A state with no more possible moves
We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?
If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?
checkers
New contributor
add a comment |
We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?
If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?
checkers
New contributor
add a comment |
We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?
If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?
checkers
New contributor
We ran into a state in a game of Checkers, where there were no more possible moves. Is this situation even possible according to the correct rules (I'm not an experienced player)? And if so, is it a draw? And if not, who wins (I'd assume white, because he jumped a piece)?
If the situation is possible, is it common? What about professional setting?
checkers
checkers
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
SorashiSorashi
1183
1183
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
According to this set of the rules:
A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.
So you win if your opponent can't move.
I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "147"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44845%2fa-state-with-no-more-possible-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to this set of the rules:
A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.
So you win if your opponent can't move.
I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
add a comment |
According to this set of the rules:
A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.
So you win if your opponent can't move.
I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
add a comment |
According to this set of the rules:
A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.
So you win if your opponent can't move.
I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.
According to this set of the rules:
A player wins the game when the opponent cannot make a move. In most cases, this is because all of the opponent's pieces have been captured, but it could also be because all of his pieces are blocked in.
So you win if your opponent can't move.
I have had this situation several times with draughts which is similar to checkers.
edited 12 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Toon KrijtheToon Krijthe
6,59843548
6,59843548
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
1
1
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
There's a section in the rules that states if a capture can be made, it MUST be made. Alternate moves that do not result in a capture cannot be performed. In order to make it into the state described above, one, or both, of the players would have to violate this rule, so I don't think it's actually possible to get into this particular state. I can see a case where one player only has 2 pieces left and gets blocked in to a corner, but not with all pieces still available on the board.
– CodeMonkey
7 hours ago
1
1
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
@CodeMonkey and still I have been there. But I can't remember the moves because it must be 35+ years ago.
– Toon Krijthe
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sorashi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44845%2fa-state-with-no-more-possible-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown