How do I reproduce a calligraphic Z (that looks like an L) from a text by Abramowitz and Stegun?
I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.
This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.
So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?
Other Info.
I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.
The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L}
but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.
Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Response to duplicate issues.
How to look up a symbol or ...
I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...
How to do the 'curvy L' ...
My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".
Scanned Symbol
symbols
add a comment |
I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.
This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.
So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?
Other Info.
I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.
The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L}
but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.
Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Response to duplicate issues.
How to look up a symbol or ...
I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...
How to do the 'curvy L' ...
My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".
Scanned Symbol
symbols
1
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
1
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.
This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.
So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?
Other Info.
I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.
The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L}
but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.
Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Response to duplicate issues.
How to look up a symbol or ...
I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...
How to do the 'curvy L' ...
My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".
Scanned Symbol
symbols
I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.
This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.
So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?
Other Info.
I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.
The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L}
but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.
Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
Response to duplicate issues.
How to look up a symbol or ...
I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...
How to do the 'curvy L' ...
My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".
Scanned Symbol
symbols
symbols
edited 16 hours ago
asked yesterday
user151522
1757
1757
1
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
1
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
1
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
1
1
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using
usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}
textcursive{L Z}
begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}
add a comment |
The following also works
usepackage{calrsfs}
mathcal{Z}
add a comment |
I recommend you use unicode-math
when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal
and mathscr
to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.
For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal
available, you would do something like:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{unicode-math}
defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}
setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
You can instead load any system font as your mathscr
and mathcal
fonts.
If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa
. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso
or boondoxo
for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs
.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{textcomp}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
add a comment |
You can use mathcal
usepackage{unicode-math}
mathcal{Z}
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468409%2fhow-do-i-reproduce-a-calligraphic-z-that-looks-like-an-l-from-a-text-by-abramo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using
usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using
usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using
usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}
This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using
usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}
edited yesterday
Camille Goudeseune
201110
201110
answered yesterday
Karlo
1,54721427
1,54721427
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.
– user151522
18 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
@user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"
– albert
17 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
Scanned symbol has been added to question.
– user151522
16 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
@albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}
textcursive{L Z}
begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}
add a comment |
I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}
textcursive{L Z}
begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}
add a comment |
I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}
textcursive{L Z}
begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}
I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}
textcursive{L Z}
begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}
answered yesterday
AndréC
8,03511443
8,03511443
add a comment |
add a comment |
The following also works
usepackage{calrsfs}
mathcal{Z}
add a comment |
The following also works
usepackage{calrsfs}
mathcal{Z}
add a comment |
The following also works
usepackage{calrsfs}
mathcal{Z}
The following also works
usepackage{calrsfs}
mathcal{Z}
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
user151522
1757
1757
add a comment |
add a comment |
I recommend you use unicode-math
when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal
and mathscr
to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.
For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal
available, you would do something like:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{unicode-math}
defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}
setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
You can instead load any system font as your mathscr
and mathcal
fonts.
If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa
. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso
or boondoxo
for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs
.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{textcomp}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
add a comment |
I recommend you use unicode-math
when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal
and mathscr
to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.
For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal
available, you would do something like:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{unicode-math}
defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}
setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
You can instead load any system font as your mathscr
and mathcal
fonts.
If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa
. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso
or boondoxo
for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs
.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{textcomp}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
add a comment |
I recommend you use unicode-math
when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal
and mathscr
to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.
For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal
available, you would do something like:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{unicode-math}
defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}
setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
You can instead load any system font as your mathscr
and mathcal
fonts.
If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa
. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso
or boondoxo
for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs
.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{textcomp}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
I recommend you use unicode-math
when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal
and mathscr
to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.
For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal
available, you would do something like:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{unicode-math}
defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}
setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
You can instead load any system font as your mathscr
and mathcal
fonts.
If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa
. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso
or boondoxo
for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs
.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{textcomp}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
begin{document}
( mathscr{Z} )
end{document}
edited 17 hours ago
answered yesterday
Davislor
4,8321024
4,8321024
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can use mathcal
usepackage{unicode-math}
mathcal{Z}
New contributor
add a comment |
You can use mathcal
usepackage{unicode-math}
mathcal{Z}
New contributor
add a comment |
You can use mathcal
usepackage{unicode-math}
mathcal{Z}
New contributor
You can use mathcal
usepackage{unicode-math}
mathcal{Z}
New contributor
edited 16 hours ago
CarLaTeX
29.9k447127
29.9k447127
New contributor
answered 16 hours ago
Ahmet Furkan YILMAZ
193
193
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468409%2fhow-do-i-reproduce-a-calligraphic-z-that-looks-like-an-l-from-a-text-by-abramo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Possible duplicate of How to do the 'curvy L' for Lagrangian or Laplace Transforms?
– jknappen
yesterday
1
Possible duplicate of How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?
– Henri Menke
yesterday
Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?
– user151522
10 hours ago
How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles
– Henry
7 hours ago