONS




                      • The (SZ) method is definitely the quickest method. It was 2X to 4X faster. This can be very much an issue on high-def videos, since all of the other methods took longer to convert than the actual length of the video! For example, The (CR) method took 53 minutes to convert the 21 minute video.


                      • The (SZ) method is definitely the best method if the definition of the video is larger than the definition of the screen that will be displaying it. For example, if your phone can only display a 1080p picture, sending it a 3840x2160 video is just wasteful. It would be best to half its size to 1080p.


                      • Some of the proposed answers actually INCREASED the size of some videos. For example, the (BR) method more than doubled the size of the 1080p sample. It did however make the 2160p size one-third. For the high-def sample, the (CR), (BL) and (DF) methods all INCREASED the size of the video.



                      Correct (or best) Answer



                      It is always best to first lower the resolution to the maximum supported by your target display.



                      If you want to reduce file size further, it will depend on personal choices. You can either reduce information content or increase compression.




                      • You can lower the resolution more if that is not something that concerns you.


                      • If the video doesn't include fast action scenes, you may want to lower the frame rate.


                      • If you have a powerful processor and space is the only issue, you can increase the compression rate.


                      • Bit rate is a combination of multiple factors. So just telling ffmpeg to lower the bit rate may not give you the results you want.


                      • Another way of lower information content is to lower the color depth. How to do this was not yet discussed.







                      share|improve this answer




























                        4












                        4








                        4







                        I tested most of the other proposed answers to this question. The test data conclusions are below. These are the proposed answers that I tested:



                        (BR) Modify the bitrate, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -b $bitrate $newoutfile 


                        (CR) Vary the Constant Rate Factor, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 $outfile


                        (SZ) Change the video size (for example to half size), using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" $outfile


                        (BL) Change the H.264 profile to "baseline", using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -profile:v baseline $outfile


                        (DF) Use the default ffmpeg processing, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile $outfile


                        DATA




                        • "size" - percent size of the converted video in relation to the original.

                        • "bitrate" - bitrates of original and converted videos.

                        • "definition" - pixel size of videos.

                        • "convert" - time to convert the video in seconds.


                        I calculated the target bitrate for (BL)using the proposed method.



                        === File A - How Node Is Helping To Propel Angular-Fnbixa7Ts6M.mkv ===



                                    original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                        -------- --- -- -- -- --
                        size 64152 kb 214% 76% 40% 83% 76%
                        bitrate 411 kb/s 883 313 165 342 313
                        definition 1920x1080 1920x1080 1920x1080 960x540 1920x1080 1920x1080
                        convert -- 648 509 225 427 510


                        === File B - Using GraphQL with Angular _ By - Lee Costello-OGyFxqt5INw.mkv ===



                                    original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                        -------- --- -- -- -- --
                        size 410301 kb 33% 109% 28% 143% 109%
                        bitrate 2687 kb/s 880 2920 764 3843 2920
                        definition 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 1920x1080 3840x2160 3840x2160
                        convert -- 2307 3188 1116 2646 3278


                        CONCLUSIONS




                        • The (SZ) method is definitely the quickest method. It was 2X to 4X faster. This can be very much an issue on high-def videos, since all of the other methods took longer to convert than the actual length of the video! For example, The (CR) method took 53 minutes to convert the 21 minute video.


                        • The (SZ) method is definitely the best method if the definition of the video is larger than the definition of the screen that will be displaying it. For example, if your phone can only display a 1080p picture, sending it a 3840x2160 video is just wasteful. It would be best to half its size to 1080p.


                        • Some of the proposed answers actually INCREASED the size of some videos. For example, the (BR) method more than doubled the size of the 1080p sample. It did however make the 2160p size one-third. For the high-def sample, the (CR), (BL) and (DF) methods all INCREASED the size of the video.



                        Correct (or best) Answer



                        It is always best to first lower the resolution to the maximum supported by your target display.



                        If you want to reduce file size further, it will depend on personal choices. You can either reduce information content or increase compression.




                        • You can lower the resolution more if that is not something that concerns you.


                        • If the video doesn't include fast action scenes, you may want to lower the frame rate.


                        • If you have a powerful processor and space is the only issue, you can increase the compression rate.


                        • Bit rate is a combination of multiple factors. So just telling ffmpeg to lower the bit rate may not give you the results you want.


                        • Another way of lower information content is to lower the color depth. How to do this was not yet discussed.







                        share|improve this answer















                        I tested most of the other proposed answers to this question. The test data conclusions are below. These are the proposed answers that I tested:



                        (BR) Modify the bitrate, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -b $bitrate $newoutfile 


                        (CR) Vary the Constant Rate Factor, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 $outfile


                        (SZ) Change the video size (for example to half size), using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -vf "scale=iw/2:ih/2" $outfile


                        (BL) Change the H.264 profile to "baseline", using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile -profile:v baseline $outfile


                        (DF) Use the default ffmpeg processing, using:



                        ffmpeg -i $infile $outfile


                        DATA




                        • "size" - percent size of the converted video in relation to the original.

                        • "bitrate" - bitrates of original and converted videos.

                        • "definition" - pixel size of videos.

                        • "convert" - time to convert the video in seconds.


                        I calculated the target bitrate for (BL)using the proposed method.



                        === File A - How Node Is Helping To Propel Angular-Fnbixa7Ts6M.mkv ===



                                    original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                        -------- --- -- -- -- --
                        size 64152 kb 214% 76% 40% 83% 76%
                        bitrate 411 kb/s 883 313 165 342 313
                        definition 1920x1080 1920x1080 1920x1080 960x540 1920x1080 1920x1080
                        convert -- 648 509 225 427 510


                        === File B - Using GraphQL with Angular _ By - Lee Costello-OGyFxqt5INw.mkv ===



                                    original    BR         CR         SZ         BL         DF
                        -------- --- -- -- -- --
                        size 410301 kb 33% 109% 28% 143% 109%
                        bitrate 2687 kb/s 880 2920 764 3843 2920
                        definition 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 1920x1080 3840x2160 3840x2160
                        convert -- 2307 3188 1116 2646 3278


                        CONCLUSIONS




                        • The (SZ) method is definitely the quickest method. It was 2X to 4X faster. This can be very much an issue on high-def videos, since all of the other methods took longer to convert than the actual length of the video! For example, The (CR) method took 53 minutes to convert the 21 minute video.


                        • The (SZ) method is definitely the best method if the definition of the video is larger than the definition of the screen that will be displaying it. For example, if your phone can only display a 1080p picture, sending it a 3840x2160 video is just wasteful. It would be best to half its size to 1080p.


                        • Some of the proposed answers actually INCREASED the size of some videos. For example, the (BR) method more than doubled the size of the 1080p sample. It did however make the 2160p size one-third. For the high-def sample, the (CR), (BL) and (DF) methods all INCREASED the size of the video.



                        Correct (or best) Answer



                        It is always best to first lower the resolution to the maximum supported by your target display.



                        If you want to reduce file size further, it will depend on personal choices. You can either reduce information content or increase compression.




                        • You can lower the resolution more if that is not something that concerns you.


                        • If the video doesn't include fast action scenes, you may want to lower the frame rate.


                        • If you have a powerful processor and space is the only issue, you can increase the compression rate.


                        • Bit rate is a combination of multiple factors. So just telling ffmpeg to lower the bit rate may not give you the results you want.


                        • Another way of lower information content is to lower the color depth. How to do this was not yet discussed.








                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Feb 5 at 23:49

























                        answered Feb 4 at 17:55









                        John PankowiczJohn Pankowicz

                        1413




                        1413























                            2














                            Note that it seems that ffmpeg already performs some optimization when ran without options, so before trying to use settings you don't understand or deciding to explicitly lose information, give a try to a default conversion :



                            ffmpeg -i input.mp4 output.mp4


                            In my case it reduced the bitrate of both the video and audio (you can check and compare the input and output file by running ffprobe on them), transforming a 700 Mb video into a 60 Mb one of seemingly similar quality.






                            share|improve this answer




























                              2














                              Note that it seems that ffmpeg already performs some optimization when ran without options, so before trying to use settings you don't understand or deciding to explicitly lose information, give a try to a default conversion :



                              ffmpeg -i input.mp4 output.mp4


                              In my case it reduced the bitrate of both the video and audio (you can check and compare the input and output file by running ffprobe on them), transforming a 700 Mb video into a 60 Mb one of seemingly similar quality.






                              share|improve this answer


























                                2












                                2








                                2







                                Note that it seems that ffmpeg already performs some optimization when ran without options, so before trying to use settings you don't understand or deciding to explicitly lose information, give a try to a default conversion :



                                ffmpeg -i input.mp4 output.mp4


                                In my case it reduced the bitrate of both the video and audio (you can check and compare the input and output file by running ffprobe on them), transforming a 700 Mb video into a 60 Mb one of seemingly similar quality.






                                share|improve this answer













                                Note that it seems that ffmpeg already performs some optimization when ran without options, so before trying to use settings you don't understand or deciding to explicitly lose information, give a try to a default conversion :



                                ffmpeg -i input.mp4 output.mp4


                                In my case it reduced the bitrate of both the video and audio (you can check and compare the input and output file by running ffprobe on them), transforming a 700 Mb video into a 60 Mb one of seemingly similar quality.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered Jan 1 at 21:04









                                Skippy le Grand GourouSkippy le Grand Gourou

                                1,0721122




                                1,0721122























                                    1














                                    You'll need to use 2-pass encoding to "fit" a video within a designated file size (bitrate), without reducing the quality too drastically. This is quite a detailed topic: http://www.mpabo.com/2014/12/14/ffmpeg-and-x264-encoding-guide/






                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      1














                                      You'll need to use 2-pass encoding to "fit" a video within a designated file size (bitrate), without reducing the quality too drastically. This is quite a detailed topic: http://www.mpabo.com/2014/12/14/ffmpeg-and-x264-encoding-guide/






                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        1












                                        1








                                        1







                                        You'll need to use 2-pass encoding to "fit" a video within a designated file size (bitrate), without reducing the quality too drastically. This is quite a detailed topic: http://www.mpabo.com/2014/12/14/ffmpeg-and-x264-encoding-guide/






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        You'll need to use 2-pass encoding to "fit" a video within a designated file size (bitrate), without reducing the quality too drastically. This is quite a detailed topic: http://www.mpabo.com/2014/12/14/ffmpeg-and-x264-encoding-guide/







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Jun 12 '16 at 18:20









                                        SaltySub2SaltySub2

                                        1112




                                        1112























                                            1














                                            I have a recipe I originally forged for myself in order to convert the Motion JPEG videos my old camera generates (they are very large videos, since each frame is an entire JPEG image) to h264. Here's an adaptation for other kinds of videos (courses, etc).



                                            I'm not using ffmpeg, but mplayer and mencoder. First, We have to demux the audio with mplayer:



                                            mplayer -vo null -ao pcm:fast:file=<audio_pcm.wav> <video>



                                            • The -vo null and -ao null parameters tells mplayer to not extract video.


                                            In the next steps, we'll do a 3-pass compression with mencoder. At the first pass we'll choose a suitable Constant Quality Mode compression (crf parameter) as a start point:



                                            mencoder <video> -ovc x264  
                                            -x264encopts ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:crf=<value>:pass=1
                                            -nosound -o video1.h264



                                            • You can add slow_firstpass parameter to the -x264encopts if you are paranoid with the final quality of the video. Mencoder manual says that this option disable some parameters that “significantly improve encoding speed while having little or no impact on the quality of the final pass”. So, use it only at the last step.


                                            • You should try several values for crf
                                              try starting from 25 and goes on increasing it until you note artifacts at the resulting video (higher values compresses more). Remember subsequent encoding passes will improve the quality you have choosed for crf.


                                            • Alternatives for the veryslow preset are slower, slow, medium etc. See mencoder manual for the complete list.


                                            • ratetol controls the bitrate variation — I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing here, but I set it to the maximum value in order to let total freedom to mencoder to choose the right bitrate for each scene.



                                            After the first pass, you'll note that the last line gives you the average bitrate you will use at the next steps:



                                            (...)
                                            x264 [info]: kb/s:526.43


                                            Change the crf parameter, recommended at the first pass, to bitrate, required at the subsequent passes:



                                            mencoder <video> -ovc x264 
                                            -x264encopts slow_firstpass:ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:bitrate=526:pass=3
                                            -nosound -o video2.h264


                                            This second pass encoding will read the statistics generated at the first pass (divx2pass.log and divx2pass.log.mbtree) in order to optimize the compression.




                                            • Note you'll use the same video input, not the generated by the first pass — first pass' output video is only useful to check the initial quality.


                                            • Note also that the pass=3 (not pass=2) will generate a new statistics file, so you can repeat the last step as many times you want. I usually do pass=3 twice, always paying attention to the result bitrate.



                                            Meanwhile, you can compress the audio too, using lame or oggenc:



                                            oggenc -q<n> <audio_pcm.wav>


                                            Finally, we'll remux audio and video



                                            mencoder -audiofile <audio>.ogg video2.h264 -oac copy -ovc copy 
                                            -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 -o <video>.mp4



                                            • The -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 generates mp4 file format using the lavopts muxers.






                                            share|improve this answer






























                                              1














                                              I have a recipe I originally forged for myself in order to convert the Motion JPEG videos my old camera generates (they are very large videos, since each frame is an entire JPEG image) to h264. Here's an adaptation for other kinds of videos (courses, etc).



                                              I'm not using ffmpeg, but mplayer and mencoder. First, We have to demux the audio with mplayer:



                                              mplayer -vo null -ao pcm:fast:file=<audio_pcm.wav> <video>



                                              • The -vo null and -ao null parameters tells mplayer to not extract video.


                                              In the next steps, we'll do a 3-pass compression with mencoder. At the first pass we'll choose a suitable Constant Quality Mode compression (crf parameter) as a start point:



                                              mencoder <video> -ovc x264  
                                              -x264encopts ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:crf=<value>:pass=1
                                              -nosound -o video1.h264



                                              • You can add slow_firstpass parameter to the -x264encopts if you are paranoid with the final quality of the video. Mencoder manual says that this option disable some parameters that “significantly improve encoding speed while having little or no impact on the quality of the final pass”. So, use it only at the last step.


                                              • You should try several values for crf
                                                try starting from 25 and goes on increasing it until you note artifacts at the resulting video (higher values compresses more). Remember subsequent encoding passes will improve the quality you have choosed for crf.


                                              • Alternatives for the veryslow preset are slower, slow, medium etc. See mencoder manual for the complete list.


                                              • ratetol controls the bitrate variation — I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing here, but I set it to the maximum value in order to let total freedom to mencoder to choose the right bitrate for each scene.



                                              After the first pass, you'll note that the last line gives you the average bitrate you will use at the next steps:



                                              (...)
                                              x264 [info]: kb/s:526.43


                                              Change the crf parameter, recommended at the first pass, to bitrate, required at the subsequent passes:



                                              mencoder <video> -ovc x264 
                                              -x264encopts slow_firstpass:ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:bitrate=526:pass=3
                                              -nosound -o video2.h264


                                              This second pass encoding will read the statistics generated at the first pass (divx2pass.log and divx2pass.log.mbtree) in order to optimize the compression.




                                              • Note you'll use the same video input, not the generated by the first pass — first pass' output video is only useful to check the initial quality.


                                              • Note also that the pass=3 (not pass=2) will generate a new statistics file, so you can repeat the last step as many times you want. I usually do pass=3 twice, always paying attention to the result bitrate.



                                              Meanwhile, you can compress the audio too, using lame or oggenc:



                                              oggenc -q<n> <audio_pcm.wav>


                                              Finally, we'll remux audio and video



                                              mencoder -audiofile <audio>.ogg video2.h264 -oac copy -ovc copy 
                                              -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 -o <video>.mp4



                                              • The -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 generates mp4 file format using the lavopts muxers.






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                1












                                                1








                                                1







                                                I have a recipe I originally forged for myself in order to convert the Motion JPEG videos my old camera generates (they are very large videos, since each frame is an entire JPEG image) to h264. Here's an adaptation for other kinds of videos (courses, etc).



                                                I'm not using ffmpeg, but mplayer and mencoder. First, We have to demux the audio with mplayer:



                                                mplayer -vo null -ao pcm:fast:file=<audio_pcm.wav> <video>



                                                • The -vo null and -ao null parameters tells mplayer to not extract video.


                                                In the next steps, we'll do a 3-pass compression with mencoder. At the first pass we'll choose a suitable Constant Quality Mode compression (crf parameter) as a start point:



                                                mencoder <video> -ovc x264  
                                                -x264encopts ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:crf=<value>:pass=1
                                                -nosound -o video1.h264



                                                • You can add slow_firstpass parameter to the -x264encopts if you are paranoid with the final quality of the video. Mencoder manual says that this option disable some parameters that “significantly improve encoding speed while having little or no impact on the quality of the final pass”. So, use it only at the last step.


                                                • You should try several values for crf
                                                  try starting from 25 and goes on increasing it until you note artifacts at the resulting video (higher values compresses more). Remember subsequent encoding passes will improve the quality you have choosed for crf.


                                                • Alternatives for the veryslow preset are slower, slow, medium etc. See mencoder manual for the complete list.


                                                • ratetol controls the bitrate variation — I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing here, but I set it to the maximum value in order to let total freedom to mencoder to choose the right bitrate for each scene.



                                                After the first pass, you'll note that the last line gives you the average bitrate you will use at the next steps:



                                                (...)
                                                x264 [info]: kb/s:526.43


                                                Change the crf parameter, recommended at the first pass, to bitrate, required at the subsequent passes:



                                                mencoder <video> -ovc x264 
                                                -x264encopts slow_firstpass:ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:bitrate=526:pass=3
                                                -nosound -o video2.h264


                                                This second pass encoding will read the statistics generated at the first pass (divx2pass.log and divx2pass.log.mbtree) in order to optimize the compression.




                                                • Note you'll use the same video input, not the generated by the first pass — first pass' output video is only useful to check the initial quality.


                                                • Note also that the pass=3 (not pass=2) will generate a new statistics file, so you can repeat the last step as many times you want. I usually do pass=3 twice, always paying attention to the result bitrate.



                                                Meanwhile, you can compress the audio too, using lame or oggenc:



                                                oggenc -q<n> <audio_pcm.wav>


                                                Finally, we'll remux audio and video



                                                mencoder -audiofile <audio>.ogg video2.h264 -oac copy -ovc copy 
                                                -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 -o <video>.mp4



                                                • The -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 generates mp4 file format using the lavopts muxers.






                                                share|improve this answer















                                                I have a recipe I originally forged for myself in order to convert the Motion JPEG videos my old camera generates (they are very large videos, since each frame is an entire JPEG image) to h264. Here's an adaptation for other kinds of videos (courses, etc).



                                                I'm not using ffmpeg, but mplayer and mencoder. First, We have to demux the audio with mplayer:



                                                mplayer -vo null -ao pcm:fast:file=<audio_pcm.wav> <video>



                                                • The -vo null and -ao null parameters tells mplayer to not extract video.


                                                In the next steps, we'll do a 3-pass compression with mencoder. At the first pass we'll choose a suitable Constant Quality Mode compression (crf parameter) as a start point:



                                                mencoder <video> -ovc x264  
                                                -x264encopts ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:crf=<value>:pass=1
                                                -nosound -o video1.h264



                                                • You can add slow_firstpass parameter to the -x264encopts if you are paranoid with the final quality of the video. Mencoder manual says that this option disable some parameters that “significantly improve encoding speed while having little or no impact on the quality of the final pass”. So, use it only at the last step.


                                                • You should try several values for crf
                                                  try starting from 25 and goes on increasing it until you note artifacts at the resulting video (higher values compresses more). Remember subsequent encoding passes will improve the quality you have choosed for crf.


                                                • Alternatives for the veryslow preset are slower, slow, medium etc. See mencoder manual for the complete list.


                                                • ratetol controls the bitrate variation — I'm not sure if I'm doing the right thing here, but I set it to the maximum value in order to let total freedom to mencoder to choose the right bitrate for each scene.



                                                After the first pass, you'll note that the last line gives you the average bitrate you will use at the next steps:



                                                (...)
                                                x264 [info]: kb/s:526.43


                                                Change the crf parameter, recommended at the first pass, to bitrate, required at the subsequent passes:



                                                mencoder <video> -ovc x264 
                                                -x264encopts slow_firstpass:ratetol=100:preset=veryslow:bitrate=526:pass=3
                                                -nosound -o video2.h264


                                                This second pass encoding will read the statistics generated at the first pass (divx2pass.log and divx2pass.log.mbtree) in order to optimize the compression.




                                                • Note you'll use the same video input, not the generated by the first pass — first pass' output video is only useful to check the initial quality.


                                                • Note also that the pass=3 (not pass=2) will generate a new statistics file, so you can repeat the last step as many times you want. I usually do pass=3 twice, always paying attention to the result bitrate.



                                                Meanwhile, you can compress the audio too, using lame or oggenc:



                                                oggenc -q<n> <audio_pcm.wav>


                                                Finally, we'll remux audio and video



                                                mencoder -audiofile <audio>.ogg video2.h264 -oac copy -ovc copy 
                                                -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 -o <video>.mp4



                                                • The -of lavf -lavfopts format=mp4 generates mp4 file format using the lavopts muxers.







                                                share|improve this answer














                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer








                                                edited Oct 31 '17 at 4:21









                                                agc

                                                4,70111137




                                                4,70111137










                                                answered Dec 20 '16 at 1:36









                                                Juliano B. NequiritoJuliano B. Nequirito

                                                112




                                                112






























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded




















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28803%2fhow-can-i-reduce-a-videos-size-with-ffmpeg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    How to make a Squid Proxy server?

                                                    Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

                                                    19世紀