What Brexit proposals are on the table in the indicative votes on the 27th of March 2019?
7
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
|
show 2 more comments
7
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
7
7
7
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
asked 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
5,17022244
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
1
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
9
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:
The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39908%2fwhat-brexit-proposals-are-on-the-table-in-the-indicative-votes-on-the-27th-of-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
9
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:
The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
add a comment |
9
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:
The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
add a comment |
9
9
9
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:
The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:
The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
edited 8 hours ago
divibisan
983521
983521
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
answered 10 hours ago
JJJJJJ
5,17022244
5,17022244
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
add a comment |
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
5
5
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
10 hours ago
2
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
9 hours ago
3
3
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
6 hours ago
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39908%2fwhat-brexit-proposals-are-on-the-table-in-the-indicative-votes-on-the-27th-of-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
8 hours ago
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
8 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
7 hours ago
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
7 hours ago