Vector-transposing function
$begingroup$
I profiled a library I'm writing that uses vector transposes and found that I am spending a good bit of time doing the following transpose. I am using a std::vector of std::vector<double>s to represent the column vectors.
What are some ways to optimize this function?
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
// take a column vector:
// |x1|
// |x2|
// |x3|
// and return a row vector |x1, x2, x3|
std::vector<double> row_vector;
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
c++ performance c++11 vectors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I profiled a library I'm writing that uses vector transposes and found that I am spending a good bit of time doing the following transpose. I am using a std::vector of std::vector<double>s to represent the column vectors.
What are some ways to optimize this function?
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
// take a column vector:
// |x1|
// |x2|
// |x3|
// and return a row vector |x1, x2, x3|
std::vector<double> row_vector;
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
c++ performance c++11 vectors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I profiled a library I'm writing that uses vector transposes and found that I am spending a good bit of time doing the following transpose. I am using a std::vector of std::vector<double>s to represent the column vectors.
What are some ways to optimize this function?
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
// take a column vector:
// |x1|
// |x2|
// |x3|
// and return a row vector |x1, x2, x3|
std::vector<double> row_vector;
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
c++ performance c++11 vectors
$endgroup$
I profiled a library I'm writing that uses vector transposes and found that I am spending a good bit of time doing the following transpose. I am using a std::vector of std::vector<double>s to represent the column vectors.
What are some ways to optimize this function?
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
// take a column vector:
// |x1|
// |x2|
// |x3|
// and return a row vector |x1, x2, x3|
std::vector<double> row_vector;
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
c++ performance c++11 vectors
c++ performance c++11 vectors
edited 2 hours ago
200_success
130k16153419
130k16153419
asked 3 hours ago
L LL L
405
405
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's not really much here. The only thing I can think of is it may prove faster to pre-allocate the destination vector using reserve. push_back has the potential to cause several re-allocations per call to transpose, which will be slow. Try:
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
std::vector<double> row_vector;
row_vector.reserve(total_entries(column_vec)); // Pre-allocate the space we need
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
Where total_entries is a function that finds how many cells there are in the 2D vector. If each row is the same length, you could use math to figure this out. If it's ragged though, you may need to iterate column_vector summing the row lengths.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214971%2fvector-transposing-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's not really much here. The only thing I can think of is it may prove faster to pre-allocate the destination vector using reserve. push_back has the potential to cause several re-allocations per call to transpose, which will be slow. Try:
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
std::vector<double> row_vector;
row_vector.reserve(total_entries(column_vec)); // Pre-allocate the space we need
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
Where total_entries is a function that finds how many cells there are in the 2D vector. If each row is the same length, you could use math to figure this out. If it's ragged though, you may need to iterate column_vector summing the row lengths.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's not really much here. The only thing I can think of is it may prove faster to pre-allocate the destination vector using reserve. push_back has the potential to cause several re-allocations per call to transpose, which will be slow. Try:
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
std::vector<double> row_vector;
row_vector.reserve(total_entries(column_vec)); // Pre-allocate the space we need
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
Where total_entries is a function that finds how many cells there are in the 2D vector. If each row is the same length, you could use math to figure this out. If it's ragged though, you may need to iterate column_vector summing the row lengths.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's not really much here. The only thing I can think of is it may prove faster to pre-allocate the destination vector using reserve. push_back has the potential to cause several re-allocations per call to transpose, which will be slow. Try:
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
std::vector<double> row_vector;
row_vector.reserve(total_entries(column_vec)); // Pre-allocate the space we need
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
Where total_entries is a function that finds how many cells there are in the 2D vector. If each row is the same length, you could use math to figure this out. If it's ragged though, you may need to iterate column_vector summing the row lengths.
$endgroup$
There's not really much here. The only thing I can think of is it may prove faster to pre-allocate the destination vector using reserve. push_back has the potential to cause several re-allocations per call to transpose, which will be slow. Try:
std::vector<double> transpose_vector(const std::vector<std::vector<double>> &column_vec) {
std::vector<double> row_vector;
row_vector.reserve(total_entries(column_vec)); // Pre-allocate the space we need
for (auto c : column_vec) {
for (auto r : c) {
row_vector.push_back(r);
}
}
return row_vector;
}
Where total_entries is a function that finds how many cells there are in the 2D vector. If each row is the same length, you could use math to figure this out. If it's ragged though, you may need to iterate column_vector summing the row lengths.
answered 3 hours ago
CarcigenicateCarcigenicate
3,63211631
3,63211631
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214971%2fvector-transposing-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown