Convert CRLF's to line feeds on Linux












33















What's the best way to convert CRLF's to line feeds in files on Linux?



I've seen sed commands, but is there anything simpler?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

    – nagul
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:13






  • 2





    This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 12:02
















33















What's the best way to convert CRLF's to line feeds in files on Linux?



I've seen sed commands, but is there anything simpler?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

    – nagul
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:13






  • 2





    This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 12:02














33












33








33


12






What's the best way to convert CRLF's to line feeds in files on Linux?



I've seen sed commands, but is there anything simpler?










share|improve this question
















What's the best way to convert CRLF's to line feeds in files on Linux?



I've seen sed commands, but is there anything simpler?







linux carriage-return






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 4 '17 at 12:49









karel

9,28093239




9,28093239










asked Oct 7 '09 at 5:06









JoelFanJoelFan

1,697103647




1,697103647








  • 4





    Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

    – nagul
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:13






  • 2





    This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 12:02














  • 4





    Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

    – nagul
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:13






  • 2





    This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 12:02








4




4





Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

– nagul
Oct 7 '09 at 9:13





Dupe: superuser.com/questions/38744/…. The link provided in the accepted answer covers the dos2unix, perl and vi options among others.

– nagul
Oct 7 '09 at 9:13




2




2





This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

– Jonik
Oct 7 '09 at 12:02





This already has better answers though (so if one of these is to be closed, it should probably be that one)

– Jonik
Oct 7 '09 at 12:02










11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















39














Use this command:



fromdos yourtextfile


The other way around:



todos yourtextfile


These commands are found in the tofrodos package (on most recent distributions), which also provides the two wrappers unix2dos and dos2unix that mimic the old unix tools of the same name.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 10:00






  • 1





    Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

    – Ryan Thompson
    Oct 8 '09 at 7:26











  • I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

    – sorin
    Jul 3 '10 at 7:47






  • 2





    @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

    – bstpierre
    Jul 25 '12 at 18:49











  • @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

    – andrewtweber
    Jan 31 '15 at 22:43



















24














Use dos2unix.




dos2unix - DOS/MAC to UNIX text file format converter



dos2unix  [options] [-c convmode] [-o file ...] [-n infile outfile ...]

Options:
[-hkqV] [--help] [--keepdate] [--quiet] [--version]






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

    – quack quixote
    Oct 7 '09 at 5:41











  • Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

    – Ryan Thompson
    Oct 7 '09 at 6:19






  • 1





    dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

    – quack quixote
    Oct 7 '09 at 7:55






  • 1





    Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

    – Jonik
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:33



















20














I prefer perl:



perl -lne 's/r//g; print' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


But that's well-suited to my uses, and it's very easy for me to remember. Not all systems have a dos2unix command, but most that I work on have a perl interpreter.



Another is recode, a powerful replacement for dos2unix and iconv; it's available in the "recode" package in Debian repositories:



recode ibmpc..lat1 winfile.txt   # dos2unix
recode lat1..ibmpc unixfile.txt # unix2dos


For awk fans:



awk '{ sub("r$", ""); print }' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


...and sed:



sed 's/r$//' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt




And now, only slightly-less-convoluted than deleting the CR's by hand in a hex editor, straight from one of our stackoverflow.com friends, useable with the beef interpreter (located on your friendly neighborhood Debian repository),



dos2unix in brainfuck!



,[[->+>+<<]>>>,[<-------------[+++++++++++++.>>>]<[>>----------[>+++++++++++++.-------------]<++++++++++>]<<<<[-]>>>[-<<<+>>>]]<[-]<[-]<]++++++++++.


big thanks to jk for wasting an hour of his life to write this!






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

    – akira
    Oct 7 '09 at 6:28






  • 2





    "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

    – quack quixote
    Oct 7 '09 at 6:32











  • @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

    – reinierpost
    Oct 7 '09 at 9:47











  • @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

    – quack quixote
    Oct 7 '09 at 10:31











  • @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

    – akira
    Oct 7 '09 at 11:22



















9














I do this on Bash:



cat cr_stuffed.file | tr -d r > no_more_crs.file





share|improve this answer


























  • nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

    – quack quixote
    Oct 7 '09 at 23:46



















7














I think you can use tr, as well (though I have no funny format files on which to try):



tr -d 'r' < file1 > file2





share|improve this answer

































    4














    In vi or Vim:



