How can I make chown work recursively?












255















I've got a directory called pdfs that contains a bunch of sub- and sub-sub-directories. I want to change ownership on all PDF files in all of the subfolders. I just tried this:



chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


...but it didn't change ownership of the PDFs in subdirectories. The user and group do exist.



According to the man page for chown, the -R should mean recursive:



-R, --recursive
operate on files and directories recursively


What am I missing?










share|improve this question





























    255















    I've got a directory called pdfs that contains a bunch of sub- and sub-sub-directories. I want to change ownership on all PDF files in all of the subfolders. I just tried this:



    chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


    ...but it didn't change ownership of the PDFs in subdirectories. The user and group do exist.



    According to the man page for chown, the -R should mean recursive:



    -R, --recursive
    operate on files and directories recursively


    What am I missing?










    share|improve this question



























      255












      255








      255


      54






      I've got a directory called pdfs that contains a bunch of sub- and sub-sub-directories. I want to change ownership on all PDF files in all of the subfolders. I just tried this:



      chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


      ...but it didn't change ownership of the PDFs in subdirectories. The user and group do exist.



      According to the man page for chown, the -R should mean recursive:



      -R, --recursive
      operate on files and directories recursively


      What am I missing?










      share|improve this question
















      I've got a directory called pdfs that contains a bunch of sub- and sub-sub-directories. I want to change ownership on all PDF files in all of the subfolders. I just tried this:



      chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


      ...but it didn't change ownership of the PDFs in subdirectories. The user and group do exist.



      According to the man page for chown, the -R should mean recursive:



      -R, --recursive
      operate on files and directories recursively


      What am I missing?







      unix permissions






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 22 '11 at 16:45









      Pops

      4,723246390




      4,723246390










      asked Mar 22 '11 at 16:29









      Nathan LongNathan Long

      10.9k2880125




      10.9k2880125






















          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          262














          Recursive mode only works on directories, not files. By using the glob '*.pdf' the shell is passing the file list to chown, which sees these are files, and changes the permissions on the files it sees, and that's it.



          Remember, in shells, the glob is evaluated by the shell, not the command. If the glob matches files, they are passed to the command and the command never knows a glob existed. (This is different than how Windows Command prompt used to do things). If you have a dir, with the contents something like:



          machine:$ ls -F
          file1.pdf file2.pdf other.txt subdir/


          And you typed:



          chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


          The shell would first make the list:
          file1.pdf file2.pdf



          and then run your command:



          chown -R someuser:somegroup file1.pdf file2.pdf


          See, there's no directory for -R to act on. It does what you asked it - change ownership on the two files on the command line, ignoring that quirky -R flag.



          To do what you want, to use the '*.pdf' as a pattern for this directory and subdirectories, you can use find, which can find files that match a filename pattern (or many other criterea) and pass to a subcommand



          find . -type f -name '*.pdf' | xargs chown someuser:somegroup


          This starts in current dir '.' to look for files (filetype f) of name pattern '*.pdf' then passes to xargs, which constructs a command line to chmod. Notice the quotes around the pattern '*.pdf', remember that the shell will create a glob if it can, but you want the pattern passed to find, so you need to quote it.



          Because filenames may have spaces in them, you want to use a trick to make it filename-with-spaces safe:



          find . -type f -name '*.pdf' -print0 | xargs -0 chown someuser:somegroup


          In bash 3 and lower, this is the way you need to do it. More powerful globbing is available in bash 4 (with shopt -s globstar)and other shells. The same in zsh, using a recursive glob **:



          chown -R someuser:somegroup ./**/*.pdf





          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

            – kojiro
            Mar 22 '11 at 22:54











          • @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

            – Rich Homolka
            Mar 22 '11 at 22:58






          • 2





            Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

            – gwideman
            Sep 28 '13 at 12:23











          • @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

            – Rich Homolka
            Mar 7 '15 at 23:40











          • @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

            – gwideman
            Mar 8 '15 at 23:51



















          40














          It's not complicated.



          chown -R someuser:somegroup /your/folder/here/*


          This will apply chown to all files and all subdirectories and sub-subdirectories of the specified folder. Use with care.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

