Find two numbers with target sum
$begingroup$
I am trying to solve this problem:
Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.
and this is my implementation:
public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}
How can I improve its execution time?
java performance programming-challenge
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 7 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to solve this problem:
Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.
and this is my implementation:
public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}
How can I improve its execution time?
java performance programming-challenge
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 7 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to solve this problem:
Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.
and this is my implementation:
public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}
How can I improve its execution time?
java performance programming-challenge
$endgroup$
I am trying to solve this problem:
Given an array of integers, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to a specific target.
and this is my implementation:
public int twoSum(int numbers, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
int requiredNumbers = null;
int index = 0;
for (int number : numbers) {
if (numbersMap.containsKey(target - number)) {
requiredNumbers = new int[2];
requiredNumbers[0] = numbersMap.get(target - number);
requiredNumbers[1] = index;
return requiredNumbers;
} else {
numbersMap.put(number, index);
index++;
}
}
return requiredNumbers;
}
How can I improve its execution time?
java performance programming-challenge
java performance programming-challenge
edited Dec 23 '18 at 18:30
Ankit Soni
483111
483111
asked Dec 23 '18 at 15:12
Karan KhannaKaran Khanna
1656
1656
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 7 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 7 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
1
1
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap
:
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);
As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap
. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor
, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.
The load_factor
defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3
is required. numbers.length * 2
is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210225%2ffind-two-numbers-with-target-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap
:
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);
As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap
. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor
, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.
The load_factor
defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3
is required. numbers.length * 2
is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap
:
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);
As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap
. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor
, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.
The load_factor
defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3
is required. numbers.length * 2
is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap
:
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);
As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap
. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor
, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.
The load_factor
defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3
is required. numbers.length * 2
is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.
$endgroup$
If the size of your input array can be large, you can get a speed-up by preallocating the capacity of your HashMap
:
Map<Integer, Integer> numbersMap = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>(numbers.length * 2);
As the algorithm runs, data will be added to the HashMap
. When number of entries exceeds the capacity * load_factor
, the hashmap's capacity is doubled, and the elements are re-binned for the larger capacity. This capacity doubling and rebinning takes time. It doesn't happen often, $O(log N)$ times, but it can be eliminated by starting with a hashmap of sufficient capacity.
The load_factor
defaults to 0.75, so an initial capacity larger than numbers.length * 4/3
is required. numbers.length * 2
is a simple expression that satisfies that requirement.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 19:55
AJNeufeldAJNeufeld
4,497318
4,497318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210225%2ffind-two-numbers-with-target-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
you could have used indexed for loop as you are anyway keeping the track of the index
$endgroup$
– Ankit Soni
Dec 23 '18 at 18:24