    :%s/^V^M//g





    share|improve this answer

































      4














      I found a very easy way… Open file with nano: ## nano file.txt



      press Ctrl+O to save, but before pressing Enter press:
      Alt+D to toggle betwen DOS and Unix/Linux line-endings, or:
      Alt+M to toggle betwen Mac and Unix/Linux line-endings
      then press Enter to save and Ctrl+X to quit.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

        – Burgi
        May 1 '16 at 1:52











      • The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

        – spinup
        Aug 25 '16 at 14:56








      • 1





        Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

        – mwfearnley
        Mar 2 '17 at 10:45



















      3














      I prefer Vim and :set fileformat=unix. While not the fastest, it does give me a preview. It is especially useful in the case of a file with mixed endings.






      share|improve this answer

































        1














        If you want a GUI method, try the Kate text editor (other advanced text editors may be able to handle this too). Open the find / Replace dialog (Ctrl+R), and replace rn with n. (NB: you'll need to choose "Regular expression" from the drop down and deselect "Selection only" from the options.)



        EDIT: Or, if you simply want to convert to Unix format, then use the menu option Tools > End of Line > Unix.






        share|improve this answer


























        • There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

          – Jonik
          Oct 7 '09 at 10:24











        • Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

          – DisgruntledGoat
          Oct 10 '09 at 23:22



















        1














        Paste this into dos2unix.py Python script.



        #!/usr/bin/env python
        """
        convert dos linefeeds (crlf) to unix (lf)
        usage: dos2unix.py <input> <output>
        """
        import sys

        if len(sys.argv[1:]) != 2:
        sys.exit(__doc__)

        content = ''
        outsize = 0
        with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as infile:
        content = infile.read()
        with open(sys.argv[2], 'wb') as output:
        for line in content.splitlines():
        outsize += len(line) + 1
        output.write(line + 'n')

        print("Done. Saved %s bytes." % (len(content)-outsize))


        Should work on any platform with Python installed. Public domain.






        share|improve this answer































          1














          CR LF to LF using awk:



          awk -v RS='r?n' 1
          command | awk -v RS='r?n' 1
          awk -v RS='r?n' 1 filename


          Usage example:



          echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' 1 | hexdump -C


          Explanation:



          -v RS='r?n' sets variable RS (input record separator) to r?n, meaning input is read line by line separated by LF (n) which may (?) be preceded by CR (r).



          1 is the script awk executes. A script consists of condition { action }. In this case, 1 is the condition which evaluates to true. The action is omitted, so the default action is executed, which means print the current line (which could also be written as {print $0} or simply {print}).





          LF to CR LF: You can set the variable ORS (output record separator) to modify the line ends of the output. Example:



          echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' -v ORS='rn' 1 | hexdump -C





          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f52044%2fconvert-crlfs-to-line-feeds-on-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            11 Answers
            11






            active

            oldest

            votes








            11 Answers
            11






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            39














            Use this command:



            fromdos yourtextfile


            The other way around:



            todos yourtextfile


            These commands are found in the tofrodos package (on most recent distributions), which also provides the two wrappers unix2dos and dos2unix that mimic the old unix tools of the same name.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:00






            • 1





              Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 8 '09 at 7:26











            • I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

              – sorin
              Jul 3 '10 at 7:47






            • 2





              @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

              – bstpierre
              Jul 25 '12 at 18:49











            • @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

              – andrewtweber
              Jan 31 '15 at 22:43
















            39














            Use this command:



            fromdos yourtextfile


            The other way around:



            todos yourtextfile


            These commands are found in the tofrodos package (on most recent distributions), which also provides the two wrappers unix2dos and dos2unix that mimic the old unix tools of the same name.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:00






            • 1





              Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 8 '09 at 7:26











            • I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

              – sorin
              Jul 3 '10 at 7:47






            • 2





              @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

              – bstpierre
              Jul 25 '12 at 18:49











            • @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

              – andrewtweber
              Jan 31 '15 at 22:43














            39












            39








            39







            Use this command:



            fromdos yourtextfile


            The other way around:



            todos yourtextfile


            These commands are found in the tofrodos package (on most recent distributions), which also provides the two wrappers unix2dos and dos2unix that mimic the old unix tools of the same name.






            share|improve this answer















            Use this command:



            fromdos yourtextfile


            The other way around:



            todos yourtextfile


            These commands are found in the tofrodos package (on most recent distributions), which also provides the two wrappers unix2dos and dos2unix that mimic the old unix tools of the same name.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Oct 7 '09 at 9:31

























            answered Oct 7 '09 at 9:22









            avelldirollavelldiroll

            1,9531115




            1,9531115








            • 2





              +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:00






            • 1





              Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 8 '09 at 7:26











            • I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

              – sorin
              Jul 3 '10 at 7:47






            • 2





              @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

              – bstpierre
              Jul 25 '12 at 18:49











            • @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

              – andrewtweber
              Jan 31 '15 at 22:43














            • 2





              +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:00






            • 1





              Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 8 '09 at 7:26











            • I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

              – sorin
              Jul 3 '10 at 7:47






            • 2





              @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

              – bstpierre
              Jul 25 '12 at 18:49











            • @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

              – andrewtweber
              Jan 31 '15 at 22:43








            2




            2





            +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

            – Jonik
            Oct 7 '09 at 10:00





            +1 Much more useful than the currently top-voted "Use dos2unix" answer.

            – Jonik
            Oct 7 '09 at 10:00




            1




            1





            Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

            – Ryan Thompson
            Oct 8 '09 at 7:26





            Yeah, even I'm voting this one up. Mine was more of a drive-by suggestion.

            – Ryan Thompson
            Oct 8 '09 at 7:26













            I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

            – sorin
            Jul 3 '10 at 7:47





            I would give extra bonus if you say how to make it recursive. Currently works only with wildcards.

            – sorin
            Jul 3 '10 at 7:47




            2




            2





            @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

            – bstpierre
            Jul 25 '12 at 18:49





            @SorinSbarnea: something like find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -null fromdos

            – bstpierre
            Jul 25 '12 at 18:49













            @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

            – andrewtweber
            Jan 31 '15 at 22:43





            @Jonik what makes it "Much more useful"? Serious question

            – andrewtweber
            Jan 31 '15 at 22:43













            24














            Use dos2unix.




            dos2unix - DOS/MAC to UNIX text file format converter



            dos2unix  [options] [-c convmode] [-o file ...] [-n infile outfile ...]

            Options:
            [-hkqV] [--help] [--keepdate] [--quiet] [--version]






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 5:41











            • Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:19






            • 1





              dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 7:55






            • 1





              Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:33
















            24














            Use dos2unix.




            dos2unix - DOS/MAC to UNIX text file format converter



            dos2unix  [options] [-c convmode] [-o file ...] [-n infile outfile ...]

            Options:
            [-hkqV] [--help] [--keepdate] [--quiet] [--version]






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 5:41











            • Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:19






            • 1





              dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 7:55






            • 1





              Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:33














            24












            24








            24







            Use dos2unix.




            dos2unix - DOS/MAC to UNIX text file format converter



            dos2unix  [options] [-c convmode] [-o file ...] [-n infile outfile ...]

            Options:
            [-hkqV] [--help] [--keepdate] [--quiet] [--version]






            share|improve this answer















            Use dos2unix.




            dos2unix - DOS/MAC to UNIX text file format converter



            dos2unix  [options] [-c convmode] [-o file ...] [-n infile outfile ...]

            Options:
            [-hkqV] [--help] [--keepdate] [--quiet] [--version]







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 29 '12 at 14:17









            Tom Wijsman

            50.4k24164247




            50.4k24164247










            answered Oct 7 '09 at 5:17









            Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson

            6,87883860




            6,87883860








            • 2





              and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 5:41











            • Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:19






            • 1





              dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 7:55






            • 1





              Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:33














            • 2





              and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 5:41











            • Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

              – Ryan Thompson
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:19






            • 1





              dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 7:55






            • 1





              Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

              – Jonik
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:33








            2




            2





            and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 5:41





            and unix2dos for the other way 'round.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 5:41













            Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

            – Ryan Thompson
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:19





            Quack, are you following me? Not that I don't appreciate it, with all the upvotes.

            – Ryan Thompson
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:19




            1




            1





            dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 7:55





            dude, i'm ~quack. pronounce "~" as "not". :) but no, not following you, tho i do appear to run into you frequently.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 7:55




            1




            1





            Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

            – Jonik
            Oct 7 '09 at 9:33





            Consider elaborating on how to get this utility for your Linux system. At least on Ubuntu it's not installed by default (but by installing tofrodos package you get something very similar: packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/tofrodos).

            – Jonik
            Oct 7 '09 at 9:33











            20














            I prefer perl:



            perl -lne 's/r//g; print' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            But that's well-suited to my uses, and it's very easy for me to remember. Not all systems have a dos2unix command, but most that I work on have a perl interpreter.



