Encrypting then Base64 Encoding












4















I notice online encryption tools encrypt the plaintext and output the ciphertext in base64 format. Why is ciphertext outputted in base64 format? Can the ciphertext be outputted in binary format?






encryption cryptography







share|improve this question























  • You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

    – meagar
    5 hours ago
















4















I notice online encryption tools encrypt the plaintext and output the ciphertext in base64 format. Why is ciphertext outputted in base64 format? Can the ciphertext be outputted in binary format?






encryption cryptography







share|improve this question























  • You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

    – meagar
    5 hours ago














4












4








4








I notice online encryption tools encrypt the plaintext and output the ciphertext in base64 format. Why is ciphertext outputted in base64 format? Can the ciphertext be outputted in binary format?






encryption cryptography







share|improve this question














I notice online encryption tools encrypt the plaintext and output the ciphertext in base64 format. Why is ciphertext outputted in base64 format? Can the ciphertext be outputted in binary format?






encryption cryptography




encryption cryptography






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









Angela LipfordAngela Lipford

332




332













  • You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

    – meagar
    5 hours ago



















  • You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

    – meagar
    5 hours ago

















You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

– meagar
5 hours ago





You can translate that data into any base, it just happens that Base64 is well suited for the web; it's composed of characters that are safe to use in URLs.

– meagar
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Ciphertext can be output in binary format. For example, gpg defaults to binary format, and you need to specify --armor to make it base64:



--armor

-a

    Create ASCII armored output. The default is to create the binary OpenPGP format.


The reason you see ASCII/base64 more often is that it is easier to transfer and manipulate than binary. SMTP email, for example, cannot handle binary data without encoding it, so having a non-binary format makes it simpler to email encrypted text. FTP may default to non-binary mode which will introduce errors when transferring a binary file. Even something as simple as popping open a file in an editor to make sure it "looks like it's there" is easier with non-binary formats.






share|improve this answer































    1














    A web browser has to print a visual representation of the binary data. The usual visual representation of binary data is the hexadecimal notation.



    Now observe: The space overhead of hex-encoded data is factor 2 (we need 2 ascii characters for one byte).
    The space overhead of base64-encoded data is only 1.33, making it more space-efficient than hex-encoded data.



    Moreover, I suspect that the tool support for base64-encoded data is at least as good as for hex-encoded data.



    For instance, you can copy-paste a base64-encoded ciphertext directly into a PEM file.






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "162"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205536%2fencrypting-then-base64-encoding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      Ciphertext can be output in binary format. For example, gpg defaults to binary format, and you need to specify --armor to make it base64:



      --armor
      
-a
      
    Create ASCII armored output. The default is to create the binary OpenPGP format.


      The reason you see ASCII/base64 more often is that it is easier to transfer and manipulate than binary. SMTP email, for example, cannot handle binary data without encoding it, so having a non-binary format makes it simpler to email encrypted text. FTP may default to non-binary mode which will introduce errors when transferring a binary file. Even something as simple as popping open a file in an editor to make sure it "looks like it's there" is easier with non-binary formats.






      share|improve this answer




























        2














        Ciphertext can be output in binary format. For example, gpg defaults to binary format, and you need to specify --armor to make it base64:



        --armor
        
-a
        
    Create ASCII armored output. The default is to create the binary OpenPGP format.


        The reason you see ASCII/base64 more often is that it is easier to transfer and manipulate than binary. SMTP email, for example, cannot handle binary data without encoding it, so having a non-binary format makes it simpler to email encrypted text. FTP may default to non-binary mode which will introduce errors when transferring a binary file. Even something as simple as popping open a file in an editor to make sure it "looks like it's there" is easier with non-binary formats.






        share|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2







          Ciphertext can be output in binary format. For example, gpg defaults to binary format, and you need to specify --armor to make it base64:



          --armor
          
-a
          
    Create ASCII armored output. The default is to create the binary OpenPGP format.


          The reason you see ASCII/base64 more often is that it is easier to transfer and manipulate than binary. SMTP email, for example, cannot handle binary data without encoding it, so having a non-binary format makes it simpler to email encrypted text. FTP may default to non-binary mode which will introduce errors when transferring a binary file. Even something as simple as popping open a file in an editor to make sure it "looks like it's there" is easier with non-binary formats.






          share|improve this answer













          Ciphertext can be output in binary format. For example, gpg defaults to binary format, and you need to specify --armor to make it base64:



          --armor
          
-a
          
    Create ASCII armored output. The default is to create the binary OpenPGP format.


          The reason you see ASCII/base64 more often is that it is easier to transfer and manipulate than binary. SMTP email, for example, cannot handle binary data without encoding it, so having a non-binary format makes it simpler to email encrypted text. FTP may default to non-binary mode which will introduce errors when transferring a binary file. Even something as simple as popping open a file in an editor to make sure it "looks like it's there" is easier with non-binary formats.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          gowenfawrgowenfawr

          53.7k11114159




          53.7k11114159

























              1














              A web browser has to print a visual representation of the binary data. The usual visual representation of binary data is the hexadecimal notation.



              Now observe: The space overhead of hex-encoded data is factor 2 (we need 2 ascii characters for one byte).
              The space overhead of base64-encoded data is only 1.33, making it more space-efficient than hex-encoded data.



              Moreover, I suspect that the tool support for base64-encoded data is at least as good as for hex-encoded data.



              For instance, you can copy-paste a base64-encoded ciphertext directly into a PEM file.






              share|improve this answer






























                1














                A web browser has to print a visual representation of the binary data. The usual visual representation of binary data is the hexadecimal notation.



                Now observe: The space overhead of hex-encoded data is factor 2 (we need 2 ascii characters for one byte).
                The space overhead of base64-encoded data is only 1.33, making it more space-efficient than hex-encoded data.



                Moreover, I suspect that the tool support for base64-encoded data is at least as good as for hex-encoded data.



                For instance, you can copy-paste a base64-encoded ciphertext directly into a PEM file.






                share|improve this answer




























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  A web browser has to print a visual representation of the binary data. The usual visual representation of binary data is the hexadecimal notation.



                  Now observe: The space overhead of hex-encoded data is factor 2 (we need 2 ascii characters for one byte).
                  The space overhead of base64-encoded data is only 1.33, making it more space-efficient than hex-encoded data.



                  Moreover, I suspect that the tool support for base64-encoded data is at least as good as for hex-encoded data.



                  For instance, you can copy-paste a base64-encoded ciphertext directly into a PEM file.






                  share|improve this answer















                  A web browser has to print a visual representation of the binary data. The usual visual representation of binary data is the hexadecimal notation.



                  Now observe: The space overhead of hex-encoded data is factor 2 (we need 2 ascii characters for one byte).
                  The space overhead of base64-encoded data is only 1.33, making it more space-efficient than hex-encoded data.



                  Moreover, I suspect that the tool support for base64-encoded data is at least as good as for hex-encoded data.



                  For instance, you can copy-paste a base64-encoded ciphertext directly into a PEM file.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Mike76Mike76

                  15119




                  15119






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205536%2fencrypting-then-base64-encoding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to make a Squid Proxy server?

                      Image
                      1 I want to set up squid proxy server for monitoring user activity in a network and Internet Web URL filtering for user. I also want to configure the user login, user log, user access group, and block unwanted web sites in my network. Please help me and guide me the full process to do this. server proxy squid share | improve this question edited Jul 31 '12 at 14:45 Jorge Castro 37.1k 107 422 617 asked Jul 31 '12 at 5:16 Goivind Tiwari Goivind Tiwari
                      Read more

                      Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

                      Image
                      6 1 $begingroup$ I have found the following Fibonacci Identity (and proved it). If $F_n$ denotes the nth Fibonacci Number, we have the following identity begin{equation} F_{n-r+h}F_{n+k+g+1} - F_{n-r+g}F_{n+k+h+1} = (-1)^{n+r+h+1} F_{g-h}F_{k+r+1} end{equation} where $F_1 = F_2 = 1$ , $r leq n$ , $h leq g$ , and $n, g, k in mathbb{N}$ . It is not too hard to show that this identity subsumes Cassini's Identity, Catalan's Identity, Vajda's Idenity, and d'Ocagne's identity to name a few. I have done a pretty thorough literature review, and I have not found anything like this, but I am still wondering if anyone has seen this identity before? I found this by accident after noticing some patterns in some analysis work I was doing, so if this is already known I would be curious to see w
                      Read more

                      Touch on Surface Book

                      Image
                      0 How can I make touch work on my Surface Book? About my Surface Book: Model: Intel Core i7-6600 U @ 2.60 GHz with 8 GB Ram and Nvidia GPU OS: Ubuntu 17.04 Latest, kernel 4.10.0-13-generic System outputs on Ubuntu: ~$ xinput list ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ USB OPTICAL MOUSE id=8 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Microsoft Surface Keyboard Consumer Control id=10 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Microsoft Surface Keyboard Touchpad id=11 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5 [slave keyboard (3)]
                      Read more