            – Francisco Tapia
            Nov 9 '15 at 17:22






          • 2





            This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

            – Sprachprofi
            Nov 10 '15 at 10:12











          • sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

            – Francisco Tapia
            Nov 10 '15 at 11:59






          • 2





            Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

            – Slav
            Jun 4 '18 at 8:14








          • 1





            I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

            – Rich Homolka
            Jul 20 '18 at 15:29



















          14














          You can use the find utility:



          find . -name '*.pdf' -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} +


          Please don't forget the quotes around *.pdf. Otherwise the shell will try to expand it. This means already the shell will replace *.pdf with the names of all PDF files found in the current directory. But that's not what you want. You want to find the PDF files located in subdirectories. Btw.: That's also the problem with your chown command.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

            – Patrick M
            Jan 13 '14 at 18:28











          • @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

            – Rich Homolka
            Jul 20 '18 at 14:36



















          6














          The command



          chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


          will only recurse down directories if the directory name ends in .pdf. You need something like:



          find . -name "*.pdf" -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} ;





          share|improve this answer
























          • Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

            – Rich Homolka
            Apr 6 '15 at 21:28



















          0














          to change the ownership of a directory recursively simply use:



          sudo chown -R <username>:<groupname> <dir name>


          here username = the new user who should be owner of directory



          groupname = the new group which should be owner of directory



          every file/directory has a user owner and a group owner






          share|improve this answer
























          • This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

            – Rich Homolka
            Jan 15 '17 at 18:50



















          0














          I use tree instead:



           sudo tree -fai ~/.blabla  | xargs -L1 -I{} sudo chown youruser:youruser {}


          Also take care to not run recursive chown or chmod on '/' directory or other system directory.






          share|improve this answer































            0














            To become the owner of all files in a directory, use



            find directory -type f -name '*' | sudo xargs -d 'n' chown $USER


            instead of



            sudo chown $USER directory*


            or



            sudo chown --recursive $USER directory


            which might not work if there are too many arguments produced by * (too many files in the directory) or which does not not do what you want respectively.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "3"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f260925%2fhow-can-i-make-chown-work-recursively%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes








              7 Answers
              7






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              262














              Recursive mode only works on directories, not files. By using the glob '*.pdf' the shell is passing the file list to chown, which sees these are files, and changes the permissions on the files it sees, and that's it.



              Remember, in shells, the glob is evaluated by the shell, not the command. If the glob matches files, they are passed to the command and the command never knows a glob existed. (This is different than how Windows Command prompt used to do things). If you have a dir, with the contents something like:



              machine:$ ls -F
              file1.pdf file2.pdf other.txt subdir/


              And you typed:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              The shell would first make the list:
              file1.pdf file2.pdf



              and then run your command:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup file1.pdf file2.pdf


              See, there's no directory for -R to act on. It does what you asked it - change ownership on the two files on the command line, ignoring that quirky -R flag.



              To do what you want, to use the '*.pdf' as a pattern for this directory and subdirectories, you can use find, which can find files that match a filename pattern (or many other criterea) and pass to a subcommand



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' | xargs chown someuser:somegroup


              This starts in current dir '.' to look for files (filetype f) of name pattern '*.pdf' then passes to xargs, which constructs a command line to chmod. Notice the quotes around the pattern '*.pdf', remember that the shell will create a glob if it can, but you want the pattern passed to find, so you need to quote it.



              Because filenames may have spaces in them, you want to use a trick to make it filename-with-spaces safe:



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' -print0 | xargs -0 chown someuser:somegroup


              In bash 3 and lower, this is the way you need to do it. More powerful globbing is available in bash 4 (with shopt -s globstar)and other shells. The same in zsh, using a recursive glob **:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup ./**/*.pdf





              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

                – kojiro
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:54











              • @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:58






              • 2





                Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

                – gwideman
                Sep 28 '13 at 12:23











              • @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 7 '15 at 23:40











              • @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

                – gwideman
                Mar 8 '15 at 23:51
















              262














              Recursive mode only works on directories, not files. By using the glob '*.pdf' the shell is passing the file list to chown, which sees these are files, and changes the permissions on the files it sees, and that's it.



              Remember, in shells, the glob is evaluated by the shell, not the command. If the glob matches files, they are passed to the command and the command never knows a glob existed. (This is different than how Windows Command prompt used to do things). If you have a dir, with the contents something like:



              machine:$ ls -F
              file1.pdf file2.pdf other.txt subdir/


              And you typed:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              The shell would first make the list:
              file1.pdf file2.pdf



              and then run your command:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup file1.pdf file2.pdf


              See, there's no directory for -R to act on. It does what you asked it - change ownership on the two files on the command line, ignoring that quirky -R flag.



              To do what you want, to use the '*.pdf' as a pattern for this directory and subdirectories, you can use find, which can find files that match a filename pattern (or many other criterea) and pass to a subcommand



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' | xargs chown someuser:somegroup


              This starts in current dir '.' to look for files (filetype f) of name pattern '*.pdf' then passes to xargs, which constructs a command line to chmod. Notice the quotes around the pattern '*.pdf', remember that the shell will create a glob if it can, but you want the pattern passed to find, so you need to quote it.



              Because filenames may have spaces in them, you want to use a trick to make it filename-with-spaces safe:



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' -print0 | xargs -0 chown someuser:somegroup


              In bash 3 and lower, this is the way you need to do it. More powerful globbing is available in bash 4 (with shopt -s globstar)and other shells. The same in zsh, using a recursive glob **:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup ./**/*.pdf





              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

                – kojiro
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:54











              • @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:58






              • 2





                Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

                – gwideman
                Sep 28 '13 at 12:23











              • @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 7 '15 at 23:40











              • @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

                – gwideman
                Mar 8 '15 at 23:51














              262












              262








              262







              Recursive mode only works on directories, not files. By using the glob '*.pdf' the shell is passing the file list to chown, which sees these are files, and changes the permissions on the files it sees, and that's it.



              Remember, in shells, the glob is evaluated by the shell, not the command. If the glob matches files, they are passed to the command and the command never knows a glob existed. (This is different than how Windows Command prompt used to do things). If you have a dir, with the contents something like:



              machine:$ ls -F
              file1.pdf file2.pdf other.txt subdir/


              And you typed:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              The shell would first make the list:
              file1.pdf file2.pdf



              and then run your command:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup file1.pdf file2.pdf


              See, there's no directory for -R to act on. It does what you asked it - change ownership on the two files on the command line, ignoring that quirky -R flag.



              To do what you want, to use the '*.pdf' as a pattern for this directory and subdirectories, you can use find, which can find files that match a filename pattern (or many other criterea) and pass to a subcommand



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' | xargs chown someuser:somegroup


              This starts in current dir '.' to look for files (filetype f) of name pattern '*.pdf' then passes to xargs, which constructs a command line to chmod. Notice the quotes around the pattern '*.pdf', remember that the shell will create a glob if it can, but you want the pattern passed to find, so you need to quote it.



              Because filenames may have spaces in them, you want to use a trick to make it filename-with-spaces safe:



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' -print0 | xargs -0 chown someuser:somegroup


              In bash 3 and lower, this is the way you need to do it. More powerful globbing is available in bash 4 (with shopt -s globstar)and other shells. The same in zsh, using a recursive glob **:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup ./**/*.pdf





              share|improve this answer















              Recursive mode only works on directories, not files. By using the glob '*.pdf' the shell is passing the file list to chown, which sees these are files, and changes the permissions on the files it sees, and that's it.



              Remember, in shells, the glob is evaluated by the shell, not the command. If the glob matches files, they are passed to the command and the command never knows a glob existed. (This is different than how Windows Command prompt used to do things). If you have a dir, with the contents something like:



              machine:$ ls -F
              file1.pdf file2.pdf other.txt subdir/


              And you typed:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              The shell would first make the list:
              file1.pdf file2.pdf



              and then run your command:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup file1.pdf file2.pdf


              See, there's no directory for -R to act on. It does what you asked it - change ownership on the two files on the command line, ignoring that quirky -R flag.



              To do what you want, to use the '*.pdf' as a pattern for this directory and subdirectories, you can use find, which can find files that match a filename pattern (or many other criterea) and pass to a subcommand



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' | xargs chown someuser:somegroup


              This starts in current dir '.' to look for files (filetype f) of name pattern '*.pdf' then passes to xargs, which constructs a command line to chmod. Notice the quotes around the pattern '*.pdf', remember that the shell will create a glob if it can, but you want the pattern passed to find, so you need to quote it.



              Because filenames may have spaces in them, you want to use a trick to make it filename-with-spaces safe:



              find . -type f -name '*.pdf' -print0 | xargs -0 chown someuser:somegroup


              In bash 3 and lower, this is the way you need to do it. More powerful globbing is available in bash 4 (with shopt -s globstar)and other shells. The same in zsh, using a recursive glob **:



              chown -R someuser:somegroup ./**/*.pdf






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 1 '15 at 18:54

























              answered Mar 22 '11 at 16:47









              Rich HomolkaRich Homolka

              25.4k64367




              25.4k64367








              • 1





                Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

                – kojiro
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:54











              • @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:58






              • 2





                Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

                – gwideman
                Sep 28 '13 at 12:23











              • @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 7 '15 at 23:40











              • @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

                – gwideman
                Mar 8 '15 at 23:51














              • 1





                Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

                – kojiro
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:54











              • @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 22 '11 at 22:58






              • 2





                Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

                – gwideman
                Sep 28 '13 at 12:23











              • @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

                – Rich Homolka
                Mar 7 '15 at 23:40











              • @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

                – gwideman
                Mar 8 '15 at 23:51








              1




              1





              Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

              – kojiro
              Mar 22 '11 at 22:54





              Edited to reflect that bash 4 with shopt -s globstar does recursive globbing.

              – kojiro
              Mar 22 '11 at 22:54













              @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

              – Rich Homolka
              Mar 22 '11 at 22:58





              @kojiro thanks! as you can tell I still use bash3

              – Rich Homolka
              Mar 22 '11 at 22:58




              2




              2





              Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

              – gwideman
              Sep 28 '13 at 12:23





              Per the man page shown by the original poster, I found the chown -R did indeed change owner on folders AND files. No need for find. Using Mint 15.

              – gwideman
              Sep 28 '13 at 12:23













              @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

              – Rich Homolka
              Mar 7 '15 at 23:40





              @gwideman I know this is old... But yes, of course -R does recursive. The OP just had an issue with a very specific type of recursion, an extension and "file type is file" filtered one

              – Rich Homolka
              Mar 7 '15 at 23:40













              @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

              – gwideman
              Mar 8 '15 at 23:51





              @RichHomolka Ah. OP said the files were in a directory called 'pdfs', so I assumed the problem was in how to specify pdfs as the directory to recurse, and that all contained files were pdfs, so no need to select them specifically. But you may well be right, if the job is to select only pdf files, and leave others unchanged.

              – gwideman
              Mar 8 '15 at 23:51













              40














              It's not complicated.



              chown -R someuser:somegroup /your/folder/here/*


              This will apply chown to all files and all subdirectories and sub-subdirectories of the specified folder. Use with care.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 9 '15 at 17:22






              • 2





                This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

                – Sprachprofi
                Nov 10 '15 at 10:12











              • sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 10 '15 at 11:59






              • 2





                Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

                – Slav
                Jun 4 '18 at 8:14








              • 1





                I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 15:29
















              40














              It's not complicated.



              chown -R someuser:somegroup /your/folder/here/*


              This will apply chown to all files and all subdirectories and sub-subdirectories of the specified folder. Use with care.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 9 '15 at 17:22






              • 2





                This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

                – Sprachprofi
                Nov 10 '15 at 10:12











              • sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 10 '15 at 11:59






              • 2





                Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

                – Slav
                Jun 4 '18 at 8:14








              • 1





                I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 15:29














              40












              40








              40







              It's not complicated.



              chown -R someuser:somegroup /your/folder/here/*


              This will apply chown to all files and all subdirectories and sub-subdirectories of the specified folder. Use with care.






              share|improve this answer













              It's not complicated.



              chown -R someuser:somegroup /your/folder/here/*


              This will apply chown to all files and all subdirectories and sub-subdirectories of the specified folder. Use with care.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 9 '15 at 11:44









              SprachprofiSprachprofi

              50144




              50144













              • Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 9 '15 at 17:22






              • 2





                This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

                – Sprachprofi
                Nov 10 '15 at 10:12











              • sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 10 '15 at 11:59






              • 2





                Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

                – Slav
                Jun 4 '18 at 8:14








              • 1





                I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 15:29



















              • Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 9 '15 at 17:22






              • 2





                This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

                – Sprachprofi
                Nov 10 '15 at 10:12











              • sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

                – Francisco Tapia
                Nov 10 '15 at 11:59






              • 2





                Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

                – Slav
                Jun 4 '18 at 8:14








              • 1





                I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 15:29

















              Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

              – Francisco Tapia
              Nov 9 '15 at 17:22





              Clearly someone answer it since 4 years, but ty for the warning.

              – Francisco Tapia
              Nov 9 '15 at 17:22




              2




              2





              This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

              – Sprachprofi
              Nov 10 '15 at 10:12





              This question is currently #1 on Google, so it's important to note the correct answer.

