Bubble sort in Python












1














I am quite new in Python and I am starting my journey with sorting algorithms, PEP8 and the Zen of Python. I would like to get some feedback about my BubbleSort algorithm which I wrote.
Also, is there a possibility to change the break statement to something else which will stop the loop?



def bubble_sort(structure):
"""
Bubble sort.

Description
----------
Performance cases:
Worst : O(n^2)
Average : O(n^2)
Best case : O(n)

Parameters
----------
structure : Mutable structure with comparable objects.

Returns
-------
structure : return sorted structure.

Examples
----------
>>> bubble_sort([7,1,2,6,4,2,3])
[1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7]

>>> bubble_sort(['a', 'c', 'b'])
['a', 'b', 'c']

"""

length = len(structure)

while True:
changed = False
for i in range(length - 1):
if structure[i] > structure[i + 1]:
structure[i], structure[i + 1] = structure[i + 1], structure[i]
changed = True
if not changed:
break
return structure









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 19 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
    – RobAu
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:30












  • I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:32


















1














I am quite new in Python and I am starting my journey with sorting algorithms, PEP8 and the Zen of Python. I would like to get some feedback about my BubbleSort algorithm which I wrote.
Also, is there a possibility to change the break statement to something else which will stop the loop?



def bubble_sort(structure):
"""
Bubble sort.

Description
----------
Performance cases:
Worst : O(n^2)
Average : O(n^2)
Best case : O(n)

Parameters
----------
structure : Mutable structure with comparable objects.

Returns
-------
structure : return sorted structure.

Examples
----------
>>> bubble_sort([7,1,2,6,4,2,3])
[1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7]

>>> bubble_sort(['a', 'c', 'b'])
['a', 'b', 'c']

"""

length = len(structure)

while True:
changed = False
for i in range(length - 1):
if structure[i] > structure[i + 1]:
structure[i], structure[i + 1] = structure[i + 1], structure[i]
changed = True
if not changed:
break
return structure









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 19 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
    – RobAu
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:30












  • I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:32
















1












1








1







I am quite new in Python and I am starting my journey with sorting algorithms, PEP8 and the Zen of Python. I would like to get some feedback about my BubbleSort algorithm which I wrote.
Also, is there a possibility to change the break statement to something else which will stop the loop?



def bubble_sort(structure):
"""
Bubble sort.

Description
----------
Performance cases:
Worst : O(n^2)
Average : O(n^2)
Best case : O(n)

Parameters
----------
structure : Mutable structure with comparable objects.

Returns
-------
structure : return sorted structure.

Examples
----------
>>> bubble_sort([7,1,2,6,4,2,3])
[1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7]

>>> bubble_sort(['a', 'c', 'b'])
['a', 'b', 'c']

"""

length = len(structure)

while True:
changed = False
for i in range(length - 1):
if structure[i] > structure[i + 1]:
structure[i], structure[i + 1] = structure[i + 1], structure[i]
changed = True
if not changed:
break
return structure









share|improve this question















I am quite new in Python and I am starting my journey with sorting algorithms, PEP8 and the Zen of Python. I would like to get some feedback about my BubbleSort algorithm which I wrote.
Also, is there a possibility to change the break statement to something else which will stop the loop?



def bubble_sort(structure):
"""
Bubble sort.

Description
----------
Performance cases:
Worst : O(n^2)
Average : O(n^2)
Best case : O(n)

Parameters
----------
structure : Mutable structure with comparable objects.

Returns
-------
structure : return sorted structure.

Examples
----------
>>> bubble_sort([7,1,2,6,4,2,3])
[1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7]

>>> bubble_sort(['a', 'c', 'b'])
['a', 'b', 'c']

"""

length = len(structure)

while True:
changed = False
for i in range(length - 1):
if structure[i] > structure[i + 1]:
structure[i], structure[i + 1] = structure[i + 1], structure[i]
changed = True
if not changed:
break
return structure






python beginner sorting






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 11 '18 at 5:52









200_success

129k15152414




129k15152414










asked Dec 10 '18 at 13:09









Michael OgorkovyiMichael Ogorkovyi

263




263





bumped to the homepage by Community 19 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 19 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
    – RobAu
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:30












  • I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:32




















  • You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
    – RobAu
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:30












  • I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:32


















You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
– RobAu
Dec 10 '18 at 13:30






You can implement it with 2 for loops, then you can get rid of the break
– RobAu
Dec 10 '18 at 13:30














I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
– Michael Ogorkovyi
Dec 10 '18 at 13:32






I get an idea now what if i change the break statment to return structure and delete the last line return structure. Will it harmonize with PEP8?
– Michael Ogorkovyi
Dec 10 '18 at 13:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Your code looks nice and the documentation is high quality.



Maybe a few things can be improved anyway.



API



It could be a good idea to get inspiration from the Python API functions related to sorting, we have:





  • sorted returning a new list from an iterable


  • list.sort sorts a list in place, returns None


In your case, as structure is sorted in place, I am not sure it makes sense to return it.



Parameter structure



This is mostly personal opinion but instead of structure, I'd find container to be a better name.



Also, if you want to be precise in the documentation, you might want to say that it is mutable but also that it implements __len__, __getitem__ and __setitem__. These objects are also called (mutable) sequences.



The code



Not much to say about the code itself.



Instead of having if not changed: break, you could write a: while changed loop which is very slightly more concise.



Also, you'll find an optimisation suggestion on Wikipedia:




The bubble sort algorithm can be easily optimized by observing that the n-th pass finds the n-th largest element and puts it into its final place. So, the inner loop can avoid looking at the last n − 1 items when running for the n-th time




Before getting into such a change, I highly recommend writing unit tests.






share|improve this answer





















  • I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:48










  • Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
    – Josay
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:51











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209361%2fbubble-sort-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Your code looks nice and the documentation is high quality.



Maybe a few things can be improved anyway.



API



It could be a good idea to get inspiration from the Python API functions related to sorting, we have:





  • sorted returning a new list from an iterable


  • list.sort sorts a list in place, returns None


In your case, as structure is sorted in place, I am not sure it makes sense to return it.



Parameter structure



This is mostly personal opinion but instead of structure, I'd find container to be a better name.



Also, if you want to be precise in the documentation, you might want to say that it is mutable but also that it implements __len__, __getitem__ and __setitem__. These objects are also called (mutable) sequences.



The code



Not much to say about the code itself.



Instead of having if not changed: break, you could write a: while changed loop which is very slightly more concise.



Also, you'll find an optimisation suggestion on Wikipedia:




The bubble sort algorithm can be easily optimized by observing that the n-th pass finds the n-th largest element and puts it into its final place. So, the inner loop can avoid looking at the last n − 1 items when running for the n-th time




Before getting into such a change, I highly recommend writing unit tests.






share|improve this answer





















  • I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:48










  • Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
    – Josay
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:51
















0














Your code looks nice and the documentation is high quality.



Maybe a few things can be improved anyway.



API



It could be a good idea to get inspiration from the Python API functions related to sorting, we have:





  • sorted returning a new list from an iterable


  • list.sort sorts a list in place, returns None


In your case, as structure is sorted in place, I am not sure it makes sense to return it.



Parameter structure



This is mostly personal opinion but instead of structure, I'd find container to be a better name.



Also, if you want to be precise in the documentation, you might want to say that it is mutable but also that it implements __len__, __getitem__ and __setitem__. These objects are also called (mutable) sequences.



The code



Not much to say about the code itself.



Instead of having if not changed: break, you could write a: while changed loop which is very slightly more concise.



Also, you'll find an optimisation suggestion on Wikipedia:




The bubble sort algorithm can be easily optimized by observing that the n-th pass finds the n-th largest element and puts it into its final place. So, the inner loop can avoid looking at the last n − 1 items when running for the n-th time




Before getting into such a change, I highly recommend writing unit tests.






share|improve this answer





















  • I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:48










  • Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
    – Josay
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:51














0












0








0






Your code looks nice and the documentation is high quality.



Maybe a few things can be improved anyway.



API



It could be a good idea to get inspiration from the Python API functions related to sorting, we have:





  • sorted returning a new list from an iterable


  • list.sort sorts a list in place, returns None


In your case, as structure is sorted in place, I am not sure it makes sense to return it.



Parameter structure



This is mostly personal opinion but instead of structure, I'd find container to be a better name.



Also, if you want to be precise in the documentation, you might want to say that it is mutable but also that it implements __len__, __getitem__ and __setitem__. These objects are also called (mutable) sequences.



The code



Not much to say about the code itself.



Instead of having if not changed: break, you could write a: while changed loop which is very slightly more concise.



Also, you'll find an optimisation suggestion on Wikipedia:




The bubble sort algorithm can be easily optimized by observing that the n-th pass finds the n-th largest element and puts it into its final place. So, the inner loop can avoid looking at the last n − 1 items when running for the n-th time




Before getting into such a change, I highly recommend writing unit tests.






share|improve this answer












Your code looks nice and the documentation is high quality.



Maybe a few things can be improved anyway.



API



It could be a good idea to get inspiration from the Python API functions related to sorting, we have:





  • sorted returning a new list from an iterable


  • list.sort sorts a list in place, returns None


In your case, as structure is sorted in place, I am not sure it makes sense to return it.



Parameter structure



This is mostly personal opinion but instead of structure, I'd find container to be a better name.



Also, if you want to be precise in the documentation, you might want to say that it is mutable but also that it implements __len__, __getitem__ and __setitem__. These objects are also called (mutable) sequences.



The code



Not much to say about the code itself.



Instead of having if not changed: break, you could write a: while changed loop which is very slightly more concise.



Also, you'll find an optimisation suggestion on Wikipedia:




The bubble sort algorithm can be easily optimized by observing that the n-th pass finds the n-th largest element and puts it into its final place. So, the inner loop can avoid looking at the last n − 1 items when running for the n-th time




Before getting into such a change, I highly recommend writing unit tests.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 14:09









JosayJosay

25.6k14087




25.6k14087












  • I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:48










  • Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
    – Josay
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:51


















  • I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
    – Michael Ogorkovyi
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:48










  • Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
    – Josay
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:51
















I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
– Michael Ogorkovyi
Dec 10 '18 at 15:48




I have one more question. How can i make a copy of the structure to return it as sorted does ?
– Michael Ogorkovyi
Dec 10 '18 at 15:48












Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
– Josay
Dec 10 '18 at 16:51




Changing the struct in place is fine to me. However, if you need, you could use the copy module. Alternatively, you could just also just call list to copy your container as a list.
– Josay
Dec 10 '18 at 16:51


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209361%2fbubble-sort-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to make a Squid Proxy server?

第一次世界大戦

Touch on Surface Book