CentOS 6.6; java 7: libjli.so cannot be found
Background
I have written a Java program to capture network packets. The code uses a wrapper API around libpcap and works nicely - as long as I run the program via sudo.
I am now trying to figure out how to set up things so that I can run the program as a "regular" user. Ultimately, it will be run on a system where I do not have sudo privilege.
After some investigation, a possible solution has been found that involves setting capabilities that provide privileged access in a specific way. Part of this involves setting the capabilities CAP_NET_RAW and CAP_NET_ADMIN to ei (e.g. sudo setcap 'CAP_NET_RAW=ei CAP_NET_ADMIN=ei' program).
The Problem
So, I have done this for the java command on my system. Unfortunately, this has created a problem (which has been asked about by many in various forums) where when java is invoked, the following message is displayed:
java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This library does indeed exist and shows up in the list of libraries for the java command.
$ sudo find / -name libjli.so -print
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
$ which java
/usr/bin/java
$ ls -l /usr/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Jun 22 2015 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Jun 22 2015 /etc/alternatives/java -> /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ls -l /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 uucp 143 7718 Apr 10 2015 /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ldd /usr/bin/java
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff3f3fa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003150c00000)
libjli.so => /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so (0x00007ff56d563000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003151000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003150800000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003150400000)
BTW, I am using the Java 7 JDK, not the OpenJDK.
So, what's wrong here? Everything seems to be in place, yet it can't find what it needs. Does the fact that there are two versions of Java on the machine have anything to do it? Is there some other weird situation?
Based on my searches, this problem has been encountered by many, but I couldn't seem to find a reason, nor a solution.
Can anyone help with this?
UPDATE #1
Well, after a little more investigating, it appears that the problem is due to a "feature" in Java. The link below includes another link that gets to heart of the matter.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/16670/291340 with the embedded link http://blog.tinola.com/?e=7.
Based upon what I read in these, it would seem that running java with specific capabilities enabled is not allowed. Perhaps that will change at some point, with an improvement to Java security.
If anyone knows about this, or more importantly, knows that a solution has been provided, please comment.
centos java
add a comment |
Background
I have written a Java program to capture network packets. The code uses a wrapper API around libpcap and works nicely - as long as I run the program via sudo.
I am now trying to figure out how to set up things so that I can run the program as a "regular" user. Ultimately, it will be run on a system where I do not have sudo privilege.
After some investigation, a possible solution has been found that involves setting capabilities that provide privileged access in a specific way. Part of this involves setting the capabilities CAP_NET_RAW and CAP_NET_ADMIN to ei (e.g. sudo setcap 'CAP_NET_RAW=ei CAP_NET_ADMIN=ei' program).
The Problem
So, I have done this for the java command on my system. Unfortunately, this has created a problem (which has been asked about by many in various forums) where when java is invoked, the following message is displayed:
java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This library does indeed exist and shows up in the list of libraries for the java command.
$ sudo find / -name libjli.so -print
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
$ which java
/usr/bin/java
$ ls -l /usr/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Jun 22 2015 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Jun 22 2015 /etc/alternatives/java -> /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ls -l /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 uucp 143 7718 Apr 10 2015 /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ldd /usr/bin/java
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff3f3fa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003150c00000)
libjli.so => /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so (0x00007ff56d563000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003151000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003150800000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003150400000)
BTW, I am using the Java 7 JDK, not the OpenJDK.
So, what's wrong here? Everything seems to be in place, yet it can't find what it needs. Does the fact that there are two versions of Java on the machine have anything to do it? Is there some other weird situation?
Based on my searches, this problem has been encountered by many, but I couldn't seem to find a reason, nor a solution.
Can anyone help with this?
UPDATE #1
Well, after a little more investigating, it appears that the problem is due to a "feature" in Java. The link below includes another link that gets to heart of the matter.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/16670/291340 with the embedded link http://blog.tinola.com/?e=7.
Based upon what I read in these, it would seem that running java with specific capabilities enabled is not allowed. Perhaps that will change at some point, with an improvement to Java security.
If anyone knows about this, or more importantly, knows that a solution has been provided, please comment.
centos java
add a comment |
Background
I have written a Java program to capture network packets. The code uses a wrapper API around libpcap and works nicely - as long as I run the program via sudo.
I am now trying to figure out how to set up things so that I can run the program as a "regular" user. Ultimately, it will be run on a system where I do not have sudo privilege.
After some investigation, a possible solution has been found that involves setting capabilities that provide privileged access in a specific way. Part of this involves setting the capabilities CAP_NET_RAW and CAP_NET_ADMIN to ei (e.g. sudo setcap 'CAP_NET_RAW=ei CAP_NET_ADMIN=ei' program).
The Problem
So, I have done this for the java command on my system. Unfortunately, this has created a problem (which has been asked about by many in various forums) where when java is invoked, the following message is displayed:
java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This library does indeed exist and shows up in the list of libraries for the java command.
$ sudo find / -name libjli.so -print
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
$ which java
/usr/bin/java
$ ls -l /usr/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Jun 22 2015 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Jun 22 2015 /etc/alternatives/java -> /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ls -l /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 uucp 143 7718 Apr 10 2015 /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ldd /usr/bin/java
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff3f3fa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003150c00000)
libjli.so => /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so (0x00007ff56d563000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003151000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003150800000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003150400000)
BTW, I am using the Java 7 JDK, not the OpenJDK.
