I didn't understand this recurrence relation solution.
$begingroup$
Recently, i was trying to solve this recurrence relation
$$ a_{n+4} = frac{-alpha(x)}{(n+4)} cdot a_{n+3} +frac{-beta(x)}{(n+3)cdot (n+4)} cdot a_{n+2} $$
But i can't solve for $a_n$
I've tried to solve using Wolfram|Alpha and i got this result.
Actually i'm really good at recurrence relations, but i can't understand how do i get this result and how to solve it.
Edit: n = 0,1,2,3....
sequences-and-series combinatorics discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recently, i was trying to solve this recurrence relation
$$ a_{n+4} = frac{-alpha(x)}{(n+4)} cdot a_{n+3} +frac{-beta(x)}{(n+3)cdot (n+4)} cdot a_{n+2} $$
But i can't solve for $a_n$
I've tried to solve using Wolfram|Alpha and i got this result.
Actually i'm really good at recurrence relations, but i can't understand how do i get this result and how to solve it.
Edit: n = 0,1,2,3....
sequences-and-series combinatorics discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recently, i was trying to solve this recurrence relation
$$ a_{n+4} = frac{-alpha(x)}{(n+4)} cdot a_{n+3} +frac{-beta(x)}{(n+3)cdot (n+4)} cdot a_{n+2} $$
But i can't solve for $a_n$
I've tried to solve using Wolfram|Alpha and i got this result.
Actually i'm really good at recurrence relations, but i can't understand how do i get this result and how to solve it.
Edit: n = 0,1,2,3....
sequences-and-series combinatorics discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Recently, i was trying to solve this recurrence relation
$$ a_{n+4} = frac{-alpha(x)}{(n+4)} cdot a_{n+3} +frac{-beta(x)}{(n+3)cdot (n+4)} cdot a_{n+2} $$
But i can't solve for $a_n$
I've tried to solve using Wolfram|Alpha and i got this result.
Actually i'm really good at recurrence relations, but i can't understand how do i get this result and how to solve it.
Edit: n = 0,1,2,3....
sequences-and-series combinatorics discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations
sequences-and-series combinatorics discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Murat Güven
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
Murat GüvenMurat Güven
204
204
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Murat Güven is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint Multiplying by $(n+4)!$ you get
$$(n+4)!a_{n+4} = -alpha(x) *(n+3)! a_{n+3} -beta(x) *(n+2)!a_{n+2}$$
Let $b_n=n! a_n$ then, your recurrence is
$$b_{n+4}= -alpha(x) cdot b_{n+3} -beta(x) cdot b_{n+2}$$
which is a standard second order recurrence.
Solve it, and then
$$a_n=frac{b_n}{n!}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Murat Güven is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3115447%2fi-didnt-understand-this-recurrence-relation-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint Multiplying by $(n+4)!$ you get
$$(n+4)!a_{n+4} = -alpha(x) *(n+3)! a_{n+3} -beta(x) *(n+2)!a_{n+2}$$
Let $b_n=n! a_n$ then, your recurrence is
$$b_{n+4}= -alpha(x) cdot b_{n+3} -beta(x) cdot b_{n+2}$$
which is a standard second order recurrence.
Solve it, and then
$$a_n=frac{b_n}{n!}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint Multiplying by $(n+4)!$ you get
$$(n+4)!a_{n+4} = -alpha(x) *(n+3)! a_{n+3} -beta(x) *(n+2)!a_{n+2}$$
Let $b_n=n! a_n$ then, your recurrence is
$$b_{n+4}= -alpha(x) cdot b_{n+3} -beta(x) cdot b_{n+2}$$
which is a standard second order recurrence.
Solve it, and then
$$a_n=frac{b_n}{n!}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint Multiplying by $(n+4)!$ you get
$$(n+4)!a_{n+4} = -alpha(x) *(n+3)! a_{n+3} -beta(x) *(n+2)!a_{n+2}$$
Let $b_n=n! a_n$ then, your recurrence is
$$b_{n+4}= -alpha(x) cdot b_{n+3} -beta(x) cdot b_{n+2}$$
which is a standard second order recurrence.
Solve it, and then
$$a_n=frac{b_n}{n!}$$
$endgroup$
Hint Multiplying by $(n+4)!$ you get
$$(n+4)!a_{n+4} = -alpha(x) *(n+3)! a_{n+3} -beta(x) *(n+2)!a_{n+2}$$
Let $b_n=n! a_n$ then, your recurrence is
$$b_{n+4}= -alpha(x) cdot b_{n+3} -beta(x) cdot b_{n+2}$$
which is a standard second order recurrence.
Solve it, and then
$$a_n=frac{b_n}{n!}$$
edited 1 hour ago
Murat Güven
204
204
answered 4 hours ago
N. S.N. S.
104k7112208
104k7112208
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
when i solve this with wolfram|alpha for b result is this. This result is very different from the solution above is there something else i'm missing
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven WA solves the second order recurrence, the solution is given by the roots of the characteristic equation (which is what WA has in bracket, under the extra assumption that they are different).
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
why beta is in the denominator here?
$endgroup$
– Murat Güven
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MuratGüven That is irrelevant... $frac{sqrt{alpha^2-beta}}{beta}c_1$ is just a contant, so writing that or $C_1$ is the same thing...That particular form probably appears because of the way in which WA solves the recurrence, but most of those constants can be put inside $C_1,C_2$.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Murat Güven is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Murat Güven is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Murat Güven is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Murat Güven is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3115447%2fi-didnt-understand-this-recurrence-relation-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown