Midterm in Mathematics Courses












3












$begingroup$


Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?



I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.



In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?










share|improve this question









New contributor




CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?



    I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.



    In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?



      I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.



      In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?



      I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.



      In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?







      reference-request course-design assessment






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      Xander Henderson

      2,528626




      2,528626






      New contributor




      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 8 hours ago









      CABCAB

      161




      161




      New contributor




      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      CAB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          "Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
            $endgroup$
            – Jasper
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
            $endgroup$
            – alephzero
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven Gubkin
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "548"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15289%2fmidterm-in-mathematics-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          "Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
            $endgroup$
            – Jasper
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
            $endgroup$
            – alephzero
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven Gubkin
            1 hour ago
















          7












          $begingroup$

          "Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
            $endgroup$
            – Jasper
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
            $endgroup$
            – alephzero
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven Gubkin
            1 hour ago














          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          "Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          "Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Steven GubkinSteven Gubkin

          8,55112348




          8,55112348








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
            $endgroup$
            – Jasper
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
            $endgroup$
            – alephzero
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven Gubkin
            1 hour ago














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
            $endgroup$
            – Jasper
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
            $endgroup$
            – alephzero
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven Gubkin
            1 hour ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
          $endgroup$
          – Jasper
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
          $endgroup$
          – Jasper
          5 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
          $endgroup$
          – alephzero
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
          $endgroup$
          – alephzero
          3 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
          $endgroup$
          – Steven Gubkin
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          @alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
          $endgroup$
          – Steven Gubkin
          1 hour ago










          CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15289%2fmidterm-in-mathematics-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

          is 'sed' thread safe

          How to make a Squid Proxy server?