Will a parallel port software protection dongle work when running Windows in a VM?
Currently running W2K. Recent hard drive failure caused loss of many tweaks that made the OS almost usable.
Seriously considering Ubuntu for browsing and email. Don't really want a dual boot setup so I'm leaning toward VM on Ubuntu.
I have several Windows applications that I must use. One is EdgeCam, a CAD/CAM program that uses a physical parallel port dongle and openGL graphics.
I guess my question would be: will the dongle be recognized when running the program on a VM?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
virtualbox
add a comment |
Currently running W2K. Recent hard drive failure caused loss of many tweaks that made the OS almost usable.
Seriously considering Ubuntu for browsing and email. Don't really want a dual boot setup so I'm leaning toward VM on Ubuntu.
I have several Windows applications that I must use. One is EdgeCam, a CAD/CAM program that uses a physical parallel port dongle and openGL graphics.
I guess my question would be: will the dongle be recognized when running the program on a VM?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
virtualbox
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29
add a comment |
Currently running W2K. Recent hard drive failure caused loss of many tweaks that made the OS almost usable.
Seriously considering Ubuntu for browsing and email. Don't really want a dual boot setup so I'm leaning toward VM on Ubuntu.
I have several Windows applications that I must use. One is EdgeCam, a CAD/CAM program that uses a physical parallel port dongle and openGL graphics.
I guess my question would be: will the dongle be recognized when running the program on a VM?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
virtualbox
Currently running W2K. Recent hard drive failure caused loss of many tweaks that made the OS almost usable.
Seriously considering Ubuntu for browsing and email. Don't really want a dual boot setup so I'm leaning toward VM on Ubuntu.
I have several Windows applications that I must use. One is EdgeCam, a CAD/CAM program that uses a physical parallel port dongle and openGL graphics.
I guess my question would be: will the dongle be recognized when running the program on a VM?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
virtualbox
virtualbox
edited May 24 '14 at 21:41
bain
9,09322942
9,09322942
asked May 24 '14 at 20:30
user284962
612
612
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29
add a comment |
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The virtualised parallel port will possibly have different signal timings, which may cause incompatibility with a protection dongle. From the VirtualBox forums:
There can be no guarantees that a particular parallel device will
work. If it's very fussy about timing, say for example a JTAG flash
programmer, then I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work. Obviously
the implementation details of software protection dongles are not
widely published, but no that would not surprise me either.
The answer is likely to be highly dependent on your dongle and your PC - in theory, exactly the same setup could work with one type of LPT controller but not another, due to the way they generate signal timings, and the way that this is interpreted by the dongle. You will just have to try it and see if it works for your case.
Also note that a W2K era PC will lack Intel/AMD hardware virtualization extensions, and hence a VM will be slower than you might expect.
add a comment |
A workarround can be passing a PCIe to Parallel port card, some Google links tell some work, some not.
But most of the users do not know the parallel port inside the guest can be seen as LPT3, but dongles normally expect LPT1, so ensure you can change what LPT number in the device properties of the guest.
Some people also say the dongle does not work on host, but passing the whole PCIe card to the guest, on the guest it works... weird thing is that guest runs the same version of Windows than the host; i think it can be related to host not leting you to assing what LPT number to use and it is using LPT3 or upper number but when on guest it uses LPT1.
All is a matter of testing, so ensure you buy someone with a coment of users that it works with dongles and LPT port number can be configured.
I am also on a search for a PCIe to LPT1 since mainboard lacks LPT port, and also for useing it under VirtualBox guests (not only on the host).
So best solution i think: Buy a PCIe to DB25 (SPP | EPP | ECP) card adapter.
Hope you have at least one free PCIe 1x port !
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f471656%2fwill-a-parallel-port-software-protection-dongle-work-when-running-windows-in-a-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The virtualised parallel port will possibly have different signal timings, which may cause incompatibility with a protection dongle. From the VirtualBox forums:
There can be no guarantees that a particular parallel device will
work. If it's very fussy about timing, say for example a JTAG flash
programmer, then I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work. Obviously
the implementation details of software protection dongles are not
widely published, but no that would not surprise me either.
The answer is likely to be highly dependent on your dongle and your PC - in theory, exactly the same setup could work with one type of LPT controller but not another, due to the way they generate signal timings, and the way that this is interpreted by the dongle. You will just have to try it and see if it works for your case.
Also note that a W2K era PC will lack Intel/AMD hardware virtualization extensions, and hence a VM will be slower than you might expect.
add a comment |
The virtualised parallel port will possibly have different signal timings, which may cause incompatibility with a protection dongle. From the VirtualBox forums:
There can be no guarantees that a particular parallel device will
work. If it's very fussy about timing, say for example a JTAG flash
programmer, then I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work. Obviously
the implementation details of software protection dongles are not
widely published, but no that would not surprise me either.
The answer is likely to be highly dependent on your dongle and your PC - in theory, exactly the same setup could work with one type of LPT controller but not another, due to the way they generate signal timings, and the way that this is interpreted by the dongle. You will just have to try it and see if it works for your case.
Also note that a W2K era PC will lack Intel/AMD hardware virtualization extensions, and hence a VM will be slower than you might expect.
add a comment |
The virtualised parallel port will possibly have different signal timings, which may cause incompatibility with a protection dongle. From the VirtualBox forums:
There can be no guarantees that a particular parallel device will
work. If it's very fussy about timing, say for example a JTAG flash
programmer, then I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work. Obviously
the implementation details of software protection dongles are not
widely published, but no that would not surprise me either.
The answer is likely to be highly dependent on your dongle and your PC - in theory, exactly the same setup could work with one type of LPT controller but not another, due to the way they generate signal timings, and the way that this is interpreted by the dongle. You will just have to try it and see if it works for your case.
Also note that a W2K era PC will lack Intel/AMD hardware virtualization extensions, and hence a VM will be slower than you might expect.
The virtualised parallel port will possibly have different signal timings, which may cause incompatibility with a protection dongle. From the VirtualBox forums:
There can be no guarantees that a particular parallel device will
work. If it's very fussy about timing, say for example a JTAG flash
programmer, then I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't work. Obviously
the implementation details of software protection dongles are not
widely published, but no that would not surprise me either.
The answer is likely to be highly dependent on your dongle and your PC - in theory, exactly the same setup could work with one type of LPT controller but not another, due to the way they generate signal timings, and the way that this is interpreted by the dongle. You will just have to try it and see if it works for your case.
Also note that a W2K era PC will lack Intel/AMD hardware virtualization extensions, and hence a VM will be slower than you might expect.
answered May 24 '14 at 21:52
bain
9,09322942
9,09322942
add a comment |
add a comment |
A workarround can be passing a PCIe to Parallel port card, some Google links tell some work, some not.
But most of the users do not know the parallel port inside the guest can be seen as LPT3, but dongles normally expect LPT1, so ensure you can change what LPT number in the device properties of the guest.
Some people also say the dongle does not work on host, but passing the whole PCIe card to the guest, on the guest it works... weird thing is that guest runs the same version of Windows than the host; i think it can be related to host not leting you to assing what LPT number to use and it is using LPT3 or upper number but when on guest it uses LPT1.
All is a matter of testing, so ensure you buy someone with a coment of users that it works with dongles and LPT port number can be configured.
I am also on a search for a PCIe to LPT1 since mainboard lacks LPT port, and also for useing it under VirtualBox guests (not only on the host).
So best solution i think: Buy a PCIe to DB25 (SPP | EPP | ECP) card adapter.
Hope you have at least one free PCIe 1x port !
New contributor
add a comment |
A workarround can be passing a PCIe to Parallel port card, some Google links tell some work, some not.
But most of the users do not know the parallel port inside the guest can be seen as LPT3, but dongles normally expect LPT1, so ensure you can change what LPT number in the device properties of the guest.
Some people also say the dongle does not work on host, but passing the whole PCIe card to the guest, on the guest it works... weird thing is that guest runs the same version of Windows than the host; i think it can be related to host not leting you to assing what LPT number to use and it is using LPT3 or upper number but when on guest it uses LPT1.
All is a matter of testing, so ensure you buy someone with a coment of users that it works with dongles and LPT port number can be configured.
I am also on a search for a PCIe to LPT1 since mainboard lacks LPT port, and also for useing it under VirtualBox guests (not only on the host).
So best solution i think: Buy a PCIe to DB25 (SPP | EPP | ECP) card adapter.
Hope you have at least one free PCIe 1x port !
New contributor
add a comment |
A workarround can be passing a PCIe to Parallel port card, some Google links tell some work, some not.
But most of the users do not know the parallel port inside the guest can be seen as LPT3, but dongles normally expect LPT1, so ensure you can change what LPT number in the device properties of the guest.
Some people also say the dongle does not work on host, but passing the whole PCIe card to the guest, on the guest it works... weird thing is that guest runs the same version of Windows than the host; i think it can be related to host not leting you to assing what LPT number to use and it is using LPT3 or upper number but when on guest it uses LPT1.
All is a matter of testing, so ensure you buy someone with a coment of users that it works with dongles and LPT port number can be configured.
I am also on a search for a PCIe to LPT1 since mainboard lacks LPT port, and also for useing it under VirtualBox guests (not only on the host).
So best solution i think: Buy a PCIe to DB25 (SPP | EPP | ECP) card adapter.
Hope you have at least one free PCIe 1x port !
New contributor
A workarround can be passing a PCIe to Parallel port card, some Google links tell some work, some not.
But most of the users do not know the parallel port inside the guest can be seen as LPT3, but dongles normally expect LPT1, so ensure you can change what LPT number in the device properties of the guest.
Some people also say the dongle does not work on host, but passing the whole PCIe card to the guest, on the guest it works... weird thing is that guest runs the same version of Windows than the host; i think it can be related to host not leting you to assing what LPT number to use and it is using LPT3 or upper number but when on guest it uses LPT1.
All is a matter of testing, so ensure you buy someone with a coment of users that it works with dongles and LPT port number can be configured.
I am also on a search for a PCIe to LPT1 since mainboard lacks LPT port, and also for useing it under VirtualBox guests (not only on the host).
So best solution i think: Buy a PCIe to DB25 (SPP | EPP | ECP) card adapter.
Hope you have at least one free PCIe 1x port !
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
claudio
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f471656%2fwill-a-parallel-port-software-protection-dongle-work-when-running-windows-in-a-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's probably not going to help you, but USB dongles do work with VirtualBox.
– Javier Rivera
May 25 '14 at 9:29