              – Sprachprofi
              Nov 10 '15 at 10:12













              sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

              – Francisco Tapia
              Nov 10 '15 at 11:59





              sure, the accepted one is more elegant, readable and complete

              – Francisco Tapia
              Nov 10 '15 at 11:59




              2




              2





              Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

              – Slav
              Jun 4 '18 at 8:14







              Somehow sudo chown -R user ./ worked for me, but sudo chown -R user ./* didn't

              – Slav
              Jun 4 '18 at 8:14






              1




              1





              I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

              – Rich Homolka
              Jul 20 '18 at 15:29





              I know this is old, but though this answers the headline, does not answer the question. This is actually slightly worse than what OP had already tried.

              – Rich Homolka
              Jul 20 '18 at 15:29











              14














              You can use the find utility:



              find . -name '*.pdf' -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} +


              Please don't forget the quotes around *.pdf. Otherwise the shell will try to expand it. This means already the shell will replace *.pdf with the names of all PDF files found in the current directory. But that's not what you want. You want to find the PDF files located in subdirectories. Btw.: That's also the problem with your chown command.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

                – Patrick M
                Jan 13 '14 at 18:28











              • @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 14:36
















              14














              You can use the find utility:



              find . -name '*.pdf' -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} +


              Please don't forget the quotes around *.pdf. Otherwise the shell will try to expand it. This means already the shell will replace *.pdf with the names of all PDF files found in the current directory. But that's not what you want. You want to find the PDF files located in subdirectories. Btw.: That's also the problem with your chown command.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

                – Patrick M
                Jan 13 '14 at 18:28











              • @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 14:36














              14












              14








              14







              You can use the find utility:



              find . -name '*.pdf' -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} +


              Please don't forget the quotes around *.pdf. Otherwise the shell will try to expand it. This means already the shell will replace *.pdf with the names of all PDF files found in the current directory. But that's not what you want. You want to find the PDF files located in subdirectories. Btw.: That's also the problem with your chown command.






              share|improve this answer













              You can use the find utility:



              find . -name '*.pdf' -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} +


              Please don't forget the quotes around *.pdf. Otherwise the shell will try to expand it. This means already the shell will replace *.pdf with the names of all PDF files found in the current directory. But that's not what you want. You want to find the PDF files located in subdirectories. Btw.: That's also the problem with your chown command.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Mar 22 '11 at 16:37









              bmkbmk

              1,5991011




              1,5991011








              • 1





                I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

                – Patrick M
                Jan 13 '14 at 18:28











              • @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 14:36














              • 1





                I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

                – Patrick M
                Jan 13 '14 at 18:28











              • @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

                – Rich Homolka
                Jul 20 '18 at 14:36








              1




              1





              I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

              – Patrick M
              Jan 13 '14 at 18:28





              I had to look up the +, neat trick for performance. -exec command {} + This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the selected files, but the command line is built by appending each selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the command will be much less than the number of matched files. The command line is built in much the same way that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of {} is allowed within the command. The command is executed in the starting directory.

              – Patrick M
              Jan 13 '14 at 18:28













              @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

              – Rich Homolka
              Jul 20 '18 at 14:36





              @PatrickM one (minor) other advantage to + vs ; .... plus isn’t a shell meta character and doesn’t have to be escaped

              – Rich Homolka
              Jul 20 '18 at 14:36











              6














              The command



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              will only recurse down directories if the directory name ends in .pdf. You need something like:



              find . -name "*.pdf" -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} ;





              share|improve this answer
























              • Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

                – Rich Homolka
                Apr 6 '15 at 21:28
















              6














              The command



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              will only recurse down directories if the directory name ends in .pdf. You need something like:



              find . -name "*.pdf" -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} ;





              share|improve this answer
























              • Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

                – Rich Homolka
                Apr 6 '15 at 21:28














              6












              6








              6







              The command



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              will only recurse down directories if the directory name ends in .pdf. You need something like:



              find . -name "*.pdf" -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} ;





              share|improve this answer













              The command



              chown -R someuser:somegroup *.pdf


              will only recurse down directories if the directory name ends in .pdf. You need something like:



              find . -name "*.pdf" -exec chown someuser:somegroup {} ;






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Mar 22 '11 at 16:38









              Mike ScottMike Scott

              4,1001217




              4,1001217













              • Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

                – Rich Homolka
                Apr 6 '15 at 21:28



















              • Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

                – Rich Homolka
                Apr 6 '15 at 21:28

















              Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

              – Rich Homolka
              Apr 6 '15 at 21:28





              Technically it will only go to one level down. whether you call that true recursion or not is an exercise for the user :)

              – Rich Homolka
              Apr 6 '15 at 21:28











              0














              to change the ownership of a directory recursively simply use:



              sudo chown -R <username>:<groupname> <dir name>


              here username = the new user who should be owner of directory



              groupname = the new group which should be owner of directory



              every file/directory has a user owner and a group owner






              share|improve this answer
























              • This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jan 15 '17 at 18:50
















              0














              to change the ownership of a directory recursively simply use:



              sudo chown -R <username>:<groupname> <dir name>


              here username = the new user who should be owner of directory



              groupname = the new group which should be owner of directory



              every file/directory has a user owner and a group owner






              share|improve this answer
























              • This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jan 15 '17 at 18:50














              0












              0








              0







              to change the ownership of a directory recursively simply use:



              sudo chown -R <username>:<groupname> <dir name>


              here username = the new user who should be owner of directory



              groupname = the new group which should be owner of directory



              every file/directory has a user owner and a group owner






              share|improve this answer













              to change the ownership of a directory recursively simply use:



              sudo chown -R <username>:<groupname> <dir name>


              here username = the new user who should be owner of directory



              groupname = the new group which should be owner of directory



              every file/directory has a user owner and a group owner







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 11 '16 at 1:38









              KawaiKxKawaiKx

              3852413




              3852413













              • This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jan 15 '17 at 18:50



















              • This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

                – Rich Homolka
                Jan 15 '17 at 18:50

















              This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

              – Rich Homolka
              Jan 15 '17 at 18:50





              This does not do what the OP asked. This changes ownership of everything, OP asked for a specific set of files.

              – Rich Homolka
              Jan 15 '17 at 18:50











              0














              I use tree instead:



               sudo tree -fai ~/.blabla  | xargs -L1 -I{} sudo chown youruser:youruser {}


              Also take care to not run recursive chown or chmod on '/' directory or other system directory.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                I use tree instead:



                 sudo tree -fai ~/.blabla  | xargs -L1 -I{} sudo chown youruser:youruser {}


                Also take care to not run recursive chown or chmod on '/' directory or other system directory.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I use tree instead:



                   sudo tree -fai ~/.blabla  | xargs -L1 -I{} sudo chown youruser:youruser {}


                  Also take care to not run recursive chown or chmod on '/' directory or other system directory.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I use tree instead:



                   sudo tree -fai ~/.blabla  | xargs -L1 -I{} sudo chown youruser:youruser {}


                  Also take care to not run recursive chown or chmod on '/' directory or other system directory.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 25 '18 at 13:36









                  Eduard FlorinescuEduard Florinescu

                  1,23352039




                  1,23352039























                      0














                      To become the owner of all files in a directory, use



                      find directory -type f -name '*' | sudo xargs -d 'n' chown $USER


                      instead of



                      sudo chown $USER directory*


                      or



                      sudo chown --recursive $USER directory


                      which might not work if there are too many arguments produced by * (too many files in the directory) or which does not not do what you want respectively.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        0














                        To become the owner of all files in a directory, use



                        find directory -type f -name '*' | sudo xargs -d 'n' chown $USER


                        instead of



                        sudo chown $USER directory*


                        or



                        sudo chown --recursive $USER directory


                        which might not work if there are too many arguments produced by * (too many files in the directory) or which does not not do what you want respectively.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          To become the owner of all files in a directory, use



                          find directory -type f -name '*' | sudo xargs -d 'n' chown $USER


                          instead of



                          sudo chown $USER directory*


                          or



                          sudo chown --recursive $USER directory


                          which might not work if there are too many arguments produced by * (too many files in the directory) or which does not not do what you want respectively.






                          share|improve this answer













                          To become the owner of all files in a directory, use



                          find directory -type f -name '*' | sudo xargs -d 'n' chown $USER


                          instead of



                          sudo chown $USER directory*


                          or



                          sudo chown --recursive $USER directory


                          which might not work if there are too many arguments produced by * (too many files in the directory) or which does not not do what you want respectively.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 29 at 20:22









                          masterxilomasterxilo

                          25517




                          25517






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f260925%2fhow-can-i-make-chown-work-recursively%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

                              is 'sed' thread safe

                              How to make a Squid Proxy server?