Have I saved too much for retirement so far?












4















I currently have a roth ira as well as a 401k from fidelity. I have around 350k in my 401k and another 10k in my Roth IRA. I just turned 40 recently. Am I saving too much for retirement and should I focus more on saving in say a regular savings account?



I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund (3 year old, 4 year old, 10 year old).



I have no car loans or student loans. My only debt is my house monthly payment around 1700 a month.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

    – JohnFx
    9 hours ago













  • Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

    – Ghanima
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

    – Brythan
    8 hours ago











  • @Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

    – JonH
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

    – Issel
    29 mins ago
















4















I currently have a roth ira as well as a 401k from fidelity. I have around 350k in my 401k and another 10k in my Roth IRA. I just turned 40 recently. Am I saving too much for retirement and should I focus more on saving in say a regular savings account?



I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund (3 year old, 4 year old, 10 year old).



I have no car loans or student loans. My only debt is my house monthly payment around 1700 a month.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

    – JohnFx
    9 hours ago













  • Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

    – Ghanima
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

    – Brythan
    8 hours ago











  • @Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

    – JonH
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

    – Issel
    29 mins ago














4












4








4


2






I currently have a roth ira as well as a 401k from fidelity. I have around 350k in my 401k and another 10k in my Roth IRA. I just turned 40 recently. Am I saving too much for retirement and should I focus more on saving in say a regular savings account?



I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund (3 year old, 4 year old, 10 year old).



I have no car loans or student loans. My only debt is my house monthly payment around 1700 a month.










share|improve this question
















I currently have a roth ira as well as a 401k from fidelity. I have around 350k in my 401k and another 10k in my Roth IRA. I just turned 40 recently. Am I saving too much for retirement and should I focus more on saving in say a regular savings account?



I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund (3 year old, 4 year old, 10 year old).



I have no car loans or student loans. My only debt is my house monthly payment around 1700 a month.







united-states 401k savings retirement-plan






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 28 mins ago









Chris W. Rea

26.7k1587174




26.7k1587174










asked 10 hours ago









JonHJonH

4691514




4691514








  • 2





    Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

    – JohnFx
    9 hours ago













  • Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

    – Ghanima
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

    – Brythan
    8 hours ago











  • @Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

    – JonH
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

    – Issel
    29 mins ago














  • 2





    Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

    – JohnFx
    9 hours ago













  • Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

    – Ghanima
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

    – Brythan
    8 hours ago











  • @Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

    – JonH
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

    – Issel
    29 mins ago








2




2





Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

– JohnFx
9 hours ago







Can you clarify your question? It asks if you are saving too much in the title, but the body seems to be about where you should put future savings. I'm confused.

– JohnFx
9 hours ago















Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

– Ghanima
9 hours ago





Related if not dupe: money.stackexchange.com/q/106895/26159

– Ghanima
9 hours ago




1




1





How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

– Brythan
8 hours ago





How old are the children? 30k for two children 17 and 18 is very different from a newborn and a one year old or not yet born. And how good your retirement and savings are depends on your income.

– Brythan
8 hours ago













@Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

– JonH
3 hours ago





@Brythan added children ages 3,4,10

– JonH
3 hours ago




1




1





Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

– Issel
29 mins ago





Is this a real question, or is it humblebragging? Considering one can rarely save to much, it seems like humblebragging.

– Issel
29 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














Nobody ever got to retirement age and said "Wow, I saved too much".



Your wealth has a direct effect on your quality-of-life in retirement - how much you travel, whether you go to movies vs. the opera, for instance. Near to endlife, it decides how good your situation will be: the quality of your independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing or hospice care. That matters. My parents despite being middle class, did very well in that department because they saved well.



Given that you are now gettng cold feet about further retirement investing, I recommend you focus on Roth IRAs (and possibly Roth 401Ks). Roths have a slick feature relevant to your concerns. Your intitial contributions (I call it the corpus, the term is actually from endowments) can be withdrawn at any time. Which means when you contribute, your money starts earning right away (properly invested). You can't take out the growth/dividends, but you can yank the corpus back out anytime you please without penalty. (Other than the passive penalty that the money is no longer multiplying for you, and it can't be put back later). The confidence of knowing this is like money in the bank -- literally, you can use it as an "emergency fund".



If you are above the income limits for contributions to Roth IRA (or even if not), then you use the "Back-door Roth" method -- deposit into a non-deductible IRA (a traditional IRA but don't claim the deduction on your taxes) then immediately convert it to Roth.



I can't comment on Roth 401Ks, I have not worked with them.






share|improve this answer
























  • I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

    – Adam Barnes
    2 hours ago











  • @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

    – njuffa
    1 hour ago





















6














Let me focus on the retirement number. I wrote a blog post on just that, The Number. In which I offer an easily editable spreadsheet to help users see if they are on track. With a goal of having 20X one's final income at a retirement age of 62, at age 40, you should have just over 5X your annual income saved. If your income is $70K or less, you are doing great, much over $100K, and you are falling behind.



If your question is about your investment mix, yes, it's good not to have all one's money in pre-tax accounts when retirement comes. I retired at 50 and will tell you first hand, it's a strange thing to look at a retirement account balance, and feel the pressure to avoid withdrawals that will be taxed at the next marginal rate, or phase out some tax benefit. I'd strongly recommend you consider a Roth 401(k) if available. If not, try to fund the Roth IRA every year. It with give you more flexibility at retirement.






share|improve this answer
























  • My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

    – JonH
    9 hours ago











  • Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago











  • Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

    – JonH
    9 hours ago











  • It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

    – xiaomy
    5 hours ago



















4














I would argue that in a world of compounding interest, that is, where time beats interest rates (as long as your investment vehicles don't fail to beat inflation) there is no such thing as "saving too much". Without knowing your goals (maybe you're up to an early retirement?) it is impossible to tell.




I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund.




The key question here is therefore not if you have saved too much for retirement but are your other financial goals are in line with your expectations, i.e. are you comfortable with the amounts in your savings account and the children's education fund? (Even a State College can run $50K for the 4 years). Nobody can tell but you yourself.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "93"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106913%2fhave-i-saved-too-much-for-retirement-so-far%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    Nobody ever got to retirement age and said "Wow, I saved too much".



    Your wealth has a direct effect on your quality-of-life in retirement - how much you travel, whether you go to movies vs. the opera, for instance. Near to endlife, it decides how good your situation will be: the quality of your independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing or hospice care. That matters. My parents despite being middle class, did very well in that department because they saved well.



    Given that you are now gettng cold feet about further retirement investing, I recommend you focus on Roth IRAs (and possibly Roth 401Ks). Roths have a slick feature relevant to your concerns. Your intitial contributions (I call it the corpus, the term is actually from endowments) can be withdrawn at any time. Which means when you contribute, your money starts earning right away (properly invested). You can't take out the growth/dividends, but you can yank the corpus back out anytime you please without penalty. (Other than the passive penalty that the money is no longer multiplying for you, and it can't be put back later). The confidence of knowing this is like money in the bank -- literally, you can use it as an "emergency fund".



    If you are above the income limits for contributions to Roth IRA (or even if not), then you use the "Back-door Roth" method -- deposit into a non-deductible IRA (a traditional IRA but don't claim the deduction on your taxes) then immediately convert it to Roth.



    I can't comment on Roth 401Ks, I have not worked with them.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

      – Adam Barnes
      2 hours ago











    • @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

      – njuffa
      1 hour ago


















    7














    Nobody ever got to retirement age and said "Wow, I saved too much".



    Your wealth has a direct effect on your quality-of-life in retirement - how much you travel, whether you go to movies vs. the opera, for instance. Near to endlife, it decides how good your situation will be: the quality of your independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing or hospice care. That matters. My parents despite being middle class, did very well in that department because they saved well.



    Given that you are now gettng cold feet about further retirement investing, I recommend you focus on Roth IRAs (and possibly Roth 401Ks). Roths have a slick feature relevant to your concerns. Your intitial contributions (I call it the corpus, the term is actually from endowments) can be withdrawn at any time. Which means when you contribute, your money starts earning right away (properly invested). You can't take out the growth/dividends, but you can yank the corpus back out anytime you please without penalty. (Other than the passive penalty that the money is no longer multiplying for you, and it can't be put back later). The confidence of knowing this is like money in the bank -- literally, you can use it as an "emergency fund".



    If you are above the income limits for contributions to Roth IRA (or even if not), then you use the "Back-door Roth" method -- deposit into a non-deductible IRA (a traditional IRA but don't claim the deduction on your taxes) then immediately convert it to Roth.



    I can't comment on Roth 401Ks, I have not worked with them.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

      – Adam Barnes
      2 hours ago











    • @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

      – njuffa
      1 hour ago
















    7












    7








    7







    Nobody ever got to retirement age and said "Wow, I saved too much".



    Your wealth has a direct effect on your quality-of-life in retirement - how much you travel, whether you go to movies vs. the opera, for instance. Near to endlife, it decides how good your situation will be: the quality of your independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing or hospice care. That matters. My parents despite being middle class, did very well in that department because they saved well.



    Given that you are now gettng cold feet about further retirement investing, I recommend you focus on Roth IRAs (and possibly Roth 401Ks). Roths have a slick feature relevant to your concerns. Your intitial contributions (I call it the corpus, the term is actually from endowments) can be withdrawn at any time. Which means when you contribute, your money starts earning right away (properly invested). You can't take out the growth/dividends, but you can yank the corpus back out anytime you please without penalty. (Other than the passive penalty that the money is no longer multiplying for you, and it can't be put back later). The confidence of knowing this is like money in the bank -- literally, you can use it as an "emergency fund".



    If you are above the income limits for contributions to Roth IRA (or even if not), then you use the "Back-door Roth" method -- deposit into a non-deductible IRA (a traditional IRA but don't claim the deduction on your taxes) then immediately convert it to Roth.



    I can't comment on Roth 401Ks, I have not worked with them.






    share|improve this answer













    Nobody ever got to retirement age and said "Wow, I saved too much".



    Your wealth has a direct effect on your quality-of-life in retirement - how much you travel, whether you go to movies vs. the opera, for instance. Near to endlife, it decides how good your situation will be: the quality of your independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing or hospice care. That matters. My parents despite being middle class, did very well in that department because they saved well.



    Given that you are now gettng cold feet about further retirement investing, I recommend you focus on Roth IRAs (and possibly Roth 401Ks). Roths have a slick feature relevant to your concerns. Your intitial contributions (I call it the corpus, the term is actually from endowments) can be withdrawn at any time. Which means when you contribute, your money starts earning right away (properly invested). You can't take out the growth/dividends, but you can yank the corpus back out anytime you please without penalty. (Other than the passive penalty that the money is no longer multiplying for you, and it can't be put back later). The confidence of knowing this is like money in the bank -- literally, you can use it as an "emergency fund".



    If you are above the income limits for contributions to Roth IRA (or even if not), then you use the "Back-door Roth" method -- deposit into a non-deductible IRA (a traditional IRA but don't claim the deduction on your taxes) then immediately convert it to Roth.



    I can't comment on Roth 401Ks, I have not worked with them.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    HarperHarper

    23.8k53581




    23.8k53581













    • I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

      – Adam Barnes
      2 hours ago











    • @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

      – njuffa
      1 hour ago





















    • I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

      – Adam Barnes
      2 hours ago











    • @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

      – njuffa
      1 hour ago



















    I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

    – Adam Barnes
    2 hours ago





    I could see myself oversaving for retirement, then regretting I no longer have the physical/mental capability to enjoy my money. We took my Grandmother on a holiday with us, and she got too tired out walking around to experience the place properly, for instance.

    – Adam Barnes
    2 hours ago













    @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

    – njuffa
    1 hour ago







    @Adam Barnes If you no longer "have the physical/mental capability to enjoy" your money, you may instead need money to cover health care costs, modifications to your house and/or vehicles because of disability, home care, or nursing facility. If you saved a lot for retirement, you could consider early retirement as an option (like JoeTaxpayer, I retired at age 50).

    – njuffa
    1 hour ago















    6














    Let me focus on the retirement number. I wrote a blog post on just that, The Number. In which I offer an easily editable spreadsheet to help users see if they are on track. With a goal of having 20X one's final income at a retirement age of 62, at age 40, you should have just over 5X your annual income saved. If your income is $70K or less, you are doing great, much over $100K, and you are falling behind.



    If your question is about your investment mix, yes, it's good not to have all one's money in pre-tax accounts when retirement comes. I retired at 50 and will tell you first hand, it's a strange thing to look at a retirement account balance, and feel the pressure to avoid withdrawals that will be taxed at the next marginal rate, or phase out some tax benefit. I'd strongly recommend you consider a Roth 401(k) if available. If not, try to fund the Roth IRA every year. It with give you more flexibility at retirement.






    share|improve this answer
























    • My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago











    • Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

      – xiaomy
      5 hours ago
















    6














    Let me focus on the retirement number. I wrote a blog post on just that, The Number. In which I offer an easily editable spreadsheet to help users see if they are on track. With a goal of having 20X one's final income at a retirement age of 62, at age 40, you should have just over 5X your annual income saved. If your income is $70K or less, you are doing great, much over $100K, and you are falling behind.



    If your question is about your investment mix, yes, it's good not to have all one's money in pre-tax accounts when retirement comes. I retired at 50 and will tell you first hand, it's a strange thing to look at a retirement account balance, and feel the pressure to avoid withdrawals that will be taxed at the next marginal rate, or phase out some tax benefit. I'd strongly recommend you consider a Roth 401(k) if available. If not, try to fund the Roth IRA every year. It with give you more flexibility at retirement.






    share|improve this answer
























    • My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago











    • Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

      – xiaomy
      5 hours ago














    6












    6








    6







    Let me focus on the retirement number. I wrote a blog post on just that, The Number. In which I offer an easily editable spreadsheet to help users see if they are on track. With a goal of having 20X one's final income at a retirement age of 62, at age 40, you should have just over 5X your annual income saved. If your income is $70K or less, you are doing great, much over $100K, and you are falling behind.



    If your question is about your investment mix, yes, it's good not to have all one's money in pre-tax accounts when retirement comes. I retired at 50 and will tell you first hand, it's a strange thing to look at a retirement account balance, and feel the pressure to avoid withdrawals that will be taxed at the next marginal rate, or phase out some tax benefit. I'd strongly recommend you consider a Roth 401(k) if available. If not, try to fund the Roth IRA every year. It with give you more flexibility at retirement.






    share|improve this answer













    Let me focus on the retirement number. I wrote a blog post on just that, The Number. In which I offer an easily editable spreadsheet to help users see if they are on track. With a goal of having 20X one's final income at a retirement age of 62, at age 40, you should have just over 5X your annual income saved. If your income is $70K or less, you are doing great, much over $100K, and you are falling behind.



    If your question is about your investment mix, yes, it's good not to have all one's money in pre-tax accounts when retirement comes. I retired at 50 and will tell you first hand, it's a strange thing to look at a retirement account balance, and feel the pressure to avoid withdrawals that will be taxed at the next marginal rate, or phase out some tax benefit. I'd strongly recommend you consider a Roth 401(k) if available. If not, try to fund the Roth IRA every year. It with give you more flexibility at retirement.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 9 hours ago









    JoeTaxpayerJoeTaxpayer

    146k23236470




    146k23236470













    • My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago











    • Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

      – xiaomy
      5 hours ago



















    • My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago











    • Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

      – JonH
      9 hours ago











    • It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

      – JoeTaxpayer
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

      – xiaomy
      5 hours ago

















    My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

    – JonH
    9 hours ago





    My question meant i had a roth ira it is not traditional roth.

    – JonH
    9 hours ago













    Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago





    Yes, a tiny fraction compared to the 401(k). Suggesting you keep the Roth going, and see if 401(k) Roth is an option.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago













    Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

    – JonH
    9 hours ago





    Didnt know there was such a thing as 401k roth. Can you elaborate or send a good explanation. Will try to google it later today. Thanks

    – JonH
    9 hours ago













    It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago





    It is a flavor of the 401(k) account which has tax rules similar to Roth. No deduction at time time of deposit, but no tax on growth even at withdrawal time. Same deposit limit at the traditional 401(k). The 2 flavors of 401 are a great mix. Best flexibility at retirement time.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    9 hours ago




    1




    1





    Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

    – xiaomy
    5 hours ago





    Could you elaborate on "flexibility" regarding roth? Is there anything more substantial / not psychological?

    – xiaomy
    5 hours ago











    4














    I would argue that in a world of compounding interest, that is, where time beats interest rates (as long as your investment vehicles don't fail to beat inflation) there is no such thing as "saving too much". Without knowing your goals (maybe you're up to an early retirement?) it is impossible to tell.




    I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund.




    The key question here is therefore not if you have saved too much for retirement but are your other financial goals are in line with your expectations, i.e. are you comfortable with the amounts in your savings account and the children's education fund? (Even a State College can run $50K for the 4 years). Nobody can tell but you yourself.






    share|improve this answer






























      4














      I would argue that in a world of compounding interest, that is, where time beats interest rates (as long as your investment vehicles don't fail to beat inflation) there is no such thing as "saving too much". Without knowing your goals (maybe you're up to an early retirement?) it is impossible to tell.




      I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund.




      The key question here is therefore not if you have saved too much for retirement but are your other financial goals are in line with your expectations, i.e. are you comfortable with the amounts in your savings account and the children's education fund? (Even a State College can run $50K for the 4 years). Nobody can tell but you yourself.






      share|improve this answer




























        4












        4








        4







        I would argue that in a world of compounding interest, that is, where time beats interest rates (as long as your investment vehicles don't fail to beat inflation) there is no such thing as "saving too much". Without knowing your goals (maybe you're up to an early retirement?) it is impossible to tell.




        I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund.




        The key question here is therefore not if you have saved too much for retirement but are your other financial goals are in line with your expectations, i.e. are you comfortable with the amounts in your savings account and the children's education fund? (Even a State College can run $50K for the 4 years). Nobody can tell but you yourself.






        share|improve this answer















        I would argue that in a world of compounding interest, that is, where time beats interest rates (as long as your investment vehicles don't fail to beat inflation) there is no such thing as "saving too much". Without knowing your goals (maybe you're up to an early retirement?) it is impossible to tell.




        I have around 30k in a regular savings account along with another 30k for my children’s education fund.




        The key question here is therefore not if you have saved too much for retirement but are your other financial goals are in line with your expectations, i.e. are you comfortable with the amounts in your savings account and the children's education fund? (Even a State College can run $50K for the 4 years). Nobody can tell but you yourself.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago









        JoeTaxpayer

        146k23236470




        146k23236470










        answered 9 hours ago









        GhanimaGhanima

        300213




        300213






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106913%2fhave-i-saved-too-much-for-retirement-so-far%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to make a Squid Proxy server?

            Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

            19世紀