            Another is recode, a powerful replacement for dos2unix and iconv; it's available in the "recode" package in Debian repositories:



            recode ibmpc..lat1 winfile.txt   # dos2unix
            recode lat1..ibmpc unixfile.txt # unix2dos


            For awk fans:



            awk '{ sub("r$", ""); print }' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            ...and sed:



            sed 's/r$//' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt




            And now, only slightly-less-convoluted than deleting the CR's by hand in a hex editor, straight from one of our stackoverflow.com friends, useable with the beef interpreter (located on your friendly neighborhood Debian repository),



            dos2unix in brainfuck!



            ,[[->+>+<<]>>>,[<-------------[+++++++++++++.>>>]<[>>----------[>+++++++++++++.-------------]<++++++++++>]<<<<[-]>>>[-<<<+>>>]]<[-]<[-]<]++++++++++.


            big thanks to jk for wasting an hour of his life to write this!






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:28






            • 2





              "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:32











            • @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

              – reinierpost
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:47











            • @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:31











            • @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 11:22
















            20














            I prefer perl:



            perl -lne 's/r//g; print' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            But that's well-suited to my uses, and it's very easy for me to remember. Not all systems have a dos2unix command, but most that I work on have a perl interpreter.



            Another is recode, a powerful replacement for dos2unix and iconv; it's available in the "recode" package in Debian repositories:



            recode ibmpc..lat1 winfile.txt   # dos2unix
            recode lat1..ibmpc unixfile.txt # unix2dos


            For awk fans:



            awk '{ sub("r$", ""); print }' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            ...and sed:



            sed 's/r$//' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt




            And now, only slightly-less-convoluted than deleting the CR's by hand in a hex editor, straight from one of our stackoverflow.com friends, useable with the beef interpreter (located on your friendly neighborhood Debian repository),



            dos2unix in brainfuck!



            ,[[->+>+<<]>>>,[<-------------[+++++++++++++.>>>]<[>>----------[>+++++++++++++.-------------]<++++++++++>]<<<<[-]>>>[-<<<+>>>]]<[-]<[-]<]++++++++++.


            big thanks to jk for wasting an hour of his life to write this!






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:28






            • 2





              "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:32











            • @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

              – reinierpost
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:47











            • @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:31











            • @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 11:22














            20












            20








            20







            I prefer perl:



            perl -lne 's/r//g; print' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            But that's well-suited to my uses, and it's very easy for me to remember. Not all systems have a dos2unix command, but most that I work on have a perl interpreter.



            Another is recode, a powerful replacement for dos2unix and iconv; it's available in the "recode" package in Debian repositories:



            recode ibmpc..lat1 winfile.txt   # dos2unix
            recode lat1..ibmpc unixfile.txt # unix2dos


            For awk fans:



            awk '{ sub("r$", ""); print }' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            ...and sed:



            sed 's/r$//' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt




            And now, only slightly-less-convoluted than deleting the CR's by hand in a hex editor, straight from one of our stackoverflow.com friends, useable with the beef interpreter (located on your friendly neighborhood Debian repository),



            dos2unix in brainfuck!



            ,[[->+>+<<]>>>,[<-------------[+++++++++++++.>>>]<[>>----------[>+++++++++++++.-------------]<++++++++++>]<<<<[-]>>>[-<<<+>>>]]<[-]<[-]<]++++++++++.


            big thanks to jk for wasting an hour of his life to write this!






            share|improve this answer















            I prefer perl:



            perl -lne 's/r//g; print' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            But that's well-suited to my uses, and it's very easy for me to remember. Not all systems have a dos2unix command, but most that I work on have a perl interpreter.



            Another is recode, a powerful replacement for dos2unix and iconv; it's available in the "recode" package in Debian repositories:



            recode ibmpc..lat1 winfile.txt   # dos2unix
            recode lat1..ibmpc unixfile.txt # unix2dos


            For awk fans:



            awk '{ sub("r$", ""); print }' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt


            ...and sed:



            sed 's/r$//' winfile.txt > unixfile.txt




            And now, only slightly-less-convoluted than deleting the CR's by hand in a hex editor, straight from one of our stackoverflow.com friends, useable with the beef interpreter (located on your friendly neighborhood Debian repository),



            dos2unix in brainfuck!



            ,[[->+>+<<]>>>,[<-------------[+++++++++++++.>>>]<[>>----------[>+++++++++++++.-------------]<++++++++++>]<<<<[-]>>>[-<<<+>>>]]<[-]<[-]<]++++++++++.


            big thanks to jk for wasting an hour of his life to write this!







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 23 '17 at 12:41









            Community

            1




            1










            answered Oct 7 '09 at 5:44









            quack quixotequack quixote

            35.3k1087119




            35.3k1087119








            • 1





              (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:28






            • 2





              "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:32











            • @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

              – reinierpost
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:47











            • @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:31











            • @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 11:22














            • 1





              (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:28






            • 2





              "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 6:32











            • @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

              – reinierpost
              Oct 7 '09 at 9:47











            • @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 10:31











            • @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

              – akira
              Oct 7 '09 at 11:22








            1




            1





            (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

            – akira
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:28





            (useless use of cat and) perl is as complicated as sed... thus you are not really answering the question but rather collecting reputation :)

            – akira
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:28




            2




            2





            "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:32





            "best way" is subjective. this works best for me (i'm tons more comfortable with perl than sed). i didn't promise it would work best for you.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 6:32













            @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

            – reinierpost
            Oct 7 '09 at 9:47





            @akira: a question can have multiple valid answers. I use this method as well, occasionally, mostly in combination with other changes, so it is definitely a valid answer; but "use dos2unix" is definitely the more practical answer in most situations. So I think the ratings are fine.

            – reinierpost
            Oct 7 '09 at 9:47













            @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 10:31





            @akira: if you find it simpler, please post it as an answer and enlighten the rest of us.

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 10:31













            @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

            – akira
            Oct 7 '09 at 11:22





            @~quack: that is the point: it is not simpler. thats the same for your perl answer. u2d or fromdos/todos are the right answers because they are simpler than any stuff expressed in any other programming language.

            – akira
            Oct 7 '09 at 11:22











            9














            I do this on Bash:



            cat cr_stuffed.file | tr -d r > no_more_crs.file





            share|improve this answer


























            • nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 23:46
















            9














            I do this on Bash:



            cat cr_stuffed.file | tr -d r > no_more_crs.file





            share|improve this answer


























            • nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 23:46














            9












            9








            9







            I do this on Bash:



            cat cr_stuffed.file | tr -d r > no_more_crs.file





            share|improve this answer















            I do this on Bash:



            cat cr_stuffed.file | tr -d r > no_more_crs.file






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 12 '17 at 5:03









            Ben Voigt

            5,53613055




            5,53613055










            answered Oct 7 '09 at 23:31









            JustJeffJustJeff

            3401522




            3401522













            • nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 23:46



















            • nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

              – quack quixote
              Oct 7 '09 at 23:46

















            nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 23:46





            nice. i saw another mention of tr earlier today. it's not a program that gets mentioned very often is it?

            – quack quixote
            Oct 7 '09 at 23:46











            7














            I think you can use tr, as well (though I have no funny format files on which to try):



            tr -d 'r' < file1 > file2





            share|improve this answer






























              7














              I think you can use tr, as well (though I have no funny format files on which to try):



              tr -d 'r' < file1 > file2





              share|improve this answer




























                7












                7








                7







                I think you can use tr, as well (though I have no funny format files on which to try):



                tr -d 'r' < file1 > file2





                share|improve this answer















                I think you can use tr, as well (though I have no funny format files on which to try):



                tr -d 'r' < file1 > file2






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 12 '17 at 4:54









                Steven Penny

                1




                1










                answered Oct 11 '09 at 2:56









                warrenwarren

                5,7552173127




                5,7552173127























                    4














                    In vi or Vim:



                    :%s/^V^M//g





                    share|improve this answer






























                      4














                      In vi or Vim:



                      :%s/^V^M//g





                      share|improve this answer




























                        4












                        4








                        4







                        In vi or Vim:



                        :%s/^V^M//g





                        share|improve this answer















                        In vi or Vim:



                        :%s/^V^M//g






                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited May 2 '12 at 8:42









                        Peter Mortensen

                        8,376166185




                        8,376166185










                        answered Oct 7 '09 at 12:24









                        fpmurphyfpmurphy

                        1,086512




                        1,086512























                            4














                            I found a very easy way… Open file with nano: ## nano file.txt



                            press Ctrl+O to save, but before pressing Enter press:
                            Alt+D to toggle betwen DOS and Unix/Linux line-endings, or:
                            Alt+M to toggle betwen Mac and Unix/Linux line-endings
                            then press Enter to save and Ctrl+X to quit.






                            share|improve this answer



















                            • 1





                              Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                              – Burgi
                              May 1 '16 at 1:52











                            • The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                              – spinup
                              Aug 25 '16 at 14:56








                            • 1





                              Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                              – mwfearnley
                              Mar 2 '17 at 10:45
















                            4














                            I found a very easy way… Open file with nano: ## nano file.txt



                            press Ctrl+O to save, but before pressing Enter press:
                            Alt+D to toggle betwen DOS and Unix/Linux line-endings, or:
                            Alt+M to toggle betwen Mac and Unix/Linux line-endings
                            then press Enter to save and Ctrl+X to quit.






                            share|improve this answer



















                            • 1





                              Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                              – Burgi
                              May 1 '16 at 1:52











                            • The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                              – spinup
                              Aug 25 '16 at 14:56








                            • 1





                              Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                              – mwfearnley
                              Mar 2 '17 at 10:45














                            4












                            4








                            4







                            I found a very easy way… Open file with nano: ## nano file.txt



                            press Ctrl+O to save, but before pressing Enter press:
                            Alt+D to toggle betwen DOS and Unix/Linux line-endings, or:
                            Alt+M to toggle betwen Mac and Unix/Linux line-endings
                            then press Enter to save and Ctrl+X to quit.






                            share|improve this answer













                            I found a very easy way… Open file with nano: ## nano file.txt



                            press Ctrl+O to save, but before pressing Enter press:
                            Alt+D to toggle betwen DOS and Unix/Linux line-endings, or:
                            Alt+M to toggle betwen Mac and Unix/Linux line-endings
                            then press Enter to save and Ctrl+X to quit.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 30 '16 at 18:17









                            Stefan SjöbergStefan Sjöberg

                            391




                            391








                            • 1





                              Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                              – Burgi
                              May 1 '16 at 1:52











                            • The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                              – spinup
                              Aug 25 '16 at 14:56








                            • 1





                              Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                              – mwfearnley
                              Mar 2 '17 at 10:45














                            • 1





                              Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                              – Burgi
                              May 1 '16 at 1:52











                            • The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                              – spinup
                              Aug 25 '16 at 14:56








                            • 1





                              Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                              – mwfearnley
                              Mar 2 '17 at 10:45








                            1




                            1





                            Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                            – Burgi
                            May 1 '16 at 1:52





                            Could you edit your answer to clarify which toggle settings will replicate the behaviour requested by the OP?

                            – Burgi
                            May 1 '16 at 1:52













                            The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                            – spinup
                            Aug 25 '16 at 14:56







                            The OP wants to toggle off DOS line endings, so Alt+d. Sometimes alt gets intercepted by the terminal program, so you can use esc+d instead.

                            – spinup
                            Aug 25 '16 at 14:56






                            1




                            1





                            Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                            – mwfearnley
                            Mar 2 '17 at 10:45





                            Lots of nano shortcuts also work with Shift pressed, which often prevents terminal interception, so 'Alt-Shift-D' works too.

                            – mwfearnley
                            Mar 2 '17 at 10:45











                            3














                            I prefer Vim and :set fileformat=unix. While not the fastest, it does give me a preview. It is especially useful in the case of a file with mixed endings.






                            share|improve this answer






























                              3














                              I prefer Vim and :set fileformat=unix. While not the fastest, it does give me a preview. It is especially useful in the case of a file with mixed endings.






                              share|improve this answer




























                                3












                                3








                                3







                                I prefer Vim and :set fileformat=unix. While not the fastest, it does give me a preview. It is especially useful in the case of a file with mixed endings.






                                share|improve this answer















                                I prefer Vim and :set fileformat=unix. While not the fastest, it does give me a preview. It is especially useful in the case of a file with mixed endings.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited May 2 '12 at 8:43









                                Peter Mortensen

                                8,376166185




                                8,376166185










                                answered Oct 7 '09 at 5:39









                                opelloopello

                                67657




                                67657























                                    1














                                    If you want a GUI method, try the Kate text editor (other advanced text editors may be able to handle this too). Open the find / Replace dialog (Ctrl+R), and replace rn with n. (NB: you'll need to choose "Regular expression" from the drop down and deselect "Selection only" from the options.)



                                    EDIT: Or, if you simply want to convert to Unix format, then use the menu option Tools > End of Line > Unix.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                    • There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                      – Jonik
                                      Oct 7 '09 at 10:24











                                    • Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                      – DisgruntledGoat
                                      Oct 10 '09 at 23:22
















                                    1














                                    If you want a GUI method, try the Kate text editor (other advanced text editors may be able to handle this too). Open the find / Replace dialog (Ctrl+R), and replace rn with n. (NB: you'll need to choose "Regular expression" from the drop down and deselect "Selection only" from the options.)



                                    EDIT: Or, if you simply want to convert to Unix format, then use the menu option Tools > End of Line > Unix.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                    • There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                      – Jonik
                                      Oct 7 '09 at 10:24











                                    • Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                      – DisgruntledGoat
                                      Oct 10 '09 at 23:22














                                    1












                                    1








                                    1







                                    If you want a GUI method, try the Kate text editor (other advanced text editors may be able to handle this too). Open the find / Replace dialog (Ctrl+R), and replace rn with n. (NB: you'll need to choose "Regular expression" from the drop down and deselect "Selection only" from the options.)



                                    EDIT: Or, if you simply want to convert to Unix format, then use the menu option Tools > End of Line > Unix.






                                    share|improve this answer















                                    If you want a GUI method, try the Kate text editor (other advanced text editors may be able to handle this too). Open the find / Replace dialog (Ctrl+R), and replace rn with n. (NB: you'll need to choose "Regular expression" from the drop down and deselect "Selection only" from the options.)



                                    EDIT: Or, if you simply want to convert to Unix format, then use the menu option Tools > End of Line > Unix.







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited May 2 '12 at 8:46









                                    Peter Mortensen

                                    8,376166185




                                    8,376166185










                                    answered Oct 7 '09 at 10:13









                                    DisgruntledGoatDisgruntledGoat

                                    2,44382843




                                    2,44382843













                                    • There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                      – Jonik
                                      Oct 7 '09 at 10:24











                                    • Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                      – DisgruntledGoat
                                      Oct 10 '09 at 23:22



















                                    • There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                      – Jonik
                                      Oct 7 '09 at 10:24











                                    • Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                      – DisgruntledGoat
                                      Oct 10 '09 at 23:22

















                                    There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                    – Jonik
                                    Oct 7 '09 at 10:24





                                    There are text editors, such as jEdit, that can do these transformations automatically - you just tell it if you want Unix, Windows or Mac line separators.

                                    – Jonik
                                    Oct 7 '09 at 10:24













                                    Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                    – DisgruntledGoat
                                    Oct 10 '09 at 23:22





                                    Actually, KATE can do that too through the Tools > End of Line menu. Maybe I should have thought more laterally than answering the question exactly as it was worded - but if you know you specifically want to convert rn to n then using search/replace is easier than remembering which OS uses which line ending. ;)

                                    – DisgruntledGoat
                                    Oct 10 '09 at 23:22











                                    1














                                    Paste this into dos2unix.py Python script.



                                    #!/usr/bin/env python
                                    """
                                    convert dos linefeeds (crlf) to unix (lf)
                                    usage: dos2unix.py <input> <output>
                                    """
                                    import sys

                                    if len(sys.argv[1:]) != 2:
                                    sys.exit(__doc__)

                                    content = ''
                                    outsize = 0
                                    with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as infile:
                                    content = infile.read()
                                    with open(sys.argv[2], 'wb') as output:
                                    for line in content.splitlines():
                                    outsize += len(line) + 1
                                    output.write(line + 'n')

                                    print("Done. Saved %s bytes." % (len(content)-outsize))


                                    Should work on any platform with Python installed. Public domain.






                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      1














                                      Paste this into dos2unix.py Python script.



                                      #!/usr/bin/env python
                                      """
                                      convert dos linefeeds (crlf) to unix (lf)
                                      usage: dos2unix.py <input> <output>
                                      """
                                      import sys

                                      if len(sys.argv[1:]) != 2:
                                      sys.exit(__doc__)

                                      content = ''
                                      outsize = 0
                                      with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as infile:
                                      content = infile.read()
                                      with open(sys.argv[2], 'wb') as output:
                                      for line in content.splitlines():
                                      outsize += len(line) + 1
                                      output.write(line + 'n')

                                      print("Done. Saved %s bytes." % (len(content)-outsize))


                                      Should work on any platform with Python installed. Public domain.






                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        1












                                        1








                                        1







                                        Paste this into dos2unix.py Python script.



                                        #!/usr/bin/env python
                                        """
                                        convert dos linefeeds (crlf) to unix (lf)
                                        usage: dos2unix.py <input> <output>
                                        """
                                        import sys

                                        if len(sys.argv[1:]) != 2:
                                        sys.exit(__doc__)

                                        content = ''
                                        outsize = 0
                                        with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as infile:
                                        content = infile.read()
                                        with open(sys.argv[2], 'wb') as output:
                                        for line in content.splitlines():
                                        outsize += len(line) + 1
                                        output.write(line + 'n')

                                        print("Done. Saved %s bytes." % (len(content)-outsize))


                                        Should work on any platform with Python installed. Public domain.






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        Paste this into dos2unix.py Python script.



                                        #!/usr/bin/env python
                                        """
                                        convert dos linefeeds (crlf) to unix (lf)
                                        usage: dos2unix.py <input> <output>
                                        """
                                        import sys

                                        if len(sys.argv[1:]) != 2:
                                        sys.exit(__doc__)

                                        content = ''
                                        outsize = 0
                                        with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as infile:
                                        content = infile.read()
                                        with open(sys.argv[2], 'wb') as output:
                                        for line in content.splitlines():
                                        outsize += len(line) + 1
                                        output.write(line + 'n')

                                        print("Done. Saved %s bytes." % (len(content)-outsize))


                                        Should work on any platform with Python installed. Public domain.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Oct 31 '13 at 9:32









                                        anatoly techtonikanatoly techtonik

                                        163112




                                        163112























                                            1














                                            CR LF to LF using awk:



                                            awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                            command | awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                            awk -v RS='r?n' 1 filename


                                            Usage example:



                                            echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' 1 | hexdump -C


                                            Explanation:



                                            -v RS='r?n' sets variable RS (input record separator) to r?n, meaning input is read line by line separated by LF (n) which may (?) be preceded by CR (r).



                                            1 is the script awk executes. A script consists of condition { action }. In this case, 1 is the condition which evaluates to true. The action is omitted, so the default action is executed, which means print the current line (which could also be written as {print $0} or simply {print}).





                                            LF to CR LF: You can set the variable ORS (output record separator) to modify the line ends of the output. Example:



                                            echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' -v ORS='rn' 1 | hexdump -C





                                            share|improve this answer






























                                              1














                                              CR LF to LF using awk:



                                              awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                              command | awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                              awk -v RS='r?n' 1 filename


                                              Usage example:



                                              echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' 1 | hexdump -C


                                              Explanation:



                                              -v RS='r?n' sets variable RS (input record separator) to r?n, meaning input is read line by line separated by LF (n) which may (?) be preceded by CR (r).



                                              1 is the script awk executes. A script consists of condition { action }. In this case, 1 is the condition which evaluates to true. The action is omitted, so the default action is executed, which means print the current line (which could also be written as {print $0} or simply {print}).





                                              LF to CR LF: You can set the variable ORS (output record separator) to modify the line ends of the output. Example:



                                              echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' -v ORS='rn' 1 | hexdump -C





                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                1












                                                1








                                                1







                                                CR LF to LF using awk:



                                                awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                                command | awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                                awk -v RS='r?n' 1 filename


                                                Usage example:



                                                echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' 1 | hexdump -C


                                                Explanation:



                                                -v RS='r?n' sets variable RS (input record separator) to r?n, meaning input is read line by line separated by LF (n) which may (?) be preceded by CR (r).



                                                1 is the script awk executes. A script consists of condition { action }. In this case, 1 is the condition which evaluates to true. The action is omitted, so the default action is executed, which means print the current line (which could also be written as {print $0} or simply {print}).





                                                LF to CR LF: You can set the variable ORS (output record separator) to modify the line ends of the output. Example:



                                                echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' -v ORS='rn' 1 | hexdump -C





                                                share|improve this answer















                                                CR LF to LF using awk:



                                                awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                                command | awk -v RS='r?n' 1
                                                awk -v RS='r?n' 1 filename


                                                Usage example:



                                                echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' 1 | hexdump -C


                                                Explanation:



                                                -v RS='r?n' sets variable RS (input record separator) to r?n, meaning input is read line by line separated by LF (n) which may (?) be preceded by CR (r).



                                                1 is the script awk executes. A script consists of condition { action }. In this case, 1 is the condition which evaluates to true. The action is omitted, so the default action is executed, which means print the current line (which could also be written as {print $0} or simply {print}).





                                                LF to CR LF: You can set the variable ORS (output record separator) to modify the line ends of the output. Example:



                                                echo -e 'foonbarrnbaz' | awk -v RS='r?n' -v ORS='rn' 1 | hexdump -C






                                                share|improve this answer














                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer








                                                edited Feb 7 at 10:28

























                                                answered Feb 6 at 15:58









                                                MartinMartin

                                                1236




                                                1236






























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded




















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f52044%2fconvert-crlfs-to-line-feeds-on-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    How to make a Squid Proxy server?

                                                    Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

                                                    Touch on Surface Book