So, what's wrong here? Everything seems to be in place, yet it can't find what it needs. Does the fact that there are two versions of Java on the machine have anything to do it? Is there some other weird situation?
Based on my searches, this problem has been encountered by many, but I couldn't seem to find a reason, nor a solution.
Can anyone help with this?
UPDATE #1
Well, after a little more investigating, it appears that the problem is due to a "feature" in Java. The link below includes another link that gets to heart of the matter.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/16670/291340 with the embedded link http://blog.tinola.com/?e=7.
Based upon what I read in these, it would seem that running java with specific capabilities enabled is not allowed. Perhaps that will change at some point, with an improvement to Java security.
If anyone knows about this, or more importantly, knows that a solution has been provided, please comment.
centos java
Background
I have written a Java program to capture network packets. The code uses a wrapper API around libpcap and works nicely - as long as I run the program via sudo.
I am now trying to figure out how to set up things so that I can run the program as a "regular" user. Ultimately, it will be run on a system where I do not have sudo privilege.
After some investigation, a possible solution has been found that involves setting capabilities that provide privileged access in a specific way. Part of this involves setting the capabilities CAP_NET_RAW and CAP_NET_ADMIN to ei (e.g. sudo setcap 'CAP_NET_RAW=ei CAP_NET_ADMIN=ei' program).
The Problem
So, I have done this for the java command on my system. Unfortunately, this has created a problem (which has been asked about by many in various forums) where when java is invoked, the following message is displayed:
java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This library does indeed exist and shows up in the list of libraries for the java command.
$ sudo find / -name libjli.so -print
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/opt/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so
$ which java
/usr/bin/java
$ ls -l /usr/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Jun 22 2015 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/java
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Jun 22 2015 /etc/alternatives/java -> /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ls -l /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 uucp 143 7718 Apr 10 2015 /opt/jdk1.7.0_79/bin/java
$ ldd /usr/bin/java
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff3f3fa000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003150c00000)
libjli.so => /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_79/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so (0x00007ff56d563000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003151000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003150800000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003150400000)
BTW, I am using the Java 7 JDK, not the OpenJDK.
So, what's wrong here? Everything seems to be in place, yet it can't find what it needs. Does the fact that there are two versions of Java on the machine have anything to do it? Is there some other weird situation?
Based on my searches, this problem has been encountered by many, but I couldn't seem to find a reason, nor a solution.
Can anyone help with this?
UPDATE #1
Well, after a little more investigating, it appears that the problem is due to a "feature" in Java. The link below includes another link that gets to heart of the matter.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/16670/291340 with the embedded link http://blog.tinola.com/?e=7.
Based upon what I read in these, it would seem that running java with specific capabilities enabled is not allowed. Perhaps that will change at some point, with an improvement to Java security.
If anyone knows about this, or more importantly, knows that a solution has been provided, please comment.
centos java
centos java
edited May 17 '18 at 18:24
slm♦
255k71538687
255k71538687
asked May 17 '18 at 14:10
Joseph GagnonJoseph Gagnon
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
if you are in a chroot environment you need to mount /proc to make java work.
If you use "strace" you will see something like this: readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so
Best regards!
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting/procshouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.
– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096)That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.
– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444382%2fcentos-6-6-java-7-libjli-so-cannot-be-found%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
if you are in a chroot environment you need to mount /proc to make java work.
If you use "strace" you will see something like this: readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so
Best regards!
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting/procshouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.
– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096)That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.
– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
if you are in a chroot environment you need to mount /proc to make java work.
If you use "strace" you will see something like this: readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so
Best regards!
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting/procshouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.
– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096)That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.
– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
if you are in a chroot environment you need to mount /proc to make java work.
If you use "strace" you will see something like this: readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so
Best regards!
if you are in a chroot environment you need to mount /proc to make java work.
If you use "strace" you will see something like this: readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so
Best regards!
edited Oct 1 '18 at 6:18
answered Sep 26 '18 at 15:09
Abraham Macias ParedesAbraham Macias Paredes
111
111
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting/procshouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.
– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096)That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.
– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting/procshouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.
– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096)That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.
– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting
/proc shouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
Welcome to U&L! The OP doesn't mention a chroot environment, and mounting
/proc shouldn't make a difference to either permissions or locating libraries.– JigglyNaga
Sep 26 '18 at 19:02
1
1
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:
readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
If you use "strace" you will see something like this:
readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd6"..., 4096) That means that Java first look at "/proc/self/exe" to know where to look for /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/../lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so. So if there is no /proc it can't find libjli.so. The OP doesn't mention it, but "chroot" is the only reason I know to not finding /proc.– Abraham Macias Paredes
Sep 28 '18 at 6:18
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
OK - that explanation would be more useful included as part of your answer (use the edit link), but it still doesn't seem relevant given that the OP already found the cause of the problem (see under "Update").
– JigglyNaga
Sep 28 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444382%2fcentos-6-6-java-7-libjli-so-cannot-be-found%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown