Size of complement of context-free language












2















Let $L$ be a context-free language, $bar L$ be its complement and $bar L_n$ be the length $n$ words in $bar L_n$.




What is known about $|bar L_n|$?




Note that it is known that $|L_n|$ is either polynomial (e.g., if $L$ is bounded$~$), or grows exponentially.
I wonder if anything similar might be true about $|bar L_n|$.
Warning, $L$ is allowed to be ambiguous!










share|cite|improve this question





























    2















    Let $L$ be a context-free language, $bar L$ be its complement and $bar L_n$ be the length $n$ words in $bar L_n$.




    What is known about $|bar L_n|$?




    Note that it is known that $|L_n|$ is either polynomial (e.g., if $L$ is bounded$~$), or grows exponentially.
    I wonder if anything similar might be true about $|bar L_n|$.
    Warning, $L$ is allowed to be ambiguous!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Let $L$ be a context-free language, $bar L$ be its complement and $bar L_n$ be the length $n$ words in $bar L_n$.




      What is known about $|bar L_n|$?




      Note that it is known that $|L_n|$ is either polynomial (e.g., if $L$ is bounded$~$), or grows exponentially.
      I wonder if anything similar might be true about $|bar L_n|$.
      Warning, $L$ is allowed to be ambiguous!










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let $L$ be a context-free language, $bar L$ be its complement and $bar L_n$ be the length $n$ words in $bar L_n$.




      What is known about $|bar L_n|$?




      Note that it is known that $|L_n|$ is either polynomial (e.g., if $L$ is bounded$~$), or grows exponentially.
      I wonder if anything similar might be true about $|bar L_n|$.
      Warning, $L$ is allowed to be ambiguous!







      fl.formal-languages context-free






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 12 hours ago







      domotorp

















      asked 12 hours ago









      domotorpdomotorp

      8,8063078




      8,8063078






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          From the proof that determining if a CFL ${L}$ = $Sigma^*$ is undecidable, the set of strings $ID_0#ID_1^R#ID_2#ID_3^R#ldots#ID_t$ where $ID_0,ID_1,ldots,ID_t$ is a list of the configurations of an accepting nondeterministic TM, is the complement of a context-free language. So $|overline{L}_n|$ can basically be any computable function less than exponential.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Thanks. I fixed it.

            – Lance Fortnow
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "114"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcstheory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42190%2fsize-of-complement-of-context-free-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9














          From the proof that determining if a CFL ${L}$ = $Sigma^*$ is undecidable, the set of strings $ID_0#ID_1^R#ID_2#ID_3^R#ldots#ID_t$ where $ID_0,ID_1,ldots,ID_t$ is a list of the configurations of an accepting nondeterministic TM, is the complement of a context-free language. So $|overline{L}_n|$ can basically be any computable function less than exponential.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Thanks. I fixed it.

            – Lance Fortnow
            3 hours ago
















          9














          From the proof that determining if a CFL ${L}$ = $Sigma^*$ is undecidable, the set of strings $ID_0#ID_1^R#ID_2#ID_3^R#ldots#ID_t$ where $ID_0,ID_1,ldots,ID_t$ is a list of the configurations of an accepting nondeterministic TM, is the complement of a context-free language. So $|overline{L}_n|$ can basically be any computable function less than exponential.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Thanks. I fixed it.

            – Lance Fortnow
            3 hours ago














          9












          9








          9







          From the proof that determining if a CFL ${L}$ = $Sigma^*$ is undecidable, the set of strings $ID_0#ID_1^R#ID_2#ID_3^R#ldots#ID_t$ where $ID_0,ID_1,ldots,ID_t$ is a list of the configurations of an accepting nondeterministic TM, is the complement of a context-free language. So $|overline{L}_n|$ can basically be any computable function less than exponential.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          From the proof that determining if a CFL ${L}$ = $Sigma^*$ is undecidable, the set of strings $ID_0#ID_1^R#ID_2#ID_3^R#ldots#ID_t$ where $ID_0,ID_1,ldots,ID_t$ is a list of the configurations of an accepting nondeterministic TM, is the complement of a context-free language. So $|overline{L}_n|$ can basically be any computable function less than exponential.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          Lance FortnowLance Fortnow

          6,8713452




          6,8713452








          • 1





            Thanks. I fixed it.

            – Lance Fortnow
            3 hours ago














          • 1





            Thanks. I fixed it.

            – Lance Fortnow
            3 hours ago








          1




          1





          Thanks. I fixed it.

          – Lance Fortnow
          3 hours ago





          Thanks. I fixed it.

          – Lance Fortnow
          3 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcstheory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42190%2fsize-of-complement-of-context-free-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to make a Squid Proxy server?

          第一次世界大戦

          Touch on Surface Book