How can I clone/backup/restore Windows 10 from Linux?
Case scenario:
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 223,6 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x13a30a5a
Device Boot Start Final Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1333247 1331200 650M 27 WinRE NTFS hidden
/dev/sda2 1333248 264058879 262725632 125,3G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 264060926 468860927 204800002 97,7G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 264060928 434049023 169988096 81,1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 434051072 464771775 30720704 14,7G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 464773120 468860927 4087808 2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Windows 10 is installed on /dev/sda2 and I assume that /dev/sda1 is a hidden partition from the same Windows system.
How can I backup my Windows 10 installation from Linux in order to restore it later?
Further data upon request:
- By "Installation" I mean the "full partition" (or partitions) required to return Windows to the moment the cloning was made.
- Being able to restore to the same system (computer, hardware) and even hard drive would enough. I.e: I installed Windows 10, made backup, and a few months ago I want to restore the backup I made, so there is no need to perform the full installation of Windows 10 (drivers, printers, programs...etc) again.
Tested until now (all tests performed on the same computer with the same partition layout):
PartImage (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
FSArchiver (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
windows cloning
|
show 6 more comments
Case scenario:
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 223,6 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x13a30a5a
Device Boot Start Final Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1333247 1331200 650M 27 WinRE NTFS hidden
/dev/sda2 1333248 264058879 262725632 125,3G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 264060926 468860927 204800002 97,7G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 264060928 434049023 169988096 81,1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 434051072 464771775 30720704 14,7G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 464773120 468860927 4087808 2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Windows 10 is installed on /dev/sda2 and I assume that /dev/sda1 is a hidden partition from the same Windows system.
How can I backup my Windows 10 installation from Linux in order to restore it later?
Further data upon request:
- By "Installation" I mean the "full partition" (or partitions) required to return Windows to the moment the cloning was made.
- Being able to restore to the same system (computer, hardware) and even hard drive would enough. I.e: I installed Windows 10, made backup, and a few months ago I want to restore the backup I made, so there is no need to perform the full installation of Windows 10 (drivers, printers, programs...etc) again.
Tested until now (all tests performed on the same computer with the same partition layout):
PartImage (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
FSArchiver (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
windows cloning
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, thenddis the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, thentarcan do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. Ifddcan do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Okay,ddcan certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them aftersda1.img,sda2.imgetc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipeddoutput throughpbzip2orp7zipto createsda1.img.bzetc. to save space.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
1
I usedddwith up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08
|
show 6 more comments
Case scenario:
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 223,6 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x13a30a5a
Device Boot Start Final Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1333247 1331200 650M 27 WinRE NTFS hidden
/dev/sda2 1333248 264058879 262725632 125,3G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 264060926 468860927 204800002 97,7G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 264060928 434049023 169988096 81,1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 434051072 464771775 30720704 14,7G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 464773120 468860927 4087808 2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Windows 10 is installed on /dev/sda2 and I assume that /dev/sda1 is a hidden partition from the same Windows system.
How can I backup my Windows 10 installation from Linux in order to restore it later?
Further data upon request:
- By "Installation" I mean the "full partition" (or partitions) required to return Windows to the moment the cloning was made.
- Being able to restore to the same system (computer, hardware) and even hard drive would enough. I.e: I installed Windows 10, made backup, and a few months ago I want to restore the backup I made, so there is no need to perform the full installation of Windows 10 (drivers, printers, programs...etc) again.
Tested until now (all tests performed on the same computer with the same partition layout):
PartImage (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
FSArchiver (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
windows cloning
Case scenario:
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 223,6 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x13a30a5a
Device Boot Start Final Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1333247 1331200 650M 27 WinRE NTFS hidden
/dev/sda2 1333248 264058879 262725632 125,3G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 264060926 468860927 204800002 97,7G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 264060928 434049023 169988096 81,1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 434051072 464771775 30720704 14,7G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 464773120 468860927 4087808 2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Windows 10 is installed on /dev/sda2 and I assume that /dev/sda1 is a hidden partition from the same Windows system.
How can I backup my Windows 10 installation from Linux in order to restore it later?
Further data upon request:
- By "Installation" I mean the "full partition" (or partitions) required to return Windows to the moment the cloning was made.
- Being able to restore to the same system (computer, hardware) and even hard drive would enough. I.e: I installed Windows 10, made backup, and a few months ago I want to restore the backup I made, so there is no need to perform the full installation of Windows 10 (drivers, printers, programs...etc) again.
Tested until now (all tests performed on the same computer with the same partition layout):
PartImage (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
FSArchiver (cloningsda1andsda2): not working. The restored operating system will not boot.
windows cloning
windows cloning
edited May 15 '18 at 21:46
Sopalajo de Arrierez
asked May 15 '18 at 20:42
Sopalajo de ArrierezSopalajo de Arrierez
1,73993562
1,73993562
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, thenddis the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, thentarcan do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. Ifddcan do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Okay,ddcan certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them aftersda1.img,sda2.imgetc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipeddoutput throughpbzip2orp7zipto createsda1.img.bzetc. to save space.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
1
I usedddwith up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08
|
show 6 more comments
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, thenddis the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, thentarcan do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. Ifddcan do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Okay,ddcan certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them aftersda1.img,sda2.imgetc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipeddoutput throughpbzip2orp7zipto createsda1.img.bzetc. to save space.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
1
I usedddwith up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, then
dd is the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, then tar can do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, then
dd is the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, then tar can do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. If
dd can do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. If
dd can do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Okay,
dd can certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them after sda1.img, sda2.img etc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipe dd output through pbzip2 or p7zip to create sda1.img.bz etc. to save space.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
Okay,
dd can certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them after sda1.img, sda2.img etc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipe dd output through pbzip2 or p7zip to create sda1.img.bz etc. to save space.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
1
1
I used
dd with up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08
I used
dd with up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08
|
show 6 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
pv method
You could use pv (man page) utility like so:
sudo sh -c 'pv < /dev/sda > /destination'
Of course you could become root first:
sudo -i
And then just do the backup:
pv < /dev/sda > /BackupDestination
And then when needed do the restore:
pv < /BackupDestination > /dev/sda
Notes
This basically does the same job as
ddin the other answer, but is faster and shows progress.This method may be slower than
rsync, but that just copies files, which is not intended.It copies everything 1:1, a perfect copy might you say.
You need also the boot sector for it to boot later on. The simplest method is to backup the whole drive.
To show progress with
dd(man page), you could just add to the command:
status=progress
Tip
For you to be able to effectively compress the image afterwards, don't forget to zero free space.
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.catwithout progress orpvwith progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.
– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Yes, the most simple solution is
dd if=/dev/sda of="/media/usb/$(date).img"
That is slow and takes up a lot of space so you can
- just copy the partition[s] + boot sector you want
- zero and compress free space
- file instead of block based backups
- rdiff-backup for reverse diffs (dramatic size reduction after the first)
- rsync (for dramatic speedup over slow networks)
- cow FS (btrfs/zfs) for faster/smaller than rsync/diff backups are only an option if you put windows in a VM, and I'm not sure how well they are suited to that scenario.
Likely you missed the boot sector, UUIDs and should read up on grub and
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_startup_process
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
add a comment |
Like other solutions posted until now, this one show progress (like the pv solution, not relative to total, just number of MB transferred) and does not compress (a 100GB partition would result in a 100GB file), but it backups only the partition (sda1), not the entire disk:
dcfldd if=/dev/sda1 of=Image.dd bs=2M
The dcfldd tool is a simple dd that shows progress.
The buffer size bs=2M seems to me a good value for USB devices (a 120 GB partition copied in about 15-20 minutes).
Tested working on Windows 10 version 1803. No need (or so it seems) to backup too the entire hard disk, happily.
Of course, compressing the resulting file later would probably be a good idea.
add a comment |
I have just successfully finished the described scenario of backing up Windows 10 from Linux to a file and restoring them on a new drive.
With the old disk zero free space from Windows by doing
zdelete -z c:
using SDelete.
Get some live Linux USB to boot and backup MBR and partition table to a spare drive
dd if=/dev/sda of=/somewhere/mbr bs=512 count=63
copy the boot partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda1.lz4
copy the system partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda2.lz4
Place the new disk into the computer, boot the live Linux again
and restore the beginning of the disk
dd of=/dev/sda if=/somewhere/file.mbr
That gets you the same primary partition layout (partitions inside extended partition
are stored somewhere else and will not be restored by doing this).
Now restore the two Windows partitions
dd of=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda1.lz4
dd of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda2.lz4
The drive didn't boot at this stage (grub complaining). So boot windows rescue disk
or the installation media and select "repair". In Troubleshooting start cmd prompt
and run
bootrec /fixmbr
At this stage I got the original Windows system to boot on the new bigger drive. I got 50% compression rate with both gzip and lz4 (with 70% full drive) but gzip was limited by the CPU speed (27MB/s in my case) while lz4 was not (480MB/s CPU limit, 180MB/s my backup drive limit).
My first try was with ntfsclone but that didn't produce bootable Windows (it was complaining of some missing files in WindowsSystem32). I am not sure why it didn't work. At the end the dd + lz4 solution created smaller image than ntfsclone by itself. Your mileage may vary based on how full the disk is modulo bugs in ntfsclone - dd seems much easier to get right :-)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444019%2fhow-can-i-clone-backup-restore-windows-10-from-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
pv method
You could use pv (man page) utility like so:
sudo sh -c 'pv < /dev/sda > /destination'
Of course you could become root first:
sudo -i
And then just do the backup:
pv < /dev/sda > /BackupDestination
And then when needed do the restore:
pv < /BackupDestination > /dev/sda
Notes
This basically does the same job as
ddin the other answer, but is faster and shows progress.This method may be slower than
rsync, but that just copies files, which is not intended.It copies everything 1:1, a perfect copy might you say.
You need also the boot sector for it to boot later on. The simplest method is to backup the whole drive.
To show progress with
dd(man page), you could just add to the command:
status=progress
Tip
For you to be able to effectively compress the image afterwards, don't forget to zero free space.
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.catwithout progress orpvwith progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.
– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
pv method
You could use pv (man page) utility like so:
sudo sh -c 'pv < /dev/sda > /destination'
Of course you could become root first:
sudo -i
And then just do the backup:
pv < /dev/sda > /BackupDestination
And then when needed do the restore:
pv < /BackupDestination > /dev/sda
Notes
This basically does the same job as
ddin the other answer, but is faster and shows progress.This method may be slower than
rsync, but that just copies files, which is not intended.It copies everything 1:1, a perfect copy might you say.
You need also the boot sector for it to boot later on. The simplest method is to backup the whole drive.
To show progress with
dd(man page), you could just add to the command:
status=progress
Tip
For you to be able to effectively compress the image afterwards, don't forget to zero free space.
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.catwithout progress orpvwith progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.
– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
pv method
You could use pv (man page) utility like so:
sudo sh -c 'pv < /dev/sda > /destination'
Of course you could become root first:
sudo -i
And then just do the backup:
pv < /dev/sda > /BackupDestination
And then when needed do the restore:
pv < /BackupDestination > /dev/sda
Notes
This basically does the same job as
ddin the other answer, but is faster and shows progress.This method may be slower than
rsync, but that just copies files, which is not intended.It copies everything 1:1, a perfect copy might you say.
You need also the boot sector for it to boot later on. The simplest method is to backup the whole drive.
To show progress with
dd(man page), you could just add to the command:
status=progress
Tip
For you to be able to effectively compress the image afterwards, don't forget to zero free space.
pv method
You could use pv (man page) utility like so:
sudo sh -c 'pv < /dev/sda > /destination'
Of course you could become root first:
sudo -i
And then just do the backup:
pv < /dev/sda > /BackupDestination
And then when needed do the restore:
pv < /BackupDestination > /dev/sda
Notes
This basically does the same job as
ddin the other answer, but is faster and shows progress.This method may be slower than
rsync, but that just copies files, which is not intended.It copies everything 1:1, a perfect copy might you say.
You need also the boot sector for it to boot later on. The simplest method is to backup the whole drive.
To show progress with
dd(man page), you could just add to the command:
status=progress
Tip
For you to be able to effectively compress the image afterwards, don't forget to zero free space.
edited May 16 '18 at 5:16
answered May 16 '18 at 0:13
VlastimilVlastimil
8,0291363136
8,0291363136
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.catwithout progress orpvwith progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.
– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.catwithout progress orpvwith progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.
– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
pv is not faster than dd unless you give dd a tiny bs value.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 8:35
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.
cat without progress or pv with progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
@user1133275 Have you ever made some benchmark? Never mind, don't bother.
cat without progress or pv with progress is preferable method of cloning for me at least.– Vlastimil
May 16 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Yes, the most simple solution is
dd if=/dev/sda of="/media/usb/$(date).img"
That is slow and takes up a lot of space so you can
- just copy the partition[s] + boot sector you want
- zero and compress free space
- file instead of block based backups
- rdiff-backup for reverse diffs (dramatic size reduction after the first)
- rsync (for dramatic speedup over slow networks)
- cow FS (btrfs/zfs) for faster/smaller than rsync/diff backups are only an option if you put windows in a VM, and I'm not sure how well they are suited to that scenario.
Likely you missed the boot sector, UUIDs and should read up on grub and
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_startup_process
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
add a comment |
Yes, the most simple solution is
dd if=/dev/sda of="/media/usb/$(date).img"
That is slow and takes up a lot of space so you can
- just copy the partition[s] + boot sector you want
- zero and compress free space
- file instead of block based backups
- rdiff-backup for reverse diffs (dramatic size reduction after the first)
- rsync (for dramatic speedup over slow networks)
- cow FS (btrfs/zfs) for faster/smaller than rsync/diff backups are only an option if you put windows in a VM, and I'm not sure how well they are suited to that scenario.
Likely you missed the boot sector, UUIDs and should read up on grub and
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_startup_process
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
add a comment |
Yes, the most simple solution is
dd if=/dev/sda of="/media/usb/$(date).img"
That is slow and takes up a lot of space so you can
- just copy the partition[s] + boot sector you want
- zero and compress free space
- file instead of block based backups
- rdiff-backup for reverse diffs (dramatic size reduction after the first)
- rsync (for dramatic speedup over slow networks)
- cow FS (btrfs/zfs) for faster/smaller than rsync/diff backups are only an option if you put windows in a VM, and I'm not sure how well they are suited to that scenario.
Likely you missed the boot sector, UUIDs and should read up on grub and
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_startup_process
Yes, the most simple solution is
dd if=/dev/sda of="/media/usb/$(date).img"
That is slow and takes up a lot of space so you can
- just copy the partition[s] + boot sector you want
- zero and compress free space
- file instead of block based backups
- rdiff-backup for reverse diffs (dramatic size reduction after the first)
- rsync (for dramatic speedup over slow networks)
- cow FS (btrfs/zfs) for faster/smaller than rsync/diff backups are only an option if you put windows in a VM, and I'm not sure how well they are suited to that scenario.
Likely you missed the boot sector, UUIDs and should read up on grub and
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_startup_process
edited May 16 '18 at 1:16
answered May 15 '18 at 23:48
user1133275user1133275
3,184723
3,184723
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
add a comment |
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
Why cloning the other partitions? The question is just about backup/restore Windows 10.
– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 16 '18 at 0:29
1
1
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
@SopalajodeArrierez the whole thing is the simple method, otherwise you need to think about partition tabe type, boot sector, UUIDs, alignment, flags, utility partitions etc.
– user1133275
May 16 '18 at 1:15
add a comment |
Like other solutions posted until now, this one show progress (like the pv solution, not relative to total, just number of MB transferred) and does not compress (a 100GB partition would result in a 100GB file), but it backups only the partition (sda1), not the entire disk:
dcfldd if=/dev/sda1 of=Image.dd bs=2M
The dcfldd tool is a simple dd that shows progress.
The buffer size bs=2M seems to me a good value for USB devices (a 120 GB partition copied in about 15-20 minutes).
Tested working on Windows 10 version 1803. No need (or so it seems) to backup too the entire hard disk, happily.
Of course, compressing the resulting file later would probably be a good idea.
add a comment |
Like other solutions posted until now, this one show progress (like the pv solution, not relative to total, just number of MB transferred) and does not compress (a 100GB partition would result in a 100GB file), but it backups only the partition (sda1), not the entire disk:
dcfldd if=/dev/sda1 of=Image.dd bs=2M
The dcfldd tool is a simple dd that shows progress.
The buffer size bs=2M seems to me a good value for USB devices (a 120 GB partition copied in about 15-20 minutes).
Tested working on Windows 10 version 1803. No need (or so it seems) to backup too the entire hard disk, happily.
Of course, compressing the resulting file later would probably be a good idea.
add a comment |
Like other solutions posted until now, this one show progress (like the pv solution, not relative to total, just number of MB transferred) and does not compress (a 100GB partition would result in a 100GB file), but it backups only the partition (sda1), not the entire disk:
dcfldd if=/dev/sda1 of=Image.dd bs=2M
The dcfldd tool is a simple dd that shows progress.
The buffer size bs=2M seems to me a good value for USB devices (a 120 GB partition copied in about 15-20 minutes).
Tested working on Windows 10 version 1803. No need (or so it seems) to backup too the entire hard disk, happily.
Of course, compressing the resulting file later would probably be a good idea.
Like other solutions posted until now, this one show progress (like the pv solution, not relative to total, just number of MB transferred) and does not compress (a 100GB partition would result in a 100GB file), but it backups only the partition (sda1), not the entire disk:
dcfldd if=/dev/sda1 of=Image.dd bs=2M
The dcfldd tool is a simple dd that shows progress.
The buffer size bs=2M seems to me a good value for USB devices (a 120 GB partition copied in about 15-20 minutes).
Tested working on Windows 10 version 1803. No need (or so it seems) to backup too the entire hard disk, happily.
Of course, compressing the resulting file later would probably be a good idea.
edited May 16 '18 at 14:52
answered May 16 '18 at 3:35
Sopalajo de ArrierezSopalajo de Arrierez
1,73993562
1,73993562
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have just successfully finished the described scenario of backing up Windows 10 from Linux to a file and restoring them on a new drive.
With the old disk zero free space from Windows by doing
zdelete -z c:
using SDelete.
Get some live Linux USB to boot and backup MBR and partition table to a spare drive
dd if=/dev/sda of=/somewhere/mbr bs=512 count=63
copy the boot partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda1.lz4
copy the system partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda2.lz4
Place the new disk into the computer, boot the live Linux again
and restore the beginning of the disk
dd of=/dev/sda if=/somewhere/file.mbr
That gets you the same primary partition layout (partitions inside extended partition
are stored somewhere else and will not be restored by doing this).
Now restore the two Windows partitions
dd of=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda1.lz4
dd of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda2.lz4
The drive didn't boot at this stage (grub complaining). So boot windows rescue disk
or the installation media and select "repair". In Troubleshooting start cmd prompt
and run
bootrec /fixmbr
At this stage I got the original Windows system to boot on the new bigger drive. I got 50% compression rate with both gzip and lz4 (with 70% full drive) but gzip was limited by the CPU speed (27MB/s in my case) while lz4 was not (480MB/s CPU limit, 180MB/s my backup drive limit).
My first try was with ntfsclone but that didn't produce bootable Windows (it was complaining of some missing files in WindowsSystem32). I am not sure why it didn't work. At the end the dd + lz4 solution created smaller image than ntfsclone by itself. Your mileage may vary based on how full the disk is modulo bugs in ntfsclone - dd seems much easier to get right :-)
add a comment |
I have just successfully finished the described scenario of backing up Windows 10 from Linux to a file and restoring them on a new drive.
With the old disk zero free space from Windows by doing
zdelete -z c:
using SDelete.
Get some live Linux USB to boot and backup MBR and partition table to a spare drive
dd if=/dev/sda of=/somewhere/mbr bs=512 count=63
copy the boot partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda1.lz4
copy the system partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda2.lz4
Place the new disk into the computer, boot the live Linux again
and restore the beginning of the disk
dd of=/dev/sda if=/somewhere/file.mbr
That gets you the same primary partition layout (partitions inside extended partition
are stored somewhere else and will not be restored by doing this).
Now restore the two Windows partitions
dd of=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda1.lz4
dd of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda2.lz4
The drive didn't boot at this stage (grub complaining). So boot windows rescue disk
or the installation media and select "repair". In Troubleshooting start cmd prompt
and run
bootrec /fixmbr
At this stage I got the original Windows system to boot on the new bigger drive. I got 50% compression rate with both gzip and lz4 (with 70% full drive) but gzip was limited by the CPU speed (27MB/s in my case) while lz4 was not (480MB/s CPU limit, 180MB/s my backup drive limit).
My first try was with ntfsclone but that didn't produce bootable Windows (it was complaining of some missing files in WindowsSystem32). I am not sure why it didn't work. At the end the dd + lz4 solution created smaller image than ntfsclone by itself. Your mileage may vary based on how full the disk is modulo bugs in ntfsclone - dd seems much easier to get right :-)
add a comment |
I have just successfully finished the described scenario of backing up Windows 10 from Linux to a file and restoring them on a new drive.
With the old disk zero free space from Windows by doing
zdelete -z c:
using SDelete.
Get some live Linux USB to boot and backup MBR and partition table to a spare drive
dd if=/dev/sda of=/somewhere/mbr bs=512 count=63
copy the boot partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda1.lz4
copy the system partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda2.lz4
Place the new disk into the computer, boot the live Linux again
and restore the beginning of the disk
dd of=/dev/sda if=/somewhere/file.mbr
That gets you the same primary partition layout (partitions inside extended partition
are stored somewhere else and will not be restored by doing this).
Now restore the two Windows partitions
dd of=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda1.lz4
dd of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda2.lz4
The drive didn't boot at this stage (grub complaining). So boot windows rescue disk
or the installation media and select "repair". In Troubleshooting start cmd prompt
and run
bootrec /fixmbr
At this stage I got the original Windows system to boot on the new bigger drive. I got 50% compression rate with both gzip and lz4 (with 70% full drive) but gzip was limited by the CPU speed (27MB/s in my case) while lz4 was not (480MB/s CPU limit, 180MB/s my backup drive limit).
My first try was with ntfsclone but that didn't produce bootable Windows (it was complaining of some missing files in WindowsSystem32). I am not sure why it didn't work. At the end the dd + lz4 solution created smaller image than ntfsclone by itself. Your mileage may vary based on how full the disk is modulo bugs in ntfsclone - dd seems much easier to get right :-)
I have just successfully finished the described scenario of backing up Windows 10 from Linux to a file and restoring them on a new drive.
With the old disk zero free space from Windows by doing
zdelete -z c:
using SDelete.
Get some live Linux USB to boot and backup MBR and partition table to a spare drive
dd if=/dev/sda of=/somewhere/mbr bs=512 count=63
copy the boot partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda1.lz4
copy the system partition to a file
dd if=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress | lz4 > /somewhere/sda2.lz4
Place the new disk into the computer, boot the live Linux again
and restore the beginning of the disk
dd of=/dev/sda if=/somewhere/file.mbr
That gets you the same primary partition layout (partitions inside extended partition
are stored somewhere else and will not be restored by doing this).
Now restore the two Windows partitions
dd of=/dev/sda1 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda1.lz4
dd of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M status=progress < lz4cat /somewhere/sda2.lz4
The drive didn't boot at this stage (grub complaining). So boot windows rescue disk
or the installation media and select "repair". In Troubleshooting start cmd prompt
and run
bootrec /fixmbr
At this stage I got the original Windows system to boot on the new bigger drive. I got 50% compression rate with both gzip and lz4 (with 70% full drive) but gzip was limited by the CPU speed (27MB/s in my case) while lz4 was not (480MB/s CPU limit, 180MB/s my backup drive limit).
My first try was with ntfsclone but that didn't produce bootable Windows (it was complaining of some missing files in WindowsSystem32). I am not sure why it didn't work. At the end the dd + lz4 solution created smaller image than ntfsclone by itself. Your mileage may vary based on how full the disk is modulo bugs in ntfsclone - dd seems much easier to get right :-)
answered Jan 26 at 8:23
Zbyněk WinklerZbyněk Winkler
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444019%2fhow-can-i-clone-backup-restore-windows-10-from-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What on Earth is the downvote for???
– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:13
If by 'installation' you meant the entire partition, then
ddis the most reliable way. If however you meant files on the partition, thentarcan do that just fine. This is worth clarifying in your question. How are you testing the restore - onto the same drive, or a different drive with a different partition layout?– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 21:14
Added the data you requested, @ajeh . I just want the classic full wiping (of the Windows partition) & restoring used by Norton Ghost, PartImage or FSArchiver. If
ddcan do it, it could be OK for me, but please remember there are more partitions on the drive.– Sopalajo de Arrierez
May 15 '18 at 21:52
Okay,
ddcan certainly do that and I use it all the time to image drives, including Windows. All you need to do is grab images of all involved partitions and store them so that you would know to which device to restore, i.e. name them aftersda1.img,sda2.imgetc. And as there will be tons of free space in most cases, pipeddoutput throughpbzip2orp7zipto createsda1.img.bzetc. to save space.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:01
1
I used
ddwith up to Windows 8.1 images, as well as QNX, Apple Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD and OS/2. I do not have a Windows 10 distro to try, as I consider this a giant malware to stay away from.– ajeh
May 15 '18 at 22:08