Linearly ordering the power set of a well ordered set with ZF (without AC)
3
$begingroup$
As the title says, my question is, how one can use only ZF-theory to prove that the power set of A, whereby (A, <) is a well-ordering, can be linearly ordered?
elementary-set-theory logic set-theory order-theory well-orders
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
$endgroup$
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
As the title says, my question is, how one can use only ZF-theory to prove that the power set of A, whereby (A, <) is a well-ordering, can be linearly ordered?
elementary-set-theory logic set-theory order-theory well-orders
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20
add a comment |
3
3
3
$begingroup$
As the title says, my question is, how one can use only ZF-theory to prove that the power set of A, whereby (A, <) is a well-ordering, can be linearly ordered?
elementary-set-theory logic set-theory order-theory well-orders
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
$endgroup$
As the title says, my question is, how one can use only ZF-theory to prove that the power set of A, whereby (A, <) is a well-ordering, can be linearly ordered?
elementary-set-theory logic set-theory order-theory well-orders
elementary-set-theory logic set-theory order-theory well-orders
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
edited Jan 21 at 6:15
Studentu
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
asked Jan 21 at 6:09
StudentuStudentu
1229
1229
1
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20
1
1
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
4
$begingroup$
Find the earliest element in the well order of A where they differ-where it is in one and not the other. Lexicographic order would take the one with the element first.
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081563%2flinearly-ordering-the-power-set-of-a-well-ordered-set-with-zf-without-ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
4
$begingroup$
Find the earliest element in the well order of A where they differ-where it is in one and not the other. Lexicographic order would take the one with the element first.
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
|
show 1 more comment
4
$begingroup$
Find the earliest element in the well order of A where they differ-where it is in one and not the other. Lexicographic order would take the one with the element first.
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
|
show 1 more comment
4
4
4
$begingroup$
Find the earliest element in the well order of A where they differ-where it is in one and not the other. Lexicographic order would take the one with the element first.
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
$endgroup$
Find the earliest element in the well order of A where they differ-where it is in one and not the other. Lexicographic order would take the one with the element first.
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
answered Jan 21 at 6:20
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
295k23198371
295k23198371
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
Not that it matters, but I thought it was usual to represent membership by a $1$ and nonmembership by a $0$, and $0$ comes before $1$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:22
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@bof: I was thinking of each set as a string. If we use the alphabet, a string beginning with ab comes before one beginning with ac because the b is present.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
@RossMillikan Thanks for your reply! I hve thought of this, as it was suggested in this thread math.stackexchange.com/questions/90078/… but I don't know how to explain that it only uses ZF-theory?
$endgroup$
– Studentu
Jan 21 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Once you have a well order on $A$ (you really just need a total order) you just start down the list. Is the first element in only one subset? If so, that one comes first. Otherwise, keep going. ZF can answer is $x in X$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 21 at 16:46
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
$begingroup$
You don't "just need a total order", you need a well-order. How would you order the power set of $mathbb R$? Which comes first, $mathbb Q$ or $mathbb Rsetminusmathbb Q$? I don't believe you can prove in ZF that there is a total order on the power set of $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 22 at 1:11
|
show 1 more comment
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081563%2flinearly-ordering-the-power-set-of-a-well-ordered-set-with-zf-without-ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Lexicograpohically, by first difference? Where's the snag?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jan 21 at 6:20