In movies, why do people move so slowly in zero gravity? [on hold]
$begingroup$
In movies where people are floating about in a spaceship or space station, they nearly always move very slowly. After doing a bit of research I can't see why this would happen. Its as if they are moving through water and there's some sort of resistance to their movement.
Could this just be for dramatic effect? To build suspense in the zero G space scenes?
gravity space
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Witthoft, Glorfindel, Max0815, Jan Doggen, Mark 6 hours ago
- This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In movies where people are floating about in a spaceship or space station, they nearly always move very slowly. After doing a bit of research I can't see why this would happen. Its as if they are moving through water and there's some sort of resistance to their movement.
Could this just be for dramatic effect? To build suspense in the zero G space scenes?
gravity space
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Witthoft, Glorfindel, Max0815, Jan Doggen, Mark 6 hours ago
- This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In movies where people are floating about in a spaceship or space station, they nearly always move very slowly. After doing a bit of research I can't see why this would happen. Its as if they are moving through water and there's some sort of resistance to their movement.
Could this just be for dramatic effect? To build suspense in the zero G space scenes?
gravity space
New contributor
$endgroup$
In movies where people are floating about in a spaceship or space station, they nearly always move very slowly. After doing a bit of research I can't see why this would happen. Its as if they are moving through water and there's some sort of resistance to their movement.
Could this just be for dramatic effect? To build suspense in the zero G space scenes?
gravity space
gravity space
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 16 hours ago
PJ BennettPJ Bennett
8317
8317
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Witthoft, Glorfindel, Max0815, Jan Doggen, Mark 6 hours ago
- This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Witthoft, Glorfindel, Max0815, Jan Doggen, Mark 6 hours ago
- This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's more for safety than anything else. Space is a very dangerous place for so many reasons. And making mistakes can very easily cause death.
Being weightless does not mean you lose mass, so momentum is just as difficult as ever. But whereas on the ground you can easily use friction to stop, in space if you try to stop against the floor you will just move off it. You can only stop by holding something, or pressing against something close to perpendicular to your movement.
As an example, imagine you jumped with all your force from one wall in the ISS. You will notice as you approach the other end that you are travelling at speed, head first, with no safe way to stop. Even reaching out to a handhold on a side wall will whip you round and into that wall, possibly injuring yourself or damaging instruments on the wall.
Look at any video from the ISS to see how carefully they move.
Similarly, outside the ISS, you want to do everything slowly so you don't damage your suit, miss a handhold or otherwise cause death.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Creating the illusion of weightlessness in movies actually requires a LOT of people operating cranes with harnesses and wires to hold the actors suspended in air. It's not easy moving (nor safe) the equipment holding the actors about as fast as real astronauts are able to move on the ISS. Also, it's important to not let the cranes and their crews fall into the view of the camera. As a result, there's quite a lot of choreography that goes into setting up weightless scenes, deciding the best camera angles, moving the actors, rehearsals, etc. All those factors go into slowing down the action we see in movies. Surprisingly, the wires are easier to hide either because their coloring and thickness are taken advantage of which causes them to be naturally hidden by the film's resolution in older movies, or they can be digitally masked out in post-production if needed in modern films.
Mind you, astronauts don't fly about helterskelter on the ISS! They're being very careful, there, too. But moving about the station only needs a very slight push off a wall and the same force to stop them when they get to where they want to be in very short time. But while they're flying between, they'll frequently entertain themselves doing stunts in zeroG such as flips and twists.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no air resistance in space. So if you increment your own speed you'll continue with that speed until you crash (considering the laws of thermodynamics).
For safety, you should move slowly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's more for safety than anything else. Space is a very dangerous place for so many reasons. And making mistakes can very easily cause death.
Being weightless does not mean you lose mass, so momentum is just as difficult as ever. But whereas on the ground you can easily use friction to stop, in space if you try to stop against the floor you will just move off it. You can only stop by holding something, or pressing against something close to perpendicular to your movement.
As an example, imagine you jumped with all your force from one wall in the ISS. You will notice as you approach the other end that you are travelling at speed, head first, with no safe way to stop. Even reaching out to a handhold on a side wall will whip you round and into that wall, possibly injuring yourself or damaging instruments on the wall.
Look at any video from the ISS to see how carefully they move.
Similarly, outside the ISS, you want to do everything slowly so you don't damage your suit, miss a handhold or otherwise cause death.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's more for safety than anything else. Space is a very dangerous place for so many reasons. And making mistakes can very easily cause death.
Being weightless does not mean you lose mass, so momentum is just as difficult as ever. But whereas on the ground you can easily use friction to stop, in space if you try to stop against the floor you will just move off it. You can only stop by holding something, or pressing against something close to perpendicular to your movement.
As an example, imagine you jumped with all your force from one wall in the ISS. You will notice as you approach the other end that you are travelling at speed, head first, with no safe way to stop. Even reaching out to a handhold on a side wall will whip you round and into that wall, possibly injuring yourself or damaging instruments on the wall.
Look at any video from the ISS to see how carefully they move.
Similarly, outside the ISS, you want to do everything slowly so you don't damage your suit, miss a handhold or otherwise cause death.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's more for safety than anything else. Space is a very dangerous place for so many reasons. And making mistakes can very easily cause death.
Being weightless does not mean you lose mass, so momentum is just as difficult as ever. But whereas on the ground you can easily use friction to stop, in space if you try to stop against the floor you will just move off it. You can only stop by holding something, or pressing against something close to perpendicular to your movement.
As an example, imagine you jumped with all your force from one wall in the ISS. You will notice as you approach the other end that you are travelling at speed, head first, with no safe way to stop. Even reaching out to a handhold on a side wall will whip you round and into that wall, possibly injuring yourself or damaging instruments on the wall.
Look at any video from the ISS to see how carefully they move.
Similarly, outside the ISS, you want to do everything slowly so you don't damage your suit, miss a handhold or otherwise cause death.
$endgroup$
It's more for safety than anything else. Space is a very dangerous place for so many reasons. And making mistakes can very easily cause death.
Being weightless does not mean you lose mass, so momentum is just as difficult as ever. But whereas on the ground you can easily use friction to stop, in space if you try to stop against the floor you will just move off it. You can only stop by holding something, or pressing against something close to perpendicular to your movement.
As an example, imagine you jumped with all your force from one wall in the ISS. You will notice as you approach the other end that you are travelling at speed, head first, with no safe way to stop. Even reaching out to a handhold on a side wall will whip you round and into that wall, possibly injuring yourself or damaging instruments on the wall.
Look at any video from the ISS to see how carefully they move.
Similarly, outside the ISS, you want to do everything slowly so you don't damage your suit, miss a handhold or otherwise cause death.
answered 16 hours ago
Rory AlsopRory Alsop
3,9081735
3,9081735
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
This reminds me of the way some people commented the movie Gravity. Some characters were moving at relatively high speed in their suit, and tried to grab something to stop themselves. The people commented how they should have lost their arm, considering they were weighing several tons with the suit.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
12 hours ago
12
12
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Clockwork An astronaut wearing one of the suits used on the space shuttle, including the life-support backpack, weighed about 500lbs, which is about a quarter of a ton, not "several tons". (Source: NASA; see page 4 of the PDF.)
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby Well, guess my memory (and my lack of knowledge on the matter) tricked me. Still, a quarter of a ton still sounds heavy for a human-being to throw themself without getting crushed on impact.
$endgroup$
– Clockwork
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Creating the illusion of weightlessness in movies actually requires a LOT of people operating cranes with harnesses and wires to hold the actors suspended in air. It's not easy moving (nor safe) the equipment holding the actors about as fast as real astronauts are able to move on the ISS. Also, it's important to not let the cranes and their crews fall into the view of the camera. As a result, there's quite a lot of choreography that goes into setting up weightless scenes, deciding the best camera angles, moving the actors, rehearsals, etc. All those factors go into slowing down the action we see in movies. Surprisingly, the wires are easier to hide either because their coloring and thickness are taken advantage of which causes them to be naturally hidden by the film's resolution in older movies, or they can be digitally masked out in post-production if needed in modern films.
Mind you, astronauts don't fly about helterskelter on the ISS! They're being very careful, there, too. But moving about the station only needs a very slight push off a wall and the same force to stop them when they get to where they want to be in very short time. But while they're flying between, they'll frequently entertain themselves doing stunts in zeroG such as flips and twists.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Creating the illusion of weightlessness in movies actually requires a LOT of people operating cranes with harnesses and wires to hold the actors suspended in air. It's not easy moving (nor safe) the equipment holding the actors about as fast as real astronauts are able to move on the ISS. Also, it's important to not let the cranes and their crews fall into the view of the camera. As a result, there's quite a lot of choreography that goes into setting up weightless scenes, deciding the best camera angles, moving the actors, rehearsals, etc. All those factors go into slowing down the action we see in movies. Surprisingly, the wires are easier to hide either because their coloring and thickness are taken advantage of which causes them to be naturally hidden by the film's resolution in older movies, or they can be digitally masked out in post-production if needed in modern films.
Mind you, astronauts don't fly about helterskelter on the ISS! They're being very careful, there, too. But moving about the station only needs a very slight push off a wall and the same force to stop them when they get to where they want to be in very short time. But while they're flying between, they'll frequently entertain themselves doing stunts in zeroG such as flips and twists.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Creating the illusion of weightlessness in movies actually requires a LOT of people operating cranes with harnesses and wires to hold the actors suspended in air. It's not easy moving (nor safe) the equipment holding the actors about as fast as real astronauts are able to move on the ISS. Also, it's important to not let the cranes and their crews fall into the view of the camera. As a result, there's quite a lot of choreography that goes into setting up weightless scenes, deciding the best camera angles, moving the actors, rehearsals, etc. All those factors go into slowing down the action we see in movies. Surprisingly, the wires are easier to hide either because their coloring and thickness are taken advantage of which causes them to be naturally hidden by the film's resolution in older movies, or they can be digitally masked out in post-production if needed in modern films.
Mind you, astronauts don't fly about helterskelter on the ISS! They're being very careful, there, too. But moving about the station only needs a very slight push off a wall and the same force to stop them when they get to where they want to be in very short time. But while they're flying between, they'll frequently entertain themselves doing stunts in zeroG such as flips and twists.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Creating the illusion of weightlessness in movies actually requires a LOT of people operating cranes with harnesses and wires to hold the actors suspended in air. It's not easy moving (nor safe) the equipment holding the actors about as fast as real astronauts are able to move on the ISS. Also, it's important to not let the cranes and their crews fall into the view of the camera. As a result, there's quite a lot of choreography that goes into setting up weightless scenes, deciding the best camera angles, moving the actors, rehearsals, etc. All those factors go into slowing down the action we see in movies. Surprisingly, the wires are easier to hide either because their coloring and thickness are taken advantage of which causes them to be naturally hidden by the film's resolution in older movies, or they can be digitally masked out in post-production if needed in modern films.
Mind you, astronauts don't fly about helterskelter on the ISS! They're being very careful, there, too. But moving about the station only needs a very slight push off a wall and the same force to stop them when they get to where they want to be in very short time. But while they're flying between, they'll frequently entertain themselves doing stunts in zeroG such as flips and twists.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 10 hours ago
TRVTRV
291
291
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no air resistance in space. So if you increment your own speed you'll continue with that speed until you crash (considering the laws of thermodynamics).
For safety, you should move slowly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no air resistance in space. So if you increment your own speed you'll continue with that speed until you crash (considering the laws of thermodynamics).
For safety, you should move slowly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no air resistance in space. So if you increment your own speed you'll continue with that speed until you crash (considering the laws of thermodynamics).
For safety, you should move slowly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
There is no air resistance in space. So if you increment your own speed you'll continue with that speed until you crash (considering the laws of thermodynamics).
For safety, you should move slowly.
New contributor
edited 11 hours ago
Community♦
1
1
New contributor
answered 13 hours ago
IceBravoIceBravo
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the question is more about insides of space ships etc, with atmosphere, and not vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– hyde
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Spacecraft are surprisingly fragile, but they move pretty darned quickly in the vacuum of space.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This is mostly a question about Movies & TV and partly a question about Space Exploration, but it seems to have nothing at all to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
11 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this does not have anything to do with astronomy.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it could be re-worded to be more about space exploration, like, how people would move once they got acquainted with zero g or asking how fast astronauts move. I've seen videos of them moving pretty fast in orbit.
$endgroup$
– userLTK
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
always move slowly? not always though it looks pretty slow as it's a large space.
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
10 hours ago