Is it harder for an intelligent octopus to live on land, or a human to live in space?












9












$begingroup$


I have a race of octopodes with the same intelligence distribution as humans. I want them to “colonise” land to a similar extent as we have “colonised” space; have regular transport between the ocean and land, and have a permanent settlement. Ideally there would also be some form of EVA suit, to enable them to perform repairs on the colony - as we do on the ISS. Likely those who go to land would be the best of the best - just as we chose the best people to be astronauts.



I have chosen octopodes because I am aware they can manipulate tools with reasonable fidelity, as humans can.



So, the summary; would it be more octopus hours and to set up a colony on land as it was human hours to set up an international space station?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
    $endgroup$
    – vlaz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
    $endgroup$
    – a4android
    1 hour ago
















9












$begingroup$


I have a race of octopodes with the same intelligence distribution as humans. I want them to “colonise” land to a similar extent as we have “colonised” space; have regular transport between the ocean and land, and have a permanent settlement. Ideally there would also be some form of EVA suit, to enable them to perform repairs on the colony - as we do on the ISS. Likely those who go to land would be the best of the best - just as we chose the best people to be astronauts.



I have chosen octopodes because I am aware they can manipulate tools with reasonable fidelity, as humans can.



So, the summary; would it be more octopus hours and to set up a colony on land as it was human hours to set up an international space station?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
    $endgroup$
    – vlaz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
    $endgroup$
    – a4android
    1 hour ago














9












9








9





$begingroup$


I have a race of octopodes with the same intelligence distribution as humans. I want them to “colonise” land to a similar extent as we have “colonised” space; have regular transport between the ocean and land, and have a permanent settlement. Ideally there would also be some form of EVA suit, to enable them to perform repairs on the colony - as we do on the ISS. Likely those who go to land would be the best of the best - just as we chose the best people to be astronauts.



I have chosen octopodes because I am aware they can manipulate tools with reasonable fidelity, as humans can.



So, the summary; would it be more octopus hours and to set up a colony on land as it was human hours to set up an international space station?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a race of octopodes with the same intelligence distribution as humans. I want them to “colonise” land to a similar extent as we have “colonised” space; have regular transport between the ocean and land, and have a permanent settlement. Ideally there would also be some form of EVA suit, to enable them to perform repairs on the colony - as we do on the ISS. Likely those who go to land would be the best of the best - just as we chose the best people to be astronauts.



I have chosen octopodes because I am aware they can manipulate tools with reasonable fidelity, as humans can.



So, the summary; would it be more octopus hours and to set up a colony on land as it was human hours to set up an international space station?







biology space humans underwater






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









TimTim

455416




455416












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
    $endgroup$
    – vlaz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
    $endgroup$
    – a4android
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
    $endgroup$
    – vlaz
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
    $endgroup$
    – a4android
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
$endgroup$
– vlaz
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure how this premise ties in with the question. Also, given that you have octopodes in mech suits/exoskeletons I'm not sure there is a definite answer to the question. It seems like it would take whatever time you want it to take. Might be a couple of months, might be a couple of centuries - anything is possible when you're in control of the tech and the plot.
$endgroup$
– vlaz
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
$endgroup$
– JBH
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is an impossible question to answer. What is the tech level of the octopi compared to the humans? What resources are available? What is the nature of the ocean starting point? What is the nature of the land end point? How many octopi are assigned vs. humans? How much time did they have to prepare? How much time did the humans have to prepare? And if you answer all that - we still can't give you a number that's any more accurate than rolling dice.
$endgroup$
– JBH
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
$endgroup$
– a4android
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@JBH Sorry, but "octopi" is the wrong plural. Octopus is a Greek word. Its plural is "octopodes". See vlaz's comment above. However, octopus is a word domesticated into being part of the English language. So "octopuses" is acceptable usage for the plural. While most people will understand "octopi" is plural for octopus, it's not exactly correct. With time & usage, it probably will become accepted.
$endgroup$
– a4android
1 hour ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

There are a few issues that need to be considered separately:




  1. Constructing water-filled environments for a water-breather to reside in on land isn't a significant technical issue. The manufacturing requirements for a salt water pool or aquarium are far simpler to achieve than for an air-filled canister to be used in a vacuum.


  2. Getting onto land from the sea requires enormously less energy than getting from the Earth's surface into space.



So far: 2-nil to the octopodes.




  1. However, there appear to be significant barriers to the manufacture of metals and ceramics in a watery environment. Similarly, wet chemistry would be a lot more difficult, so it might be hard for the octopodes to develop even simple mechanical technology.


  2. A water-breather has a distinct disadvantage in manufacturing/using an EVA suit compared to an air-breather. Air can be compressed and is light. Water is in-compressible and heavy. So an octopus EVA suit would be very heavy and would probably need complex components to continuously reoxygenate the water. It is unlikely that such an EVA suit could be supported/manipulated by an individual octopus without mechanical assistance.



So 2-all in the end. Easier to get there, simpler technology required for the environment, but harder to move around and possibly harder to develop even the simpler tech.



But if the octopodes do already have a similar technology base to us, then it would be much simpler/cheaper/faster for them to reach land than it is for us to reach space.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
    $endgroup$
    – Quaternion
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    30 mins ago



















7












$begingroup$

I would say that for both humans and your octopodes, Space is a much tougher frontier.



Without going into the details, I would like to direct you to a few factors that may come into play.



Space as it were, is extremely dangerous for both humans and octopodes. Radiation, extreme temperature changes, micro gravity, and the vacuum of space. In comparison to a human trying to live in the ocean, or octopus trying to live on land, space is much more dangerous. As humans can go snorkeling and swim in water, octopodes can hang out on the sea shores for a bit but to both, space really suck all the life out of them.( And makes the water in their body boil and then freeze.) http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f



On another point, technology needed are an important factor. Note that the space suits required for humankind is much more expensive and technologically advance compared to a scuba diver's gear, space suits are whole other level.I would assume your octopus would have a similar comparison. ( The specifics of technology I will leave out as the price difference is clue enough.) The other thing is that space is a lot harder to get to than a place that is on your home planet.



The resources required for colonies is important. Note that space has terrible resources compared to anything on our lovable Earth. As with most pioneer colonies, resources for initial colonization would be sent to the site. It would be easier to do that if the colony was on the same planet. After your colony starts its own manufacturing and works towards sustainability, the resources at the site would play an important role in how much needs to be shipped from home to the colony. Land has trees.Your octopodes would not have lumber as traditional materials.I could guess that your adorable octopode scientists would bring up the idea to use local materials instead of coral and seaweed or whatever ocean things do. Space has rocks and ice. Not really a nice place to grow octopode food. https://science.howstuffworks.com/what-if-moon-colony1.htm



The very final point is most obvious. Space stations mimic the environments humans lived in on Earth. Your land colony for octopodes is probably going to be something along the lines of an aquarium tank scientified( That is not a word). Or a pool or lake. I don't "sea" that as very difficult at all. In fact, it is easier for Octopodes to colonize land than it is for humans to live underwater. Depending on the species, atmospheric pressure differences hurts creatures with air filled lungs much more than octopodes.



I suggest you think your idea over a bit. May I suggest toughening up the environment on land compared to the sea? A more lifeless or hostile environment on land could bring the difficulty of a land colony closer to a space colony. If a tough colonization project is what you want your octopodes to go through.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Octopus crawling on land



    You can see octopodes crawl out of a tide pool and into a neighboring pool with little difficulty. octopodes have been known to crawl out of a tank in an aquarium and have the crab in the tank next door for dinner. They have even been known to shut off lights that bother them in their tank at an aquarium. They have been documented crawling out of their tanks, walking to a drain and exiting to the sea.



    I would definitely feel humans in space would have a much more difficult time at survival.




    • https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/10/wales-ceredigion-octopus-land-deaths-spd/

    • https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/43456/how-long-can-an-octopus-survive-out-of-the-water






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      One major advantage that octopodes have in colonising the land, is that they can already make short stints out of the water without any specialised equipment. This is very much not true of humans in a vacuum.



      A question asked on Biology SE details the ability of an octopus to survive out of water, and another source details that coming out of the water to hunt terrestrial prey is common behaviour for certain kinds of octopus.



      What this suggests to me, is that given human level intelligence (maybe paired with a longer lifespan?), octopodes would be well placed to begin colonising the shores. They probably wouldn't even need particularly advanced technology to do it.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        Octopodes are not going to colonize land the same way we've colonized space - they're going to colonize the land the way we've colonized the sea.



        Penguino has done a pretty good of addressing how different it is for humans to go to space versus octopodes coming ashore. But there is a parallel that's much closer to shore (so to speak).



        An octopus' ability to survive on land is not that different from our ability to survive under the ocean, and in both cases there are resources that make it worth learning how to extend that length of time.



        You're not going to see ISS-like mobile aquariums as the early colonization steps. You're going to see irrigation, dikes, and dams, which turn formerly dry land into tidepools the same way humans carved Holland out of the sea.



        The earliest land-going octopus vehicles will be not be spacecraft or submarine-like - they'll be more akin to large bowls on wheels probably crank-powered (or oar-powered), given the difficulty they'll have domesticating any suitable pulling animal. They won't exactly be safe, but then again neither were the earliest boats.



        Entirely enclosed habitats won't come until much later, assuming they come at all. There's simply no need for them, and their construction complexity (and expense!) is much higher.





        share









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136671%2fis-it-harder-for-an-intelligent-octopus-to-live-on-land-or-a-human-to-live-in-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9












          $begingroup$

          There are a few issues that need to be considered separately:




          1. Constructing water-filled environments for a water-breather to reside in on land isn't a significant technical issue. The manufacturing requirements for a salt water pool or aquarium are far simpler to achieve than for an air-filled canister to be used in a vacuum.


          2. Getting onto land from the sea requires enormously less energy than getting from the Earth's surface into space.



          So far: 2-nil to the octopodes.




          1. However, there appear to be significant barriers to the manufacture of metals and ceramics in a watery environment. Similarly, wet chemistry would be a lot more difficult, so it might be hard for the octopodes to develop even simple mechanical technology.


          2. A water-breather has a distinct disadvantage in manufacturing/using an EVA suit compared to an air-breather. Air can be compressed and is light. Water is in-compressible and heavy. So an octopus EVA suit would be very heavy and would probably need complex components to continuously reoxygenate the water. It is unlikely that such an EVA suit could be supported/manipulated by an individual octopus without mechanical assistance.



          So 2-all in the end. Easier to get there, simpler technology required for the environment, but harder to move around and possibly harder to develop even the simpler tech.



          But if the octopodes do already have a similar technology base to us, then it would be much simpler/cheaper/faster for them to reach land than it is for us to reach space.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
            $endgroup$
            – Quaternion
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
            $endgroup$
            – Arcanist Lupus
            30 mins ago
















          9












          $begingroup$

          There are a few issues that need to be considered separately:




          1. Constructing water-filled environments for a water-breather to reside in on land isn't a significant technical issue. The manufacturing requirements for a salt water pool or aquarium are far simpler to achieve than for an air-filled canister to be used in a vacuum.


          2. Getting onto land from the sea requires enormously less energy than getting from the Earth's surface into space.



          So far: 2-nil to the octopodes.




          1. However, there appear to be significant barriers to the manufacture of metals and ceramics in a watery environment. Similarly, wet chemistry would be a lot more difficult, so it might be hard for the octopodes to develop even simple mechanical technology.


          2. A water-breather has a distinct disadvantage in manufacturing/using an EVA suit compared to an air-breather. Air can be compressed and is light. Water is in-compressible and heavy. So an octopus EVA suit would be very heavy and would probably need complex components to continuously reoxygenate the water. It is unlikely that such an EVA suit could be supported/manipulated by an individual octopus without mechanical assistance.



          So 2-all in the end. Easier to get there, simpler technology required for the environment, but harder to move around and possibly harder to develop even the simpler tech.



          But if the octopodes do already have a similar technology base to us, then it would be much simpler/cheaper/faster for them to reach land than it is for us to reach space.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
            $endgroup$
            – Quaternion
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
            $endgroup$
            – Arcanist Lupus
            30 mins ago














          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          There are a few issues that need to be considered separately:




          1. Constructing water-filled environments for a water-breather to reside in on land isn't a significant technical issue. The manufacturing requirements for a salt water pool or aquarium are far simpler to achieve than for an air-filled canister to be used in a vacuum.


          2. Getting onto land from the sea requires enormously less energy than getting from the Earth's surface into space.



          So far: 2-nil to the octopodes.




          1. However, there appear to be significant barriers to the manufacture of metals and ceramics in a watery environment. Similarly, wet chemistry would be a lot more difficult, so it might be hard for the octopodes to develop even simple mechanical technology.


          2. A water-breather has a distinct disadvantage in manufacturing/using an EVA suit compared to an air-breather. Air can be compressed and is light. Water is in-compressible and heavy. So an octopus EVA suit would be very heavy and would probably need complex components to continuously reoxygenate the water. It is unlikely that such an EVA suit could be supported/manipulated by an individual octopus without mechanical assistance.



          So 2-all in the end. Easier to get there, simpler technology required for the environment, but harder to move around and possibly harder to develop even the simpler tech.



          But if the octopodes do already have a similar technology base to us, then it would be much simpler/cheaper/faster for them to reach land than it is for us to reach space.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There are a few issues that need to be considered separately:




          1. Constructing water-filled environments for a water-breather to reside in on land isn't a significant technical issue. The manufacturing requirements for a salt water pool or aquarium are far simpler to achieve than for an air-filled canister to be used in a vacuum.


          2. Getting onto land from the sea requires enormously less energy than getting from the Earth's surface into space.



          So far: 2-nil to the octopodes.




          1. However, there appear to be significant barriers to the manufacture of metals and ceramics in a watery environment. Similarly, wet chemistry would be a lot more difficult, so it might be hard for the octopodes to develop even simple mechanical technology.


          2. A water-breather has a distinct disadvantage in manufacturing/using an EVA suit compared to an air-breather. Air can be compressed and is light. Water is in-compressible and heavy. So an octopus EVA suit would be very heavy and would probably need complex components to continuously reoxygenate the water. It is unlikely that such an EVA suit could be supported/manipulated by an individual octopus without mechanical assistance.



          So 2-all in the end. Easier to get there, simpler technology required for the environment, but harder to move around and possibly harder to develop even the simpler tech.



          But if the octopodes do already have a similar technology base to us, then it would be much simpler/cheaper/faster for them to reach land than it is for us to reach space.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          PenguinoPenguino

          7167




          7167








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
            $endgroup$
            – Quaternion
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
            $endgroup$
            – Arcanist Lupus
            30 mins ago














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
            $endgroup$
            – Quaternion
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
            $endgroup$
            – Arcanist Lupus
            30 mins ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
          $endgroup$
          – Quaternion
          1 hour ago






          $begingroup$
          With regards to the EVA suite it could be a lot lighter than at first supposed... Eye protection and a respirator, the respirator would facilitate the exchange of oxygen into water, but very little water would be needed. With only those two components the octopodes could work terrestrially ideally under a constant mist to protect their skin but perhaps some special UV protecting mucus could be applied thereby removing the need for bulky suite (or any suite).
          $endgroup$
          – Quaternion
          1 hour ago














          $begingroup$
          You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
          $endgroup$
          – Arcanist Lupus
          30 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          You've missed a big plus on the octopus side - octopodes do better in air than humans do in vacuum.
          $endgroup$
          – Arcanist Lupus
          30 mins ago











          7












          $begingroup$

          I would say that for both humans and your octopodes, Space is a much tougher frontier.



          Without going into the details, I would like to direct you to a few factors that may come into play.



          Space as it were, is extremely dangerous for both humans and octopodes. Radiation, extreme temperature changes, micro gravity, and the vacuum of space. In comparison to a human trying to live in the ocean, or octopus trying to live on land, space is much more dangerous. As humans can go snorkeling and swim in water, octopodes can hang out on the sea shores for a bit but to both, space really suck all the life out of them.( And makes the water in their body boil and then freeze.) http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f



          On another point, technology needed are an important factor. Note that the space suits required for humankind is much more expensive and technologically advance compared to a scuba diver's gear, space suits are whole other level.I would assume your octopus would have a similar comparison. ( The specifics of technology I will leave out as the price difference is clue enough.) The other thing is that space is a lot harder to get to than a place that is on your home planet.



          The resources required for colonies is important. Note that space has terrible resources compared to anything on our lovable Earth. As with most pioneer colonies, resources for initial colonization would be sent to the site. It would be easier to do that if the colony was on the same planet. After your colony starts its own manufacturing and works towards sustainability, the resources at the site would play an important role in how much needs to be shipped from home to the colony. Land has trees.Your octopodes would not have lumber as traditional materials.I could guess that your adorable octopode scientists would bring up the idea to use local materials instead of coral and seaweed or whatever ocean things do. Space has rocks and ice. Not really a nice place to grow octopode food. https://science.howstuffworks.com/what-if-moon-colony1.htm



          The very final point is most obvious. Space stations mimic the environments humans lived in on Earth. Your land colony for octopodes is probably going to be something along the lines of an aquarium tank scientified( That is not a word). Or a pool or lake. I don't "sea" that as very difficult at all. In fact, it is easier for Octopodes to colonize land than it is for humans to live underwater. Depending on the species, atmospheric pressure differences hurts creatures with air filled lungs much more than octopodes.



          I suggest you think your idea over a bit. May I suggest toughening up the environment on land compared to the sea? A more lifeless or hostile environment on land could bring the difficulty of a land colony closer to a space colony. If a tough colonization project is what you want your octopodes to go through.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$


















            7












            $begingroup$

            I would say that for both humans and your octopodes, Space is a much tougher frontier.



            Without going into the details, I would like to direct you to a few factors that may come into play.



            Space as it were, is extremely dangerous for both humans and octopodes. Radiation, extreme temperature changes, micro gravity, and the vacuum of space. In comparison to a human trying to live in the ocean, or octopus trying to live on land, space is much more dangerous. As humans can go snorkeling and swim in water, octopodes can hang out on the sea shores for a bit but to both, space really suck all the life out of them.( And makes the water in their body boil and then freeze.) http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f



            On another point, technology needed are an important factor. Note that the space suits required for humankind is much more expensive and technologically advance compared to a scuba diver's gear, space suits are whole other level.I would assume your octopus would have a similar comparison. ( The specifics of technology I will leave out as the price difference is clue enough.) The other thing is that space is a lot harder to get to than a place that is on your home planet.



            The resources required for colonies is important. Note that space has terrible resources compared to anything on our lovable Earth. As with most pioneer colonies, resources for initial colonization would be sent to the site. It would be easier to do that if the colony was on the same planet. After your colony starts its own manufacturing and works towards sustainability, the resources at the site would play an important role in how much needs to be shipped from home to the colony. Land has trees.Your octopodes would not have lumber as traditional materials.I could guess that your adorable octopode scientists would bring up the idea to use local materials instead of coral and seaweed or whatever ocean things do. Space has rocks and ice. Not really a nice place to grow octopode food. https://science.howstuffworks.com/what-if-moon-colony1.htm



            The very final point is most obvious. Space stations mimic the environments humans lived in on Earth. Your land colony for octopodes is probably going to be something along the lines of an aquarium tank scientified( That is not a word). Or a pool or lake. I don't "sea" that as very difficult at all. In fact, it is easier for Octopodes to colonize land than it is for humans to live underwater. Depending on the species, atmospheric pressure differences hurts creatures with air filled lungs much more than octopodes.



            I suggest you think your idea over a bit. May I suggest toughening up the environment on land compared to the sea? A more lifeless or hostile environment on land could bring the difficulty of a land colony closer to a space colony. If a tough colonization project is what you want your octopodes to go through.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$
















              7












              7








              7





              $begingroup$

              I would say that for both humans and your octopodes, Space is a much tougher frontier.



              Without going into the details, I would like to direct you to a few factors that may come into play.



              Space as it were, is extremely dangerous for both humans and octopodes. Radiation, extreme temperature changes, micro gravity, and the vacuum of space. In comparison to a human trying to live in the ocean, or octopus trying to live on land, space is much more dangerous. As humans can go snorkeling and swim in water, octopodes can hang out on the sea shores for a bit but to both, space really suck all the life out of them.( And makes the water in their body boil and then freeze.) http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f



              On another point, technology needed are an important factor. Note that the space suits required for humankind is much more expensive and technologically advance compared to a scuba diver's gear, space suits are whole other level.I would assume your octopus would have a similar comparison. ( The specifics of technology I will leave out as the price difference is clue enough.) The other thing is that space is a lot harder to get to than a place that is on your home planet.



              The resources required for colonies is important. Note that space has terrible resources compared to anything on our lovable Earth. As with most pioneer colonies, resources for initial colonization would be sent to the site. It would be easier to do that if the colony was on the same planet. After your colony starts its own manufacturing and works towards sustainability, the resources at the site would play an important role in how much needs to be shipped from home to the colony. Land has trees.Your octopodes would not have lumber as traditional materials.I could guess that your adorable octopode scientists would bring up the idea to use local materials instead of coral and seaweed or whatever ocean things do. Space has rocks and ice. Not really a nice place to grow octopode food. https://science.howstuffworks.com/what-if-moon-colony1.htm



              The very final point is most obvious. Space stations mimic the environments humans lived in on Earth. Your land colony for octopodes is probably going to be something along the lines of an aquarium tank scientified( That is not a word). Or a pool or lake. I don't "sea" that as very difficult at all. In fact, it is easier for Octopodes to colonize land than it is for humans to live underwater. Depending on the species, atmospheric pressure differences hurts creatures with air filled lungs much more than octopodes.



              I suggest you think your idea over a bit. May I suggest toughening up the environment on land compared to the sea? A more lifeless or hostile environment on land could bring the difficulty of a land colony closer to a space colony. If a tough colonization project is what you want your octopodes to go through.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$



              I would say that for both humans and your octopodes, Space is a much tougher frontier.



              Without going into the details, I would like to direct you to a few factors that may come into play.



              Space as it were, is extremely dangerous for both humans and octopodes. Radiation, extreme temperature changes, micro gravity, and the vacuum of space. In comparison to a human trying to live in the ocean, or octopus trying to live on land, space is much more dangerous. As humans can go snorkeling and swim in water, octopodes can hang out on the sea shores for a bit but to both, space really suck all the life out of them.( And makes the water in their body boil and then freeze.) http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f



              On another point, technology needed are an important factor. Note that the space suits required for humankind is much more expensive and technologically advance compared to a scuba diver's gear, space suits are whole other level.I would assume your octopus would have a similar comparison. ( The specifics of technology I will leave out as the price difference is clue enough.) The other thing is that space is a lot harder to get to than a place that is on your home planet.



              The resources required for colonies is important. Note that space has terrible resources compared to anything on our lovable Earth. As with most pioneer colonies, resources for initial colonization would be sent to the site. It would be easier to do that if the colony was on the same planet. After your colony starts its own manufacturing and works towards sustainability, the resources at the site would play an important role in how much needs to be shipped from home to the colony. Land has trees.Your octopodes would not have lumber as traditional materials.I could guess that your adorable octopode scientists would bring up the idea to use local materials instead of coral and seaweed or whatever ocean things do. Space has rocks and ice. Not really a nice place to grow octopode food. https://science.howstuffworks.com/what-if-moon-colony1.htm



              The very final point is most obvious. Space stations mimic the environments humans lived in on Earth. Your land colony for octopodes is probably going to be something along the lines of an aquarium tank scientified( That is not a word). Or a pool or lake. I don't "sea" that as very difficult at all. In fact, it is easier for Octopodes to colonize land than it is for humans to live underwater. Depending on the species, atmospheric pressure differences hurts creatures with air filled lungs much more than octopodes.



              I suggest you think your idea over a bit. May I suggest toughening up the environment on land compared to the sea? A more lifeless or hostile environment on land could bring the difficulty of a land colony closer to a space colony. If a tough colonization project is what you want your octopodes to go through.







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 hours ago





















              New contributor




              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 4 hours ago









              LonhaLonha

              713




              713




              New contributor




              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Lonha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  Octopus crawling on land



                  You can see octopodes crawl out of a tide pool and into a neighboring pool with little difficulty. octopodes have been known to crawl out of a tank in an aquarium and have the crab in the tank next door for dinner. They have even been known to shut off lights that bother them in their tank at an aquarium. They have been documented crawling out of their tanks, walking to a drain and exiting to the sea.



                  I would definitely feel humans in space would have a much more difficult time at survival.




                  • https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/10/wales-ceredigion-octopus-land-deaths-spd/

                  • https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/43456/how-long-can-an-octopus-survive-out-of-the-water






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Octopus crawling on land



                    You can see octopodes crawl out of a tide pool and into a neighboring pool with little difficulty. octopodes have been known to crawl out of a tank in an aquarium and have the crab in the tank next door for dinner. They have even been known to shut off lights that bother them in their tank at an aquarium. They have been documented crawling out of their tanks, walking to a drain and exiting to the sea.



                    I would definitely feel humans in space would have a much more difficult time at survival.




                    • https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/10/wales-ceredigion-octopus-land-deaths-spd/

                    • https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/43456/how-long-can-an-octopus-survive-out-of-the-water






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Octopus crawling on land



                      You can see octopodes crawl out of a tide pool and into a neighboring pool with little difficulty. octopodes have been known to crawl out of a tank in an aquarium and have the crab in the tank next door for dinner. They have even been known to shut off lights that bother them in their tank at an aquarium. They have been documented crawling out of their tanks, walking to a drain and exiting to the sea.



                      I would definitely feel humans in space would have a much more difficult time at survival.




                      • https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/10/wales-ceredigion-octopus-land-deaths-spd/

                      • https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/43456/how-long-can-an-octopus-survive-out-of-the-water






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Octopus crawling on land



                      You can see octopodes crawl out of a tide pool and into a neighboring pool with little difficulty. octopodes have been known to crawl out of a tank in an aquarium and have the crab in the tank next door for dinner. They have even been known to shut off lights that bother them in their tank at an aquarium. They have been documented crawling out of their tanks, walking to a drain and exiting to the sea.



                      I would definitely feel humans in space would have a much more difficult time at survival.




                      • https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/10/wales-ceredigion-octopus-land-deaths-spd/

                      • https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/43456/how-long-can-an-octopus-survive-out-of-the-water







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 1 hour ago









                      gwallygwally

                      2,303612




                      2,303612























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          One major advantage that octopodes have in colonising the land, is that they can already make short stints out of the water without any specialised equipment. This is very much not true of humans in a vacuum.



                          A question asked on Biology SE details the ability of an octopus to survive out of water, and another source details that coming out of the water to hunt terrestrial prey is common behaviour for certain kinds of octopus.



                          What this suggests to me, is that given human level intelligence (maybe paired with a longer lifespan?), octopodes would be well placed to begin colonising the shores. They probably wouldn't even need particularly advanced technology to do it.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            One major advantage that octopodes have in colonising the land, is that they can already make short stints out of the water without any specialised equipment. This is very much not true of humans in a vacuum.



                            A question asked on Biology SE details the ability of an octopus to survive out of water, and another source details that coming out of the water to hunt terrestrial prey is common behaviour for certain kinds of octopus.



                            What this suggests to me, is that given human level intelligence (maybe paired with a longer lifespan?), octopodes would be well placed to begin colonising the shores. They probably wouldn't even need particularly advanced technology to do it.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              One major advantage that octopodes have in colonising the land, is that they can already make short stints out of the water without any specialised equipment. This is very much not true of humans in a vacuum.



                              A question asked on Biology SE details the ability of an octopus to survive out of water, and another source details that coming out of the water to hunt terrestrial prey is common behaviour for certain kinds of octopus.



                              What this suggests to me, is that given human level intelligence (maybe paired with a longer lifespan?), octopodes would be well placed to begin colonising the shores. They probably wouldn't even need particularly advanced technology to do it.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              One major advantage that octopodes have in colonising the land, is that they can already make short stints out of the water without any specialised equipment. This is very much not true of humans in a vacuum.



                              A question asked on Biology SE details the ability of an octopus to survive out of water, and another source details that coming out of the water to hunt terrestrial prey is common behaviour for certain kinds of octopus.



                              What this suggests to me, is that given human level intelligence (maybe paired with a longer lifespan?), octopodes would be well placed to begin colonising the shores. They probably wouldn't even need particularly advanced technology to do it.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 2 hours ago









                              Arkenstein XIIArkenstein XII

                              2,226425




                              2,226425























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Octopodes are not going to colonize land the same way we've colonized space - they're going to colonize the land the way we've colonized the sea.



                                  Penguino has done a pretty good of addressing how different it is for humans to go to space versus octopodes coming ashore. But there is a parallel that's much closer to shore (so to speak).



                                  An octopus' ability to survive on land is not that different from our ability to survive under the ocean, and in both cases there are resources that make it worth learning how to extend that length of time.



                                  You're not going to see ISS-like mobile aquariums as the early colonization steps. You're going to see irrigation, dikes, and dams, which turn formerly dry land into tidepools the same way humans carved Holland out of the sea.



                                  The earliest land-going octopus vehicles will be not be spacecraft or submarine-like - they'll be more akin to large bowls on wheels probably crank-powered (or oar-powered), given the difficulty they'll have domesticating any suitable pulling animal. They won't exactly be safe, but then again neither were the earliest boats.



                                  Entirely enclosed habitats won't come until much later, assuming they come at all. There's simply no need for them, and their construction complexity (and expense!) is much higher.





                                  share









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Octopodes are not going to colonize land the same way we've colonized space - they're going to colonize the land the way we've colonized the sea.



                                    Penguino has done a pretty good of addressing how different it is for humans to go to space versus octopodes coming ashore. But there is a parallel that's much closer to shore (so to speak).



                                    An octopus' ability to survive on land is not that different from our ability to survive under the ocean, and in both cases there are resources that make it worth learning how to extend that length of time.



                                    You're not going to see ISS-like mobile aquariums as the early colonization steps. You're going to see irrigation, dikes, and dams, which turn formerly dry land into tidepools the same way humans carved Holland out of the sea.



                                    The earliest land-going octopus vehicles will be not be spacecraft or submarine-like - they'll be more akin to large bowls on wheels probably crank-powered (or oar-powered), given the difficulty they'll have domesticating any suitable pulling animal. They won't exactly be safe, but then again neither were the earliest boats.



                                    Entirely enclosed habitats won't come until much later, assuming they come at all. There's simply no need for them, and their construction complexity (and expense!) is much higher.





                                    share









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Octopodes are not going to colonize land the same way we've colonized space - they're going to colonize the land the way we've colonized the sea.



                                      Penguino has done a pretty good of addressing how different it is for humans to go to space versus octopodes coming ashore. But there is a parallel that's much closer to shore (so to speak).



                                      An octopus' ability to survive on land is not that different from our ability to survive under the ocean, and in both cases there are resources that make it worth learning how to extend that length of time.



                                      You're not going to see ISS-like mobile aquariums as the early colonization steps. You're going to see irrigation, dikes, and dams, which turn formerly dry land into tidepools the same way humans carved Holland out of the sea.



                                      The earliest land-going octopus vehicles will be not be spacecraft or submarine-like - they'll be more akin to large bowls on wheels probably crank-powered (or oar-powered), given the difficulty they'll have domesticating any suitable pulling animal. They won't exactly be safe, but then again neither were the earliest boats.



                                      Entirely enclosed habitats won't come until much later, assuming they come at all. There's simply no need for them, and their construction complexity (and expense!) is much higher.





                                      share









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Octopodes are not going to colonize land the same way we've colonized space - they're going to colonize the land the way we've colonized the sea.



                                      Penguino has done a pretty good of addressing how different it is for humans to go to space versus octopodes coming ashore. But there is a parallel that's much closer to shore (so to speak).



                                      An octopus' ability to survive on land is not that different from our ability to survive under the ocean, and in both cases there are resources that make it worth learning how to extend that length of time.



                                      You're not going to see ISS-like mobile aquariums as the early colonization steps. You're going to see irrigation, dikes, and dams, which turn formerly dry land into tidepools the same way humans carved Holland out of the sea.



                                      The earliest land-going octopus vehicles will be not be spacecraft or submarine-like - they'll be more akin to large bowls on wheels probably crank-powered (or oar-powered), given the difficulty they'll have domesticating any suitable pulling animal. They won't exactly be safe, but then again neither were the earliest boats.



                                      Entirely enclosed habitats won't come until much later, assuming they come at all. There's simply no need for them, and their construction complexity (and expense!) is much higher.






                                      share











                                      share


                                      share










                                      answered 29 secs ago









                                      Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

                                      2,954917




                                      2,954917






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136671%2fis-it-harder-for-an-intelligent-octopus-to-live-on-land-or-a-human-to-live-in-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          How to reconfigure Docker Trusted Registry 2.x.x to use CEPH FS mount instead of NFS and other traditional...

                                          is 'sed' thread safe

                                          How to make a Squid Proxy server?