Why openssl s_client verifies a cert against a mismatching CAfile?
I am trying to yield a certificate verification error with openssl s_client like this:
$ openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
The certificate of the web.de server is certified by the Deutsche Telekom CA, not TURKTRUST, thus the above command should fail, right?
But it reports:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
Why?
I mean an analog gnutls-cli command fails as expected:
$ { echo -e 'ehlo example.orgnstarttls' ; sleep 1 } |
gnutls-cli --starttls --crlf
--x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
--port 25 mx-ha03.web.de
[..]
*** Verifying server certificate failed...
Doing a crosscheck, i.e. using instead --x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt with gnutls-cli I get:
[..]
- The hostname in the certificate matches 'mx-ha03.web.de'.
- Peer's certificate is trusted
(which is also expected)
Openssl s_client prints for ca-certificates.crt:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
The same result as for TURKTRUST ...
First I suspected openssl using a default setting for -CApath (i.e. /etc/ssl/certs) - but when I strace the process I just see just the open syscall for the argument of CAfile.
(all tests done on a Ubuntu 10.04 server)
Update: I've copied the TURKTRUST certificate to a Fedora 20 system and executed the first openssl statement - there I get a different result:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
openssl certificates gnutls
add a comment |
I am trying to yield a certificate verification error with openssl s_client like this:
$ openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
The certificate of the web.de server is certified by the Deutsche Telekom CA, not TURKTRUST, thus the above command should fail, right?
But it reports:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
Why?
I mean an analog gnutls-cli command fails as expected:
$ { echo -e 'ehlo example.orgnstarttls' ; sleep 1 } |
gnutls-cli --starttls --crlf
--x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
--port 25 mx-ha03.web.de
[..]
*** Verifying server certificate failed...
Doing a crosscheck, i.e. using instead --x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt with gnutls-cli I get:
[..]
- The hostname in the certificate matches 'mx-ha03.web.de'.
- Peer's certificate is trusted
(which is also expected)
Openssl s_client prints for ca-certificates.crt:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
The same result as for TURKTRUST ...
First I suspected openssl using a default setting for -CApath (i.e. /etc/ssl/certs) - but when I strace the process I just see just the open syscall for the argument of CAfile.
(all tests done on a Ubuntu 10.04 server)
Update: I've copied the TURKTRUST certificate to a Fedora 20 system and executed the first openssl statement - there I get a different result:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
openssl certificates gnutls
add a comment |
I am trying to yield a certificate verification error with openssl s_client like this:
$ openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
The certificate of the web.de server is certified by the Deutsche Telekom CA, not TURKTRUST, thus the above command should fail, right?
But it reports:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
Why?
I mean an analog gnutls-cli command fails as expected:
$ { echo -e 'ehlo example.orgnstarttls' ; sleep 1 } |
gnutls-cli --starttls --crlf
--x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
--port 25 mx-ha03.web.de
[..]
*** Verifying server certificate failed...
Doing a crosscheck, i.e. using instead --x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt with gnutls-cli I get:
[..]
- The hostname in the certificate matches 'mx-ha03.web.de'.
- Peer's certificate is trusted
(which is also expected)
Openssl s_client prints for ca-certificates.crt:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
The same result as for TURKTRUST ...
First I suspected openssl using a default setting for -CApath (i.e. /etc/ssl/certs) - but when I strace the process I just see just the open syscall for the argument of CAfile.
(all tests done on a Ubuntu 10.04 server)
Update: I've copied the TURKTRUST certificate to a Fedora 20 system and executed the first openssl statement - there I get a different result:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
openssl certificates gnutls
I am trying to yield a certificate verification error with openssl s_client like this:
$ openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
The certificate of the web.de server is certified by the Deutsche Telekom CA, not TURKTRUST, thus the above command should fail, right?
But it reports:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
Why?
I mean an analog gnutls-cli command fails as expected:
$ { echo -e 'ehlo example.orgnstarttls' ; sleep 1 } |
gnutls-cli --starttls --crlf
--x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.pem
--port 25 mx-ha03.web.de
[..]
*** Verifying server certificate failed...
Doing a crosscheck, i.e. using instead --x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt with gnutls-cli I get:
[..]
- The hostname in the certificate matches 'mx-ha03.web.de'.
- Peer's certificate is trusted
(which is also expected)
Openssl s_client prints for ca-certificates.crt:
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
The same result as for TURKTRUST ...
First I suspected openssl using a default setting for -CApath (i.e. /etc/ssl/certs) - but when I strace the process I just see just the open syscall for the argument of CAfile.
(all tests done on a Ubuntu 10.04 server)
Update: I've copied the TURKTRUST certificate to a Fedora 20 system and executed the first openssl statement - there I get a different result:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
openssl certificates gnutls
openssl certificates gnutls
edited Oct 19 '14 at 13:39
maxschlepzig
asked Oct 19 '14 at 11:19
maxschlepzigmaxschlepzig
33.8k33135212
33.8k33135212
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It turns out that the openssl s_client on Ubuntu 10.04 still queries a default location for system installed certificates, even if -CApath and -CAfile are specified:
8466 open("/usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0", O_RDONLY) = 4
(strace output)
Where:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2014-04-11 21:50 /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0 ->
Deutsche_Telekom_Root_CA_2.pem
The directory /usr/lib/ssl/certs is a symlink to /etc/ssl/certs on Ubuntu 10.04, thus the open line from the strace log is not selected when grepping for '/etc/ssl' ...
Source
Looking at the openssl-0.9.8k, the source of this issue is located in crypto/x509/by_dir.c, dir_ctrl():
dir=(char *)Getenv(X509_get_default_cert_dir_env());
if (dir)
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,dir,X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
else
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,X509_get_default_cert_dir(),
X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
Where X509_get_default_cert_dir returns /usr/lib/ssl/certs and X509_get_default_cert_dir_env returns SSL_CERT_DIR.
Workaround
Thus, one can use following workaround under Ubuntu 10.04/openssl 0.9.8k to get the expected behavior:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR="" openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.crt
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
And with the verification fails:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
Current Situation
This is a Ubuntu issue. For example, with the Fedora 20's openssl 1.0.1e or Fedora 29's openssl 1.1.1, this workaround is not necessary, because the issue cannot be reproduced. That means when specifying an option like -CAfile or -CApath, no default certificate system directory is added to the directory search list on Fedora systems.
On Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g the issue is still present.
It's also present on CentOS 7 with openssl-1.0.2k-16 - and unfortunately, the above workaround doesn't help there and the gnutls-3.3.29-8 fails due to unknown/unexpected TLS packet types.
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and-verify_return_errorthe command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.
– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f162969%2fwhy-openssl-s-client-verifies-a-cert-against-a-mismatching-cafile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It turns out that the openssl s_client on Ubuntu 10.04 still queries a default location for system installed certificates, even if -CApath and -CAfile are specified:
8466 open("/usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0", O_RDONLY) = 4
(strace output)
Where:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2014-04-11 21:50 /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0 ->
Deutsche_Telekom_Root_CA_2.pem
The directory /usr/lib/ssl/certs is a symlink to /etc/ssl/certs on Ubuntu 10.04, thus the open line from the strace log is not selected when grepping for '/etc/ssl' ...
Source
Looking at the openssl-0.9.8k, the source of this issue is located in crypto/x509/by_dir.c, dir_ctrl():
dir=(char *)Getenv(X509_get_default_cert_dir_env());
if (dir)
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,dir,X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
else
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,X509_get_default_cert_dir(),
X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
Where X509_get_default_cert_dir returns /usr/lib/ssl/certs and X509_get_default_cert_dir_env returns SSL_CERT_DIR.
Workaround
Thus, one can use following workaround under Ubuntu 10.04/openssl 0.9.8k to get the expected behavior:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR="" openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.crt
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
And with the verification fails:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
Current Situation
This is a Ubuntu issue. For example, with the Fedora 20's openssl 1.0.1e or Fedora 29's openssl 1.1.1, this workaround is not necessary, because the issue cannot be reproduced. That means when specifying an option like -CAfile or -CApath, no default certificate system directory is added to the directory search list on Fedora systems.
On Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g the issue is still present.
It's also present on CentOS 7 with openssl-1.0.2k-16 - and unfortunately, the above workaround doesn't help there and the gnutls-3.3.29-8 fails due to unknown/unexpected TLS packet types.
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and-verify_return_errorthe command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.
– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
add a comment |
It turns out that the openssl s_client on Ubuntu 10.04 still queries a default location for system installed certificates, even if -CApath and -CAfile are specified:
8466 open("/usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0", O_RDONLY) = 4
(strace output)
Where:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2014-04-11 21:50 /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0 ->
Deutsche_Telekom_Root_CA_2.pem
The directory /usr/lib/ssl/certs is a symlink to /etc/ssl/certs on Ubuntu 10.04, thus the open line from the strace log is not selected when grepping for '/etc/ssl' ...
Source
Looking at the openssl-0.9.8k, the source of this issue is located in crypto/x509/by_dir.c, dir_ctrl():
dir=(char *)Getenv(X509_get_default_cert_dir_env());
if (dir)
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,dir,X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
else
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,X509_get_default_cert_dir(),
X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
Where X509_get_default_cert_dir returns /usr/lib/ssl/certs and X509_get_default_cert_dir_env returns SSL_CERT_DIR.
Workaround
Thus, one can use following workaround under Ubuntu 10.04/openssl 0.9.8k to get the expected behavior:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR="" openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.crt
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
And with the verification fails:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
Current Situation
This is a Ubuntu issue. For example, with the Fedora 20's openssl 1.0.1e or Fedora 29's openssl 1.1.1, this workaround is not necessary, because the issue cannot be reproduced. That means when specifying an option like -CAfile or -CApath, no default certificate system directory is added to the directory search list on Fedora systems.
On Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g the issue is still present.
It's also present on CentOS 7 with openssl-1.0.2k-16 - and unfortunately, the above workaround doesn't help there and the gnutls-3.3.29-8 fails due to unknown/unexpected TLS packet types.
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and-verify_return_errorthe command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.
– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
add a comment |
It turns out that the openssl s_client on Ubuntu 10.04 still queries a default location for system installed certificates, even if -CApath and -CAfile are specified:
8466 open("/usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0", O_RDONLY) = 4
(strace output)
Where:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2014-04-11 21:50 /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0 ->
Deutsche_Telekom_Root_CA_2.pem
The directory /usr/lib/ssl/certs is a symlink to /etc/ssl/certs on Ubuntu 10.04, thus the open line from the strace log is not selected when grepping for '/etc/ssl' ...
Source
Looking at the openssl-0.9.8k, the source of this issue is located in crypto/x509/by_dir.c, dir_ctrl():
dir=(char *)Getenv(X509_get_default_cert_dir_env());
if (dir)
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,dir,X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
else
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,X509_get_default_cert_dir(),
X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
Where X509_get_default_cert_dir returns /usr/lib/ssl/certs and X509_get_default_cert_dir_env returns SSL_CERT_DIR.
Workaround
Thus, one can use following workaround under Ubuntu 10.04/openssl 0.9.8k to get the expected behavior:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR="" openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.crt
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
And with the verification fails:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
Current Situation
This is a Ubuntu issue. For example, with the Fedora 20's openssl 1.0.1e or Fedora 29's openssl 1.1.1, this workaround is not necessary, because the issue cannot be reproduced. That means when specifying an option like -CAfile or -CApath, no default certificate system directory is added to the directory search list on Fedora systems.
On Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g the issue is still present.
It's also present on CentOS 7 with openssl-1.0.2k-16 - and unfortunately, the above workaround doesn't help there and the gnutls-3.3.29-8 fails due to unknown/unexpected TLS packet types.
It turns out that the openssl s_client on Ubuntu 10.04 still queries a default location for system installed certificates, even if -CApath and -CAfile are specified:
8466 open("/usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0", O_RDONLY) = 4
(strace output)
Where:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2014-04-11 21:50 /usr/lib/ssl/certs/4e18c148.0 ->
Deutsche_Telekom_Root_CA_2.pem
The directory /usr/lib/ssl/certs is a symlink to /etc/ssl/certs on Ubuntu 10.04, thus the open line from the strace log is not selected when grepping for '/etc/ssl' ...
Source
Looking at the openssl-0.9.8k, the source of this issue is located in crypto/x509/by_dir.c, dir_ctrl():
dir=(char *)Getenv(X509_get_default_cert_dir_env());
if (dir)
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,dir,X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
else
ret=add_cert_dir(ld,X509_get_default_cert_dir(),
X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
Where X509_get_default_cert_dir returns /usr/lib/ssl/certs and X509_get_default_cert_dir_env returns SSL_CERT_DIR.
Workaround
Thus, one can use following workaround under Ubuntu 10.04/openssl 0.9.8k to get the expected behavior:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR="" openssl s_client -crlf -verify 9
-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/TURKTRUST_Certificate_Services_Provider_Root_1.crt
-starttls smtp -host mx-ha03.web.de -port 25
And with the verification fails:
Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain)
Current Situation
This is a Ubuntu issue. For example, with the Fedora 20's openssl 1.0.1e or Fedora 29's openssl 1.1.1, this workaround is not necessary, because the issue cannot be reproduced. That means when specifying an option like -CAfile or -CApath, no default certificate system directory is added to the directory search list on Fedora systems.
On Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g the issue is still present.
It's also present on CentOS 7 with openssl-1.0.2k-16 - and unfortunately, the above workaround doesn't help there and the gnutls-3.3.29-8 fails due to unknown/unexpected TLS packet types.
edited Jan 15 at 10:55
answered Oct 19 '14 at 15:30
maxschlepzigmaxschlepzig
33.8k33135212
33.8k33135212
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and-verify_return_errorthe command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.
– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
add a comment |
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and-verify_return_errorthe command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.
– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
I have version 1.0.2g and it still has this bug. To make things worse, the -verify_return_error flag has no effect whatsoever and the TLS connection proceeds even if the cert is wrong.
– takumar
Jan 15 at 9:31
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and
-verify_return_error the command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
@takumar, I re-tested this under Ubuntu 16 with openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14 and I can confirm, without the workaround this openssl test still fails. But at least with the workaround I get the expected error message - and with the workaround and
-verify_return_error the command terminates with exit status 1. With Fedora 29 and openssl-1.1.1-3.fc29.x86_64 everything still works as expected, i.e. the workaround isn't necessary.– maxschlepzig
Jan 15 at 10:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f162969%2fwhy-openssl-s-client-verifies-a-cert-against-a-mismatching-cafile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown