encfs encryted encfs6.xml itself
I using EncFS, I did the following:
- I encrypted a folder using
encfs ~/.folder ~/folder
- Afterwards, I changed the password with
encfsctl passwd ~/.folder
Now, I cannot access my files anymore, because the .encfs6.xml
file got encrypted itself.
Can I do anything about this? It is very urgent for me to access the files. I still have the files, know the password and also saved the encrypted .encfs6.xml
file.
Any chance I can recover the files/decrypt the .encfs6.xml
file?
encfs
add a comment |
I using EncFS, I did the following:
- I encrypted a folder using
encfs ~/.folder ~/folder
- Afterwards, I changed the password with
encfsctl passwd ~/.folder
Now, I cannot access my files anymore, because the .encfs6.xml
file got encrypted itself.
Can I do anything about this? It is very urgent for me to access the files. I still have the files, know the password and also saved the encrypted .encfs6.xml
file.
Any chance I can recover the files/decrypt the .encfs6.xml
file?
encfs
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09
add a comment |
I using EncFS, I did the following:
- I encrypted a folder using
encfs ~/.folder ~/folder
- Afterwards, I changed the password with
encfsctl passwd ~/.folder
Now, I cannot access my files anymore, because the .encfs6.xml
file got encrypted itself.
Can I do anything about this? It is very urgent for me to access the files. I still have the files, know the password and also saved the encrypted .encfs6.xml
file.
Any chance I can recover the files/decrypt the .encfs6.xml
file?
encfs
I using EncFS, I did the following:
- I encrypted a folder using
encfs ~/.folder ~/folder
- Afterwards, I changed the password with
encfsctl passwd ~/.folder
Now, I cannot access my files anymore, because the .encfs6.xml
file got encrypted itself.
Can I do anything about this? It is very urgent for me to access the files. I still have the files, know the password and also saved the encrypted .encfs6.xml
file.
Any chance I can recover the files/decrypt the .encfs6.xml
file?
encfs
encfs
edited 2 days ago
Rui F Ribeiro
39.3k1479131
39.3k1479131
asked Apr 7 '13 at 9:38
Ice09Ice09
1011
1011
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09
add a comment |
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
encfs ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
fusermount -u ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
encfsctl passwd ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder
And ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder/.encfs6.xml
is still not encrypted.
Probably you are doing something wrong.
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try togrep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.
– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71563%2fencfs-encryted-encfs6-xml-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
encfs ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
fusermount -u ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
encfsctl passwd ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder
And ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder/.encfs6.xml
is still not encrypted.
Probably you are doing something wrong.
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try togrep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.
– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
encfs ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
fusermount -u ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
encfsctl passwd ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder
And ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder/.encfs6.xml
is still not encrypted.
Probably you are doing something wrong.
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try togrep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.
– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
encfs ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
fusermount -u ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
encfsctl passwd ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder
And ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder/.encfs6.xml
is still not encrypted.
Probably you are doing something wrong.
encfs ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
fusermount -u ~/tmp/test_encfs/folder
encfsctl passwd ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder
And ~/tmp/test_encfs/.folder/.encfs6.xml
is still not encrypted.
Probably you are doing something wrong.
answered Apr 7 '13 at 14:06
intint
48433
48433
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try togrep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.
– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try togrep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.
– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
yes, I left out the fusermount step, which probably wasn't a good idea. However, to me it's more interesting to know if this can be fixed somehow. Of course, it makes sense to examine how this could happen. What really seems weird to me: why was the file, but not the filename encrypted? All other filenames have been encrypted as well.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:04
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try to
grep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
Even if I do not make fusermount step, everything is still fine (ArchLinux, latest encfs version). Try these steps again to prove that it is really so (not with important files, of course). And there is a very little opportunity, that unencrypted .encfs6.xml is still on hdd. Try to
grep
your hdd for it, because you need only 3 parameters from this file: encodedKeyData, saltData, kdfIterations.– int
Apr 7 '13 at 16:06
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
I had cryptkeeper running at the same time, because I thought encfs and cryptkeeper belonged together - as I said, I am really new to encfs etc. I am quite sure that the problem is not caused by encfs but by using it not correctly. However, it doesn't help me now... I "grep"ed without success. Is there any chance I can brute force decrypt the file - it is not really important how long it takes and probably it helps that I still have the correct password?
– Ice09
Apr 8 '13 at 7:48
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
It is near to impossible. But better ask in their mailing list lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/encfs-users
– int
Apr 8 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71563%2fencfs-encryted-encfs6-xml-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
just have to add that I am pretty sure about the file being encrypted, but I cannot prove it - it is just "scrambled" and encfs cannot read it anymore - don't know how this could happened otherwise.
– Ice09
Apr 7 '13 at 15:09