Why does 'apt' do not store downloaded packages anymore?












0















I was used to apt storing downloaded packages in /var/cache/apt/archives/, but it does not do it anymore and I can't figure out why.



Configuration is set accordingly IMHO:



# apt-config dump | grep -i cache

Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt";

Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";

Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";

Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache "";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show "";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show::Version "2";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::AllVersions "0";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVirtuals "1";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search "";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search::Version "2";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowDependencyType "1";

Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVersion "1";


Although I don't know about the Binary::* stuff.



It does not seem to be related to any permission issue as well, because /var/cache/apt/archives/ is recreated when using apt install <arbitrary-package>.



Any hints?






linux apt-get apt







share|improve this question



























    0















    I was used to apt storing downloaded packages in /var/cache/apt/archives/, but it does not do it anymore and I can't figure out why.



    Configuration is set accordingly IMHO:



    # apt-config dump | grep -i cache
    
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt";
    
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
    
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
    
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache "";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show "";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show::Version "2";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::AllVersions "0";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVirtuals "1";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search "";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search::Version "2";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowDependencyType "1";
    
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVersion "1";


    Although I don't know about the Binary::* stuff.



    It does not seem to be related to any permission issue as well, because /var/cache/apt/archives/ is recreated when using apt install <arbitrary-package>.



    Any hints?






    linux apt-get apt







    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I was used to apt storing downloaded packages in /var/cache/apt/archives/, but it does not do it anymore and I can't figure out why.



      Configuration is set accordingly IMHO:



      # apt-config dump | grep -i cache
      
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt";
      
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
      
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
      
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show::Version "2";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::AllVersions "0";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVirtuals "1";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search::Version "2";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowDependencyType "1";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVersion "1";


      Although I don't know about the Binary::* stuff.



      It does not seem to be related to any permission issue as well, because /var/cache/apt/archives/ is recreated when using apt install <arbitrary-package>.



      Any hints?






      linux apt-get apt







      share|improve this question














      I was used to apt storing downloaded packages in /var/cache/apt/archives/, but it does not do it anymore and I can't figure out why.



      Configuration is set accordingly IMHO:



      # apt-config dump | grep -i cache
      
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt";
      
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
      
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
      
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Show::Version "2";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::AllVersions "0";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVirtuals "1";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search "";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Search::Version "2";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowDependencyType "1";
      
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::ShowVersion "1";


      Although I don't know about the Binary::* stuff.



      It does not seem to be related to any permission issue as well, because /var/cache/apt/archives/ is recreated when using apt install <arbitrary-package>.



      Any hints?






      linux apt-get apt




      linux apt-get apt






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 12 at 20:38









      doakdoak

      1535




      1535






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Rubber duck asking did work. During writing next to last paragraph, I realised that apt install works differently to apt-get install in this context.



          Manpage of apt explains this: (emphasised by me)




          All features of apt(8) are available in dedicated APT tools like apt-get(8) and apt-cache(8) as well. apt(8) just changes the default value of some options (see apt.conf(5) and specifically the Binary scope).




          (See also section BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION in man apt.conf.)



          Unfortunately the behaviour does not change, although I added these to lines to a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d:



          Binary::apt::APT::Cache "/var/cache/apt";
          
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Archives "archives";





          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1405001%2fwhy-does-apt-do-not-store-downloaded-packages-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Rubber duck asking did work. During writing next to last paragraph, I realised that apt install works differently to apt-get install in this context.



            Manpage of apt explains this: (emphasised by me)




            All features of apt(8) are available in dedicated APT tools like apt-get(8) and apt-cache(8) as well. apt(8) just changes the default value of some options (see apt.conf(5) and specifically the Binary scope).




            (See also section BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION in man apt.conf.)



            Unfortunately the behaviour does not change, although I added these to lines to a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d:



            Binary::apt::APT::Cache "/var/cache/apt";
            
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Archives "archives";





            share|improve this answer




























              0














              Rubber duck asking did work. During writing next to last paragraph, I realised that apt install works differently to apt-get install in this context.



              Manpage of apt explains this: (emphasised by me)




              All features of apt(8) are available in dedicated APT tools like apt-get(8) and apt-cache(8) as well. apt(8) just changes the default value of some options (see apt.conf(5) and specifically the Binary scope).




              (See also section BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION in man apt.conf.)



              Unfortunately the behaviour does not change, although I added these to lines to a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d:



              Binary::apt::APT::Cache "/var/cache/apt";
              
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Archives "archives";





              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                Rubber duck asking did work. During writing next to last paragraph, I realised that apt install works differently to apt-get install in this context.



                Manpage of apt explains this: (emphasised by me)




                All features of apt(8) are available in dedicated APT tools like apt-get(8) and apt-cache(8) as well. apt(8) just changes the default value of some options (see apt.conf(5) and specifically the Binary scope).




                (See also section BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION in man apt.conf.)



                Unfortunately the behaviour does not change, although I added these to lines to a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d:



                Binary::apt::APT::Cache "/var/cache/apt";
                
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Archives "archives";





                share|improve this answer













                Rubber duck asking did work. During writing next to last paragraph, I realised that apt install works differently to apt-get install in this context.



                Manpage of apt explains this: (emphasised by me)




                All features of apt(8) are available in dedicated APT tools like apt-get(8) and apt-cache(8) as well. apt(8) just changes the default value of some options (see apt.conf(5) and specifically the Binary scope).




                (See also section BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION in man apt.conf.)



                Unfortunately the behaviour does not change, although I added these to lines to a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d:



                Binary::apt::APT::Cache "/var/cache/apt";
                
Binary::apt::APT::Cache::Archives "archives";






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 12 at 20:38









                doakdoak

                1535




                1535






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1405001%2fwhy-does-apt-do-not-store-downloaded-packages-anymore%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to make a Squid Proxy server?

                    Image
                    1 I want to set up squid proxy server for monitoring user activity in a network and Internet Web URL filtering for user. I also want to configure the user login, user log, user access group, and block unwanted web sites in my network. Please help me and guide me the full process to do this. server proxy squid share | improve this question edited Jul 31 '12 at 14:45 Jorge Castro 37.1k 107 422 617 asked Jul 31 '12 at 5:16 Goivind Tiwari Goivind Tiwari ...
                    Read more

                    Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

                    Image
                    6 1 $begingroup$ I have found the following Fibonacci Identity (and proved it). If $F_n$ denotes the nth Fibonacci Number, we have the following identity begin{equation} F_{n-r+h}F_{n+k+g+1} - F_{n-r+g}F_{n+k+h+1} = (-1)^{n+r+h+1} F_{g-h}F_{k+r+1} end{equation} where $F_1 = F_2 = 1$ , $r leq n$ , $h leq g$ , and $n, g, k in mathbb{N}$ . It is not too hard to show that this identity subsumes Cassini's Identity, Catalan's Identity, Vajda's Idenity, and d'Ocagne's identity to name a few. I have done a pretty thorough literature review, and I have not found anything like this, but I am still wondering if anyone has seen this identity before? I found this by accident after noticing some patterns in some analysis work I was doing, so if this is already known I would be curious to see w...
                    Read more

                    19世紀

                    Image
                    この記事は検証可能な参考文献や出典が全く示されていないか、不十分です。 出典を追加して記事の信頼性向上にご協力ください。 （ 2012年3月 ） 千年紀: 2千年紀 世紀: 18世紀 - 19世紀 - 20世紀 十年紀: 1800年代 1810年代 1820年代 1830年代 1840年代 1850年代 1860年代 1870年代 1880年代 1890年代 19世紀に君臨した大英帝国。 19世紀 （じゅうきゅうせいき）は、西暦1801年から西暦1900年までの100年間を指す世紀。 目次 1 19世紀の歴史 1.1 国民国家の成立 1.2 帝国主義の興隆 1.3 列強の植民地争奪戦 2 できごと 2.1 1800年代 2.2 1810年代 2.3 1820年代 2.4 1830年代 2.5 1840年代 2.6 1850年代 2.7 1860年代 2.8 1870年代 2.9 1880年代 2.10 1890年代 2.11 1900年代 3 文化 3.1 文学 3.2 音楽 3.3 思想 3.4 科学 3.5 技術 4 人物 4.1 ヨーロッパ 4.1.1 政治家・王族 4.1.1.1 フランス 4.1.1.2 オーストリア＝ハンガリー 4.1.1.3 ロシア 4.1.1.4 イギリス 4.1.1.5 ドイツ（プロイセンほかドイツ領邦を含む） 4.1.1.6 北欧 4.1.1.7 イタリア 4.1.1.8 スペイン 4.1.1.9 ベルギー 4.1.1.10 ギリシア 4.1.2 軍人 4.1.3 実業家 4.1.4 科学と技術 4.1.5 思想と哲学・人文諸学 4.1.6 宗教 4.1.7 文学 4.1.8 美術 4.1.9 音楽 4.1.10 社会事業家 4.1.11 探検家・旅行家 4.1.12 料...
                    Read more