How to determine if case owner is queue with specific developer name
I have a problem with selecting specific custom queue in apex code.
For example I have:
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
String queueName = c.Owner.Name;
if (queueName != 'ATM_queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
Thanks for any advice.
apex queue
add a comment |
I have a problem with selecting specific custom queue in apex code.
For example I have:
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
String queueName = c.Owner.Name;
if (queueName != 'ATM_queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
Thanks for any advice.
apex queue
add a comment |
I have a problem with selecting specific custom queue in apex code.
For example I have:
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
String queueName = c.Owner.Name;
if (queueName != 'ATM_queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
Thanks for any advice.
apex queue
I have a problem with selecting specific custom queue in apex code.
For example I have:
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
String queueName = c.Owner.Name;
if (queueName != 'ATM_queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
Thanks for any advice.
apex queue
apex queue
asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:03
David
548
548
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There's no direct relationship between Owner and DeveloperName, because it is a Name object. If you really want to check by developer name, you'll have to query for it:
if(c.ownerid.getsobjecttype() == Group.SobjectType) {
Group queue = [select developername from group where id = :c.ownerid];
if(Queue.DeveloperName == 'atm_queue') {
As an alternative, you could also create a formula field to return the value, something like owner:queue.developername
, and then you can check that value instead.
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
add a comment |
I'm not sure if you specifically need Developer Name or if you can use friendly name instead, but the Owner.Name field is populated when the Owner is a queue - but it uses the display name. So if your queue is called "ATM Queue" then the Owner.Name will be ATM Queue and your if statement would be:
if(queueName != 'ATM Queue'){
// Do Something
}
Additionally, to make sure that the owner IS a queue before you assign the queueName string, you should do a Owner Check to see if the Owner is a User or a queue, like this:
String queueName;
String ownerId;
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
ownerId = c.OwnerId;
if(String.valueOf(ownerId).startsWith('00G')){
queueName = c.Owner.Name;
}
if (queueName != 'ATM Queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.
– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239851%2fhow-to-determine-if-case-owner-is-queue-with-specific-developer-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's no direct relationship between Owner and DeveloperName, because it is a Name object. If you really want to check by developer name, you'll have to query for it:
if(c.ownerid.getsobjecttype() == Group.SobjectType) {
Group queue = [select developername from group where id = :c.ownerid];
if(Queue.DeveloperName == 'atm_queue') {
As an alternative, you could also create a formula field to return the value, something like owner:queue.developername
, and then you can check that value instead.
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
add a comment |
There's no direct relationship between Owner and DeveloperName, because it is a Name object. If you really want to check by developer name, you'll have to query for it:
if(c.ownerid.getsobjecttype() == Group.SobjectType) {
Group queue = [select developername from group where id = :c.ownerid];
if(Queue.DeveloperName == 'atm_queue') {
As an alternative, you could also create a formula field to return the value, something like owner:queue.developername
, and then you can check that value instead.
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
add a comment |
There's no direct relationship between Owner and DeveloperName, because it is a Name object. If you really want to check by developer name, you'll have to query for it:
if(c.ownerid.getsobjecttype() == Group.SobjectType) {
Group queue = [select developername from group where id = :c.ownerid];
if(Queue.DeveloperName == 'atm_queue') {
As an alternative, you could also create a formula field to return the value, something like owner:queue.developername
, and then you can check that value instead.
There's no direct relationship between Owner and DeveloperName, because it is a Name object. If you really want to check by developer name, you'll have to query for it:
if(c.ownerid.getsobjecttype() == Group.SobjectType) {
Group queue = [select developername from group where id = :c.ownerid];
if(Queue.DeveloperName == 'atm_queue') {
As an alternative, you could also create a formula field to return the value, something like owner:queue.developername
, and then you can check that value instead.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
sfdcfox
248k11189424
248k11189424
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
add a comment |
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
+1 for formula field as it saves queries, Downside(Only 20 object references on a case and that can be bit tricky)
– Pranay Jaiswal
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05
add a comment |
I'm not sure if you specifically need Developer Name or if you can use friendly name instead, but the Owner.Name field is populated when the Owner is a queue - but it uses the display name. So if your queue is called "ATM Queue" then the Owner.Name will be ATM Queue and your if statement would be:
if(queueName != 'ATM Queue'){
// Do Something
}
Additionally, to make sure that the owner IS a queue before you assign the queueName string, you should do a Owner Check to see if the Owner is a User or a queue, like this:
String queueName;
String ownerId;
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
ownerId = c.OwnerId;
if(String.valueOf(ownerId).startsWith('00G')){
queueName = c.Owner.Name;
}
if (queueName != 'ATM Queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.
– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
add a comment |
I'm not sure if you specifically need Developer Name or if you can use friendly name instead, but the Owner.Name field is populated when the Owner is a queue - but it uses the display name. So if your queue is called "ATM Queue" then the Owner.Name will be ATM Queue and your if statement would be:
if(queueName != 'ATM Queue'){
// Do Something
}
Additionally, to make sure that the owner IS a queue before you assign the queueName string, you should do a Owner Check to see if the Owner is a User or a queue, like this:
String queueName;
String ownerId;
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
ownerId = c.OwnerId;
if(String.valueOf(ownerId).startsWith('00G')){
queueName = c.Owner.Name;
}
if (queueName != 'ATM Queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.
– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
add a comment |
I'm not sure if you specifically need Developer Name or if you can use friendly name instead, but the Owner.Name field is populated when the Owner is a queue - but it uses the display name. So if your queue is called "ATM Queue" then the Owner.Name will be ATM Queue and your if statement would be:
if(queueName != 'ATM Queue'){
// Do Something
}
Additionally, to make sure that the owner IS a queue before you assign the queueName string, you should do a Owner Check to see if the Owner is a User or a queue, like this:
String queueName;
String ownerId;
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
ownerId = c.OwnerId;
if(String.valueOf(ownerId).startsWith('00G')){
queueName = c.Owner.Name;
}
if (queueName != 'ATM Queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
I'm not sure if you specifically need Developer Name or if you can use friendly name instead, but the Owner.Name field is populated when the Owner is a queue - but it uses the display name. So if your queue is called "ATM Queue" then the Owner.Name will be ATM Queue and your if statement would be:
if(queueName != 'ATM Queue'){
// Do Something
}
Additionally, to make sure that the owner IS a queue before you assign the queueName string, you should do a Owner Check to see if the Owner is a User or a queue, like this:
String queueName;
String ownerId;
Case c = (Case) controller.getRecord();
ownerId = c.OwnerId;
if(String.valueOf(ownerId).startsWith('00G')){
queueName = c.Owner.Name;
}
if (queueName != 'ATM Queue') {
//DO SOMETHING
}
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:52
Morgan Marchese
1,455426
1,455426
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.
– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
add a comment |
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.
– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
4
4
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
if(c.OwnerId.getSobjectType() == Group.SobjectType)
is more self-documenting instead of relying on the key prefix.– sfdcfox
Nov 19 '18 at 14:54
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
I actually didn't even know that you could use .getSObjectType() in that context, that's very good information, thanks!
– Morgan Marchese
Nov 19 '18 at 14:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f239851%2fhow-to-determine-if-case-owner-is-queue-with-specific-developer-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown