Ytdyklly

There is no general solution, at least not if you need to support Linux, because the Linux kernel treats everything following the first “word” in the shebang line as a single argument.

I’m not sure what NixOS’s constraints are, but typically I would just write your shebang as

#!/bin/bash --posix

or, where possible, set options in the script:

set -o posix

Alternatively, you can have the script restart itself with the appropriate shell invocation:

#!/bin/sh -



if [ "$1" != "--really" ]; then exec bash --posix -- "$0" --really "$@"; fi



shift



# Processing continues

This approach can be generalised to other languages, as long as you find a way for the first couple of lines (which are interpreted by the shell) to be ignored by the target language.

The shebang is described in execve(2) man page as follow:

#! interpreter [optional-arg]

Two spaces are accepted in this syntax:

1. One space before the interpreter path, but this space is optional.


2. One space separating the the interpreter path and its optional argument.

Note that I didn't used the plural when talking of an optional argument, neither does the syntax above uses [optional-arg ...], as you can provide at most one single argument.

As far as shell scripting is concerned, you can use the set built-in command near the beginning of your script which will allow to set interpreters parameters, providing the same result as if you used command-line arguments.

In your case:

set -o posix

From a Bash prompt, check the output of help set to get all available options.

The POSIX standard is very terse on describing #!:

From the rationale section of the documentation of the exec() family of system interfaces:

Another way that some historical implementations handle shell scripts is by recognizing the first two bytes of the file as the character string #! and using the remainder of the first line of the file as the name of the command interpreter to execute.

From the Shell Introduction section:

The shell reads its input from a file (see sh), from the -c option or from the system() and popen() functions defined in the System Interfaces volume of POSIX.1-2008. If the first line of a file of shell commands starts with the characters #!, the results are unspecified.

This basically means that any implementation (the Unix you are using) is free to do the specifics of the parsing of the shebang line as it wants.

Some Unices, like macOS (can't test ATM), will split the arguments given to the interpreter on the shebang line into separate arguments, while Linux and most other Unices will give the arguments as a single option to the interpreter.

It is thus unwise to rely on the shebang line being able to take more than a single argument.

See also the Portability section of the Shebang article on Wikipedia.

One easy solution, which is generalizable to any utility or language, is to make a wrapper script that executes the real script with the appropriate command line arguments:

#!/bin/sh

exec /bin/bash --posix /some/path/realscript "$@"

I don't think I would personally try to make it re-execute itself as that feels somewhat fragile.

Although not exactly portable, starting with coreutils 8.30 and according to its documentation you will be able to use:

#!/usr/bin/env -S command arg1 arg2 ...

So given:

$ cat test.sh

#!/usr/bin/env -S showargs here 'is another' long arg -e "this and that " too

you will get:

% ./test.sh 

$0 is '/usr/local/bin/showargs'

$1 is 'here'

$2 is 'is another'

$3 is 'long'

$4 is 'arg'

$5 is '-e'

$6 is 'this and that '

$7 is 'too'

$8 is './test.sh'

and in case you are curious showargs is:

#!/usr/bin/env sh

echo "$0 is '$0'"



i=1

for arg in "$@"; do

    echo "$$i is '$arg'"

    i=$((i+1))

done

On Linux, the shebang isn't very flexible; according to multiple answers (Stephen Kitt's answer and Jörg W Mittag's), there is no designated way to pass multiple arguments in a shebang line.

I'm not sure if it will be of use to anyone, but I've written a short script to implement the lacking feature. See https://gist.github.com/loxaxs/7cbe84aed1c38cf18f70d8427bed1efa.

It is also possible to write embedded workarounds. Bellow, I present four language-agnostic workarounds applied to the same test script and the result each prints. I suppose that the script is executable and is in /tmp/shebang.

Wrapping your script in a bash heredoc inside process substitution

As far as I know, this is the most reliable language-agnostic way of doing it. It allows passing arguments and preserves stdin. The drawback is that the interpreter doesn't know the (real) location of the file it reads.

#!/bin/bash

exec python3 -O <(cat << 'EOWRAPPER'

print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING")



from sys import argv

try:

    print("input() 0 ::", input())

    print("input() 1 ::", input())

except EOFError:

    print("input() caused EOFError")

print("argv[0]   ::", argv[0])

print("argv[1:]  ::", argv[1:])

print("__debug__ ::", __debug__)

# The -O option changes __debug__ to False



print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_END")

EOWRAPPER

) "$@"

Calling echo -e 'aanbb' | /tmp/shebang 'arg1' 'arg2 contains spaces' 'arg3 uses \escapes\' prints:

PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING

input() 0 :: aa

input() 1 :: bb

argv[0]   :: /dev/fd/62

argv[1:]  :: ['arg1', 'arg2 contains spaces', 'arg3\ uses\ \\escapes\\']

__debug__ :: False

PYTHON_SCRIPT_END

Note that process substitution produces a special file. This may not suit all executables. For instance, #!/usr/bin/less complains: /dev/fd/63 is not a regular file (use -f to see it)

I don't know if it is possible to have heredoc inside process substitution in dash.

Wrapping your script in a simple heredoc

Shorter and simpler, but you won't be able to access stdin from your script and it requires the interpreter to be able to read and execute a script from stdin.

#!/bin/sh

exec python3 - "$@" << 'EOWRAPPER'

print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING")



from sys import argv



try:

    print("input() 0 ::", input())

    print("input() 1 ::", input())

except EOFError:

    print("input() caused EOFError")

print("argv[0]   ::", argv[0])

print("argv[1:]  ::", argv[1:])

print("__debug__ ::", __debug__)

# The -O option changes __debug__ to False



print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_END")

EOWRAPPER

Calling echo -e 'aanbb' | /tmp/shebang 'arg1' 'arg2 contains spaces' 'arg3 uses \escapes\' prints:

PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING

input() caused EOFError

argv[0]   :: -

argv[1:]  :: ['arg1', 'arg2 contains spaces', 'arg3\ uses\ \\escapes\\']

__debug__ :: True

PYTHON_SCRIPT_END

Use awk system() call but without arguments

Correctly passes the name of the executed file, but your script won't receive the arguments you give it.
Note that awk is the only language I know whose interpreter both is installed on linux by default and reads its instructions from the command line by default.

#!/usr/bin/gawk BEGIN {system("python3 -O " ARGV[1])}

print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING")



from sys import argv



print("input() 0 ::", input())

print("input() 1 ::", input())

print("argv[0]   ::", argv[0])

print("argv[1:]  ::", argv[1:])

print("__debug__ ::", __debug__)

# The -O option changes __debug__ to False



print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_END")

Calling echo -e 'aanbb' | /tmp/shebang 'arg1' 'arg2 contains spaces' 'arg3 uses \escapes\' prints:

PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING

input() 0 :: aa

input() 1 :: bb

argv[0]   :: /tmp/shebang

argv[1:]  :: 

__debug__ :: False

PYTHON_SCRIPT_END

Use awk 4.1+ system() call, provided your arguments do not contain spaces

Nice, but only if you are sure your script won't be called with arguments containing spaces. As you can see, your arguments containing spaces would be split, unless the spaces are escaped.

#!/usr/bin/gawk @include "join"; BEGIN {system("python3 -O " join(ARGV, 1, ARGC, " "))}

print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING")



from sys import argv



print("input() 0 ::", input())

print("input() 1 ::", input())

print("argv[0]   ::", argv[0])

print("argv[1:]  ::", argv[1:])

print("__debug__ ::", __debug__)

# The -O option changes __debug__ to False



print("PYTHON_SCRIPT_END")

Calling echo -e 'aanbb' | /tmp/shebang 'arg1' 'arg2 contains spaces' 'arg3 uses \escapes\' prints:

PYTHON_SCRIPT_BEGINNING

input() 0 :: aa

input() 1 :: bb

argv[0]   :: /tmp/shebang

argv[1:]  :: ['arg1', 'arg2', 'contains', 'spaces', 'arg3 uses \escapes\']

__debug__ :: False

PYTHON_SCRIPT_END

For awk versions below 4.1, you will have to use string concatenation inside a for loop, see example function https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/Join-Function.html .