Midterm in Mathematics Courses
$begingroup$
Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?
I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.
In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?
reference-request course-design assessment
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?
I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.
In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?
reference-request course-design assessment
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?
I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.
In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?
reference-request course-design assessment
New contributor
$endgroup$
Can someone point me to papers indicating whether or not a midterm is an important part of a course?
I suspect I can find many 'experiential anecdotes' that midterms are good/bad/moot but I would really like some concrete evidence (papers?) that a midterm is a useful assessment element in a mathematics/computer science course.
In particular, what would happen if I replaced midterms with many small quizzes? Do we get a change in student learning?
reference-request course-design assessment
reference-request course-design assessment
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
Xander Henderson
2,528626
2,528626
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
CABCAB
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
"Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "548"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15289%2fmidterm-in-mathematics-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
"Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.
$endgroup$
"Cheating Lessons" by James M. Lang argues (and has many references to back up) the claim that smaller, more frequent, lower stakes assessment both improves student learning outcomes and decreases the frequency of cheating.
answered 7 hours ago
Steven GubkinSteven Gubkin
8,55112348
8,55112348
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
amazon.com/gp/product/0674724631
$endgroup$
– Jasper
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you change the frequency (and probably the content) of the assessment process, how to you demonstrate that the "improved outcomes" are real? It is sort of obvious that students are more likely to remember something for a week in order to get marks in a test, compared with having the remember the same thing for a year and take an end-of-year exam. But the weekly tests by themselves don't mean they remember anything at the end of the year.
$endgroup$
– alephzero
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@alephzero I would recommend reading the book. Basically more frequent assessment --> more study with less anxiety --> greater retention in long term. Studies are cited which show superior long term retention when compared with students learning the same content but with fewer assessments.
$endgroup$
– Steven Gubkin
1 hour ago
add a comment |
CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
CAB is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15289%2fmidterm-in-mathematics-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown