Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses












13












$begingroup$


Assume we have a fair coin, and we throw the coin $10$ times in a row.



I want to calculate the probability that the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' occurs.



So I think I can interpret this event as a binary number with $10$ digits. So $1$ means tail, $0$ means head. Therefore we have $2^{10} = 1024$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws. The sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' can start at $7$ different positions and so there are $7cdot2^6 = 448$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws with the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail'. So the probability would be $frac{448}{1024} = 0.4375$.



But I have a feeling there's something wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    12 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


Assume we have a fair coin, and we throw the coin $10$ times in a row.



I want to calculate the probability that the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' occurs.



So I think I can interpret this event as a binary number with $10$ digits. So $1$ means tail, $0$ means head. Therefore we have $2^{10} = 1024$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws. The sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' can start at $7$ different positions and so there are $7cdot2^6 = 448$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws with the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail'. So the probability would be $frac{448}{1024} = 0.4375$.



But I have a feeling there's something wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    12 hours ago














13












13








13


2



$begingroup$


Assume we have a fair coin, and we throw the coin $10$ times in a row.



I want to calculate the probability that the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' occurs.



So I think I can interpret this event as a binary number with $10$ digits. So $1$ means tail, $0$ means head. Therefore we have $2^{10} = 1024$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws. The sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' can start at $7$ different positions and so there are $7cdot2^6 = 448$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws with the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail'. So the probability would be $frac{448}{1024} = 0.4375$.



But I have a feeling there's something wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Assume we have a fair coin, and we throw the coin $10$ times in a row.



I want to calculate the probability that the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' occurs.



So I think I can interpret this event as a binary number with $10$ digits. So $1$ means tail, $0$ means head. Therefore we have $2^{10} = 1024$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws. The sequence 'tail, head, head, tail' can start at $7$ different positions and so there are $7cdot2^6 = 448$ different outcomes of the $10$ throws with the sequence 'tail, head, head, tail'. So the probability would be $frac{448}{1024} = 0.4375$.



But I have a feeling there's something wrong?







probability combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Robert Howard

2,2383935




2,2383935






New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 13 hours ago









geirageira

663




663




New contributor




geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






geira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    12 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    12 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
You are over-counting sequences like T H H T H H T .
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
@kimchilover ...and even THHTHHTHHT.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

You can use the Inclusion-exclusion principle to solve this. When I do this I get $$7cdot 2^6 - 6cdot 2^2 - 4cdot 2^3+1$$ where the first term is what you get, where the second and third terms count the number of sequences with two non-overlapping instances of T H H T and of sequences with one overlap, like T H H T H H T, and finally the number of sequences with a triple overlap, T H H T H H T H H T.



Confession: I has earlier got $45cdot2^2$ for the second term, by a mental blunder, as AnnaSaabel pointed out. There are 2 "gaps" to separate the two instances of THHT, which can occur before, between, or after the 2 instances; they can be distributed in any of the 6 ways 200,020,002,110,101, or 011.



Added: if the number of coin tosses were $n=100$ (say), and the pattern sought was still THHT, this method becomes clumsy. A different method is to construct a Markov chain with states representing how far a string matching algorithm has progressed in matching the given pattern. If $M$ is the transition matrix for this chain, the desired answer is the entry in the matrix $M^n$ corresponing to the pair $(text{start state}, text{accepting state})$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
    $endgroup$
    – Anna Saabel
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – infmagic2047
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    10 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

As @kimchilover states in the comments, you are counting some 10-digit binary numbers more than once in the number $7cdot 2^6$. To make this more obvious, consider a different problem: to find the probability that the sequence 'heads' appears. By your counting logic, there are 10 places for it to begin, so there are $10cdot 2^9$ different outcomes of the 10 throws with the sequence 'heads', so the probability would be $frac{10cdot 2^9}{2^{10}} = 5$. That can't be good. It's very clear now that the issue is overcounting -- you have five times as many sequences with 'heads' in them as the number of sequences total! The problem is that we have counted sequences with multiple heads many times. For example, the sequence of all heads is counted $10$ times, once for each of the places where the sequence 'heads' begins within it.



As I write this, I see that @kimchilover also just posted an answer to the question which directs you to the inclusion-exclusion principle, so I'll stop here with an answer which could just help you to try generalizing arguments which feel fishy to see where they go wrong. Good job detecting the fishiness!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    geira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158242%2fprobability-that-thht-occurs-in-a-sequence-of-10-coin-tosses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    You can use the Inclusion-exclusion principle to solve this. When I do this I get $$7cdot 2^6 - 6cdot 2^2 - 4cdot 2^3+1$$ where the first term is what you get, where the second and third terms count the number of sequences with two non-overlapping instances of T H H T and of sequences with one overlap, like T H H T H H T, and finally the number of sequences with a triple overlap, T H H T H H T H H T.



    Confession: I has earlier got $45cdot2^2$ for the second term, by a mental blunder, as AnnaSaabel pointed out. There are 2 "gaps" to separate the two instances of THHT, which can occur before, between, or after the 2 instances; they can be distributed in any of the 6 ways 200,020,002,110,101, or 011.



    Added: if the number of coin tosses were $n=100$ (say), and the pattern sought was still THHT, this method becomes clumsy. A different method is to construct a Markov chain with states representing how far a string matching algorithm has progressed in matching the given pattern. If $M$ is the transition matrix for this chain, the desired answer is the entry in the matrix $M^n$ corresponing to the pair $(text{start state}, text{accepting state})$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
      $endgroup$
      – Anna Saabel
      11 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
      $endgroup$
      – infmagic2047
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      10 hours ago
















    7












    $begingroup$

    You can use the Inclusion-exclusion principle to solve this. When I do this I get $$7cdot 2^6 - 6cdot 2^2 - 4cdot 2^3+1$$ where the first term is what you get, where the second and third terms count the number of sequences with two non-overlapping instances of T H H T and of sequences with one overlap, like T H H T H H T, and finally the number of sequences with a triple overlap, T H H T H H T H H T.



    Confession: I has earlier got $45cdot2^2$ for the second term, by a mental blunder, as AnnaSaabel pointed out. There are 2 "gaps" to separate the two instances of THHT, which can occur before, between, or after the 2 instances; they can be distributed in any of the 6 ways 200,020,002,110,101, or 011.



    Added: if the number of coin tosses were $n=100$ (say), and the pattern sought was still THHT, this method becomes clumsy. A different method is to construct a Markov chain with states representing how far a string matching algorithm has progressed in matching the given pattern. If $M$ is the transition matrix for this chain, the desired answer is the entry in the matrix $M^n$ corresponing to the pair $(text{start state}, text{accepting state})$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
      $endgroup$
      – Anna Saabel
      11 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
      $endgroup$
      – infmagic2047
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      10 hours ago














    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    You can use the Inclusion-exclusion principle to solve this. When I do this I get $$7cdot 2^6 - 6cdot 2^2 - 4cdot 2^3+1$$ where the first term is what you get, where the second and third terms count the number of sequences with two non-overlapping instances of T H H T and of sequences with one overlap, like T H H T H H T, and finally the number of sequences with a triple overlap, T H H T H H T H H T.



    Confession: I has earlier got $45cdot2^2$ for the second term, by a mental blunder, as AnnaSaabel pointed out. There are 2 "gaps" to separate the two instances of THHT, which can occur before, between, or after the 2 instances; they can be distributed in any of the 6 ways 200,020,002,110,101, or 011.



    Added: if the number of coin tosses were $n=100$ (say), and the pattern sought was still THHT, this method becomes clumsy. A different method is to construct a Markov chain with states representing how far a string matching algorithm has progressed in matching the given pattern. If $M$ is the transition matrix for this chain, the desired answer is the entry in the matrix $M^n$ corresponing to the pair $(text{start state}, text{accepting state})$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    You can use the Inclusion-exclusion principle to solve this. When I do this I get $$7cdot 2^6 - 6cdot 2^2 - 4cdot 2^3+1$$ where the first term is what you get, where the second and third terms count the number of sequences with two non-overlapping instances of T H H T and of sequences with one overlap, like T H H T H H T, and finally the number of sequences with a triple overlap, T H H T H H T H H T.



    Confession: I has earlier got $45cdot2^2$ for the second term, by a mental blunder, as AnnaSaabel pointed out. There are 2 "gaps" to separate the two instances of THHT, which can occur before, between, or after the 2 instances; they can be distributed in any of the 6 ways 200,020,002,110,101, or 011.



    Added: if the number of coin tosses were $n=100$ (say), and the pattern sought was still THHT, this method becomes clumsy. A different method is to construct a Markov chain with states representing how far a string matching algorithm has progressed in matching the given pattern. If $M$ is the transition matrix for this chain, the desired answer is the entry in the matrix $M^n$ corresponing to the pair $(text{start state}, text{accepting state})$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 10 hours ago

























    answered 12 hours ago









    kimchi loverkimchi lover

    11.4k31229




    11.4k31229








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
      $endgroup$
      – Anna Saabel
      11 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
      $endgroup$
      – infmagic2047
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      10 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
      $endgroup$
      – Anna Saabel
      11 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
      $endgroup$
      – infmagic2047
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      10 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
    $endgroup$
    – Anna Saabel
    11 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    How did you calculate 45 for the second term?
    $endgroup$
    – Anna Saabel
    11 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    11 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AnnaSaabel By a mental blunder. Thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    11 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    This is correct, as this Python 3 code snippet gives the same number: $tag*{}$ print(sum('0110' in s for s in [bin(n)[-10:] for n in range(1<<10,1<<11)]))
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – infmagic2047
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Your transition matrix is wrong: a match failure in state 1 or 2 will result in state 1, not state 0. In general, the transition matrix is basically the same thing as the array produced in the preprocessing step of KMP algorithm.
    $endgroup$
    – infmagic2047
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @infmagic2047 You are right; I've hopefully corrected this.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    10 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    As @kimchilover states in the comments, you are counting some 10-digit binary numbers more than once in the number $7cdot 2^6$. To make this more obvious, consider a different problem: to find the probability that the sequence 'heads' appears. By your counting logic, there are 10 places for it to begin, so there are $10cdot 2^9$ different outcomes of the 10 throws with the sequence 'heads', so the probability would be $frac{10cdot 2^9}{2^{10}} = 5$. That can't be good. It's very clear now that the issue is overcounting -- you have five times as many sequences with 'heads' in them as the number of sequences total! The problem is that we have counted sequences with multiple heads many times. For example, the sequence of all heads is counted $10$ times, once for each of the places where the sequence 'heads' begins within it.



    As I write this, I see that @kimchilover also just posted an answer to the question which directs you to the inclusion-exclusion principle, so I'll stop here with an answer which could just help you to try generalizing arguments which feel fishy to see where they go wrong. Good job detecting the fishiness!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      As @kimchilover states in the comments, you are counting some 10-digit binary numbers more than once in the number $7cdot 2^6$. To make this more obvious, consider a different problem: to find the probability that the sequence 'heads' appears. By your counting logic, there are 10 places for it to begin, so there are $10cdot 2^9$ different outcomes of the 10 throws with the sequence 'heads', so the probability would be $frac{10cdot 2^9}{2^{10}} = 5$. That can't be good. It's very clear now that the issue is overcounting -- you have five times as many sequences with 'heads' in them as the number of sequences total! The problem is that we have counted sequences with multiple heads many times. For example, the sequence of all heads is counted $10$ times, once for each of the places where the sequence 'heads' begins within it.



      As I write this, I see that @kimchilover also just posted an answer to the question which directs you to the inclusion-exclusion principle, so I'll stop here with an answer which could just help you to try generalizing arguments which feel fishy to see where they go wrong. Good job detecting the fishiness!






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        As @kimchilover states in the comments, you are counting some 10-digit binary numbers more than once in the number $7cdot 2^6$. To make this more obvious, consider a different problem: to find the probability that the sequence 'heads' appears. By your counting logic, there are 10 places for it to begin, so there are $10cdot 2^9$ different outcomes of the 10 throws with the sequence 'heads', so the probability would be $frac{10cdot 2^9}{2^{10}} = 5$. That can't be good. It's very clear now that the issue is overcounting -- you have five times as many sequences with 'heads' in them as the number of sequences total! The problem is that we have counted sequences with multiple heads many times. For example, the sequence of all heads is counted $10$ times, once for each of the places where the sequence 'heads' begins within it.



        As I write this, I see that @kimchilover also just posted an answer to the question which directs you to the inclusion-exclusion principle, so I'll stop here with an answer which could just help you to try generalizing arguments which feel fishy to see where they go wrong. Good job detecting the fishiness!






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As @kimchilover states in the comments, you are counting some 10-digit binary numbers more than once in the number $7cdot 2^6$. To make this more obvious, consider a different problem: to find the probability that the sequence 'heads' appears. By your counting logic, there are 10 places for it to begin, so there are $10cdot 2^9$ different outcomes of the 10 throws with the sequence 'heads', so the probability would be $frac{10cdot 2^9}{2^{10}} = 5$. That can't be good. It's very clear now that the issue is overcounting -- you have five times as many sequences with 'heads' in them as the number of sequences total! The problem is that we have counted sequences with multiple heads many times. For example, the sequence of all heads is counted $10$ times, once for each of the places where the sequence 'heads' begins within it.



        As I write this, I see that @kimchilover also just posted an answer to the question which directs you to the inclusion-exclusion principle, so I'll stop here with an answer which could just help you to try generalizing arguments which feel fishy to see where they go wrong. Good job detecting the fishiness!







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 12 hours ago

























        answered 12 hours ago









        cspruncsprun

        2,325210




        2,325210






















            geira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            geira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            geira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            geira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158242%2fprobability-that-thht-occurs-in-a-sequence-of-10-coin-tosses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to make a Squid Proxy server?

            Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

            19世紀